06th August, 2024 Approval of Resolution Plan - Kotsons Private Limited [Resolution Plan IA-25-2024 in IB-761(ND)-2022] (710.33 KB)
Resolution Plan IA-25/2024 In IB-761(ND)/2022 Date of Order: 02.08.2024 Page 1 of 17
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
COURT-III, NEW DELHI
Resolution Plan IA-25/2024
In
IB-761(ND)/2022
IN THE MATTER OF IB-761(ND)/2022:
State Bank of India
…… Financial Creditor
VERSUS
M/s. Kotsons Private Limited ……Corporate Debtor
AND IN THE MATTER OF Resolution Plan IA-25/2024:
Under Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1) of IBC, 2016 read with
Regulation 39(4) of IBBI (CIRP Regulations), 2016
Mr. Alok Kaushik
Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor
…… Applicant/Resolution Professional
Pronounced On: 02.08.2024
CORAM:
SHRI BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
SHRI ATUL CHATURVEDI, HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
PRESENT:
For the Applicant/RP
: Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Mr.
Krishan Sharma, Advs. a/w Mr. Alok Kaushik,
Resolution Professional
For the SRA
: Mr. P. Nagesh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akshay Sharma,
Mr. Shourya Aditya, Advs.
ORDER
PER: BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
1.1.
The present application has been filed by Mr. Alok Kaushik, Resolution
Professional (“RP”) of M/s. Kotsons Private Limited (“Corporate
Debtor”) under the provisions of Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1)
of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code” or “IBC”) read
with Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Board of India
Resolution Plan IA-25/2024 In IB-133(ND)/2023 Page 2 of 17
(Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations,
2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) for approval of the Resolution Plan in
respect of M/s. Kotsons Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) submitted
by Respondent/Successful Resolution Applicant (“SRA”) namely M/s.
Bee Pee Electricals.
1.2.
Brief Background of the Case:
i.
An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016 ("IBC") was filed by Financial Creditor i.e., State Bank
of India against the Corporate Debtor i.e., M/s. Kotsons Private
Limited and the said application was admitted by this
Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 09.06.2023 and a
moratorium was declared and Mr. Alok Kaushik was appointed as
an Interim Resolution Professional.
ii.
The Resolution Plan was submitted by the Successful Resolution
Applicant namely M/s. Bee Pee Electricals which was approved by
the CoC in its 14th meeting dated 15.04.2024 (e-voting concluded
on 10.05.2024) by 100% voting share in respect of the CIRP of the
Corporate Debtor after considering its feasibility and viability.
1.3.
Background of the Corporate Debtor:
The Corporate Debtor was incorporated on 22.04.1978, as a Company
Limited
by
Shares
(Non-govt.
Company)
having
CIN:
U31101DL1978PTC191934, under the Companies Act, 1956 with the
Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Authorised
Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor was 12,00,00,000/- and the
Paid-up Share Capital of the Corporate Debtor was Rs. 6,96,72,110/-
The Registered Office Address of the Corporate Debtor was at A-208,
2nd Floor, R. G. City Centre, Plot No. 4, D.D.A Community Centre,
Motia Khan, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055. The Corporate Debtor was
engaged in manufacturing, exporting and repairing and servicing
power and distribution transformers.
2.
Collation of claims by RP
2.1. In terms of Section 13 and Section 15 of the Code, the Applicant/RP
Page 3 of 17
has submitted that the public announcement was published in
newspapers i.e., Financial Express (English Edition) and Jansatta
(Hindi Edition) Delhi, West UP, UK and Rajasthan and Jaipur-Tonk
Sabdesh (Hindi and Rajasthan Edition) on 14.06.2023 in Form-A to
invite the stakeholders for submission of their claims. In terms of
Regulations 6(2)(c) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016, the last date for
submission of claim was specified as 27.06.2023.
2.2. In response to the public announcement (publication of Form-A) made,
the Applicant constituted the Committee of Creditors ("CoC") under
Section 21(1) of the Code read with Regulation 13 & 17 of CIRP
Regulations. The 1st CoC Meeting was convened on 06.07.2023 wherein
the IRP was confirmed as the Resolution Professional (RP) by 100%
votes.
3.
Evaluation and voting
3.1. The 2nd CoC Meeting was convened on 01.08.2023 wherein the CoC
approved the publication of Form-G, Evaluation Matrix, Eligibility
Criteria, Request of RFRP and Performance Security for the Resolution
Applicant. In terms of Section 29 of the Code and Regulation 36 of the
CIRP Regulations, the Applicant prepared and issued Information
Memorandum (IM).
3.2. The 3rd CoC Meeting was convened on 22.08.2023 wherein the
Applicant informed the members of CoC that on the last date for
submissions of EOI, 15 EOI was received from PRAs.
3.3. The 4th CoC Meeting was convened on 22.09.2023 wherein the RP
apprised that as per Regulation 36A CIRP Regulations, the Applicant
issued the Provisional List of PRAs to the Committee of Creditors and
Prospective Resolution Applicant on 29.08.2023 and Applicant also
issued the Information Memorandum, Request for Resolution Plan and
Evaluation Matrix to the Prospective Resolution Applicants on
03.09.2023.
3.4. The 5th CoC Meeting was convened on 10.10.2023 wherein the RP
Page 4 of 17
informed the members of the CoC that a total of 6 Resolution Plans
have been received from the Prospective Resolution Applicants in
sealed envelopes till the last date of submission of Resolution Plans,
i.e. 09.10.2023. The Applicant further apprised that as per Form-G
published on 04.08.2023, the last date of receipt of the Resolution Plan
was 03.10.2023. However, due to various requests received from PRAs,
the last date was extended up to 09.10.2023 with the approval of CoC
member in accordance with Section 30(1) read with Regulation 39(1)
of the CIRP Regulations.
3.5. The 6th CoC Meeting was convened on 06.11.2023. The 7th CoC
Meeting was convened on 24.11.2023 wherein the RP informed the
members of the CoC that 5 PRA's have submitted their draft Resolution
Plans. Further, the Applicant apprised the CoC members that the last
date of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor is 05.12.2023 and the
Resolution Plans received by the Applicant in the CIRP of the Corporate
Debtor are under active consideration of the members of the CoC. After
due deliberation and discussions, the members of the CoC resolved to
seek an extension for a period of 90 days from 06.12.2022 to
04.03.2024 and authorized the Applicant herein to file an appropriate
application before this Adjudicating Authority.
3.6. The 8th CoC Meeting was convened on 11.12.2023 wherein the RP
informed the members of the CoC that all the Resolution Plans
submitted by the Resolution Applicants as per Section 30(1) of the
Code were examined and were in compliance with Section 30(2) of Code
read with Regulation 37, 38 and 39 of CIRP Regulations and RFRP.
Accordingly, this Adjudicating Authority vide Order dated 14.12.2023
was pleased to grant extension and hence CIRP of the Corporate Debtor
was extended by 90 (Ninety) days beyond 05.12.2023 i.e., 180 days.
3.7. The 9th CoC Meeting was convened on 04.01.2024. The 10th CoC
Meeting was convened on 20.01.2024. The 11th CoC Meeting was
convened on 08.02.2024 wherein the Applicant informed the members
of the CoC that the Appeal filed by the Suspended Board of Directors
Page 5 of 17
of the Corporate Debtor before the Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal bearing Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) 869 of 2023 against the Admission Order dated 09.06.2023 passed by this Adjudicating Authority was dismissed as withdrawn vide Order dated 22.01.2024 and as a result, the interim Order for stay on the final decision on resolution plan is now vacated. 3.8. The 12th CoC Meeting was convened on 26.02.2024 wherein the Applicant informed the members of the CoC that the previous extension of the CIRP granted by this Adjudicating Authority is coming to an end on 04.03.2024. After due deliberations and discussions, the members of the CoC resolved to seek an extension for 60 days from 05.03.2024 to 03.05.2024 and authorized the Applicant herein to file an appropriate application before this Adjudicating Authority. Accordingly, this Adjudicating Authority vide Order dated 07.03.2024 was pleased to grant an extension and hence CIRP of the Corporate Debtor was extended by 60 (Sixty) days. 3.9. The 13th CoC Meeting was convened on 22.03.2024 wherein the Applicant informed the members of the CoC that the Resolution Applicant shall pursue the Preferential, Undervalued, Fraudulent and Extortionate Applications once the Resolution Plan is implemented. It was further decided that recoveries and expenses would be divided in an 80:20 ratios between the CoC and the Successful Resolution Applicant respectively. 3.10. The 14th CoC Meeting was convened on 15.04.2024 wherein the Applicant presented the final resolution plans before the CoC, after discussion and deliberation, it was decided to put all Resolution Plans being 5 in number for e-voting. It is further submitted that the voting window was opened on 18.04.2024 wherein, the last date for voting was on 23.04.2024 till 05:00 PM as decided by the members of CoC. The e-voting on the Resolution Plan was conducted from 18.04.2024 at 11:00 A.M. to 10.05.2024 at 05:00 PM wherein the members of CoC were pleased to approve the Resolution Plan submitted by Bee Pee
Page 6 of 17
Electricals with 100% votes in favour which is more than requisite
threshold of 66%.
3.11. The 15th CoC Meeting was convened on 23.04.2024 wherein the
members of the CoC resolved to extend the CIRP period by 30 days
beyond the period of 330 days as per provisions of the Code.
Accordingly, this Adjudicating Authority vide Order dated 08.05.2024
was pleased to grant extension and hence CIRP of the Corporate Debtor
was extended by 30 (Thirty) days.
4. The RP has submitted that a total of 15 (Fifteen) CoC meetings have been
held during the CIRP period which are as follows:
S. No.
Sequence of Meeting of CoC
Date of Meeting
CoC Members
Present
1.
First Meeting of CoC
06.07.2023
Yes
2.
Second Meeting of CoC
01.08.2023
Yes
3.
Third Meeting of CoC
22.08.2023
Yes
4.
Fourth Meeting of CoC
22.09.2023
Yes
5.
Fifth Meeting of CoC
10.10.2023
Yes
6.
Sixth Meeting of CoC
06.11.2023
Yes
7.
Seventh Meeting of CoC
24.11.2023
Yes
8.
Eight Meeting of CoC
11.12.2023
Yes
9.
Ninth Meeting of CoC
04.01.2024
Yes
10.
Tenth Meeting of CoC
20.01.2024
Yes
11.
Eleventh Meeting of CoC
08.02.2024
Yes
12.
Twelfthth Meeting of CoC
26.02.2024
Yes
13.
Thirteenth Meeting of CoC
22.03.2024
Yes
14.
Fourteenth Meeting of CoC
15.04.2024
Yes
15.
Fifteenth Meeting of CoC
23.04.2024
Yes
The List of the Financial Creditors of the Corporate Debtor being members of the CoC and distribution of voting share is as under:
Page 7 of 17
- Valuation of the Corporate Debtor
In terms of Regulation 27 of CIRP Regulations, the Applicant appointed registered valuers who were entitled to determine the fair and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor.
As per the Form-H, the fair value and liquidation value of the assets of the Corporate Debtor are as follows: The Fair Value of the Corporate Debtor is Rs. 60,60,94,335/- and the Liquidation Value of the Corporate Debtor is Rs. 44,64,60,736/-. - Details of Resolution Plan/Payment Schedule The Resolution Applicant has to the extent possible, taken into account the interests of all stakeholders of the Corporate Debtor in the following manner: 6.1 Sources of Funds
6.2 Payment of CIRP Cost Based on the information provided by the Resolution Professional, the estimated CIRP Cost amounts to Rs. 0.90 Crs. In compliance to the provisions of Section 30(2)(a) of the IBC, 2016 read with Regulation 38 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency
Page 8 of 17
Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, the
Insolvency Resolution Process Cost will be paid in priority to any other
class of creditors. The Resolution Applicant proposes the payment of
the unpaid CIRP cost amounting to Rs.0.90 Crs in priority to all other
debts of the Corporate debtor proposed under this Resolution Plan.
6.3
Payment to Secured Financial Creditors (Not related to the
Corporate Debtor)
Based on the information made available to the Resolution Applicant,
the Corporate Debtor has three Secured Financial Creditor, i.e. State
Bank of India, Punjab National Bank & SIDBI. All financial creditors
are member of the Committee of Creditors and are unrelated parties.
6.4
Payment to Dissenting Secured Financial Creditors
In compliance to Regulation 38(1)(b) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution
Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, if the Financial
Creditors representing a minority stake do not consent to the
repayments as proposed above, then such dissenting creditors would
be eligible for payment in priority to any other payment being made to
consenting Creditors. The amount for dissenting creditors shall be paid
out of amount proposed for the Financial Creditors under the
Resolution Plan which shall not be less than liquidation value available
to said dissenting creditor.
6.5
Payment to Operational Creditor
Based on the information made available to the Resolution Applicant,
the Corporate Debtor has received only 4 claims from statutory
authorities.
Since the liquidation value of Corporate Debtor as assessed by
Resolution Applicant is not sufficient to settle the dues of Secured
Financial Creditors, hence RA is not proposing any amount against the
admitted claims of statutory authorities (except EPFO). The EPFO
claim as admitted by RP, has been proposed for 100% payment of claim
admitted amount under the plan.
6.6
Workmen and Employees
Page 9 of 17
The claims received from workmen/employees are from left/existing staff of Corporate Debtor. However, the present staff has been terminated during CIRP as informed by RP. Hence at present there are no workmen/employees on the rolls of Corporate Debtor. Further all the retirement benefits & dues of workmen/employees has been dealt with in this plan. 6.7 Term of the Resolution Plan Resolution Applicant hereby proposes to implement the plan in 15 months times from effective date (Date of approval of resolution plan by Adjudicating Authority).
Page 10 of 17
Page 11 of 17
7
Waivers, Reliefs, Concessions and Exemptions
The Resolution Applicant has prayed for the reliefs as enumerated under
the Resolution Plan approved by the CoC. From the Resolution Plan
approval date, all inquiries, investigations and proceedings, whether civil
or criminal, suits, claims, disputes, interests and damages in connection
with the Corporate Debtor or the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, pending
or threatened, present or future in relation to any period prior to the
plan approval date, or arising on account of implementation of this
resolution plan are requested to be stand withdrawn, satisfied and
discharged. From the date of approval of the Resolution Plan, the
Resolution Applicant has requested to be legally authorised to seek
appropriate orders from respective authorities/ courts/tribunals for
renewal of licences/withdrawal/dismissal or abatement of the
proceeding as the case may be.
The Resolution Plan also provides details of Reliefs and Concessions as
already set out in Chapter 4 (14. RELIEFS AND WAIVERS SOUGHT,
Page No. 60-67 of the Resolution Plan).
Page 12 of 17
8
Details on Management and Implementation as per the Resolution
Plan
The Resolution Plan also provides details of the Implementation
Schedule under Regulation 38(2)(a) of CIRP Regulations, management
and control under Regulation 38(2)(b) of CIRP Regulations and under
Section 30(2)(c) of IBC, and supervision under Regulation 38(2)(c) of
CIRP Regulations and under Section 30(2)(d) of IBC under the Resolution
Plan. The same has already been set out in Chapter 4 (10. MANDATORY
CONTENTS OF RESOLUTION PLAN) on Page No. 47-53 of the Resolution
Plan.
9
Analysis & Findings
9.1
This Adjudicating Authority notes that the Resolution Plan was
submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant namely M/s. Bee
Pee Electricals which was approved by the CoC in its 14th meeting
dated 15.04.2024 (e-voting concluded on 10.05.2024) by 100% voting
share in respect of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor under Section
30(4) of the IBC and no provision of the IBC has been contravened.
9.2
We find that the Resolution Plan meets the requirement of being viable
and feasible and for the revival of the Corporate Debtor. By and large,
there are provisions for making the Plan effective after approval by this
Bench.
9.3
This Adjudicating Authority has relied on the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s
decision in the matter of “Vallal RCK vs. M/s. Siva Industries and
Holdings Limited and Others, Civil Appeal Nos. 1811-1812 of
2022”
whereby the Hon’ble Apex Court has answered the question as to
whether ‘the adjudicating authority (NCLT) or the appellate
authority (NCLAT) can sit in an appeal over the commercial
wisdom of the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) or not’. We have
relied upon the following paragraphs:
“21. This Court has consistently held that the commercial wisdom
of the CoC has been given paramount status without any judicial
Page 13 of 17
intervention for ensuring the completion of the stated processes
within the timelines prescribed by the IBC. It has been held that
there is an intrinsic assumption that Financial Creditors are fully
informed about the viability of the Corporate Debtor and the
feasibility of the proposed resolution plan. They act on the basis of
thorough examination of the proposed Resolution Plan and
assessment made by their team of experts.”
A reference in this respect could be made to the judgments of this
Court in the cases of “K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank
and Others, Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India
Limited through Authorised Signatory v. Satish Kumar
Gupta and Others, Maharashtra Seamless Limited v.
Padmanabhan Venkatesh and Others, Kalpraj Dharamshi
and Another v. Kotak Investment Advisors Limited and
Another and Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments
Welfare Association and Others v. NBCC (India) Limited and
Others.
27. This Court has, time and again, emphasized the need or
minimal judicial interference by the NCLAT and NCLT in the
framework of IBC. We may refer to the recent observation of this
Court made in the case of Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal
Steel and Power Limited and Another:
…..
“95. However, we do take this opportunity to offer a note of caution
for NCLT and NCLAT, functioning as the adjudicatory authority and
appellate authority under the IBC respectively, from judicially
interfering in the framework envisaged under the IBC. As we have
noted earlier in the judgment, the IBC was introduced in order to
overhaul the insolvency and bankruptcy regime in India. As such,
it is a carefully considered and well thought out piece of legislation
which sought to shed away the practices of the past. The
Legislature has also been working hard to ensure that the efficacy
Page 14 of 17
of this legislation remains robust by constantly amending it based
on its experience. Consequently, the need for judicial intervention
or innovation from NCLT and NCLAT should be kept at its bare
minimum and should not disturb the foundational principles of the
IBC”
9.4
In light of the above-quoted judgements, it is clear that the
“Commercial wisdom of CoC” is given paramount status. This
Adjudicating Authority is not endowed with the powers of jurisdiction
or authority to analyse or evaluate the commercial decision of the CoC.
The Resolution Plan has been submitted by the Successful Resolution
Applicant namely M/s. Bee Pee Electricals which was approved by the
CoC in its 14th meeting dated 15.04.2024 (e-voting concluded on
10.05.2024) by 100% voting share in respect of the CIRP of the
Corporate Debtor under Section 30(4) of the IBC, this Adjudicating
Authority cannot interfere in the same.
9.5
On perusal of the documents on record, we are satisfied that the
Resolution Plan is in accordance with Sections 25(2)(h), 29A, 30(2),
30(4) and 31(1) of the IBC and also complies with Regulations 35A,
36B(4A), 37, 38(1), 38(1A), 38(1B), 38(2), 38(3), 39(1), 39(2) and 39(4)
of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons)
Regulations,2016. The Applicant/RP has filed a Compliance Certificate
in the prescribed Form, i.e., Form-H as per the amended Resolution
Plan in compliance with Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations. The
Applicant/RP submits that the Successful Resolution Applicant is not
disqualified under Section 29A of the Code to submit the Resolution
Plan, as required by Regulation 39(1)(a) of the CIRP Regulations. A
separate undertaking has also been submitted along with the EoI by
the Successful Resolution Applicant, as mandated in terms of
Regulation 39(1)(c) of the CIRP Regulations.
9.6
The reliefs, concessions and waivers sought by the Successful
Resolution Applicant will be dealt with strictly as per law.
9.7
As far as the question of granting time to comply with the statutory
Page 15 of 17
obligations/seeking sanctions from governmental authorities is
concerned, the Resolution Applicant is directed to do the same within
one year as prescribed under section 31(4) of the Code.
9.8
In case of non-compliance of this order or withdrawal of the Resolution
Plan within the stipulated time, in addition to other consequences
which follow under law, the CoC shall forfeit the EMD already paid by
the SRA as well as the PBG.
9.9
The present application has been filed with bonafide means, in the
interest of justice and to advance the objectives of the Code.
10 Orders
10.1 The Resolution Plan IA-25/2024 which is for approval of the Resolution
Plan is allowed and the Resolution Plan of Rs. 52,86,39,545/- is
approved [The total amount proposed under Resolution Plan is Rs.
52,86,39,545/-. The amount of Rs. 51,83,40,322/- is exclusive of
regulatory fee payable to IBBI in compliance with Regulation 31(A)(1)
of CIRP Regulations (0.25% of the realizable value to creditors, i.e., Rs.
12,99,223/-) and amount allocated towards the payment of CIRP cost
which is Rs. 90,00,000/-]. The Resolution Plan shall form part of
this Order. “Effective Date” means the date on which this Resolution
Plan is approved by this Adjudicating Authority under Section 31 of
the Code.
10.2 The Resolution Plan is binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees,
members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State
Government or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the
payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is
due, guarantors and other stakeholders involved in the Resolution
Plan, so that the revival of the Corporate Debtor Company shall come
into force with immediate effect.
10.3 The Moratorium imposed under section 14 of the Code shall cease to
have effect from the date of this order.
Page 16 of 17
10.4 Further from the effective date and until the transfer date, a 3-member
Monitoring Committee or Managing Committee is to be constituted.
The Committee shall consist of one representative of the Resolution
Applicant, one representative of the CoC and the Resolution
Professional.
10.5 The RP shall submit the records collected during the commencement
of the proceedings to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
(“IBBI”) for their record.
10.6 Liberty is hereby granted for moving appropriate application(s), if
required in connection with the implementation of this Resolution
Plan.
10.7 A copy of this Order shall be filed by the Resolution Professional with
the Registrar of Companies, (RoC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana. The
Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA)
shall accordingly be amended and filed with the RoC, for information
and record.
10.8 The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan,
shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being
in force, within such period as may be prescribed.
10.9 The Resolution Professional shall stand discharged from his duties
with effect from the date of this Order, save and except those duties
that are enjoined upon him for implementation of the approved
Resolution Plan. Further, the Resolution Professional shall supervise
the implementation of the Resolution Plan and file the status of its
implementation before this Adjudicating Authority from time to time,
preferably every quarter.
10.10 Further, in terms of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
matter of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited Vs.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Civil Appeal No.
8129 of 2019, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that on the
Page 17 of 17
date of the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating
Authority, all such claims which are not a part of the Resolution Plan,
shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or
continue any proceedings in respect to a claims which are not a part
of the Resolution Plan.
10.11 The Resolution Professional is further directed to hand over all records,
premises/factories/documents available with it to the Successful
Resolution Applicant to finalise the further line of action required for
starting the operation. The Successful Resolution Applicant shall have
access to all the records and premises through the Resolution
Professional to finalise the further course of action required for starting
operations of the Corporate Debtor.
10.12 The Registry is hereby directed to send copies of the order forthwith to
the IBBI, all the parties and their Ld. Counsel for information and for
taking necessary steps.
10.13 A certified copy of this order may be issued, if applied for, upon
compliance with all requisite formalities.
File be consigned to the record.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
(ATUL CHATURVEDI)
MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
(BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.