IN FORCE 2017-06-28

Alignment of State Codes of ICES with GSTN - Implementation of changes in ICES

Document text

re. c

lez—\ Haew Aaa, Aral Tas, HES, TSTA-370421 ‘8 CUSTOMOFFICE OF HOUSE,THE PRI MU N CIPDR A LPORT, COMMISSIONER OFCUSTOMSKUTCH, GUJARAT- 370 421. tend sO PHONE: 02838-271029 FAX : 271162

F. No. VII/48-12/PN/AG/CHM/2017-18 /194r

Date: 28.06.2017

PUBLIC NOTICE - 12/2017

Subject: Alignment of State Codes of ICES with GSTN - Implementation of changes in ICES - Reg.

Attention of all Importers, Customs Brokers, Members of the Trade and others is invited towards the roll out of GST in India with effect from 01.07.2017. In this regard, several changes are anticipated in BE/SB declarations in alignment with proposed GST implementation. 2. Currently in ICES, State Codes are maintained as per RBI list, and is used being for declaration in Bills of Entry and Shipping Bills for various purposes.(State of Origin in Shipping Bill and State Code for VAT Registration).

  1. As an initial step towards GST implementation, the state codes are being aligned with Census Codes, the ones used for GST purposes. The list of State code is given in Annexure -I. NIC RES package has already been modified to reflect this change. The trade may be advised to make note of the changes and declare the new code to avoid declaration at ICEGATE end.

  2. Difficulties, if any may be brought to the notice of System Manager/ADC (EDI), CHM.

\e (G. P.“alMe e na)e \+ ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, MUNDRA.

Enc.: Annexure-l.

Copy to:-

  1. The Chief Commissioner of Customs, Gujarat Zone, Ahmedabad. 2. All the Addl/ Joint Commissioners of Customs, MCH. 3. All the DC/ACs, MCH.

  2. Mundra/Kandla Custom House Agent Association 5. All Trade Associations.

==> picture [29 x 20] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ed<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

:

Annexure-1

|OLD STATE|
|---|
|| 46<br>| HIMACHALPRADESH |—02~SSS—=S|
|| 34<br>|<br>HARYANA<br>T(t‘<br>SCSC*~C*”|
|| 50<br>|RAJASTHAN,<br>|<br>CBSC“‘SC*’<br>| 20, |~UTTARPRADESH<br>|<br>—09—s”~—~=—“Ct~*™<br>| 6<br>BIHAR—aseTCt—~iCsCC‘(‘(SC#CO’|
|| 09 |ARUNACHALPRADESH<br>|<br>—s12,~SsS—=SY|
|| 69<br>| DADRA&<br>NAGARHAVELI**|**—o26**S**—CS<br>| 60<br>|MAHARASHTRA<br>D7 —=isd|
|Peal<br>eee(ee<br>-+ Se<br>|<br>ee<br>|<br>89 |<br>LAKSHADWEEP<br>[—iHT——CS™”<br>ine<br>'Se 2<br>| **9**0 **|** TAMILNADU COT<br>TC*”S<br>|<br>9 PONDICHERRY<br>|<br>84™~=~S*”Y|
||<br>80.|~ANDHRAPRADESH<br>|<br>—o37~=ié<“‘C*’|

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied