26-06-19 को आयोजित एनएसईजेड प्राधिकरण बैठक के मिनट

Minutes of NSEZ Authoritv meetins held on 26.06.2019 at 11:30 AM in the conference hall Eaio ze. 6T'4-{d dt('sr Eslq 3Tlffiqt qt* srfr6{ur, dt'sr 06.201e of gct 11:30 il$ 3IrdBd dtrrsl fuclq 3Trfq6 f{ slfro.{ur fr tm or NSEZ Authoritv. The following Members of the Authority were present.

1. Shri S.S. Shukla, Jt. Development Commissioner, NSEZ
2. Sh. Gagandeep Singh, Dy. DGFT, Kanpur,
3. Sh. Alok Mukherjee, Director, M/s Idemia Syscom India Pvt. Ltd.
4. Sh. Puneet Kapoor, Partner, M/s. APK Identification (A special Invitee from trade members) Besides, during the meeting Md. Salik Parwaiz, Jt. Commissioner (Customs), NSEZ, Shd Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner, NSEZ, Shri R. P. Verm4 Secretary, NSEZ Authority, Shri Ajay Kumar Mishra, Sr. Account Officer, NSEZ and Sh. Rajeev Sharma, FCA, lv[/s. Rajeev Sharma & Associates were also present to assist the Authority. At the outset, the Chairman & CEO, NSEZA welcomed the participants and after brief introduction, each item included in the agenda were taken up for deliberations one by one. The Gist of discussion/decision is siven belorv: NSEZ Authority was informed that no reference was received against any ofdecisions taken in its meeting of NSEZ Authority hetd on 26.03.2019. Accordingly, the Minutes of meeting held on 26.03.2019 were ratified. Further. NSEZ Authority reviewed the con.rpliance of decisions taken in its meeting held on 26.03.2019 in terms of sub-Rule l4 of Rule I 0 of SEZ Authority Rules, 2009 and expressed satisfaction over progress made in implementation of decisions taken by the Authority in its meeting held on 26.03.2019. The Balance sheet and Annual Report for the year 2018-19 prepared and audited by a nominated CA firm viz. Ir4/s. Raj eev Sharma & Associates was placed before the Authority for approval. Decision:- Sh. Rajeev Shama, FCA, N{/s. Rajeev Sharma & Associates briefed the members of the Authority about highlights of financial statements (Balance Sheet) and notes on accounts. The Authority, after due deliberation approved the Balance Sheet lbr the year 2018- 19. The Chairman & CEO, NSEZ Authority directed Estate Division, NSEZ to lorward the copies of Annual Accounts/Reports for the year 2018-'19 to CAG for statutory audit and DoC for information. It was informed to the Authority that Deptt. of commerce in the meeting held on 01.05.2013 under the Chairmanship of Additional Secretary decided that lease rent should be revised every year in all Central Govt. SEZs. Accordingly, the revision in the user charges was proposed as under:- t \oF,, \t ,,. Page I of20

akrsr Aq 3nft6 qt qlfu6{ur, a'tggl Eaiq'zo.oo.zote m) go-5 l1:30 tri 3{rdlB-d dt'sr fuets 3ilfi6 aiT qlfuo{sr 6r d-om ot Lease rent SDF Plot Existinq fale Rs.19421- Rs. 140/- Pronosed rates Rs.2l36l- Rs. 154/- IncreFlent 9.980/o t0% Maintenance Rs.22l- Rs.24l- 9.09% Water charges a. B!gllg@109!s@ b. Plots un to 5000 sqr mtrs c.E!tuIloves000-ssr mtrs d. SDF Per quarter Rs.10921 Rs. 1541/- Rs.3082/- Rs.2054/- Per quarter Rs.1200/- Rs. 16951 Rs.33901 Rs.22601- 9.89% 9.99% 9.99% 10% e, Staff Ouarters Tvpe -II f. Staff Ouarters Tvpe-III g. Staff Ouafterq Tvoe-IV Rs.30/- Rs.30/- Rs.30/- Rs. 63/- Per month Rs.219l Per month Rs. 263l-Per month (Rates are based -on Noida Authority vide Offrce order dated 05/04/2018) Decision: - Trade members of the Authority suggested that we have to facilitate setting up new units in the Zone complex. The proposal for incremental of lease rental about l0% is too high hence they suggested to increase lease rent of SDFs/Plots based on cost inflation index. The CA of NSEZ Authority informed the members about increase in cost inflation index by 2.88o/o of previous year as declared by Income Tax Deptt. After due deliberations, the Authority on the recommendations of both members of Authority representing Trade, decided to increase the lease rcfi @ 3Yo and rest as proposed in the agenda. Accordingly, the increment approved by the Authority as proposed is as follows: Lease rent SDF Plot Existing rate Rs.1942l- Rs. 140/- Anproved rates Rs.2000/- Rs. 144l- Increment 3o/o 3o/o Maintenance Rs.22l- Rs.24l- 9.09% Water charges a. ElelsrpleL0!0 !$ b. Plots un to 5000 sor mtrs c. Plots above 5000 sqr mtrs d. SDF Per quarter Rs.1092/- Rs. 1541/- Rs.3082/- Rs.20541 Per quarter Rs.l200l- Rs. 1695/- Rs.3390/- Rs.22601- 9.89% 9.99% 9.99% l0o/o e. Staff Ouarters Tvpe -II f. StaffOuartersTvpe-lII g, Staff Ouarters Tvpe-IV Rs.30/- Rs. 30/- Rs. 30/- Rs. 63/- Per month Rs.219l- Per month Rs. 263lPer month (Rates are based on Noida Authority vide Office order dated 05/04/2018) The above rate shall be application w.e.f .01107/2019. Page 2 of20

fraio,zo. 6T4-{F akrsI trclq 3lrfts. sil qrfufi{ur, a'tqsr o6.2ots +t grc u:30 rr$ 3ndfrd dr'sr frclq 3{rtr6 al-d qrfu+.{ur 6t d-co or It was informed to the Authority that the SEZ Rules has been amended as published in Gazette Notification dated 19.09.2018 wherein in Rule 19, in sub-Rule (2) after the third proviso, the following proviso has been inserted, namely:- "Provided also that the Approval Committee may also approve proposals for merger of Letters of Approval of two or more Unils fall within the same company or firm subject to the condition that these Units fall within the same Special Economic Zone and after merger, block period for calculation of Net Foreign Exchange shall be from the date of commencement of production of the Unit which commenced operationJirst and the Income tax exemption period shall be consideredfrom the date ofstart ofoperation ofJirst Unit." 4.1 Policv reeardins lew of Transfer charses in respect of Plot-NSEZ Authority in its meeting held on 04.09.2012 has decided norms regarding levy oftransfer charges is as under:- "In case of company/partnership, even if the LOA is same, no transfer charges shall be levied if there is change/transfer of equity up to 50o%, but tansfer charges shall be levied if more than 5094 share/promoters/directors/partners are changed. In case ofproprietary concerw, d there is changes of hands, transfer charges shall be levied. In cose there is change in name only with no changes in constitution and ownership, no tratsfer charges shall be levied." 4.2 Policv reqardins lew of Allotment charses in case of chanse of Entreoreneurship in respect of SDF- NSEZ Authority in its meeting held on 29.06.2015 has decided norms regarding levy of allotment charges is as under:- "In case of plots, we are charging transfer charges if more than 50%o shareholding exchange it was proposed to adopt same analogt in the case of SDF . The same was approved by NSEZ Authority. 4.3 The issue of merger of two LOA had not deliberated earlier in the Authority as this situation has arisen after amendment of rule 19 vide Notification dated 19.09.2018. earlier, the following situations were deliberated/decided:- S. No. Situation Decision of Authoritv 1. Charging of transfer charges on change of Entrepreneurship In case of company/partnership, even if the LOA is same, no transfer charges shall be levied if there is change/transfer of equity up to 50%, but transfer charges shall be levied if more than 50% share/promoters/ directors/ partners are changed. In case of proprietary concems, if there is changes of hands, transfer charges shall be levied. In case there is change in name only with no changes in constitution and ownership, no transfer charges shall be levied. 2. Unit was allotted more than one plot as per its requirement at the time of setting up. The unit is working unit but due to recession or lack of requirement or other reasons, wants to transfer Committee was of the view that built up space only as constructed in accordance with the building plan approved by Competent Authority may be allowed for transfer charges as applicable. Vacant plotVland without any construction have to be surrendered to the Authority & transfer of such plot is not permitted. Page 3 of20

fuaio z or$-{d ak'sr frclq 3nftr6 al-* ffi6.Tur, il('sr 6.o6.2ote of gar 1 l :30 TS 3nqlB-d dt('sr fdelq 3nf{6 &td srfuo{ur ffI t6+' ol 4.4 In view of above, it was proposed that il there is more than 50% is change in shareholding pattem, transfer charges/Allotment fee is liable to be levied in case of merger of LOAs. Proposal was placed before NSEZ Authority for consideration. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberation, decided that no transfer charges shall be levied in case of merger of two LOAs if there is no change in shareholding. Transfer charges shall be applicable in case change of constitution/shareholding beyond 50% as decided earlier by the Authority. It was inibrmed the Authority that this oll-rce awarded the work for re-development of parks in NSEZ vide this office letter dated 05.10.2017 @ estimated cost Rs. 4,19,56,456/- to M/s NPCC Ltd. M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 05.03.2018 award the work to N4/s Anulata Construction Company@ cost Rs. 3,42,12,719/-. This work was initially to be completed by 06.09.2018. Hou,ever. on the request of NPCC. the Authority in its meeting held on 14.01.2019 had extended time lirnit for completion of project up to 28.02.201 9 and directed NPCC to complete the project within the extended time but work was completed on 08.04.2019. 5.1 Nou', M/s NPCC Ltd. vide letter dated 22.03.2019 received in this office on 27.03.2019 has informed that due to follow'ing reasons the u,ork could not be completed on time:- i. The civil works almost completed, only some finishing rvorks are to be completed. ii. The work has been hampered due to various reasons like hapazdly laying of existing electrical cablesi sanitary/plumbing pipes etc. in the working area. 5.2 lWs NPCC Ltd. had requested to extend the completion time of the aforesaid work till 08.04.2019. As per condition No. 16 of MoU signed with \rVs NPCC Ltd. "Any time extension for completion of the work due to geruine reason shall require prior approval of DC, NSEZ' 5.3 The Development Commissioner, NSEZ has granted the time extension up to 08i04i2019 on file in view ofthe reasons mentioned above. 5.4 In vie*'ofabove, the approval granted for extension of time in respect of re-development of Park near Service Centre up to 08/04/2019 was placed before the Authority for ratification. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberations, ratified the decision for grant of extension of time in respect ofre-development ofpark near Service Centre up to 08i04/19. It was informed to the Authority that M/s. NBCC (lndia) Ltd. vide its letter dated 12.06.201 8 submitted provisional estimate of I{s 5 I ,77,6341 which rvas placed before the committee constituted by NSEZ Authority. The committee advised M/s. NBCC (lndia) Ltd. to submit revised estimate in light ofrevised scope of u,ork. The revised estimate ofRs. 48,53,912.79 one/more plots to a valid LOA holder. Levy of Allotment charges in case of change of Entrepreneurship in respect of SDF. In case of plots, we are charging transfer charges if more than 50% shareholding exchange it was propose to adopt same analogy in the case ofSDF. ^r, Page 4 of20

dtqsr fuels 3Trfr6 da srfuoTsr, a'k'st Baim zo.oo.zote +l go-5 II:30 Ed 3{rdBd il('sr fre}q 3fif{zF et{ qlfu+-{ur 6r tom ar (including all charges) submitted by tWs. NBCC (lndia) Ltd. was placed before the Authority in its meeting dated 19.09.2018 for approval. Authority decided to defer the matter to re-examine the estimate and scope of work by the committee headed by JDC and submit its recommendations to the Authority in the next meeting. 6,f The revised estimate was placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh. Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh. Puneet Kapoor. representative of trade was in its meeting held on 18.04.2019 at 11:00 AM for examination & recommendation. The Committee examined the proposal and keeping in view of cost effectiveness /durability etc. recommended that granite stone may be fixed on wall of staircases instead of wooden panel. DGM, lWs. NBCC (India) Ltd. had suggested to go in for granite stone as rates of wooden panel and Granite stone are almost same. In the BOQ (Bill of Quantity), the Granite stone shall be inserted by them in place ofwooden panels. 6.2 Now, M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. has submitted the revised estinate of Rs. 44,83,112l- (including all charges). Details of estimate are as under:-
S. No. Description of items Amount Amt. considerable 1. Renovation of Reception, Room Nos. 101, 102, 105, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, Toilet & Pantry on 1't Floor, Estate, accounts & EOU section, DC Chamber & Hall, Toilet & Pantry on 2ndFloor, Main Staircase. Fire Staircase) 33,72,562.53 33,72,562.51 2. Cost lndex 15.68% 5,28,817.80 5,28,817.80 J. Sub-Total 39.01.380.33 3e.0r.380.33 4. Contineencv @39lo I .01 .176.88 r.01.176.88 5. Sub-Total (3+4) 40.02.557.2t 40.02.557.21 6. Design & Drawing charges @ 27o 80,051 .14 80,051.14 7. Sub-Total (5+6) 40,82.608.35 40,82,608.35 8. Agency charges@ 9 % 3,67,434.75 3,67,434.75 9_ GST@l2o/o on Asency Charees 3 3.069. r 3 Not Applicable* 10. Grand Total 44.83.112.23 44.50.043.10 *GST shall be zero rated in terms of Section 16 of IGST Act. 6.3 The revised estimate of Rs.44,50,043/- (Rupees forty four lakh fifty thousand forty three only) was placed before Authority for approval. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberations, approved revised estimate ofRs. Rs. 44,50,0431- @upees forty fow lakh fifty thousand forty three only) for renovation of stair cases, reception, rooms etc. as mentioned in table above in the Service Centre. Page 5 of20

Eaio. zo sr4-{d dtqsr Eslq 3Trft6 #* srfr6{ur, at('* .06.2019 at go-r l r:30 Ei 3{rdR-d dt('sr fuc}q 3nE6 etd qrfuo{q 6r tom or It was informed the Authority that M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. has submitted the application for extension of time up to the actual date of completion i.e. 30.04.2019 without levy of compensation in respect of Fire Fighting work at SDF F, G, H & I Block at NSEZ, Noida. Details of work are below:- I Approved cost estimate Rs. 8,96,38,687/- 2. Tender award cost Rs. 5,28.88,223l- 3. Date of work order issued to NBCC 02.fi.2015 4. Whether copy of work award letter issued by NBCC to its contractor received. Yes 5. Name of contractor IWs. Fire Remedy Systems 6. Date of work award letter issued by NBCC to its contractor 26.02.2016 7. Date of commencement of work 07.03.2016 (10rn day from issue of work award letter) 8. Date of completion as per Agreement As oer agreement the work would be completed within the stipulated time mentioned in work award letter to the contractor bv NBCC plus 3(three) months more time to NBCC for administrative formalities. Hence, we may take completion date as 07 .12.2016. (09 months from the date of commencement of work i.e. 07.03.2016) 9. Period for which extension is applied for 08. 12.2016 to 30.04.2019 10. Reason for extension of time Some of the hindrances faced by NBCC are summarized below:- a. Some unit holders did not allow them to work in one lot and some allowed to work after some time. b. Work was delaved due to heavy rain and falling of trees. c. Power suooly & water supply pumo sets were not orovided by clienVdeoartment. d. WeVSprinkler riser cannot be laid since the same is sealed by Customs Department. e. Fire Alarm Control room was not available. 7.1 The matter of Fire Fighting work at SDF F. G, H & I Block at NSEZ, Noida was placed before the Authority in its meeting held on 26.03.2019 for monitoring. Extract of minutes is as under:- Sh. Anurag Singhal, DGM informed to the Authority that 95 % work has been completed. For the remaining u,ork they are in touch with the unit's representative to makz spuce U- Page 6 of20

dk'sr fratq 3Trfr6 qt* qrfu+tur, a'tqst Eaio zo.oo.zors ol gc5 tt.:o a-$ 3Irdfi-d #(.5r fuclq 3lftr6 f{ crfufiTuI6t d-ao or available.for work. llork will be completed soon. Sh. Singhal has requested extension of lime for completion of work. Authority, afrer due deliberations, noted that M/s. NBCC had not made any request for extension of time and once such requesl reccived with proper iustification appropriate action would be laken. 7.2 Now, M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd., vide its letter dated 25.03.2019, has requested to extend the time up to 30.04.2019. The hindrances faced by M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. were brought to the notice in Authority meetings dated 04.01.2018, 26.03.2018, 25.06.2018, 19.09.2018, 14.01.2019 and review meeting dated 08.08.2018. 7.3 In view of facts mentioned above, it was placed belore Authority to cottsider the request of NBCC for extension of time limit in completion ol work up to 30.04.2019' Decision: Sh. Atul Jadhav, DPM, NBCC (lndia) Ltd. appeared before the Authority and explained that the work has almost been completed except connectivity of water line, other minor repairing work etc. He requested to grant extension of time to complete the project ry lo 3110712019. The Authority, after due deliberations, approved the request ofNBCC for grant of extension of time up to 3l/0712019 for completion of firefighting rvork at SDF- F, G, H & I Blocks in NSEZ, Noida. It was informed to the Authority that this oflice awarded the work for establishment of Solid Waste Management in NSEZ vide this ofllce letter dated 12.01.2018 to M/s NPCC Ltd. @ the estimated cost Rs. 5.33 crore ( including all charges). M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 16.03.2018 awarded the work to lv{/s Panneshwar Dayal, Ghaziabad @ cost of Rs. 3,09,41,7331' for civil work only. The brief details of work are as under:-

1. Approved estimated cost Rs. 5.33 Crore ( including all charges i.e. PMC, Contingency, labour cess)
2. Capital cost approved by DoC under TIES 4.25 Crore (excluding all charges)
3. Fund approved by DoC(50% of 4.25 crore) Rs. 2.13 Crore
4. DoC released first installment on/for 29.12.2017 Rs. 1.07 Crore
5. Revised Capilal cost due to installation of Plant & Machinerv on hire basis. Rs. 3.55 Crore (3.09+ 0.46)
6. 50% of revised cost(as mentioned at S. No. 5) Rs. 1 .78 Crore
7. Remaining amount to be released by DoC(6-4) Rs. 0.705 Crore
8. Date of Work Order issued to NPCC 12.01.2018
9. Tender au'ard amount for Civil *'ork Rs. 3,09,4 i,733l- + Rs. 46, I 3,308/-(deviation) Rs.35555041
10. Name of Contractor M/s Parmeshwar Dayal, Ghaziabad I 1. Date of Tender awarded by NPCC to its contractor lor civil work 16.03.2018 Page 7 of20

Eaio z mr*-{d et<'sr fretq 3Trffio' sf{ srfuoTur, d(tst 6.06.20ts of g*t 11:30 irS 3ndBd dt(.sr frtq 3{rf{6 f{ slfuoTsr fr d-co or 8.1 M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 18.04.2019 had infonned that the work of Establishment of Solid Waste Management System lvas not expected to be completed by 30.04.2019.In vierv of General Elections there was less availability of labour & difficulties in making arrangements for transportation due to which the delay occurred in completing the work at site. M/s NPCC Ltd. had requested to extend the completion of date of project till 3l .05.2019. 8.2 As per condition No. 18 of MoU signed with M/s NPCC Ltd, "Any time extension for complelion of lhe work due to genuine reason shall require prior approval of DC, NSEZ' 8.3 The Development Commissioner has granted the time extension up to 31.05.2019 on file in view ofthe reasons mentioned above. 8.4 In view ofabove, it was proposed to ratify the decision taken on file for extension oftime up to 3110512019. It is mentioned here that work has since been cornpleted. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberations, ratified the decision for grant of extension of time up to 31105119 for development of Solid Waste Management System in the Zone complex. It was informed to the Authority that tlie request of M/s NPCC Ltd. for time extension to complete the work of construction of new warehouse in CWC Complex and deviation of work was placed before the NSEZ Authority in its meeting held on 26.03.2019 for consideration/approval. 9.1 M/s NPCC informed that due to change in the proposed design there is deviation of rvork which will be subrnitted by them shortly in the meantime they have requested for time extension only. The Authority in the light ofjustification given by executing agency after due deliberations, extended the time limit up to 30.06.2019 for construction of new warehouse in CWC Complex and advised Mis NPCC Ltd. to submit item wise deviation statement and General Manager, NPCC will submit a personal certificate in this regard that change of specification was essentially required for the stability of structure and the additional work has actually been canied out. 9.2 Accordingly, M/s NPCC Ltd. vide this office letter dated 12.04.2019, was advised to complete the project within the extended time up to 30.06.2019 and submit the following documents-

1. Item wise deviation statement in respect of construction of new warehouse in CWC Complex, NSEZ. Rs. 66,00,000/- per year for five year including 3 years lock period and 2 years extension
2. Tender award amount for Operation & Maintenance work M/s Vedika Infracon OPC P,1. Ltd., New Delhi
3. Name of Contractor 28.01.2019
4. Date of Tender awarded by NPCC to its contractor for civil work Rs. 3.42,39,505/- (approx. 90% of actual cost for civil work (3,80,43,894/-) paid to NPCC in 4 instalments
5. Details of payment already made in respect of Civil rvork w Page 8 of20

fraim zo. o.r*-{d atqsr fuslq 3Trft6 at{ qrfu6{ul, dk'gr o6.2ots of ga-o 11:30 iri 3{rq}E-d il(rsr frc}q 3lrffitn et{ qlfu+-{ur 6r d-co mr 2. A personal certificate of General Manager, M/s NPCC Ltd. in this regard that change of specification was essentially required for the stability of structure and the additional work has actually been carried out. 9.3 Now, M/s NPCC Ltd. has clarifred flrat the carpet area of the said building is 1048 sqr meter (47m x 22.3 m). But as per the actual site condition the nearby area of 3000 sqr meter (60 m x 50 m) was covered with jungle & bushes which was cleaned as per the site requirement & as necessary to develop the peripheral road. During the course ofexecution some BOQ items have been revised due to change in scope of work & execution of some extra items as per actual site condition as decided & directed for proper completion of works' Since the warehouse was designed for larger rnodule & to make maximum utilization of space the no. of columns in between the hall were decreased which increased the load on beams & columns at outer edge & a few modification in foundation also, resulting in increase of arnount of steel and concrete. M/s NPCC further informed that the plinth level was increased in accordance with the road level. The net variation comes out to be Rs. 42,91,725.261- or: y wlrere tlre awarded amount l'as Rs. 2,89,12.804i- & revised amount is Pts.3,32,04,529.231-. Details of the deviation are as under:- s. No Description Tender awarded Amount Revised amount Difference amount I Total of civil, electrical rvorks. firefighting, plumbing & road ra'orks 26544381.53 30484545.65 3940164.12 2. Contingency (43% on 1 796331.45 914536.37 118204.92 3. Total (l+2) 27340712.98 3t 399082.02 4058369.04 4. PMC charees@ 5.75 % of 3 1 s72091 .00 180s447.22 2333s6.22 5. Grand Total(3+,{+5) 289r2803.97 33204529.23 4291725.26 Authority noted that the approved estimate cost is Rs. 3,25,68,2391-(including contingency and PMC), tender awarded cost is Rs. 2,89,12,8041- (including contingency and PMC) and revised estimate cost is Rs. 3,32,04,529/-. Flence the difference of tender awarded cost and revised estimated cost is Rs 42,91,7251-. In view of above. matter was placed before Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh. Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade lbr examination of deviation. The Committee examined the deviation statement in details. Two members of committee viz Sh. Puneet Kapoor and Sh. Salik Parwaiz, JC (Customs) had visited the site on 20.06.2019 and had conveyed their observations as under:- I . They informed that M/s NPCC Ltd. has changed the scope of work in respect of construction of neu,warehouse in CWC Complex, NSEZ at their own without prior approva[ of Competent Authority. 2. M/s NPCC Ltd. could not explain the cost variation satisfactorily. 9.6 The Committee recommended to place the above facts before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting to be held on 26.06.2019 for consideration and appropriate decision.In view of 9.4 9.5 Page 9 of20

fraio, za o,rdTd dt<'sr frqlq 3nf{6 af{ srfu+Tul, dk'sl .o6.2ots +t g+5 1 1 :30 tri 3ndB-d dtr'fl hclq $rftrr S{ ulfuo-{ur fI d-d6 o'r above, the recommendation of committee was placed before Authority for taking a view in the matter. Decision: Sh. Dharmendra Mudgal, Group General Manager, NPCC appeared before the Authority. Sh. Mudgal was asked to produce justification and documentary evidence in support of deviation in Rs. 42, 91,725/-. Sh. Mudgal requested the Authority to give him some time to produce justification and documentary evidence in support of deviation. The Authority, after due deliberations, defened the proposal. The Authority directed said the Committee headed by JDC to re-examine the proposal again on receipt of detailed justification from NPCC and re-submit their findings in its next meeting for consideration. It was informed to the Authority that M/s. NPCC Ltd. was requested to submit scope of work and estimate for development of parking area about 5000 sq. mtr., public convenience and construction of a shed for sitting/waiting & drinking water at the end of NSEZ main road near boundary wall, NSEZ vide this office letter dated 03.12.2018. l0.l lr{/s NPCC Ltd. vide letter dated 13.03.2019 has informed that a proper suvey was conducted for the same, based on which a detailed estimate has been prepared and submitted the same. Details of estimate are as under:- S. No. Amount Remarks Total amount for DSR works 24893022.00 24893022.00 2. Total amount for MR u,orks 38407 53.59 3840753.59 Cost index on 1 @12.7 5%:o 3173860.3r 3173860.31 4. Total(1+2+3) 31907635.90 31907635.90 5. Contingency Gl3o/o on 4 9s7229.08 957229.08 6. Total(4+5) 32864864.98 32864864.98 7. PMC charses@ 5.75 oh on 6 1889729.74 1889729.74 8. Labour Cess@1% on 6 328648.6s This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not siving to NBCC also. 9. Grand Total(6+7+8) 3s083243.36 34754594.72 10.2 The above estimate for development of 5000 sqr. meter parking area, public convenience and constnrction of a shed for sitting & provision of r.vater purilier for drinking water at the end of NSEZ main road near boundary wall NSEZ amounting to Rs. 3,47,54,595/- (excludiug labour cess and GST) was placed before the NSEZ Authority in its meeting held on 26.03.2019 for approval. 10.3 The estimate for development of 5000 sqr. meter parking area, public convenience and construction of a shed for sitting & provision of water purifier for drinking water at the end of NSEZ main road near boundary wall NSEZ rvas explained to the Authority. The Authoriti/ observed that breakup/details of the estimate have not been examined by the Comrnittee of JDC. Therefore. after due deliberations, the Authority deferred the oroposal for fuilher examination of estimate bv the Committee constituted under the Chairmanship of Joirt Developnrent Commissioner, NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. ,, Page l0 of20

Edio. 26 m'rtr{d dttsl ftSls 3Trffi6. A.t* ffioTur, drtsl .06.20ts +i ga-f 1 1 :30 q-$ 3ndBd ;it('sr fuels 3Irf{6 f{ qrfufiqr fit i-co or Commissioner (Customs), Sh Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade for rnaking suitable recommendations' 10.4 Now, M/s. NPCC Ltd. vide letter dated 03.06.2019 has also submitted another estimate of Rs. 2,99,02,009.09/- for development of 5000 sqr. meter parking area. public convenience and construction ofa shed for sitting & provision of water purifier for drinking water at the end of NSEZ main road near boundary wall NSEZ as option 02. Details of estimate are iven below: S. No. Amount Remarks l. Total amount of DSR Works 23154634.50 233s4634.50 2. Total amount of MR items 3840753.59 3840753.59 J. Total (1+2) 27195388.09 27195388.09 4. Continsency @, 3o/o on (3) 815861.64 815861.64 5. Total (3+4) 28011249.74 28011249.74 6. Labour Cess @1 Yo on 5 280112.50 This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not giving labour cess to NBCC also- 7. PMC Charges @5.7 5%o on 5 1610646.86 1610646.86 Total(5+6+7) 29902009.09 29621896.59 10.5 Previous estimate includes RCC parking and option 2 includes interlocking paver parking. 10.6 In view of above matter was placed before the above Commitlee headed by JDC NSEZ for examination of estimate and suitable recommendations. The Committee examined the estimate in details and two members of committee viz Sh. Puneet Kapoor and Sh. Salik Pan>raiz, JC (Customs) had visited the site on 20.06.2019 at 5:00 PM and found that the area already developed for parking is not being lully utilized. Hence, they have suggested that adjoining area which is proposed to be developed may be leveled first and compulsory parking ofvehicles may be enforced on that area. This practice may be watched for 15 days. Thereafter, requirement of additional parking area may be re-assessed. This was lbr placed before the Authority for inlbrmation to the Authority. Decision: The Authority agreed with the recommendations of the committee and after due deliberations decided to defer the matter and directed the Committee to re-examine the same after watching the utilization of exiting parking space and place their recommendation before the Authority in its next meeting. It was informed to the Authority that vide this office letter dated 07.02.2019, M/s NPCC Ltd. was requested to submit estimate for re-operationalization of solar system installed at rooftop of Service Centre, NSEZ. It is mentioned that NSEZ Authority in its meeting held on 14.01.2019 decided to award the r.vork to M/s NPCC Ltd. in terms of Rule 133(3) of GFR for re- operationalization ofsolar system installed at roof top of Service Centre, NSEZ. l1'1 Now, M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 30.04.2019 has informed that a survey w-zrs conducted for the same to install new grid panels rvhich will be connected to the solar panels Page ll of20

faio'z 6r4-q3 dt(.g lqclq 3TIffi6 st-{ qrfu{'{ur, et(,sr 6.06.2019 +t go-5 1 1:30 cr$ 3lrdB-d ait('fl frclq srfitn' F{ qrfuo{sr fit *co ol already installed at roof top of NSEZ building and subrnitted the estimate for re- operationalization of solar system installed at roof top of Service Centre, NSEZ. Details of estimatc submitted bv M/s NPCC India Ltd. are as under:- S. No. Amount Remarks Total arnount 100 KWp Solar 2501986.36 2501986.36 2. Continsency @3o/o on 1 7 5059.59 75059.59 .t- Total(1+2) 2577045.95 2577045.95 4. PMC charges@ 5.75 % of 3 148180.14 148180.14 5. Labour Cess@l% on 3 25770.46 This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not siving to NBCC also. 6. Grand Total(3+4+5) 2750996.55 2725226.09 ll.2 Earlier. the work for re-operationalization of Solar System installed at rooftop of Service Centre building was awarded to M/s PEC Ltd. @ Rs. 18,50,000i- vide letter dated 23.04.2018. M/s PEC Ltd. vide e-mail dated 13.12.2018 was informed that since PEC is going through financial problems. manpower problems and uncertainties, therefore at present, PEC might not be able to do justice in implementing ofthe new project. 11.3 It is mentioned drat I\rVs AN Electromech refened by Sh. Puneet Kapoor has also submitted the estimated cost for re-operationalization of Solar System installed at rooftop of Service Centre building of Rs. 2988583.60(Off Grid) and Rs. 778043.60 (On Grid). 11.4 In view of above matter was placed before Committee headed by JDC NSEZ and comprising of MD Satik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade for examination of estimate and suitable recommendation. The Committee discussed the estimate in details and observed that the estimate submitted by the M/s NPCC Ltd. is much higher than that of the M/s PEC Ltd. and M/s. AN Electromech. The Committee recommended to invite open e- tender for re-operationalization of Solar Systenl installed at rooftop of Service Centre building by adopting provisions ofGFR-2017. 11.5 The above proposal as recontmended by the Authority was placed before Authority lor approval. Decision: The Authority agreed with the recommendation of the above Committee. The Authority directed Estate Managernent Division to prepare tender documents for e-tendering in accordance with the gr.ridelines of CVC. It rvas also directed to consult the officers of Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. for grid connectivity betbre e-tendering. It was informed to the Authority that vide this ofhce letter dated 21.02.2019, M/s NPCC Ltd. was requested to submit estirnate for following nrisc. works at SDF 'E' Block in NSEZ- L Replacement of darraged pipe of shaft. 2. Repairing of 200 meter drain. 3. Construction of 600 meter new setr,er liue. 12,1 Now, M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 06.04.2019 has informed that a survey was conducted for the same based on rvhich a detailed estimate has been prepared based on DSR ( $;nry. Page l2 of20

dk'sr frtq 3nffio. $* qlfrEF{ur, ekrsr o6.zote d g*-g 1 t:30 trS 3Trdfrd dt(.EI fualq ,n6o S* srfuo{ur fr d-co ot 2016 & market rate and submitted the estimate of Rs. 47,82,881 .46/- for above mentioned work. Details of estimate submitted bv Mis NPCC Ltd. are as undcr:- S. No. DescriDtion of items Amount Remarks 1 Total amount of DSR work 862929.00 862929.00 2. Total amount of MR work 3377000.00 3377000.00 J. Cost index or 1@12."15%o 1 I 0023.45 110023.45 4. Total(1+2+3) 4349952.45 43499s2.45 5. Contineencv @3%o 130498.57 130498.5'.7 6. Total(4+5) 44804s1.02 44804s1.02 7. PMC charees@ 5.75 % 257625.93 2s7625.93 8. Labour Cess@ I % 44804.51 This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not giving to NBCC also. 9. Grand Total(6+7+8) 4782881.46 4738076.9s 12.2 In view of above matter was placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and con.rprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh Nitin Gupta, Dy. Developnrent Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade for examination of estimate and suitable recommendations. The Committee discussed the proposal in details and after due deliberations recommended to place the estimate before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting to be held on 26.06.2019 for approval. 12,3 Accordingly, proposal was placed before Authority for approval. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberations. approved the estimate amounting to Rs. 4738076.95 submitted by NPCC Ltd. for miscellaneous u,ork as per agenda. I 3. (rs&qs, qs' .fr .(rE JrB .S qri iBrr ar6. fr ilrfr frqd 6) Tqira * {rtrff f I ffi'urdhfr$ Hff+s frfris i 3rqi q-{ ffiio oo.o:.zole fr'Exr qfud fo.qr f6 aqdt(rs qs ,,r'q,3n$ ,i a?i lBzr @rfi'f ilrfr M & siftR-ra qrt ErflT f Etrrerr rfi' t @ifo. t ffi 3n5clts t | frs osur ftrc ER-ER il;q d qrfr t ui ffit rre-a srar affilgare G fiI ilrff t | (rgfi(rq. qF,,w,:n€',i rti iBzr wro f mfi M or fo-+<urB-sfrfuat- S. No. Location of lift Make Type of lift Remarks 1. SDF F Block OTIS Passenger Lift is about 19 year old. 2. SDF F Block OTIS Goods Lift is about 19 year old. J. SDF G Block OTIS Passenger Lift is about 19 year old. 4. SDF G Block OTIS Goods Lift is about 19 year old. 5. SDF H Block Kone Passenger Lift is about l0-15 vear old. 6. SDF H Block Kone Goods Lift is about l0-15 year old. 7. SDF I Block City Passenger Lift is about l0- 15 year old. 8. SDF I Block City Goods Lift is about 10-15 year old. 9. SDF J Block Kinetic Passenger Lift is about 10-15 year old. fraio zo. EFr*-{d Page 13 of20

ak'sr fuelq Eaio, zo.oo.zou +l g+t l1:30 "r$ 3Trfr6 f* qrfu6{ul, a'tqgt :rdB-a dqET frcls 3nf{o' et{ qrfra'tq ft i-ao +-r Lift is about 10- 15 vear old. SDF J Block Lift is about 10-15 Lift is about 10-15 l 3. 1 +€S \ra-drfiS sffi €-d fr fr|E * gtrdt fr w $ft B-ra ffiar 6t a-Slgrq}}s Rqz O ild-fri tq ffi rsra 6{A 6T fri{d fu-+r g o16 * fudI frFfi Ertn fi c-Erd fii ilr sh t scrlo ffi of enftBa-a Mar fi rfirqs ftE t a-ca-i or rwrq iffi fir s{sqerdr d i{dio. 18.04.201e "f d tc" f E-{Rr?t tsE rqa laer urqr qI I Bs u-ea fr afr gdra oq +i u-wra fi BY-€r+,T rtr6l ft Fqufr i-i fi ft (' $1116 fuqr urql Er E +.W i ffi tS$ ffid frfr& uq'r ffit u-qa 6t t t wf i sqtm frA * repair/maintenance ot ggt € 8,603,100/- + GST ((i AMC sr gf t s,zo,ooo/- + GST qarqr t el\ac I ir-{6J modemization f q(d sri qrd sEr6{ur fi tt t'gtt('s (rtr,fr ,trq , sn$ il H&ra +r or{'t'+ffi 4t fuqr rrqr t afoa a;rdr$S A frE cca-} ot qrqsnd 3rqi qrffi-ilf, d a-$t fo+r fi 3'kT :r+flrtl i. fi. fr. 61 6-i& (ffi grar fl{€r e flrft-n q-{a-d, rrgF argo fifrI ga,, * Hft-a gtr, rq fuffi rrgo lzi,fr 5tra oq{, ls e'q{ t I fi sqo la-qrRt fu rqa fou ar+r tt 13.2 m-i& i r*arq ql fuFrt t qd' fi 3i1-{ T6 qRrT 1+. i lii iG-rI dr6 d ilrfr ffi 6I Rrft qilfi wrq t I va.fi.fr.fr. sik qa.fi.fr.fr S 6-rA d r.o ar fu+-aq M or replacement t d-dfd gr{fu 6Rr 6-{rA fr repair/maintenance 3fr comprehensive arrlc fu- qrq f+o-cq t | 59fr(t (.selt'q' i tti lGzr earo fr rto-r'o frFc 6I rdFrra m.r? tg g-fr +Afr<r snfikd fiI ar u-6-fr t t fafi 61+' il} t Er6 6rd fr zJurE-mzfirra of tqo-r qg ffiq frqr ar uo-ar t 6o qa1 E151 6qd o-r mr4 $-Efr{r 6nr fra qrfu6-{q 6Rr 6--{il &fi Grn qr e}s ffi fi errre-d o,ri fu sS r'+ffi SBqr frftrs ui qaffi frfris t srffiila u-qa o-ci b frt tnp ar s6-dr t I ofer fi uqfr qrfuo-iur b Frumf tti rgrani wgd 6t rr$ | Decision: The Authority. alier due deliberations, approved the proposal to get one lift each one by one installed in SDF 'J' & 'trading' blocks through open e-tendering module available at wuu'.nsez.gov.in. The tender documents/publicity etc. should be in accordance with CVCI guidelines and GFR. Decision in respect of other lifts should be taken up after observing result of this method. It was informed to the Authority that M/s NPCC Ltd. and M/s NBCC India Ltd. were requested to submit scope of work and estirnate for re-construction of DG Set Foundation, Shed and installation of panels at NSEZ. Accordingly. Mis NPCC Ltd. vide letter dated 28.01.2019 was submitted the estirnate of Rs. 49.83,968/- and M/s NBCC vide letter dated 22.03.2019 was Page 14 of20

ftaio, zo. 6r+{d dt('g ldals 3nffio. tt* srfu+.-{q, et('5I o6.2o1s ai gar 1 I :30 trS 3TrdBd dk'fl Fdtq 3TIffiiF S{ crfudF{ur SI t-ffi ol submitted the estimate of Rs. 19,16,895/-(including GST) for re-construction of DG Set Foundation, Shed and installation ofpanels at NSEZ which rvere placed before Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh. Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh. Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade in its meeting held on 18.04.2019 at 1l:00 AM for exantination & recommendation. 14.1 The Committee examined above both estimates in details. Prima facie, Committee found the estimate of Rs. 18.98,088/-(excluding GST) submitted by M/s NBCC India Ltd. reasonable. 14.2 Now, M/s NPCC Ltd. vide letter dated 18.04.2019 received in this office on 24.04.2019 has again submitted the revised estimate ofRs. 8,70,382/- for aforesaid works. Details of all estimates are as under- 1, Details of estimate submitted bv M./s NPCC Ltd, on 2E,01,2019 are as under:- S. No. Amount Remarks

1. Total amount of DSR rvork 2471783.88 247t783.88 2_ Total amount of NSR rvork 1752080.00 1752080.00 '!- Cost index on 1@12.5o/o {(115-102y102} 308972.98 308972.98

Total(l+2+3) 4532836.86 4s32836.86 5. Contingency At),3o/o on 4 135985.1 I 135985.t I 6. Total(4+5) 4668821.97 4668821.97 7. PMC charses@ 5.75 % of 5 268457.26 268457.26 8. Labour Cess-@lo% on 5 46688.22 This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not civins to NBCC also. 9. Grand Total(6+7+8) 4983967.4s 4937219.23 Details o[ estimate submitted bv M/s N l'(lC Ltd. on 23.04.2019 are as under:- S, No. Amount Remarks l. Total amount of DSR rvork 539383.00 539383.00 2. Total amount of NSR work t84792.72 184792.72 Cost index on 1@.12.5% {(l ls-102y102} 67422.88 67422.88 4. Total(l+2+3) 791s98.60 791598.60 5. Contingency @3"/o on 4 2374'7.96 23747.96 6. Total(4+5) 815346.55 815346.55 7. PMC charses@ 5 .7 5 Yo of 5 46882.43 46882.43 8. Labour Cess@170 on 5 81s3.47 This has to be provided by tlle contractor. We are not giving to NBCC also. 9. Grand Total(6+7+8) 870382.45 862228.98 3. ol estimate submitted by M/s NBCC lndia Ltd. on 22.03.2019 are as under:- s. No. Amount Remarks t. Total amount of work 16s7496.00 1657496.00 2_ Cortingency @3Yo on 1 49'724.88 49724.88 7 Details ,, Page 15 of20

fraim zo 6rd-{d at(rEr ldatq 3rrffi6 at{ qrfu6{ur, at(rsr .06.201e oi gar5 11:30 cr$ 3ndBd;it('fl fuclq 3{rf{6 f{ qrfuo-tq ft d-co or 14.3 The estimate submitted bv Mis NPCC Ltd. on23.04.2019 was not as part of the requirement ofthis office. 14.4 In vieu'ofabove lnatter was placed before the said Committee for examination of proposal and making suitable recommendation. The Committee examined in details. Prima facie, Committee found the estimate of Rs. 18,98.088/-(excluding GST) submitted by IWs NBCC India Ltd. takes care of all important components and is reasonable. Whether the estimate submitted by M/s. NPCC though cheaper does not include critcal component in the estimate which is llcessary lor rumring DG System smotthly. Thus the Committee recommended to place the estimate before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting to be held on 26.06.2019 for consideration. 14.5 Hence, the proposal was placed before Authority to grant approval to assign the work to M/s NBCC India Ltd. Decision: The Authority obserwed that the estimates of M/s. NPCC are not as per the requirement ol this ofhce. These estimates do not include critical component like feeder pillars. DG Panel, Main Panel etc. On the other hand, the estimates of NVs. NBCC are comprehension and as per the requirement of this office. The Authority, after due deliberations, decided to assigr the work to M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. at the estimated cost of Rs. 18.98,088/- (excluding GST). It was ir1formed to the Authority that vide this office letter dated 16.12.2018 & 03.05.2019, N4/s NPCC Ltd. rvas requested to submit estimate for repairing/re-development of Park No. 2, 3, 4 & 5 in NSEZ. 15.1 Norv. M/s NPCC Ltd. vide their letter dated 21.05.2019 has infonned tl.rat a survey was conducted for the same based on which a detailed estimate has been prepared based on DSR 2016 & market rate and submitted the estimate of Rs. I ,00,1 5,336/- for repairing of Park No. 2,3, 4 &. 5 in NSEZ. 15.2 Scope ofwork taken for parks is as under:-

1. Park No. 2 (near Gate No. 02)- i. Plaster & paint ofboundaly wall. ii. Plaster & paint ofroom erected in the Park.
2. Park No. 3 ( near Ovcrhead Water Tank)- i. Plaster & paint olboundary wall. ii. Repair of footpath u,ith colored interlocking. iii. Repairing of grill along with paint. iv. Repair ofboard to wtite slogans related to Srvachchta/Infbrmation ofwater tank. Design & Drawing chatges @ 2o/o on 3 34144.42 34144.42 t74t365.30 174t365.30 156722.88 9o/oof5 GST@12%on6 GST zero rated in terms of section 16 of IGST Act. Grand Total(5+6+ 1916894.93 I\sf,. Page l6 of20

fraia; zo m,r4-{d dt('fl frelq 3TIft6 et{ qrfuoTur, dt('g .o6.2ots of ger 1 l :30 {$ 3{rdB-d dt('fl frc}q 3IIf{o tid srfufiur ffI d-d+, ol

1. LED Cost ofRs. 16.17 takh per LED
2. High mast pole Rs. 10.62 lakh 16.2 In view of above matter was placed before Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor. representative of trade for examination of proposal and making suitable recommendations. The Committee discussed the proposal in details and after due deliberations recommended to install only one LED display and High mast pole for flag and place the proposal before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting to be held on 26.06.2019 lor consideration. Details of estimate for one LED display and High are as S. No. Amount l. Total amount of MR for high mast 1062000.00

Total amount of DSR Works for installation of high masts 219199.00 3. Total amount of MR for LED display including installation 16t6676.82 4. Total (1+2+3) 2897875.82 5. PMC Charges @5.7 5oh on 5 166627.85 Total(4+5) 3064502.85 16,3 Accordingly, the proposal lor approval of estimate for Rs. 3064503.67 was placed before Authority for approval. Decision: The Authority, after due deliberations, approved the estimated cost of Rs. 13,54,8671- for installation of High mast pole of 30 meter high for Flag at Gate No. l, NSEZ, Noida. *rqxrf I It was informed to the Authority that this office *-as constructed 68 water harvesting system in various place in the Zone in year 2006. All water harvesting system were cleaned in year 2016. During the last year rainy season, it was observed that the water harvesting systems were not working properly hence cleaning and maintenance of rain water harvesting system is required. mast bo[e under S. No. Descrirrtion of items Amount Remarks l. Total amount of DSR Works 2,19,199.00 2,19,199.00 2. Total amount of MR items 75,28,707.28 75,28,707.28 't- Tolal ( I +2) 77,47 ,906.28 77,47 ,906.28 4. Continsency @ 3% on (3) 2,32,$7.19 2,32,437.19 5. Total 13+4) 79,80,343.47 79,80,343.47 6. Labour Cess @,1 %o on 5 79,803.43 This has to be provided by the contractor. We are not giving labour cess to NBCC also. 7. PMC Charges @5.75Yo ort 5 4,58,869.75 4,s8,869.7s Total(5+6+7) 85,19,016.65 84,39,213.22 \F Page 18 of20

Qaio'zo o.r+-{d d('sr fusls 3TIffi6 qtd srfu6,{ur, ?ik'Er .06.201s oi go-t 1 1 :30 tr$ 3Irdffid dt('sl fua}q 3ntro, si{ qrfuoTur dt i-co ot Accordingly. vide this office letter dated 15.05.2019. M/s WAPCOS Ltd. uas requested to submit estimate tbr Cleaning and Maintenance of 68 nos. rain Water Harvesting System in NSEZ' l7.l Now. M/s WAPCOS Ltd. vide their letter dated 24.05.2019 has submitted the estimate for Cleaning and Maintenance of 68 nos. rain Water Harvesting System in NSEZ which includes followings- l. Site clearance is required at some location due to excessive growth of grass or vegetation. 2. Cleaning of underground sump including disposal of silt and rubbish. 3. The cleaning shall consist of following operations: i. Tank shall be emptied of water by pumping & bottom shall be cleaned of silt and other deposits. ii. Entire surface area of the sump shall tlren scrubbed thoroughly with wire brush etc. and pressure rvashed with rvater. iii. Chlorination ofRCC internal surface by liquid chlorine. iv. The treated surface shall be dried using air jetting and all loose particles shall be removal from the surface. 3. Providing pre-cast R.C.C. manhole cover and frame at some damaged portion of water harvesting structure. 4. Providing new Aluminum Jali in filter chamber and bore chamber in everv water harvesting structure. 5. Repair the wall of silt chamber, filter charrber and hore chamber. 6. Providing new 150 mm dia. P.V.C slated pipe. 7. Washing the filter media of every water harvesting structure. Details M/s WAPCOS of estimate submitted bv M.is WAPCOS Ltd. are as under:- s. No. Amount( in Lakh) I Cleaning and Maintenance of 68 nos. Rain Water Harvesting System 11.38 2. Continsency @ 10% 1 .14 -). Total(1+2) 12.52 4. PMC charees@ 5.70 0.7 | 5. Grand Total(3+4+5) 13.23 17.1 In view of above matter was placed before Committee headed by JDC NSEZ and comprising of MD Salik Parwaiz Jt. Commissioner (Customs), Sh Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner and Sh Puneet Kapoor, representative of trade for examination of proposal and making suitable recommendations. The said Committee discussed the proposal in details and after due deliberations recommended to place the proposal before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting to held on 26.06.2019 for approval. Accordingly, the proposal for approval of estimate lbr Rs. I 3.23 lakh is placed before Authority for approval. Decision: The Authority. after due deliberations, approved the estimated cost ofRs. 13.23 lacs for Cleaning and Maintenance of 68 nos. rain Water Harvesting System in NSEZ. Review of ongoing Projects awarded to NBCC: Progress report in respect of ongoing projects awarded to NBCC was placed before the Authority. The Authority reviewed the projects one by one and after due deliberations, expressed the satisfaction over progress made in the implementation of projects. Nsry Page l9 of20 18.

dk-sr lqclq 3Trfr6 ql-* qrfu6{ur, dtr'sr .o6.2ote d g-o-t 11:30 {i 3TrdtBd dt('sr fua}q sltr-6 Ef-d qrfuo-rq 6r d-o-o or fraia zo o.r{-{d 19. Review of on-going projects arvarded to NPCC. Progress report in respect of ongoing projects awarded to NPCC was placed before the Authority. The Authority reviewed the projects one by one and after due deliberations, expressed the satisfaction over progress made in the implementation of projects. Meeting ended with vote of thanks to the ch (S.S. Jt. Development Commissioner Chairman & CEO Page 20 of20