← Archive
IN FORCE SEZ / EOU / FTWZ

Minutes of the 42nd meeting of Approval Committee

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

Minutes of the 42"¢ meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kumar, IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ.

Following were present:

==> picture [315 x 129] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Shri Upendra Vasishth Jt. Development Co<br>Shri C.J. Maniar Addl. Commissione<br>Shri D.N. Zinzuwadia JCI&GM,DIC |<br>. |<br>(1) Director (Banking) |<br>(2) Jt. DGFT }<br>(3) Addl. Commissioner (Cus) |<br>(4) Asstt. Collector/SDM |<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Absent:

42.1 Review/confirmation of the minutes of last meeting of the Approval Committee:

Minutes of the last meeting of the Approval Committee were confirmed.

42.2. Action Taken Report:-

42.2.1 M/s. SOI Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd — Committee noted that rejection letter had been issued to the applicant. |

| |

42.3.1 M/s. Link Enterprises, Gandhidham

TheOil, proposalLDO, HSD, of M/s.Engine LinkSpares Enterprisesfor ships, forIron settingropes, up aropes unit inof KASEjute/plastics| tradingwas deferred of Furnacein the | Approval Committee meeting held on 6/10/2010 as Addl. Commiss oner, Kandla Customs wanted to confirm the status of unit in the wake of number of SCNs issued to the DTA unit. Addl. Commissioner, Kandla Customs was requested on 28//12/2010 to confirm the status of the unit, so that a decision could be taken in the Approval Committee, However, since no reply was received and Addl. Commissioner, Kandla Customs was not present in the Approval Committee meeting held on 5/1/2011, the proposal was agai deferred on that day. | Committee noted that the proposal was deferred in the last Approval bomattics meetings wherein the Addl. Commissioner (Customs), Kandla was not present. this was done in the | light of some query raised by the Additional Commissioner (Custo s), Kandla that there were quite a number of SCNs issued and some were adjudicated an their track record was not proper _ Page 1 of 6 | |

Minutes of the 42" meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kumar, IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ.

It was brought before the Committee that vide letter dated 12/1/2011 e Addl. Commissioner (Customs), Kandla had informed that there were 6 SCNs issued to /s| Link Enterprises for recovery of duty on balance quantity of bulk liquid cargo, which w rahe cleared from the warehouse within stipulated period under the Customs Act. All the said SCNs were adjudicated and confirmed the duty. Aggrieved by the said O-I-O, the importer preferred appeal with the Commissioner (Appeals), who had remanded the case back to original adjudicating authority for de-novo adjudication and the same was stil pending with the Custom House. Further, he had informed that the track record of the party in general, was good.

Considering the above letter of Addl. Commissioner (Customs), ‘Kandla, Committee reconsidered the proposal and approved it in-principle, subject to a ailability of space for allotment.

(Action: IA-I)

42.3.2 M/s. Agasthya Free Trade Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

|

The 40" Approval Committee held on 22/12/2010 had taken a decision that in the wake of a large number of units having taken warehousing LOA, their performance needed to be watched. Therefore, it had deferred all the warehousing proposals and had asked the DC’s office to prepare a statement of performance of all the warehousin if over six months period. In line with the same, the proposal of M/s. Agasthya Free rade Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. was again deferred in the 41 Approval Committee meeting. | | On these issues, there was a discussion in the Approval Committee uf it was decided that theconsidered proposalson ofmeritsexisting unitsand all other which proposals do not requirefor warehouse any furtherrequiring alloca’ nfad itional of premisesspace may be deferred or kept in abeyance, as decided in the 40" Approval Committee meeting. Therefore, it was decided to put up only such proposals for warehousing for c nsideration in the next Approval Committee meetings that do not require any additional space. | (Action: [A-I) }

Page 2 of 6

Minutes of the 42" meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kumar, IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ. | 42.3.3. Deferred Proposal Proposal | M/s. Real Pack Tech, Gandhidham: |

42.3.3. Deferred Proposal Proposal

M/s. Real Pack Tech, Gandhidham:

Committee noted that the proposal was deferred in the last Approval ommittee meeting. The proposal is to set up a unit for manufacture of stretch cling films, plastic films and all types of plastic bags. The promoter appeared for interview and put forth the following points regarding proposed project for consideration: }

  • » Presently in the business of shipping, logistics-import and export of various products. >» Annual turnover of the group is Rs.25 crore.

  • » Raw materials will be imported (granules).

|

  • » Proposed project cost is Rs.39 lakhs. Value of imported machinery will be Rs.15 lakhs.

  • Project cost will be met from promoters share capital.

  • » Provide employment to 22 persons > Require 2500 sq. mtrs. space.

| | |

Observations/clarification of the Committee:

  • FOB value of exports projected for 5 year period is Rs.1396 lakhs with a NFE of Rs.764 I lakhs. }

  • Import of plastic scrap shall not be allowed. | » Applicant was informed about the shortage of space/premises. | >» Proposal was approved in-principle, subject to availability of space.

(Action: [A-I)

  • 42.4 New Proposals to set up units at KASEZ: 42.4.1 M/s. Zug Bearings Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

| |

The proposal is to set up a unit for manufacture of industrial and a tomobile bearings. The projectpromoter for consideration:-appeared for interview and put forth the following point. regarding proposedee Ga

Page 3 of 6

Minutes of the 42" meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kumar, IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ.

  • » Promoted by a Switzerland based company with 100% foreig » Initially they will import components and undertake assemb and later on they will set up complete manufacturing line.

  • Countries of export are CIS, Brazil, Middle East, etc. >» Raw materials will be imported from China, Taiwan, and Eur » Plant and machinery worth Rs.60 lakhs will be imported from >» At present no intention to sell in domestic market.

  • » Employment 52 persons. > Require 1000 sq. mtrs. space and 500 sq. mtrs. built up area.

Observations/clarifications of the Committee:

investment. activity in KASEZ | | dn Countries. ermany | | | | |

  • » FOB value of exports projected for 5 year period was Rs.8190 lakhs with a NFE of Rs.547 lakhs.

  • » Authorized capital of the promoter company was only Rs. project[cost][was][stated][to][be][Rs.64][lakhs.] 1 ; lakh, whereas their

  • » Applicants were asked to re-work on their capital investmen ofan and also produce income tax returns of all the Directors. Applicant was also asked to give a Board Resolution from the foreign company regarding their commitment for investment. The proposal was deferred.

| (Action: [A-I)

|

42.4.2 M/s. United Drilling Tools Ltd.

Proposal is to set up a unit for manufacture of Casing Pipe with po for oil field application. Mr. Satya Narayan Rai, Director (Commercial) appeared for interview and put forth the following points regarding proposed project for consideratio

  • Already in the same business at Noida, supplying to M/s. Jindal ipes.

  • Got 25 years of experience in the field. | > Major buyers are oil companies abroad and ONGC in India. | > Project cost Rs.470 lakhs, which will be met from Bank reserves.

==> picture [131 x 39] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> borrowings and surplus<br>a<br>|<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Page 4 of 6

Minutes of the 42" meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kuma » IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ. |

» Connectors will be manufactured in SEZ and will export.

be connected with the pipes before | | | | is Rs.186 0 Jakhs Jakhs with a NFE NFE of of pace. (Action: IA-1) | perm ssions issued during I permission isstied to M/s. Pon Pure | Propyl Alcohol Tech Grade. M/s. Shr chakra chakra Udyog Pvt. Ltd. permissi n issued to to M/s. Milak Milak cosmetic. toiletry preparations as } of ew and unrelated items sho Id. be asked to submit the mo Committee for (Action: IA-I) | |

  • Employment 100 persons.

» Space requirement — 10,000 sq. mtrs.

Observations/clarifications of the Committee:

FOB value of exports projected for 5 year period is Rs.186 0 Jakhs Jakhs with a NFE NFE of Rs.8975 lakhs.

» Proposal was approved in-principle, subject to availability of pace.

42.5 | Ratification of Broad banding/change of name perm ssions issued during January. 2011:I 42.5.1 Committee noted and ratified the broad-banding permission isstied to M/s. Pon Pure Chem | (P) Ltd. for undertaking manufacturing activity of Iso Propyl Alcohol Tech Grade. 42.5.2 Committee noted and ratified the change of name of M/s. Shr chakra chakra Udyog Pvt. Ltd. to M/s. Shrichakra Udyog Ltd.

42.5.3 Committee also noted and ratified the broad-banding permissi n issued to to M/s. Milak Milak Warehouse for undertaking manufacturing and packing of cosmetic. toiletry preparations as well as food products. }

42.5.4 Chairman informed that the approvals for manufacturing of ew and unrelated items should not be accorded as broad-banding and the applicants sho Id. be asked to submit considerationseparate applicationsand decision.and the same should be placed before the mo Committee for

Page 5 of 6

| ||

Minutes of the 42" meeting of Approval Committee held on 27/01/2011 at 1130 hrs. at KASEZ, under the Chairmanship of Shri Pravir Kuma » IAS, Development Commissioner, KASEZ.

42.6 General:

|

It was informed to the Committee that a letter had been issued to all the units to submit the copy of PAN & copy of audit report in Form 56F and 56FF prescribed in Income-Tax Rules, 1962, duly certified by Chartered Accountant. This action was at th request of the IncomeTax department for monitoring at their end. |

issued to all the units to submit the

==> picture [164 x 562] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> | —,<br>| (Pravir Kumar)<br>4[_Development Commissioner,KASEZ<br>|<br><br>|<br>I<br>|<br>|<br>}<br>|<br>I<br>|<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [52 x 13] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Page 6 of 6<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 4700 --apply.

Citation copied