Minutes of the 23rd SEEPZ-SEZ Authority Meeting Held on 26.11.2014

J

: —

pi |MINUTES OF THE 234 MEETING OF THE SEEPZ SEZ AUTHORITY HELD | ON 26th NOVEMBER, 2014 AT 3.30 PM UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF po ‘ SEEPZDEVELOPMENSEZ AU T HORITY.COMMISSIONER,| SEEPZ SEZ AND CHAIRPERSON, |. |The following were present: : . | a”) Shri[P.s. RamanMember |a ole Joint Development Commissioner | * 2) Shril Abhay Doshi, (MD)Member Representating Trade |). M/s, Fineline Cirouit Led, | We 3) sind Prem kumar L. Kothari, (CMD)- Member Representating Trade ; | M/s) Fine Jewellary Manufacturing Ltd. a ! In Attendance: | . . .es YW Smt. Mu. Kulkarni & z Astt, Development Commissioner | pot ‘Minutes of the meeting held on 26% November, 2014 were confirmed. | | / Agenda No.1: Supplying and erecting perforated and ladder tray to SDF | and G&J Building in SEEPZ-SEZ premises | | | _ The Authority noted that this work is required to be done at the ro ! earliest as the same is a requirement as per Disaster Management Plan. The po | Members representating the trade stated that the projects executed through gp MIDC normally take longer time and monitoring the quality of the work of a | the contractor also at time becomes an issue. They suggested that wherever Me . | the work |is to be directly executed by the Authority, the services of the pope, | reputed otganizations such as KPMG, PWC, Accenture etc can be explored | | to provide turnkey service and expertise. The Chairperson observed that the . 7 el would be examined. ; | : Decision: After detailed discussion, the estimate of MIDC. for Rs, ae 3,92,85,200.00 was approved. . | ‘ i : Bi i f J .

-_ Agenda No. ‘2: Annual Maintenance for the high mast, street light and pot ‘electrical | ‘installations in the SEEPZ-SEZ premises and colony | ‘Premises.| For 2014-15) | . The autharity noted that as the proposal is for Annual Maintenance, the tender for the same can be directly floatedby the Authority as this is | : “| maintenaitce related AMC. The Authority was informed that service of the | : present AMC contractor has not been satisfactory. It was noted that there | 7 (are large no. of complains regarding maintenance and non attendance of the ! > calls. It was also noted that in the residential complex, the residents that | have complained MIDC contractor has not attended to electrical and other 9%) ~* | | work. It m1 s observed that tender for AMC work can be directly called for by | _ > | the Authority instead of MIDC » - Decision:| The Authority directed that AMC tender may be invited by . . the: | | the Authority. ! : Agenda No. 3: Employees clinic facility - | Has The|Authority noted that it is welfare activity and the facility is used - | oy by empleo ices of Zone units and that concessional tariff is provided by the | clinic, Considering, the justification furnished in their representation dated ! oO | 29.09.2014, the Authority observed that concessional lease rent: may be Yo granted fora temporary period. | . I Decision: The Authority approved grant of rent concession to the vA | extent of 50% w.e.f. 1.12.2014 for a period of one year, to be reviewed a i thereafter. I He '| Agenda No- 4: Requirement of outsourced services of % Data Entry pe a Operator in Estate section | , | Cod : The Authority noted that at present, there are 5 Data entry operators | - +1 in the Estate section. As there is voluminous work in the. Authority related < | | to Administration, security matters and estate related issues, there is pe additional requirement of services of 2 Data Entry Operators, i.e one DEO ; i | :

~ ./ |

)

, : oe for Legal doneultant end another for Disaster Management Advisor, on the | “game terms and conditions. || Decision: The Authority approved the proposal for outsourcing of i additional 2 Data Entry Operators. : | : A enda No. 5: Outsourcing of Legal Adviser | : The Authority noted that the services of Legal Advisor have been | . | outsource for attending to various Court matters. ! oy Decision: The Authority ratified the appointment of Dr. Kaushik as . ,; | | Legal Advisor for one year w.e.f @ Rs. 69,060/- per month. As regards ' | | -: c lass’igiility whiletravel by on officialAir India tourand Dr. KaushikRs. 4,500/ will be - eligible forper day for economyHotel AR ' Accommodation and actual local conveyance for visit to Delhi. ee | ne| : | ‘Agendacommon No.area/invalid6: Penalties ora expiredfor unau ga t horizede pass/, smokingdumpinga penalty of debris/kept, in, , | : | The Authority was informed that the storage of goods in common area | by units ‘has been an issue which still continuous inspite of repeated oral : vand written communication to the units. There were number of complains from the software units regarding difficulties face due to storage of goods by © i the hardware/ G&J units at the entrance to units and in the surrounding | area. In brder to curb, this it is necessary to impose penalty on repeated 7©: defaulters. Also entry into the Zone with invalid Gate pass/invalid Vehicle EP -pass/ Smpking in public, need to be prevented by appropriately enhancing | |. . the penalty. Similarly, some.of the units have not been providing segregated | | - wet & dry waste, as required. Though sufficient training has been imparted , : | | and repéated instructions have been issued to provide segregated wet/ dry | : “waste for collection by the authorized agency Many units have not been | 7 complying with the instruction. This impacts the feed level of the bio gas : i plant asadversely of wet waste may go down due to providing mix waste. : | The Mejnbers representative the trade stated that accumulation of

a : | packaging, material/scrap is due to undue time taken for approval from | | SEEPZ caltoms At present, it.takes even upto 2 weeks for the permission, If | permission /process can be expedited, say the same day or next/ working | . | day. The Chairperson observed that the time taken. for grant of permission . :| || willDecision: be expedited.| After detailed |discussion, the Authority approved; imposing | penalty for unauthorized dumping of debris/ unauthorized use of Jo | common larea for storage/ non-segregation of wet and dry waste/ | _ | . s smoking in public/entry of person without gate pass or with expired | gate pass/ entry of vehicle with expired gate pass as follows:| ; 1 > Rs, 1000/ - ‘Unauthorized dumping of debris and actual cost of | : removal of same. | we | - > ‘Rs. '1000/- per day for unauthorized use of common area, ) “ / i - & For'non Segregation of wet and dry waste eh — ; “ : Rs. |,000/ - for 1st offence Ae | | : . ! 'Rs, 1000/- to Rs.5000/- for each subsequent offence . ieee - | : > Rs. '500/- for smoking in public. - all uns _ - > Rs, 1000/- per person, for entry into the SEEPZ - SEZ without : bo gate pass a : Vd| . ! _ > Rs. 200/ ~ per person for entry with expired. gate pass, . fp oo - >: Rs.|5000/ - for entry into the Zone without vehicle pass > : Rs., 1250/- for entry with expired vehicle pass. &: | Agenda Item. No. 7: Opening of small cafeteria with snacks in lake :ne| )7 SnacksMembersidofte / Teaof the shop Authority near beautifully emphasized maintainthe needlake.for Itproviding was pointedhygienic out : | . ‘that there is no decent place in SEEPZ to provide such facility. Hence, | | modern format coffee shop need to open immediately. It was agreed to open 2 | “small kidsk/ Coffee, Tea shop after inviting. application from interested | | Parties. | |

| ;

oa | ti . | i Decision: he Authority approved the proposal for opening a kiosk for | | providing (Coffee /Tea/Snacks/near the Lake. i iA enda Item No. 8: Qtrs allotted to Private Person . ) : ; : The Authority noted that, it was decided in the 22nd Authority meeting | | dated 5th | August, 2014 to provide Qtrs to outsourced staff through ||| ‘Contractor!{ontractorf ofservice such provider.staff. It wasThe proposalalso notedis tothat fixfixing the rent very to high be recoverrent would fron ultimately have to be met by the Authority by way corresponding of increase | the cost for such outsourcing. It was noted that the proposal is to charge the i i | ; license feep for the temporary allotment as follows:i _| of license fees Electricity Charges | | I Decision: ‘The Authority approved the proposal . | : | The! Authority was informed that the plant was conceived as - - : commercial plant, anticipating generation of gas to extent of generating ee He revenue nfore thanthe operating expenditure require for operating the plant. «. : However, hue to inadequate availability of wet waste, which has been much ; ie less than the MIDC estimated quantity of 5 MT per day. The generation of | ! : gas is ronpicerably less which makes the plant commercially unavailable. | i It was noted the on an average 1 % truck load of dry leaves | | | accumulation is available per day and disposal of the same is also an issue. . _ | The discussion with Dr. S.P. Kale scientist, BARC who is providing | | | *echnology support for the plant indicated that about 30% to 40% of the dry | 7 leaves cay be, after treatment and used as feed for the plant to supplement

;

| | 1 the requiréd feed for the plant. Dr. Kale has suggested that this plant will | | have to be converted as a Waste Treatment Plant as the commercial viability | has not been possible. | ‘Decision: latter ‘the detailed discussion, the Authority approved the | | ‘conversion of the existing Bio-methanization Plant into a waste ; | | plant. After getting technical opinion from Dr. Kale in | : ‘writing. 4 was also decided to fix price of gas generated from BioPf methanization Plant in accordance with following formula: - | a | Price will be fixed by comparing Caloric Value of gas generated from | ‘plant with LPG and concession of 10% will be given on such price. | Agenda Item No. 10: Caretaking Allowance to the aforementioned SG ‘Security Guards. es . Si | : The Authority noted that the proposal is for grant of caretaking allowance to ' | the Security Guards who have been assigned the work of Care Taker, to | extent of 10% of pay + Grade Pay, as per O.M. No.7(46)/E.II(A)/98 dated pe | 30.06.1999, of DOPT. | ! Decision: Alte the detailed discussion, the Authority approved the | : | proposal. | | | The nesting ended with vote of thanks to the Chair oe | | A) BIL fy Fa Chatirperson fo | , SEEPZ-SEZ Authority

C .

aa

|