IN FORCE SEZ / EOU / FTWZ

23-12-19 को आयोजित एनएसईजेड प्राधिकरण बैठक के मिनट

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

| | | || | | | | | | |

atvst fasts aifiar ate oiftraor, atest @ frais 23.12.2019 HY AST 12:00 ar Hara attest faery ares ats oT A doen ar rege | Minutes of NSEZ Authority meeting held on 23.12.2019 at_12:00 Noon in the Conference hall of Service Centre, NSEZ under the Chairmanship of Dr. L.B. Singhal, Chairman & CEO, NSEZ Authority.

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ) ----- End of picture text -----

The following Members of the Authority were present.

Shri S.S. Shukla, Jt. Development Commissioner, NSEZ 2. Sh. Amit Mehra, Chief Managing Director, M/s Medico Electrodes International Ltd.
Sh. Puneet Kapoor, Partner, M/s. APK Identification (A special Invitee from trade members)

Besides, during the meeting Md. Salik Parwaiz, Jt. Commissioner (Customs), NSEZ, Shri Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner, NSEZ, Shri R. P. Verma, Secretary, NSEZ Authority, Shri Ajay Kumar Mishra, Sr. Account Officer, NSEZ and Sh. Rajeev Sharma, FCA, M/s. Rajeev Sharma & Associates were also present to assist the Authority.

At the outset, the Chairman & CEO, NSEZA welcomed the participants and after brief introduction, each item included in the agenda were taken up for deliberations one by one.

The Gist of discussion/decision is given below:

1. fRerre 01.10.2019 at aratiora ativan ete anit ata iar Ht dow & Higa Hl Wear: NSEZ Authority was informed that no reference was received against any of decisions taken in its meeting held on 01.10.2019. Accordingly, the Minutes of meeting held on 01.10.2019 were ratified. Further, NSEZ Authority reviewed the compliance of decisions taken in its meeting held on 01.10.2019 in terms of subRule 14 of Rule 10 of SEZ Authority Rules, 2009 and expressed satisfaction over progress made in implementation of decisions taken by the Authority in its meeting held on 01.10.2019. 2. VaouMesoase A WoiTelt hy om a

2.1 It was mentioned that NSEZA was informed in its meeting held on 01.10.2019 that M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) vide their letter dated 30.04.2019 had informed that BECIL is mandated by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India to undertake and execute such projects i.e. Supply and Installation of Integrated Security & Surveillance System for government agencies across the country. It was also informed that they had_requested to allow to conduct a survey of this office premises to understand the requirement and propose state-of-art solution. Accordingly, vide this office letter dated 14.05.2019, M/s Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) was accordingly advised to conduct a survey and submit the estimated cost for supply and installation of integrated security & surveillance system in NSEZ, Noida for further examination.

ited (BECIL) was accordingly advised to conduct a survey and submit the estimated cost for supply and installation of integrated security & surveillance system in NSEZ, Noida for further examination. 2.2 M/s Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) had submitted the following estimates/documents for Supply and Installation of Integrated Security & Surveillance System in NSEZ after conducting a survey in NSEZ:-

i. Estimate of Rs. 6,31,56,936/- for Network Video Recorder (NVR) based Solution. Details of estimate are given below:-
- 1. BOQ for NVR based solution as per requirement of this office with estimate of Rs. 3,02,53,326/for 126 Cameras.
- 1. Optional-
  - i) 2 Ton Industrial Grade AC for Control Room with estimate of Rs. 4,79,509/ii) Comprehensive Annual Maintenance Cost for 4 years with estimate of Rs. 1,60,18,901/iii) Skilled Manpower with estimate of Rs. 1,64,05,200/-

ii. Estimate of Rs. 10,20,42,421/- for Solution as per the guidelines by MHA. Details of estimate are given below:Ne

Page 1 of 10

atest fasts anfitr ata ofrecer, atvst feetia 23.12.2019 HY ATSe 12:00 Tat Haier atest fate aries ata wrieencor AT dow or HH

BOQ as per guidelines of MHA with estimate of Rs. 5,22,06,212/- for 134 Cameras.

1. Optional:-
- i) Comprehensive Annual Maintenance Cost for 4 years with estimate of Rs. 2,76,69,292/-
- ii) Skilled Manpower with estimate of Rs. 1,64,05,200/-

iii) Redundancy/Failover Solutions with estimate of Rs. 57,61,718/-

iii, Unpriced BOQ-Optional/Additional locations as per MHA Guidelines. iv. Recommendations to enhance the security of the premises. vy. Systems minimum specifications as per MHA Guidelines. 2.3 The Authority was further informed that estimates for the purpose were also called for from M/s NBCC India Ltd. Accordingly, they have also submitted estimate. The estimated cost submitted by M/s NPCC Ltd. for installation of 126 nos. CCTV Camera was Rs. 3,35,51,312/- and M/s NBCC had quoted Rs. 3,24,53,003/-

ccordingly, they have also submitted estimate. The estimated cost submitted by M/s NPCC Ltd. for installation of 126 nos. CCTV Camera was Rs. 3,35,51,312/- and M/s NBCC had quoted Rs. 3,24,53,003/-

2.4 As per the set procedure the matter was placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of Shri Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner, NSEZ, Shri. Salik Parwaiz, Joint Commissioner (Customs), NSEZ and Shri. Puneet Kapoor, Partner, M/s. APK Identification, NSEZ, Noida, Trade member on 19.08.2019 for examination of the proposal and recommendations. 2.5 The Committee observed that BECIL is an empanelled agency by MHA for the purpose of installing CCTV system in Govt. buildings. Also they have sufficient domain knowledge towards installation of CCTV systems, as may be seen from their past records whereas other two PSUs viz M/s NPCC Ltd. & M/s NBCC India Ltd. do not have much experience in the relevant field and also they have not been empanelled by MHA for the purpose. The Committee considering pros and cons and having regard to experience & expertise of M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) recommended that their proposal which is as per MHA Guidelines may be placed before NSEZA in its next meeting for consideration along with details of estimates submitted by M/s NBCC India Ltd. and M/s NPCC Ltd. also. The Committee had also recommended that before considering the proposal, M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) may be called for presentation before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting.

tee had also recommended that before considering the proposal, M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) may be called for presentation before NSEZ Authority in its next meeting.

2.6 In view of above, all the three estimates along with recommendations of the committee as mentioned above were placed before Authority in its meeting held on 01.10.2019 for appropriate decision. 2.7 M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) had madea presentation before the Authority and explained all components to be installed, way of installation, modus operandi for | maintenance and utility of surveillance system. | 2.8 Sh. Alok Mukherjee, one of the Authority members had suggested that storage capacity should be | availed through cloud storage (on-line storage) instead of installation of server etc. which will reduce the | cost of project also drastically. He also suggested that basic need be assessed again properly. | 2.9 The Authority decided to include Sh. Alok Mukherjee also in the Committee headed by Jt. : Development Commissioner to examine the proposal again and decide exact scope of work. After finalization of ‘Scope of Work’, the proposal may again be placed before the Authority with the recommendation of the committee for decision. The procedure to engage the agency on nomination basis may also be examined in the light of proviso of GFR. 2.10 The matter was again placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ on 09.12.2019 for further examination and recommendations. During the meeting all members of Committee were present except Sh.

.10 The matter was again placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ on 09.12.2019 for further examination and recommendations. During the meeting all members of Committee were present except Sh. Alok Mukherjee who could not attend meeting due to his another business meeting at | Bhuvneshwar. The representative of M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) had

2.10 The matter was again placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ on 09.12.2019 for further examination and recommendations. During the meeting all members of Committee were present except Sh. Alok Mukherjee who could not attend meeting due to his another business meeting at Bhuvneshwar. The representative of M/s. Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (BECIL) had

==> picture [18 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Yo ----- End of picture text -----

Page 2 of 10

atest fasts anit ata wiftrarr, atest © iaaiiz 23.12.2019 FratTRT 12:00 TY HeNfara ater Fete are ats oni Mt dow aT erga

informed that the capacity of cloud storage is limited and cloud storage is expensive in compression to normal storage. The cloud storage required high speed internet.

2.11. The recommendations of the Committee were as under:-
i. In view of above stated facts the Committee recommended that we may go in NVR based Solution as mentioned at proposal no. 1 with AMC for one year also without work force. The work force may be deputed from Security agency already engaged by NSEZA.
ii. Committee also recommended to invite EOIs and bids for lump sum charges from all 6 agencies nominated by Ministry of Home Affairs for scope of work as specified for NVR based Solution.
2.12 The above proposal along with the recommendations of the committee as mentioned above was placed before Authority for appropriate decision.

fareter:- The Authority discussed the matter in details and after due deliberations decided to include Sh. Amit Mehra also in the Committee headed by Joint Development Commissioner, NSEZ to examine the proposal again and decide complete ‘Scope of Work’ along with make & specification of items/Cameras and infrastructure required/mandatory for operationalization of CCTV system. After finalization of complete ‘Scope of Work’, the proposal may again be placed before the Authority with the recommendation of the committee for decision. 3.

for operationalization of CCTV system. After finalization of complete ‘Scope of Work’, the proposal may again be placed before the Authority with the recommendation of the committee for decision. 3. vadiowv, at, ot BS, F, &, Ua, Ca sare, Wa sore Wa Bar He A AA Hay A Brae STAT aoe Fq WHA H Ede A | 3.1 It is submitted that based on technical report of M/s NBCC Services Ltd. regarding fire system installed in above SDF Blocks this office vide letter dated 27.08.2019, M/s WAPCOS Ltd. had requested to submit estimate for replacement of following firefighting equipments installed at SDF A, B, C, D, E, J, K, L, M, Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ. Details of equipments are as under:|TH [Foti[ReplacementReplacement ofofringetic!Hose line reel complete—__——~—~=«d set with||| 82 STO nos. meter | ServiceA, B,ska C, Cente D,Sanie E, J, K, Trading Cae avi. iReplacement of Hydrant Box 57 nos. A, B, C, D, E, J, K, L & vil | Replacement of Hydrant valve ——*|T0mos | ix | Painting ofall firefighting ystem | —s| Sd x. [Refling of fre extinguisher _——«d(S3nos | 3.2 M/s WAPCOS WAPCOS Ltd. vide their letter dated 30.10.2019 has submitted the estimate for replacement replacement of firefighting equipments installed at SDF A, B, C, D, E, J, K, L, M , Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ. Details of estimate estimate submitted by M/s WAPCOS Ltd. are as under:C, D, E, J, K, L, M , Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ

B, C, D, E, J, K, L, M , Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ. Details of estimate estimate submitted by M/s WAPCOS Ltd. are as under:C, D, E, J, K, L, M , Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ

3.2 M/s WAPCOS WAPCOS Ltd. vide their letter dated 30.10.2019 has submitted the estimate for replacement replacement of firefighting equipments installed at SDF A, B, C, D, E, J, K, L, M , Trading Block and Service Center, NSEZ. Details of estimate estimate submitted by M/s WAPCOS Ltd. are as under:-

==> picture [32 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- gee ----- End of picture text -----

Page 3 of 10

attest fasts sift ata onftrnxor, atvst feetiee 23.12.2019HY TST 12:00 FA Haare atest fasts ale ets wre A dow ar eG

3.3 The above proposal was placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ and comprising of Shri Nitin Gupta, Dy. Development Commissioner, NSEZ, Shri. Salik Parwaiz, Joint Commissioner (Customs), NSEZ and Shri. Puneet Kapoor, Partner, M/s. APK Identification, NSEZ, Noida, Trade member on 09.12.2019 for examination and suitable recommendations.

3.4 The Committee observed that the facts regarding warrantee etc. should be checked along with their year of installations and thereafter the same may be placed before Authority with full facts.

3.5 The Authority was informed that the concerned files were checked and it was observed that equipment in SDF A, B, C, D blocks were installed in 2005-06 and in J, K, L & Trading Block were installed in 2007-08. Items as mentioned from S. No. (i) to (ix) are essential to make the system functional. The proposal is only to replace the broken/worn out items not the entire system. 3.6 The proposal for replacement of firefighting equipment was placed before the Authority for approval.

fatla:- The Authority discussed the proposal in details and after due deliberations approved the estimate of

Rs.45,78,968/- for replacement of aforesaid firefighting equipment through M/s WAPCOS Ltd.

4, Vasien soln wH, of, va ve 31s, vavasas & adietaror art tq sfehac ware hr edie UraeeF |

4.1 It is submitted that the work for Renovation of SDF Blocks F,G,H & I at NSEZ, Noida was awarded to M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. vide this office letter dated 30.10.2018 at estimated cost of Rs. 19,80,36,379/-. M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. vide their letter dated 13.05.2019 awarded the work to M/s. S.K. Builders at cost of Rs. 13,13,90,988/-.

4.2 M/s. NBCC (India) Ltd. vide its letter No. NBCC/SBG/N&U/AGM/NSEZ/2019/556 dated 26.09.2019 has submitted that Aluminium for ACP base frame was left out in the provisional estimate. Then a team comprising Sh. Nitin Gupta, DDC, Sh. R. P. Verma, Secretary and Sh. Puneet Kapoor, Trade Member visited for site inspection on 13.09.2019 and suggested that following items are necessary to complete the renovation work. The provisional estimate by NBCC of proposed extra items is Rs. 1,41,56,135/- (including all charges). Brief details of additional items are as under:-

i. Mumty Door — 56 sq. meters
ii. Float glass panes 5.5mm — 2000 sq. meters
iii, Water Tank — 480000 litres (24 tanks in each block) iv. Gun Metal Gate Valve 25mm — 320 nos. v. 25mm CPVC Pipe — 1920 meter
vi. 50mm CPVC Pipe -1100 meter
vii. Fire Door — 45.77 sq. meters
viii. | Guniting — 9200 sq. feet ix. 25mm Nipple — 320 nos.

al Gate Valve 25mm — 320 nos. v. 25mm CPVC Pipe — 1920 meter

vi. 50mm CPVC Pipe -1100 meter
vii. Fire Door — 45.77 sq. meters
viii. | Guniting — 9200 sq. feet ix. 25mm Nipple — 320 nos.

4.3 M/s NBCC India Ltd. in addition to above ix items submitted estimate for Aluminium for ACP base frame also— 20000 kgs (M/s NBCC has claimed that its cost was inadvertently left to be taken in account where submitting estimate). M/s NBCC India Ltd. further clarified vide their letter dated 17.12.2019 that all the items mentioned above are as per the decision taken during the visit of committee members on 13.09.2019, except Aluminum for the base frame ACP costing Rs. 53,99,750/-. Regarding Aluminum for base frame of ACP, they have clarified that that the item considered on original sanctioned item rate estimate for ACP is as per DSR 2016. They have mentioned that the Aluminum for ACP base frame was not considered in estimate and shall have to be paid extra and analysis for the same is also

a

Page 4 of 10

| | | | |

aitver fasts anfite ata oiftracor, atest @ feaiie 23.12.2019 araver 12:00 a Hrahfara attest fares ante ata wear Mt dow ar arga

submitted. NBCC requested to give the administrative approval for the same so that the work should be completed in time.

4.4 In view of above, matter was placed before the Committee headed by JDC, NSEZ for examination of the extra items and recommendations.

4.5 The Committee after due deliberations recommended that additional items as mentioned above except Aluminium for ACP base frame be placed before NSEZA for consideration. Regarding Aluminium for ACP base frame the committee recommended that the same may be examined separately on receipt of appropriate reason/justification from NBCC.

4.6 The proposal along with recommendations of the Committee was placed before the Authority for appropriate decision.

faretat:- The Authority discussed the proposal in details and noted that all items except s. no. (ii) above are in accordance with the advice of the committee as mentioned in para 4.2 above. Mr. Nagarajan, Project Manager, M/s NBCC India Ltd., present in the meeting explained that Aluminium for ACP base frame was left to be included in BOQ inadvertently. The Authority after due deliberations approved the cost of additional items mentioned in para 4.2 above subject to condition that the same will examined on the basis of detailed estimate submitted by M/s NBCC India Ltd. to this office viz-a-viz tender notice actually issued by it. Regarding Aluminum for base frame of ACP, the Authority granted in-principle approval.

detailed estimate submitted by M/s NBCC India Ltd. to this office viz-a-viz tender notice actually issued by it. Regarding Aluminum for base frame of ACP, the Authority granted in-principle approval. If it is found that the same was mentioned in estimate submitted to NSEZ but to be inadvertently left to be included in the tender notice issued by M/s NBCC India Ltd. and M/s NBCC India Ltd. submit documentary evidence that Aluminium for ACP base frame was actually required and brought inside the zone, sanction against this item may also be issued. Final position in this regard will be informed to Authority in its next meeting.

seus a fafa sana or Scone A awe ste aol sas gan Beqt store Ui Ta Are Fa Waa dial Maia ae H UFaetr F | 5.1 Ue Wed fren otra & fh Sa Halos CANT Seg Isl SHIGA H sas A ela SANT At §- areret fr ufar Aas wavaeeh feiaes Sant sarisAr ome S | Has Tava ferfaes FART aratfara S-sfrerat ofan F Meer Slat Ae SHS TANT GET arora UT TAT Het UFIee H AT VACHE oHaes St SEAS F sae Hel S EAA Hsreet feted SeUN g - “Bidders are also advised to contact NSEZfor the complete payment schedule. The successful buyer has to adhere payment schedule provided by NSEZ. MSTC shall not be accountable for the payment to be deposited with NSEZ authority once e-auction is closed.

ete payment schedule. The successful buyer has to adhere payment schedule provided by NSEZ. MSTC shall not be accountable for the payment to be deposited with NSEZ authority once e-auction is closed. The onus for handing over the plots to the successful bidder shall lie solely with NSEZ.” 5.2 SHA HSA UL Hh HATA WAT schedule attvsr favre snfeien ata wifelenxoT aAt FTN AATF | UE HATATWie H FAT Successful Buyer Hl UH ATS HT AAA Sas | olfehet Ue BuyerWAS Fale Ar AUaT ALA TEATS , AT BATA MH HeHleat A aa gale Ar sa ead a sary sch F fer Buyer GANT CASH %12HXHAT SreTT] 5.3 efes Ha Aare Ue SATS aX UT Ha eH UTeeHLOT A feat a dow A cal agi Al ag F SAAT ter 5.1 AF sfeataa wed & Hee od UH TU Ware SAS IAM GT Aaa & Ale Successful Buyer VAST IST H HATA TE TAT MT a aT A Ha aNl SIA F AM THAgaR sel ferdeet Ye Page 5 of10

alvst fasts afte ata witracor, ater

feotich 23.12.2019 AY SITET 12:00 gat Branfsta atest fasts arisen ats oiernoT At dow ar erg

|
AXA AA HAAG Hl justify HAT SF at Asay, atvsr fats snfeen ats wrfrpwoTy 12 Wie SATs |x Ue TAAgaRe & AeA g | ferotey: oe af SNe WETS OK faea Tal Hr cen eater Wee ISAS FeTraTi. Successful Buyer HT WEGUt aoa MeN STAT aHXet Se 30 feet ar sare fea oT |
ii, Ue Successful Buyer ATTA Get STAT Hier ed 30 feat o& aifaitect aaagqeley aT ferdeet XA B, aT SS Vay a A Hatet 30 Heit aH a HHA 60 feat cH AY Haale arena TR OF 12 WA SATA) a AAT SAAT Hor HT seers SSat cane at sr WHA F |
iii. Uf Successful Buyer sara sree BAS Hare F, aeqUt ATTA So SAT HLeT A AHS Ve &, al SAH SANT AAT HY aS EMD Tet Set HT a svat aan $-fafaer ferret Aloft STahy|

r HT seers SSat cane at sr WHA F |

iii. Uf Successful Buyer sara sree BAS Hare F, aeqUt ATTA So SAT HLeT A AHS Ve &, al SAH SANT AAT HY aS EMD Tet Set HT a svat aan $-fafaer ferret Aloft STahy|

WAHT of SWFA Tce Meat Aas vavaeel fads s-afaar axalast a sh UPA HA wT faéersf fear |

Aud seen Borsa eera siesar wi. feesHl cole AAT 10, 11,57& A aa 57 HY VaoupososgeH Hey saeae 371.20 astaley awe Hl Meet & Uedet Fi |

6.1 Ug eda Pear oie & fe Aas Hseu Borge facera gsiesar ur fees Hi cole HAT 10, 11, 57 T&F AM STH WatoUAosoasoHrafea ¢ | faaxnr faraifofaa B-

SHS TS HAAS Hl Alda fear ar fe atest HHT af Colle AAT 10 Ud cone HEAT 57A, B,C, 11 Saar Hy Fate la ANTST TAIATOT BH TT Pe 19.09.2019 SANT Talat He AVS | SHS A Soa Cone eT a EU Rere AHS 371.20 aT HT HaCaT HA Oy Fordaer fev aT |
6.2 38 Grae A ag ala sl fH sa Hares &H oa fetes 16.05.2019 & gare atvsr wrfeaner at Raat Cale Teast A Ag HATA FAA AAT AT fH VaToUMeSoase H thal & faery H Bre 2.5 Fler aisr spews er sit Ha1 Ud bell & fare & ae Urey we aa | Rea spavs We a at HS ala dee F aM His eT Gish aaa, 3a fH ase, frat & ar, we Fr oTsy, afore, sie: att fanaa aet Mr aS F | BE UTH HBT A at pata a él 8 | Sa spas araftat at andita ae A se arate at ars aroha b | see ga aE AA PI PATA AST MIAO ART Tale SA S A WEALAT AAT ATELT COT ST HoTATCT MTA ALOT F Wc fran area fara SH ate AT Gre afar Ht aeaieuad saisar Ht 3diea ae Soave Fear ST |
6.3 SHiFA HT ACS TAT Ta FT attest oTfeHTTT apr Tae Fea a few Sa SHS a TATA TAS Tate PLY Ue SHTS GANT STAT FHA TY TAMA AFM HT Hepat HY Cae SI MEA iA AT ag ar |

saisar Ht 3diea ae Soave Fear ST |

6.3 SHiFA HT ACS TAT Ta FT attest oTfeHTTT apr Tae Fea a few Sa SHS a TATA TAS Tate PLY Ue SHTS GANT STAT FHA TY TAMA AFM HT Hepat HY Cae SI MEA iA AT ag ar |
6.4 sides Bafa a Ue sit cer fe acdareat A Hrarers qant fer sit seavs opr Ta Hla ces aTST HAT A VET F | hae $-fidar a area S spaus strait fed a xe &, fora Rare Tey freak sq atest wifey eaNT ees Page 6 of 10

| , | |

atest fasts arfia ata wftracor, atest @ pecig 23.12.2019er atoER 12:00 aH Banat atest faetw anit ats on At dow ar aria fereifter srdcet Yow Ht UeAfole Pa Sar F | SA WARFH, CANT TEA S7A, Ba 11 d Hey Feta 139.75 aat Flo HAH BT TAT SH HAT SANT atic 28.06.2005 a fear sear at TA VG 231.45 a Fito aan & dal awn & vere sas Aad seu Borsa Rieecea sfesar or. feAes ar ardiect F Het: AE spaus Pret sea sang owt arate at favar ot Aha F HN Sa BIS HY NSEZ CaN feetstort alae fore valet a aft tet AAT SH TET 8] Sta: S-fafaer araifla Hen caagihta aT eT] He: SHI S Het 371.20 aeaer AaHeT WL Bdcet Yow, sacar fay A atest wriereneoy Gar fereiXet ax fo NSEZA a Fale | forar $, F Aret Pa ST Hepa F | ACARI, SHS AF HaCaT oH 224,92,608/-, TAT WHY %53,453/-, WaT | FATEYGT Teer PWT Z15,590/- Ve THAT Geer ATA F3,25,857/- HAT PUASFA HAH 371.20 aeeer Hl Heal of FAT F | 6.5 Sa MTT Be Here TEA FAT STAT | faore:- Wie Ft Aas Hera asa cera siesar ow. fatAat ve e HEATs 10, 11, 57U & Maar57 H, VaoUPoSosse H HCY SHLAA 371.20 Talaex AHS H BHadeet Hr Hepa HAT]

FAT F | 6.5 Sa MTT Be Here TEA FAT STAT | faore:- Wie Ft Aas Hera asa cera siesar ow. fatAat ve e HEATs 10, 11, 57U & Maar57 H, VaoUPoSosse H HCY SHLAA 371.20 Talaex AHS H BHadeet Hr Hepa HAT]

Permission for sharing of space with the original allottee: 71 It was submitted that NSEZ Authority had been allowing sharing permission to valid LOA holders on the decision taken by Authority in its various meetings. Gist of decisions are given below:-

i) In the meeting held on 30.09.2010, Authority decided as under“It was noted by the Authority that Plot holders who have constructed building on the plot often request the office of CEO to allow sharing of another LOA holder to carry out operations in their premises as they have spare space. Plot/building holders charge rentals from the tenant as per their mutual understanding but do not pay to the Authority. They pay normal lease rentals as fixed for original allottee. Authority decided to charge lease rentals from the original allottee@ 1.5 times of the normal lease rent in case original allottee sub-let their premises till validity ofsharing permission’.

ii) In the meeting held on 03.01.2013, Authority decided as under:-

ottee@ 1.5 times of the normal lease rent in case original allottee sub-let their premises till validity ofsharing permission’.

ii) In the meeting held on 03.01.2013, Authority decided as under:-

“Authority was of the view that sharing should be allowed only to the sister concern of the allottee up to the 25% of the built up space. The request of the units those are not working and want to sublet the building should not be permitted and permission granted earlier to such units be reviewed. Authority empowered CEO to take appropriate action against non-functional units and other than sister concern.”

iii) In the meeting held on 30.07.2013, Authority decided as under-

“Several permissions to share the premises allotted to one LOA holder with another LOA holder have been given in the past. Many units are working on sharing basis and such permissions have been granted on year to year basis. Many cases are now coming up for renewal and as these units are working. The permission to share space cannot be denied as it would lead to forced exit. Thus a systematic phasing out is required. It was explained that the sharing permissions given in the past can be divided into three categories:-

a) Aunit having multiple LOAs and units under the same management/group. b) The units which are functioning and have surplus space. To utilize the space optimally the permission has been given to some other valid LOA holder units to share the space.
c) The units which are not functioning or are poorly performing and have rented out their space for income. The committee decided that in the first case, there should be no objection as this
allows the expansion of business and export and is not amounting to sub-leasing and renting ofthe premises.

Page 7 of 10

==> picture [552 x 529] intentionally omitted <==

jection as this

allows the expansion of business and export and is not amounting to sub-leasing and renting ofthe premises.

Page 7 of 10

==> picture [552 x 529] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- atest faets anttte ata orftrarcor, atver | festa 23.12.2019wT SITS 12:00 ar sTANSre atvsr fasts anew ats orto Ht dow ar aig In the second category, though both the units are performing this should be phased out and the functioning sharing units be encouraged to move out to the space allotted in their name. In the third case, such units are primarily using the space of NSEZ for rental purposes. All such cases should be reviewed and appropriate action be taken to stop the practice including denial ofanyfurther extension.” iv) In the meeting held on 23.06.2016, Authority decided as under:- Different situations for sharing/transfer/re-allotment ofSDF was explained before the Authority as per agenda. After due deliberation, NSEZ Authority, approved the following guidelines to be | ollowed with prospective effect:- i) | Unit has been allotted SDF(s) in the Zone to | Such request shall not be considered implement an LOA issued to it but has not | and unit will have mandatorily to commenced commercial activity.

Unit has been allotted SDF(s) in the Zone to | Such request shall not be considered implement an LOA issued to it but has not | and unit will have mandatorily to commenced commercial activity. If such unit | surrender the SDF to NSEZ Authority. makes application for exit and requests for transfer of SDF allotted to it to some other | unit having a valid LOA holder. | ii) | Unit has been allotted SDF(s) and has | Such request shall not be considered. commenced commercial production but has | Unit will have to surrender the SDF to | now applied to exit from NSEZ and requests |NSEZ Authority. | for transfer the SDF to its sister concern : which has agreed to take over their | assets/liabilities. | iii) | Unitits requirementwas allottedat morethe timethanofone settingSDFup.as perThe || Requestwill be treatedmay be asconsideredsharing bybutsisterthis unit is working unit but due to recession or | concern and may be permitted subject : lack ofrequirement or other reasons, wants to | to payment of lease rent @125% of transfer one/more SDF(s) to its sister | normal rentfor shared area. concern. iv) | Sharing of the same SDF by sister concern. May be permitted subject to payment of lease rent @125% of normal rent for shared area and also sharing with not more than one unit may be allowed. ----- End of picture text -----

7.2 In the meeting held on 14.01.2019, Authority decided as under:-

t for shared area and also sharing with not more than one unit may be allowed. ----- End of picture text -----

7.2 In the meeting held on 14.01.2019, Authority decided as under:-

“The Authority, after due deliberations, considering the investment made by the unit and Export | performance of said unit decided to extend the validity of sharing permission for one year or | acceptance ofrecommendation of the Committee whichever is earlier.”

|| |

73 No decision from DOC has been received so far. The sharing permissions granted to units have expired and requests have been received for renewal of sharing permissions. 74 In view of above, it was placed before NSEZ Authority to take a view on extension of sharing permission.

ferefa:- The Authority, after due deliberations, considering the investment already made by the sharing units and their Export performances decided to extend the validity of sharing permission for one more year or acceptance of recommendation of the Committee whichever is earlier.

Page 8 of 10

8. Establishment of Disaster Management Risk Reduction System in Noida Special Economic Zone:

8.1 The Authority was informed that a meeting was held on 16.07.2018 with Sh. Roshan Singh Aswal, Second-In-Command, National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) to discuss the issue of implementation of Disaster Management Risk Reduction System, its modalities and in order to work out basic infrastructure requirement for Disaster Management Risk Reduction System in NSEZ, Noida. 8.2 The Authority further informed that a meeting was again held with NDRF on 30.09.2019 which was attended by Sh. K.K. Singh, Deputy Inspector General, NDRF and Sh. Surender Singh, Dy. Commandant, NDRF. During the meeting it was informed by Sh. Surender Singh, Dy. Commandant, NDRF that a Disaster Management Centre for G.B. Nagar has already been approved by Competent Authority of NDRF and they are endeavoring to set up the same in G.B. Nagar, if place and conditions are suitable to NDRF, they can establish the Disaster Management Center in NSEZ. 8.3 Deputy Inspector General & Dy. Commandant along with Secretary, NSEZ visited the zone complex and they were showna built up area measuring 700 sq. mtrs. on first floor of Facilitation Centre. The area of staff quarters, parking places etc. were also shown to the said officers. They desired to send a proposal to Headquarter, NDRF to take further view to set up the Disaster Management Centre.

e area of staff quarters, parking places etc. were also shown to the said officers. They desired to send a proposal to Headquarter, NDRF to take further view to set up the Disaster Management Centre. 8.4 It was informed to NDRF vide this office letter dated 16.10.2019 that as per prevailing rates NSEZ Authority provides the space/staff quarter on the following charges:-

a. Allotment fee @ Rs. 1750/- per sq. mtr. (non-refundable) is levied as one time charge. _ b. Security money (refundable) equivalent to one year lease rent. c. Lease rent @Rs. 2000/- per sq. mtr. is charged and is to be paid in advance on quarterly basis. Lease rent is revised every year at the rate as decided by the Authority but not more than 10%.
d. Anamount of Rs. 24/- per sq. mtr. per annum is charged as maintenance charges. e. Anamount of @ Rs. 2,260/- per quarter is charged as water charges. f. Staff quarter is allotted on the eligibility criteria as prescribed by Central Govt. on payment/deduction of licence fee/HRA/Water charges.

@ Rs. 2,260/- per quarter is charged as water charges. f. Staff quarter is allotted on the eligibility criteria as prescribed by Central Govt. on payment/deduction of licence fee/HRA/Water charges.

8.5 Now, Shri Surendra Singh, Dy. Commandant, NDRF vide its letter dated 20.12.2019 has submitted that NDRF is constituted by the Govt. of India for the purpose of saving human lives and to provide relief in case of natural as well as manmade Disaster. NDRF RRC at Noida will provide help to the public as well as industries of surrounding area during said situations and would be beneficial for citizens of the area. 8.6 In this regard, they have requested to provide the proposed built up accommodation for NDRF, RRC at free of cost. Whereas the electricity & water charges will be borne by NDRF as well as the license fee,individuals. water haregs/TIRA eke: will also be deducted if the said quarters will be utilized for the personal use of 8.7 The proposal of NDRF to provide the proposed built up accommodation for NDRF RRC at free of cost was placed before the Authority for appropriate decision.

ll be utilized for the personal use of 8.7 The proposal of NDRF to provide the proposed built up accommodation for NDRF RRC at free of cost was placed before the Authority for appropriate decision.

ferofa:- The Authority discussed the matter in details and after due deliberations, Authority decided to provide the built up area measuring 700 sq. mtrs. on first floor of Facilitation Centre, NSEZ for NDRF, RRC without charging lease rent & maintenance charges. As this office has already allotted a space to BSNL to facilitate SEZ units without lease rent. However, as communicated by NDRF, it will pay for electricity/water charges for office and electricity/water charges and license fee toward staff quarter, if allotted to NDRF personnel as per Govt. of India Rules/guidelines and deduction of HRA from the concerned personnel.

9, tat vaddiet star fies garr A on vst ahatorensit hy altar | Progress report in respect of ongoing projects awarded to NBCC was placed before the Authority. The Authority reviewed the projects one by one and after due deliberations, expressed the satisfaction over progress made in the implementation ofmarsNPCC Ltd. requested to grant extension cftime up to ra

Page 9 of 10

attest fasts aifter ata oiftrneur, atest eater 23.12.2019 HY AST 12:00 TS se fSra atest fats anit ats wT A dow ar orig

| 20.01.2020 in respect of repair of boundary wall of Jewellery Complex & beautification of area from gate no. | to staff quarters and up to 06.01.2020 in respect of installation of High Mast pole for flag at gate no. 1, NSEZ. Authority agreed for extension in view of NGT orders/ban on construction subject to submission of written request of M/s NPCC Ltd. .

10. Aad verteieh fetes gare ht Sr et TRatstrerait Ht walter |

| Progress report in respect of ongoing projects awarded to NPCC was placed before the Authority. The | Authority reviewed the projects one by one and after due deliberations, expressed the satisfaction over progress made in the implementation of projects.

| 11. tad areata fortes cart at ar Tel Barat & vate Hr afew | | Progress report in respect of services provided by M/s WAPCOS Ltd. was placed before the Authority. The | Authority directed the representative of M/s WAPCOS Ltd. to ensure the payment of wages, EPF & ESIC | contribution to engaged work force by 7" of every month and submit the report of the same on 8" of every | month.

HEARTHT TUT AT Oe TAHT BS

==> picture [98 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (THUS Ur) daed face syed ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [84 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Glo war, at. tien aeaarvd Bsa ----- End of picture text -----

Page 10 of 10

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 4934 --apply.