18th May, 2026 Approval of Resolution plan- Shri Ram Switchgears Limited [IA(IBC)(Plan)/2/MP/2026] (1.52 MB)
PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER Delivered on 08/05/2026
The case is fixed for pronouncement of the order.
The order is pronounced in open Court vide separate sheet.
Sd/- Sd/-
MAN MOHAN GUPTA BRAJENDRA MANI TRIPATHI
MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Tomar
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
INDORE BENCH
COURT NO. 1
ITEM No.204
IA(Plan)/2(MP)2026
in
CP(IB)/22(MP)2023
Order under Section 30(6)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Navin Khandelwal RP for Shri Ram Switchgears Ltd ........Applicant
Coram:
Hon’ble Shri Brajendra Mani Tripathi, Member (J) Hon’ble Shri Man Mohan Gupta Member (T)
NCLT Indore Bench
Order dated: 08.05.2026
IA (IBC)(PLAN)/2(MP) 2026 in
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 2 of 46
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH
IA(Plan)/2(MP)2026
in
CP(IB)/22(MP)2023
[This is an application under sections 30(6) and 31 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulation 39 of IBBI Regulations, 2016]
IN THE MATTER OF:
NAVIN KHANDELWAL
Resolution Professional for
Shri Ram Switchgears Ltd.
Address: 206, Navneet Plaza, Old Palasia,
Indore, 452001 (MP).
……Applicant/
Resolution Professional
CORAM:
Shri. Brajendra Mani Tripathi, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Shri. Man Mohan Gupta, HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
APPEARANCE:
For the Applicant: Mr. Rohit Dubey, Adv (Physical) a.w.
Ms. Akanksha Tiwari, Adv (Physical)
JUDGMENT
Delivered on: 08.05.2026
- The Present application has been filed by Navin Khandelwal Resolution Professional for Shri Ram Switchgears Ltd. under Section 30(6) read with Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”),
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 3 of 46
seeking approval of the Revised Resolution Plan received on 19.06.2025 submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant - Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited ("SRA"). Initially, the Resolution Plan had been approved by the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) with 93.81% voting share, pursuant to which IA No. 436 (MP) of 2025 was filed before this Adjudicating Authority seeking approval of the said Plan. Subsequently, IA No. 481 (MP) of 2025 in CP (IB) No. 22 (MP) of 2023 came to be filed by Religare Finvest Limited raising objections to the Resolution Plan. In view thereof, the matter was reconsidered by this Adjudicating Authority and the Resolution Plan was remitted back to the Committee of Creditors for reconsideration.
Thereafter, in the 22nd Meeting of the Committee of Creditors held on 03.02.2026, the Resolution Plan was reconsidered and re-approved unanimously with 100% voting share (96.94% during the meeting and 3.06% through e-mail confirmation), in compliance with the directions issued by this Adjudicating Authority.
- The averments made by the Applicant/Resolution Professional in the present application and as presented by the Ld. Counsel are summarized as under: -
2.1 It is stated that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) in respect of the Corporate Debtor was initiated vide order of this Adjudicating Authority dated 29.02.2024 in C.P. (IB) No.22(MP)2023 filed by Mr. Peri Rama Krishna, Authorized Representative of M/s Small Industries Development Bank of India (Financial Creditor). Pursuant thereto vide the same order Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jindal was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional ("IRP") of the corporate Debtor and Thereafter, the erstwhile IRP was replaced by Mr. Navin
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 4 of 46
Khandelwal (the Applicant) as Resolution Professional (RP) vide order dated 17.12.2024.
2.2 Public Announcement: Accordingly, the IRP made a public announcement on 03.03.2024 in the newspapers namely Raj Express (Hindi newspaper) and Times Nation (English Newspaper) thereby inviting claims from the creditors of the corporate debtor in terms of Regulation 6(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 ("CIRP Regulations"). The last date for submission of claims was 14.03.2024.
2.3 Constitution of CoC and first CoC Meeting: Pursuant to Public Announcement made, IRP had received the claims on or before the last date and accordingly the Committee of creditors (‘CoC’) was constituted on 21.03.2024. The first meeting of CoC was convened on 30.03.2024. The IRP received 20 claims up to 21.03.2024. Out of 20 claims received by the IRP, 3 claims have been admitted up to 21.03.2024 & 17 claims are under verification for want of additional information at that stage.
The first meeting of the CoC was duly convened and held on 30.03.2024. It is further noted that immediately prior to the commencement of the first CoC meeting, the claim of one financial creditor, namely AU Small Finance Bank Limited, stood satisfied, and the same was intimated to the IRP via email shortly before the meeting. Consequently, the CoC was constituted, and only two financial creditors formed part of the CoC at the time of the meeting.
Accordingly, the composition of the CoC and their respective voting shares, based on admitted claims, is as follows:
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 5 of 46
S. No. Name of Financial Creditor Voting Share (%) 1 Small Industries Development Bank of India 28.056% 2 Punjab National Bank 71.943% 2.4 Appointment of Registered Valuers: It is submitted that in the 2nd meeting of the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) held on 26.04.2024, the agenda for appointment of registered valuers was placed before the CoC. In compliance with Regulation 27 read with Regulation 35 of the CIRP Regulations, the Interim Resolution Professional (“IRP”) is required to appoint two registered valuers for determination of the fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor.
Accordingly, after obtaining quotations from multiple registered valuers and upon due deliberations by the CoC, the IRP appointed the following registered valuers for conducting valuation of the assets of the Corporate Debtor, including land and building, plant and machinery, and securities/financial assets, for determination of the fair value and liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor: S. No . Name of Valuer/ Firm IBBI Registration No. 1 AAA Valuation Professionals LLP IBBI/RVE/02/2019/104 2 Mavent Advisors Private Limited IBBI/RVE/02/2022/176 The snapshot of details of valuation done by first valuer is as follows:
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 6 of 46
The snapshot of details of valuation done by Second valuer is as follows:
The Average valuation is as follows:
Particulars
AAA Valuation
Professionals LLP
Mavent Advisors
Private Limited
Average Valuation
FV (INR)
LV (INR)
FV (INR)
LV (INR
FV (INR)
LV (INR
Land &
Building
9,14,25,911
6,85,69,433
8,03,48,150
6,32,54,773
8,58,87,031
6,59,12,103
Plant &
Machinery
44,36,865
31,05,805
61,75,457
43,22,820
53,06,161
37,14,313
Inventory
+
Financial
Assets
5,50,67,133
3,21,46,176
2,13,04,661
1,85,78,867
3,81,85,897
2,53,62,522
Average
—
—
—
—
12,93,79,089
9,49,88,938
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 7 of 46
2.5 Replacement of IRP: It is further submitted that in the 5th CoC Meeting held on 02.07.2024, the CoC, resolved with 67.20% voting share to replace the IRP. Accordingly, an application being IA/349(MP)/2024 was filed under Section 22(3)(b) of the Code seeking appointment of a new Resolution Professional. This Adjudicating Authority, vide order dated 17.12.2024, allowed the said application and appointed Mr. Navin Khandelwal as the Resolution Professional (RP) to conduct the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.
2.6 Reconstitution of Committee of Creditors: During the course of CIRP, additional claims were received and certain claims were withdrawn, including those of SIDBI and AU Small Finance Bank pursuant to settlement. Accordingly, the Committee of Creditors was reconstituted from time to time in terms of the CIRP Regulations. As on 20.11.2024, the composition of the Committee of Creditors is as under: S. No. Name of Financi al Creditor Amount Claimed (₹) Amount Admitted (₹) Voting Share 1 UCO Bank 18,65,60,219.00 12,50,72,574.81 27.04 % 2 Punjab National Bank 9,75,60,856.74 9,75,26,988.05 21.08 % 3 Bank of Maharas htra 1,96,83,192.08 1,41,61,724.50 3.06%
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 8 of 46
4 Religare Finvest Limited 2,86,25,203.27 2,86,25,203.00 6.19% 5 Urban Develop ment Trust Pvt. Ltd. 23,57,29,199.00 19,72,11,653.00 42.63 %
Total 56,81,58,670.09 46,25,98,143.36 100% 2.7 Invitation of Expression of Interest and Publication of Form G: It is submitted that the Resolution Professional published Form G on 01.08.2024 inviting Expression of Interest (EOI) from prospective resolution applicants, with the last date for submission being 07.08.2024. Thereafter, the final list of eligible prospective resolution applicants was published on 11.09.2024 in accordance with the CIRP Regulations.
2.8 RFRP, Extension for Submission and Receipt of Resolution Plans: It is submitted that the Resolution Professional issued the Request for Resolution Plan (RFRP) on 20.01.2025. During the 12th CoC Meeting, the CoC approved extension of the last date for submission of resolution plans till 05.04.2025, which was treated as the final extension for all prospective resolution applicants.
2.9 Consideration of Resolution Plans: It is submitted that out of four prospective resolution applicants, only two prospective resolution applicants submitted their resolution plans within the stipulated time, namely Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited and the
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 9 of 46
Suspended Management represented by Mr. Rohit Kumar
Jhalani, Mr. Nilesh Kumar Jhalani and Mr. Devraj Jhalani.
Both the resolution plans were received on 05.04.2025 through
password-protected emails as well as sealed hard copy envelopes
in accordance with the prescribed process and were placed before
the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) for consideration in its
meetings.
The plans were initially discussed and thereafter subjected to vetting, pursuant to which observations were communicated to the respective PRAs. Subsequently, the Resolution Plans underwent multiple rounds of deliberations, negotiations, and revisions between the CoC and the PRAs, and revised Resolution Plans were submitted from time to time.
Ultimately, the final revised Resolution Plan of Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited, dated 09.06.2025 and received on 19.06.2025, and the final revised Resolution Plan of the Suspended Management, received on 13.05.2025, were placed before the CoC. The said plans were thereafter deliberated upon and evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the approved Evaluation Matrix.
2.10 Approval of Resolution Plan: It is submitted that both resolution plan was put to e-voting, which commenced on 21.07.2025 and concluded on 12.08.2025, and the resolution plan submitted by Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited was approved by the CoC with 93.81% voting share, thereby satisfying the requirement under Section 30(4) of the Code.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 10 of 46
2.11 Issuance of Letter of Intent: Pursuant thereto, a Letter of Intent dated 13.08.2025 was issued to the successful resolution applicant, which was duly accepted, and the successful resolution applicant furnished performance security of ₹1,98,80,000/- by way of bank guarantees dated 14.08.2025 and 26.08.2025.
2.12 Reconsideration and Final Approval of Resolution Plan: It is further submitted that this Adjudicating Authority, vide order dated 16.01.2026 passed in IA No. 436(MP)/2025, directed reconsideration of the resolution plan by the CoC. In compliance with the said directions, the 22nd CoC Meeting was held on 03.02.2026, wherein the resolution plan was reconsidered and thereafter approved unanimously with 100% voting share (96.94% during the meeting and 3.06% through email confirmation).
2.13 CIRP Timeline of the Corporate Debtor: The CIRP of the Corporate Debtor commenced on 29.02.2024 pursuant to the admission order passed by this Adjudicating Authority in CP(IB)/22(MP)2023. The initial period of 180 days expired on 27.08.2024, which was further extended by 90 days up to 24.11.2024. Thereafter, this Adjudicating Authority, vide order dated 17.12.2024 in IA/516(MP)/2024, granted a further extension of 180 days, extending the CIRP period up to 24.05.2025, making the total CIRP period 450 days.
An application for further extension of 30 days along with exclusion of 148 days was filed by the Resolution Professional; however, the same was dismissed vide order dated 25.06.2025. Aggrieved thereby, UCO Bank preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble NCLAT, which vide order dated 16.07.2025, allowed
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 11 of 46
extension of 30 days along with exclusion of 148 days, thereby extending the CIRP period up to 18.11.2025.
The Resolution Plan was initially approved by the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) on 12.08.2025, and thereafter an application for approval of the said Resolution Plan, being I.A. No. 436 of 2025, was filed before this Adjudicating Authority. It is pertinent to note that the said Resolution Plan was submitted within the prescribed timeline, i.e., on 03.09.2025.
Subsequently, pursuant to the order passed in I.A. No. 481 (MP) of 2025, the approved Resolution Plan was remitted back to the CoC for reconsideration. In compliance with the said order, the Resolution Plan was reconsidered by the CoC and was thereafter approved in its 22nd meeting held on 03.02.2026. Thereafter, the present application under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been filed for approval of the Resolution Plan.
Tabular Representation of CIRP Timeline: S. No. Particulars Period / Timeline Order Reference 1 CIRP Commencement Date 29.02.2024 — 2 Initial CIRP Period (180 days) 29.02.2024 – 27.08.2024 — 3 First Extension (90 days) Up to 24.11.2024 Order dated 17.12.2024 in IA/490(MP)/2024 4 Second Extension (180 days) Up to 24.05.2025 Order dated 17.12.2024 in IA/516(MP)/2024 5 Application for Extension & Exclusion — IA/261(MP)/2025 (Dismissed on 25.06.2025)
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 12 of 46
6 NCLAT Order (Extension + Exclusion) Up to 18.11.2025 Order dated 16.07.2025 in CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 1021/2025 7 Approval of Resolution Plan by CoC 12.08.2025 — 8 Filing of IA for Approval 03.09.2025 IA No. 436 (MP) of 2025 9 Fresh Application (Post Reconsideration) 28.02.2026 Filed pursuant to order in IA No. 481 (MP) of 2025
- Brief Profile of the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA):
3.1 As mentioned in Chapter IV – Details of the Resolution Applicant of the Resolution Plan, the Successful Resolution Applicant, Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited, was incorporated on 19.07.1996 and has its registered office at 1218/7, Baircha Road, Post Army War College, Mhow, Indore, Madhya Pradesh – 453441. It is further submitted that the promoters’ association with civil construction and toll collection activities traces back to the pre-independence period since 1942, reflecting long-standing experience in the sector. 3.2 The Resolution Applicant is primarily engaged in infrastructure development, particularly in the construction and operation of roads and highways. The company operates across multiple verticals including Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC), Build-Operate- Transfer (BOT), Hybrid Annuity Mode (HAM), toll collection, Operation, Maintenance and Transfer (OMT) projects, and development of road infrastructure and logistics facilities. 3.3 The Resolution Applicant is an established player in the infrastructure sector and is stated to be among the leading toll collection companies in India. The company holds “A” Class contractor registration, enabling it to undertake large-scale infrastructure and construction projects. It undertakes projects for government, semi-government, and private sector entities, including through joint ventures, special purpose vehicles, and consortium arrangements. 3.4 The Board of Directors comprises experienced professionals, including Mr. Nitin Agrawal (Managing Director) along with other directors, who possess
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 13 of 46
technical and managerial expertise in infrastructure development, execution, and operations. The key managerial personnel are qualified engineers and management professionals having substantial experience in project implementation, toll operations, financial modelling, and business development. Financially, the Resolution Applicant has demonstrated consistent revenue generation and profitability, indicating its capability to effectively implement the proposed resolution plan and revive the Corporate Debtor as a going concern.
-
Eligibility of SRA as Per Section 29A of the Code:
4.1 The Resolution Applicant has further confirmed its eligibility under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and has declared that neither it nor its promoters/directors suffer from any disqualification under the said provision.
4.2 The Resolution Applicant has expressed its intent to revive the Corporate Debtor by leveraging its technical expertise and operational capabilities and to expand business operations in related sectors. 4.3 As certified by the Applicant in Form H, the Resolution Applicant, Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited, has submitted an affidavit pursuant to section 30(1) of the Code confirming that it is not ineligible under section 29A of the Code to submit a resolution plan. The Applicant being RP in this case, has certified that the said affidavit is in order. -
Details of Resolution Plan/Financial Proposal:
5.1 Resolution Plan has been annexed in Annexure 8 of the present IA (pg. no. 123-188). Financial Proposal of the plan has been provided in Chapter VIII, comprising of the details of composite financial proposal made by the Resolution Applicant to settle all claims against the Corporate Debtor. The details are as follows:
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 14 of 46
CHAPTER VIII – FINANCIAL PROPOSAL The financial proposal has been prepared on the basis of the information provided by the Resolution Professional in the Information Memorandum along with all the annexures enclosed with it and subsequent correspondences received therefrom. The resolution applicant proposes to acquire the corporate debtor through itself and settle the debt of all creditors by paying lump-sum amounts and proposes to provide resolution for the corporate debtor as a going concern and its operational turnaround through necessary infusion, entailing a total proposed outlay of Rs. 19.88 Crores/-. The funds shall be utilized towards settling the various outstanding dues of claims as proposed in this resolution plan. SYNOPSIS OF FINANCIAL PROPOSAL: A Synopsis of financial proposal of the Resolution Applicant is provided below: Sr. No. Particulars Rupees Timeline 1 Upfront payment towards CIRP cost 30,00,000 30 days 2 Payment towards Secured Financial Creditors in full and final settlement of their dues 15,17,64,751 Within 3 months 3 Payment towards Unsecured Financial Creditors in full and final settlement of their dues 3,54,46,967 Within 3 months 4 Payment towards Operational Creditors (other than Workmen & Employees and government dues) 10,41,606 Within 2 months
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 15 of 46
5
Payment towards Operational
Creditors
(Workmen
&
Employees)
30,46,676
Within
2
months
6
Payment towards Operational
Creditors (Government Dues)
0
Within
2
months
7
Payment
towards
Other
Creditors (Creditors other than
Financial
and
operational
Creditors)
0
Within
2
months
8
Capex and Working Capital
Requirements
45,00,000
Within
3
months
Total: 19,88,00,000
Note: The payment to the operational creditors will be paid in
priorities over the financial creditors.
5.2 Funding Plan:
The overall Resolution Plan is for a total amount of Rs. 19.88 Crores/-
(Indian Nineteen Crore Eighty-Eight Lakh Rupees Only), which shall
be funded as under:
Stakeholde
r Type
Amount
Claimed
Amount
Admitted
Realisable
amount
under the
plan
Amou
nt
realiz
able
in
plan
to
amou
nt
Admi
tted
(%)
Payme
nt
schedu
le
CIRP Cost
30,00,000
30 days
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 16 of 46
Secured Financial Creditors
-
Creditors not having a right to vote under sub-section (2) of section 21 Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
-
Dissenting Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
-
Assenting 30,38,04,268 23,67,61,287 15,17,64,751 64.10 % 3 months Unsecured Financial Creditors
-
Creditors not having a right to vote under sub- section (2) of section 21 30,59,11,400 22,07,68,051 84,11,263 3.81% 3 months
-
Dissenting
0.00%
- Assenting 26,43,54,402 22,58,36,856 2,70,35,704 11.97 % 3 months Operationa l Creditors
(i) Government Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil (ii) Workmen
-PF dues
-Other dues 11,81,617 11,81,617 11,81,617 100% 2 months (iii) Employees
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 17 of 46
- PF dues
-Other dues 18,65,059 18,65,059 18,65,059 100% 2 months (iv) Other Operational creditors 2,85,67,881 2,08,32,127 10,41,606 4.99% 2 months Other Debts and Dues Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Shareholde rs Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Total 90,56,84,627 70,72,44,997 19,13,00,000
3 months Capex and Working Capital Requireme nts
45,00,000
3 months Total 90,56,84,627 70,72,44,997 19,88,00,000
3 month s
5.3 Sources of Funds to Provide for Payments Proposed as per the Resolution Plan: The Resolution Applicant has its own funds. The Resolution Applicant as well as its managing director and promoter have sufficient resources to induct more funds in the company to meet the proposed investment as envisaged in the Resolution Plan. Therefore, the source of payments under this plan shall be the internal accruals & funds available with the Resolution Applicant and the funds that may be raised out of established standing of the Resolution Applicant. Further the resolution applicant will infuse the fund in form of Equity Share Capital and Debt as per its own discretion in a time period specified in the resolution plan.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 18 of 46
It is pertinent to note that, vide order dated 12.03.2026, this Adjudicating Authority had directed the Successful Resolution Applicant (“SRA”) to clarify its experience and sources of funds. In compliance thereof, it has been submitted that as on 31.03.2025, the SRA has a net worth of ₹1,269.26 crore and maintains strong liquidity of approximately ₹350 crore, thereby demonstrating its financial capability to implement the Resolution Plan.
5.4 Implementation and Supervision of Resolution Plan: Chapter X of the Resolution Plan provides a structured framework for implementation and supervision, including a turnaround strategy aimed at revival of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern through settlement of dues, infusion of funds, and operational restructuring. The plan is proposed to be implemented within a period of 3 months from the Effective Date, in a phased manner, covering payment of CIRP costs, discharge of liabilities of creditors, and infusion towards capital expenditure and working capital.
(A) Implementation: The implementation of the Resolution Plan shall be carried out in a phased manner within the stipulated timeline. It includes payment of CIRP costs, settlement of claims of financial and operational creditors, and infusion towards capital expenditure and working capital. Upon approval of the Resolution Plan, the management and control of the Corporate Debtor shall vest in the Resolution Applicant, and the Board of Directors shall be reconstituted accordingly.
(B) Monitoring and Supervision: For effective supervision, an Implementation and Monitoring Committee shall be constituted within a stipulated period,
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 19 of 46
comprising an Insolvency Professional, a representative of the Resolution Applicant, and a representative of the Committee of Creditors. The Committee shall oversee the implementation of the Resolution Plan, ensure adherence to timelines, and monitor completion of all obligations under the Plan. The Monitoring Committee shall continue to supervise the implementation process until full execution of the Resolution Plan.
5.5 Indicative
Timeline
for
Implementation/Implementation
Schedule: Chapter XII of the plan provides for the Indicative timeline
The Resolution Plan shall be implemented in the following manner,
as per the timelines stated below or as per applicable laws:
Sr.
No.
Activity
Estimated
Timeline
1.
Submission of the resolution plan by the
Resolution Applicant
20-03-2025
2.
NCLT Approval Date
X (Effective
Date)
3.
Formation of Monitoring Committee
X + 3 Days
4.
Payment of CIRP Costs
Within X + 30
Days
5.
Allotment of entire Share Capital in favour of
Resolution Applicant or SPV
Within X + 30
Days
6.
Payment to Workman and Employees as per
Resolution Plan
Within X + 2
months
7.
Payment to Operational Creditors and Other
Creditors as per Resolution Plan
Within X + 2
months
8.
Payment of Statutory Dues as per Resolution
Plan
Within X +
2months
9.
Payment to Financial Creditors as per
Resolution Plan
Within X + 3
months
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 20 of 46
Infusion for Capex and Working Capital As & when required 5.6 Effective date means: The date on which this resolution plan is finally approved by the Adjudicating Authority vide its order of approval.
5.7 Treatment of Transaction Fall Under Section 43, 45, 47,49,50 or 66 of the IBC, 2016: In the event, any transaction is avoided /set aside by the NCLT in terms of Section 43, 45,47,49,50 or 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and any amount is received by the resolution professional or the Corporate Debtors in furtherance thereof, such sum shall be retained by the Resolution Applicant. Further, any application pertaining to the above referred sections will be pursued by the RA.
5.8 Capital Restructuring and SEBI Compliance
The Resolution Plan provides for comprehensive restructuring of the
share capital of the Corporate Debtor. The existing issued,
subscribed, and paid-up share capital shall stand cancelled and
reduced, with no payment to existing shareholders, as the
liquidation value is insufficient to satisfy creditor dues. A minimal
residual capital structure shall be retained for public shareholders,
and fresh equity shares shall be issued and allotted to the Resolution
Applicant upon infusion of funds. The extinguishment and reduction
of share capital shall form part of the approval of this Resolution
Plan and shall be deemed to be in compliance with Section 66 of the
Companies Act, 2013, without requiring any separate approval.
Since the Corporate Debtor is a listed entity, the Resolution
Applicant shall ensure compliance with applicable SEBI regulations
and Rule 19A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 21 of 46
The plan provides that minimum public shareholding shall be maintained at 10% within 12 months and increased to 25% within 36 months from the date of approval of the Resolution Plan. The Corporate Debtor shall continue to remain listed, and necessary steps such as dilution of shareholding or public offer shall be undertaken to achieve compliance. Any past non-compliances or liabilities under SEBI laws and other applicable regulations shall be dealt with in accordance with applicable law and judicial precedents governing resolution plans under the Code.
5.9 Reliefs and Concessions: In CHAPTER XIII, The Resolution
Applicant seeks necessary reliefs, waivers and concessions from the
Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to ensure effective implementation of
the Resolution Plan. These primarily include waiver of all taxes,
duties, levies, penalties and interest (including income tax, GST and
MAT) pertaining to the period prior to the Effective Date and arising
out of the Resolution Plan. Further, all past non-compliances,
defaults and breaches of the Corporate Debtor under applicable laws
(including Companies Act, SEBI Regulations, labour and statutory
laws) are requested to be condoned, with complete immunity from
any proceedings, investigations or liabilities (civil or criminal)
relating to the pre-Effective Date period.
It is further sought that all existing claims, litigations and liabilities
against the Corporate Debtor shall stand extinguished, and all
licenses, approvals and permits shall continue or be restored
without additional cost or procedural requirements. The Resolution
Applicant shall be entitled to carry forward losses, restructure
capital, modify business operations and receive necessary regulatory
approvals seamlessly. Additionally, all security interests shall stand
satisfied upon payment under the Plan, and the Resolution
Applicant and Corporate Debtor shall be indemnified against any
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 22 of 46
past liabilities, including those arising from forensic audits, thereby enabling a clean and viable revival of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern.
Compliance Certificate Filed By ‘RP’ In ‘Form H’: The Applicant/RP has filed a Compliance Certificate in prescribed form, i.e., Form ‘H’ in compliance with Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016, giving all the details of the relevant compliances made during the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor along with details of all the steps taken for its insolvency resolution, details and documents related to SRA and salient features of Resolution Plan including details of its implementation and schedule of payment to various stakeholders, which has been annexed to the IA as ‘Annexure 19’.
Certain clarifications were raised by this Hon'ble Tribunal on
07.04.2026. The copy of the revised Form H - compliance certificate was
provided with Affidavit. As per the affidavit filed on 09.04.2026,
clarifying the valuation figures and confirming that the valuation reports
were duly placed before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) for its
consideration, on perusal of the revised Form H, the Fair Value and
Liquidation Value of the Corporate Debtor are stated to be Rs. 12.93
crores and Rs. 9.49 crores, respectively. The Resolution Plan Value and
Realisable Amount under the Approved Resolution Plan are stated to be
Rs. 19.88 Crores, and the percentage of realisation in the Approved
Resolution Plan is as under:
7A. Realisable Amount:
Sl.
No.
Particulars
Description
1.
Total Realisable amount under the
plan (In case of real estate CDs, provide
Rs. 19,88,00,000/-
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 23 of 46
the monetary value of flats etc. given to
allottees)
(Indian
Nineteen
Crore
Eighty-Eight
Lakh Rupees Only)
2.
Fair Value
Rs.12,93,79,089
3.
Liquidation Value
Rs. 9,49,88,938
4.
Percentage (%) of realisable amount to
Fair Value
153.66%
5.
Percentage (%) of realisable amount to
Liquidation Value
209.29%
6.
Percentage (%) Recovery to Secured FCs
15.17/23.67*100
64.10% of admitted
claims
7.
Percentage (%) of realisable amount to
Total admitted claims
28.11%
8.
Percentage (%) of realisable amount to
Other
than
admitted
Corporate
Guarantee claims
–
7.
Mandatory Contents of Plan:
The Applicant in his capacity as RP of the Corporate Debtor has certified
with respect to compliances of provisions under the Code and related
Regulations stating that; -
(i) The CoC approved Resolution Plan of Prakash Asphaltings and
Toll Highways (India) Limited, complies with all the provisions
of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (Code), the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution
Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP
Regulations) including the provisions and Regulations as per the
table below:
Section
of the
Code/
Requirement
with respect to
Resolution Plan
Compliance
(Y/N)
Relevant
clause of
resolution plan
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 24 of 46
Regulatio n No. Section 25(2)(h) The Resolution Applicant meets the criteria approved by the CoC having regards to the complexity and scale of operation of business of CD Yes According to the EOI eligibility criteria, the PRA’S must have minimum net worth of Rs. 5 crores. The RA has provided latest audited financial statement which shows Net worth of 1269.26 Crore as on 31.03.2025 Section 29A The Resolution Applicant eligible to submit resolution plan as per final list of Resolution Professional or Order, if any, of the Adjudicating Authority Yes Affidavit under 29A has been provided by SRA. Section 30(1) The Resolution Applicant has Yes Affidavit under 29A has been
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 25 of 46
submitted an affidavit stating that it is eligible as per Code provided by SRA. Section 30(2) The Resolution Plan- (a) Provides for the payment of insolvency resolution process costs Yes Page 25, 31 and 34
(b) Provides for the payment to the operational creditors Yes the resolution plan provides that if liquidation valuer is attributable to OC then such minimum amount shall be paid to oc Page 37 (Minimum amount shall be paid to OC)
(c) Provides for payment to financial creditors who did not Yes plan provide for this clause Page 46
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 26 of 46
vote in favour
(d) Provides for management of the affairs of the corporate debtor Yes Page 53-56
(e) Provides for implementati on and supervision of the resolution plan Yes Page 51-52
(f) Does not contravene any of the provisions of the law Yes (The plan does not contravene) Page 25 & 27 Section 30(4) (a) Is feasible and viable, according to the CoC Yes The CoC member in the 22nd CoC meeting held on 03.02.2026 approved unanimously by 100% voting share (96.94% during the meeting &
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 27 of 46
3.06% through email confirmation) vote in favour by the CoC.
(b) Approved by CoC with 66% voting share Yes
Section 31(1) The Resolution Plan has provisions for its effective implementation plan, according to the CoC Yes Page 51-52 Regulatio n 38(1) The amount due to the operational creditors under the resolution plan has been given priority in payment over financial creditors Yes Page 37 Regulatio n 38(1A) The resolution plan includes a statement as to how it has dealt with the interests of all stakeholders Yes Page 25 Regulatio n 38(1B) Neither the Resolution No such non compliance Page 25
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 28 of 46
Applicant nor any of its related parties has failed to implement or contributed to the failure of implementation of any resolution plan approved under the Code. If applicable, the Resolution Applicant has submitted a statement giving details of any such non implementation undertaken by the SRA and this declaration is mentioned in the resolution plan. Regulatio n 38(2) (a) Term of the plan and implementation schedule Yes Page 57
(b) Management and control of the business during its term Yes Page 53-56
(c) Adequate means for supervising its implementation Yes Page 51-52
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 29 of 46
Regulatio n 38(3) The resolution plan demonstrates that- (a) it addresses the cause of default (b) it is feasible and viable (c) it has provisions for its effective implementa tion (d) it has provisions for approvals required and the timeline for the same (e) the resolution applicant has the capability to implement the Yes the resolution plan provide for all of these clause in the resolution plan.
Page no.24 Page no.22
Page no. 33
Page no. 33
Page no. 33
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 30 of 46
resolution
plan
Regulatio
n 39(2)
Whether the RP
has
filed
applications
in
respect
of
transactions
observed, found or
determined
by
him?
Yes
The RP has filed
an
application
under
section
43, 45 & 66 of
IBC 2016 which
is
pending
before AA.
Regulatio
n 39(4)
Details
of
performance
security
received
(under reg 36B)
Yes
A
bank
guarantee dated
14.08.2025
amounting
Rs
1,73,80,000
&
bank guarantee
dated
26.08.2025
amounting
Rs
25,00,000 was
provided
by
SRA.
(ii) the resolution plan does not contravene any of the provisions of
the law for the time being in force.
(iii)that the contents of this certificate given in ‘Revised Form H’ are
true and correct to the best of the knowledge and belief of the
Applicant in his capacity as RP of the Corporate Debtor and
nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
8. Applications Filed Challenging Present Resolution Plan:
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 31 of 46
8.1 It is pertinent to note that an application being I.A. No. 481 (MP) of 2025 in C.P. (IB) No. 22 (MP) of 2023 was filed by a financial creditor, namely Religare Finvest Ltd., challenging the Resolution Plan on the ground that its security interest over a third-party mortgaged property had been improperly dealt with during the CIRP. This Adjudicating Authority, vide order dated 16.01.2026, considered the objections raised, particularly in relation to the inclusion, treatment, and non-valuation of third-party security. 8.2 The principal issues which arose for consideration were whether third-party assets mortgaged to a creditor could be included within the CIRP without the consent of such creditor, and whether non- valuation of such extraneous security would amount to material non-compliance under Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. 8.3 Upon consideration, this Adjudicating Authority held that the jurisdiction of the Resolution Professional is confined to the assets of the Corporate Debtor and that third-party assets cannot be treated as part of the CIRP estate without the consent of the concerned creditor. It was further observed that while the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors is paramount, the same is not absolute and cannot be exercised in a manner that extinguishes or compromises the independent rights of creditors against third-party securities or guarantees, contrary to law. 8.4 It was also held that where a Resolution Plan contemplates extinguishment or compromise of third-party security, such security must necessarily be valued to enable the CoC to take an informed decision on the feasibility and viability of the plan. Non-valuation of such third-party/related-party security was held to constitute material non-compliance under Section 30(2) of the Code, as it
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 32 of 46
impairs proper assessment of recoverable value and may result in
unjust enrichment.
8.5 Accordingly, the application was allowed, and the Resolution
Professional was directed to place the Resolution Plan before the CoC
for reconsideration, limited to curing the defect pertaining to the
treatment of such extraneous security.
9. Details of Interlocutory Applications
The following Interlocutory Applications filed by the RP in the present
CIRP are pending adjudication before this Adjudicating Authority,
and the Resolution Plan makes specific provision as to how each shall
be dealt with post-approval:
Details of Application
Prayer
How dealt within the Resolution
Plan
Interlocutory
Application
(IBC)/335(MP)2024 -
Rakesh Kumar Jindal
(erstwhile
IRP)
Vs
Religare
Finvest
Limited and Others
Direction
to
Respondent No. 1
(Religare
Finvest
Limited) to repay
Rs. 50,00,000/- to
the
Corporate
Debtor, being an
amount transferred
from the account of
the
Corporate
Debtor
to
Respondent No. 1
during
the
moratorium period
in
violation
of
Section 14 of the
Insolvency
and
Bankruptcy Code,
2016.
As provided at Page 13 of
the
Resolution
Plan
Additional Terms —Assets
of
Corporate
Debtor
(without prejudice to the
scheme of slump sale of
Operating
Business
Undertaking prescribed
under
this
resolution
plan):
a)
All
assets
(whether
known
or
unknown,
including but not limited
to Land and Building,
Plant
and
Machinery
whether
freehold,
leasehold or license basis
and
intangible
assets
including
technical
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 33 of 46
Interlocutory Application (IBC)/336(MP)2024- Rakesh Kumar Jindal (erstwhile IRP) Vs Urban Development Trust Private Limited and Others Direction to Respondent No. 1 (Urban Development Trust Private Limited) to repay Rs. 9,50,000/- to the Corporate Debtor, being an amount transferred from the account of the Corporate Debtor to Respondent No. 1 during the moratorium period in violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. knowhow, licenses, patents, copyrights, logo, knowledge, brand, franchise agreement etc., if any) held by the Corporate Debtor shall be remain in the Corporate Debtor (free from all encumbrances of the existing creditors and only subject to the encumbrance of the Resolution Applicant/SPV assignee), pursuant to payment and settlement of the creditors under this resolution plan. Further, immediate upon payments under this resolution plan, on 90th day of the NCLT Approval Date, the operating business undertaking (more particularly defined in Chapter III) of the Corporate Debtor shall be transferred under slump sale arrangement to the Resolution Applicant or a Resolution Applicant's controlled Special Purpose Vehicle'.
Interlocutory
Application
(IBC)/19(MP)2026 -
Navin
Khandelwal,
Resolution
Professional for Shri
Ram Switchgears Ltd.
Vs
Rakesh
Kumar
Jindal, erstwhile IRP
of
Shri
Ram
Switchgears Ltd.
(b)
Direct
the
Respondent
to
refund
the
TDS
amount to the CIRP
account
operated
by the Resolution
Professional;
(c) Direct the Respondent to reimburse the interest and penalties levied as per the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of non-filing of TDS returns and non- payment of TDS challans during the CIRP period, as the
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 34 of 46
same has arisen solely due to the Respondent's acts and omissions. Interlocutory Application
(I.B.C)/514(MP)2024
- Rakesh Kumar Jindal Vs Devraj Jhalani
Direct the Respondents to contribute the amount of Rs. 1,60,34,718.29/- (One Crores Sixty Lakhs Thirty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Eighteen Rupees and Twenty-Nine Paisa Only) plus interest at the rate of 12% p.a. to the Corporate Debtor along with cost of litigation to the tune of Rs 1,50,000 and/or; AVOIDANCE TRANSACTIONS: Upon approval of the resolution plan, the proceedings and all rights as litigant and beneficiary party to such avoidance transactions in respect of avoidance transactions, if any, under Chapter III or fraudulent or wrongful trading under Chapter VI of Part II of the Code, will be pursued and remain for exclusive absolute benefit of the resolution applicant; The Resolution Professional shall facilitate the change of petitioner and enable the Resolution Applicant to continue such litigation. Interlocutory Application
(I.B.C)/518(MP)2024
- Rakesh Kumar Jindal Vs Devraj Jhalani
Direct the Respondents to repay the amount of Rs. 48,16,000/- (Forty-Eight lakhs Sixteen Thousand only) plus interest at the rate of 12% p.a. to the Corporate Debtor along with cost of litigation to the tune of Rs 1,50,000; and/or Interlocutory Application
(I.B.C)/519(MP)2024
- To direct the Respondents to repay the amount
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 35 of 46
- Rakesh Kumar Jindal Vs Devraj Jhalani
of
Rs.
24,81,62,178.71
(Twenty-Four
Crores
Eighty-
One Lakhs Sixty-
Two
Thousand
One
Hundred
and
Seventy-
Eight
Rupees
Seventy-One
Paisa Only) plus
interest
at
the
rate of 12% p.a.
to the Corporate
Debtor along with
cost of litigation
to the tune of Rs
1,50,000;
2. Pass
necessary
directions under
Section 67 of the
Insolvency
and
Bankruptcy
Code,
2016
And/or;
INTERLOCUTORY
APPLICATION
(I.B.C)/9(MP)2025 -
Rakesh Kumar Jindal
Vs. Devraj Jhalani
- To direct the Respondents to repay the amount of Rs.31,93,70,510/- plus interest at the rate of 12% p.a. to the Corporate Debtor along with cost of litigation to the tune of Rs 1,50,000 and/or;
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 36 of 46
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS:
10. We have heard the submissions advanced by the Learned Counsel for
the Resolution Professional and perused the entire material available on
record, including the Resolution Plan dated 19.06.2025 submitted by
the Successful Resolution Applicant, Prakash Asphaltings and Toll
Highways (India) Limited, the minutes of the Committee of Creditors
(“CoC”) meetings, voting results, compliance certificate in Form H,
valuation reports, performance security documents, affidavit under
Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), and
other documents placed on record.
-
It is observed that the Resolution Plan was initially approved by the CoC with 93.81% voting share upon conclusion of e-voting on 12.08.2025. However, pursuant to the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by this Adjudicating Authority in IA No. 436 (MP) of 2025, the Resolution Plan was remitted back to the CoC for reconsideration, particularly with regard to the treatment and valuation of third-party security.
-
In compliance with the aforesaid directions, the Resolution Plan was reconsidered in the 22nd CoC Meeting held on 03.02.2026, wherein the CoC, after due deliberations, approved the Resolution Plan with 100% voting share (96.94% during the meeting and 3.06% through email confirmation).
-
It is a settled position of law that this Adjudicating Authority does not sit in appeal over the commercial wisdom of the CoC. The jurisdiction of this Authority under Section 31 of the Code is limited to satisfying itself that the Resolution Plan meets the requirements specified under Section 30(2) of the Code and the CIRP Regulations. The commercial decision of the CoC, taken after due deliberation and with the requisite voting
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 37 of 46
share, is not to be interfered with unless it is in contravention of any provision of law.
- For the purpose of a comprehensive examination of the Resolution Plan in
terms of Sections 30(2), 30(4) and 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,
2016, this Adjudicating Authority has undertaken a detailed analytical
assessment of the material on record, and the key findings are summarised
hereunder:
S.
No.
Parameter
Findings Based on
Record
Analysis &
Satisfaction of
Adjudicating
Authority
1
CIRP Cost
Compliance
The Resolution Plan
provides
for
payment of CIRP
Costs amounting to
₹30,00,000
within
30 days from the
Effective Date.
It is further provided that any excess or shortfall in CIRP costs shall be adjusted from the amount payable to Financial Creditors. This ensures full compliance with Section 30(2)(a) of the Code, as CIRP costs are accorded absolute priority.
The adjustment mechanism adequately safeguards any variation, ensuring complete discharge of CIRP costs without affecting the viability of the Plan. 2 Operational Creditors The Plan provides 100% payment to workmen and employees, while other operational creditors are proposed to be paid ₹10.41 lakh within 2 months. The treatment complies with Section 30(2)(b) read with Regulation 38, as priority is accorded to workmen and employees. Further, under the Section 53 waterfall, the liquidation value (₹9.49 crore approx.) would be exhausted towards CIRP costs and secured financial creditors, leaving nil value for Operational
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 38 of 46
Creditors.
Accordingly,
the
amount
proposed
under the Resolution
Plan, though limited,
is higher than the
liquidation
entitlement
and
is
being paid in priority,
thereby satisfying the
requirements
of
Section 30(2)(b) of the
Code.
3
Financial
Creditors
Treatment
Secured
Financial
Creditors
are
proposed to be paid
₹15.17 crore and
Unsecured
Financial Creditors
₹3.54 crore within 3
months. There are
no
dissenting
financial creditors.
The distribution has
been approved with
100% voting share of
the
CoC,
reflecting
complete commercial
acceptance.
4
Value
Maximization
The Resolution Plan
value
is
₹19.88
crore as against the
average Fair Value
of ₹12.93 crore and
average Liquidation
Value
of
₹9.49
crore, as certified in
Revised Form H.
The
Plan
provides
approx. 153.66% of
Fair
Value
and
209.29%
of
Liquidation
Value,
thereby
clearly
demonstrating
value
maximization, which
is a core objective of
the Code.
5
Feasibility &
Viability
The
Plan
is
proposed
to
be
funded
through
internal
accruals
and
financial
strength
of
the
Resolution
Applicant. A clear
implementation
schedule
and
financial
proposal
have been provided.
The CoC, after due
evaluation,
has
approved
the
Plan.
The
financial
capability
and
structured execution
mechanism establish
that
the
Plan
is
feasible and viable as
required
under
Section 30(4) of the
Code.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 39 of 46
6 Net Worth of SRA The net worth of the Resolution Applicant has increased from ₹648.76 crore in FY 2020–21 to ₹1,269.26 crore in FY 2024–25, as per the financial statements placed on record. The increasing net worth reflects strong financial stability, credibility, and capacity of the Resolution Applicant to meet its obligations and successfully implement the Resolution Plan. 7 Experience of SRA The Resolution Applicant has been engaged in infrastructure development since 1996, including EPC, BOT, HAM, toll collection, and OMT projects. The long-standing industry experience and operational expertise indicate the capability of the Resolution Applicant to revive the Corporate Debtor as a going concern. 8 Management Capability The Resolution Applicant is managed by experienced directors and professionals with expertise in engineering, finance, and project execution. The presence of a competent management team ensures efficient implementation, monitoring, and long- term sustainability of the Corporate Debtor. 9 Implementation Timeline The Resolution Plan is proposed to be implemented within a period of 3 months from the Effective Date. The defined and time- bound schedule aligns with the objective of the Code for speedy resolution and ensures timely revival of the Corporate Debtor. 10 Monitoring Mechanism A Monitoring Committee comprising an Insolvency Professional, representative of the CoC, and representative of This mechanism ensures transparency, accountability, and effective supervision of implementation, thereby strengthening the execution framework of the Plan.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 40 of 46
the Resolution Applicant is proposed. 11 Management & Control Upon approval, management and control of the Corporate Debtor shall vest with the Resolution Applicant, and the Board shall be reconstituted. This is in compliance with Section 30(2)(c) & (d) and enables effective decision- making and operational control for revival. 12 Capital Restructuring The Plan provides for reduction of existing share capital and fresh issuance of shares to the Resolution Applicant. The restructuring ensures a clean slate for the Corporate Debtor and is in line with the framework of the Code and applicable laws. 13 Avoidance Transactions Any recoveries from avoidance transactions shall accrue to the Resolution Applicant and such applications shall be pursued. This is consistent with the provisions of the Code and enhances the value and effectiveness of the Resolution Plan. 14 Reliefs & Concessions The Resolution Applicant has sought various reliefs, waivers, and concessions for effective implementation of the Plan. Such reliefs are subject to applicable laws, judicial precedents, and the provisions of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. 15 Section 29A Compliance The Resolution Applicant has submitted an affidavit confirming eligibility under Section 29A, duly verified by the Resolution Professional. The mandatory eligibility requirement under the Code stands satisfied. 16 Form H Compliance Compliance Certificate in Form This confirms that the Resolution Plan meets
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 41 of 46
H has been filed by the Resolution Professional. all statutory and regulatory requirements under the Code and CIRP Regulations. 17 CoC Approval The Resolution Plan has been approved with 100% voting share in the 22nd CoC Meeting held on 03.02.2026. This reflects complete commercial satisfaction of the CoC, which is paramount and non- justiciable except on limited grounds. 18 No Contravention of Law Nothing has been brought on record to indicate that the Resolution Plan contravenes any provision of law. Requirement under Section 30(2)(e) stands satisfied. 19 Binding Effect (Section 31) Upon approval, the Resolution Plan shall be binding on all stakeholders including creditors, employees, and government authorities. This fulfills the requirement under Section 31 and ensures finality and enforceability of the Resolution Plan. The analysis herein is based on the documents placed on record, including the Resolution Plan, revised Form H, CoC minutes, and other material available before this Adjudicating Authority.
-
It is also pertinent to note that objections were earlier raised in IA No. 481 (MP) of 2025 regarding the treatment of third-party security. This Adjudicating Authority had directed reconsideration of the Resolution Plan. The said defect having been duly cured and the Resolution Plan having been re-approved by the CoC with 100% voting share, the requirement of Section 30(2) of the Code stands satisfied.
-
Further, in Chapter XIII, Page no. 58-62 of the resolution plan, the SRA has sought the reliefs and concessions. The stated effect of the
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 42 of 46
Resolution Plan and reliefs & concessions as prayed for shall be
available in accordance with the principle laid down by Hon’ble Supreme
Court in case of Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v/s.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited {(2021) 13 S.C.R
737} & Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Abhilash Lal
and Ors. (2019) ibclaaw.in 480 NCLAT. Further, it is clarified and
ordered that:
a. The Plan seeks waivers from procedural requirements under the
Companies Act, 2013, such as those under Section 66 for future
capital reduction, and extinguishment of all liabilities not covered by
the proposed payments. These reliefs are consistent with the IBC’s
clean slate principle, as upheld in Committee of Creditors of Essar
Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta [(2020) 8 SCC 531].
b. The Income Tax Department shall be at liberty to examine the tax
implications arising from the proposals contained in the plan, in
terms of Section 2(24), Section 28 and Section 56 of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 read with GAAR provisions thereunder.
c. The Applicant shall file necessary forms and pay prescribed fees, if
any, in terms of provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in relation to
reduction in capital and issuance of fresh capital, however, the
Registrar of Companies shall waive the additional fees, if any, payable
on such filing.
d. The SRA may approach prescribed authorities for waiver/reduction
in fees, charges, stamp duty, and registration fees, if any arising from
actions contemplated under the Resolution Plan and such request
shall be subject to the relevant law/statute and adherence to the
procedure prescribed thereunder.
e. The SRA may file appropriate application, if required, for renewal of
all Business Permits, rights, entitlements, benefits, subsidies and
privileges whether under applicable Law, contract, lease or license
granted in favour of the Corporate Debtor or to which the Corporate
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 43 of 46
Debtor is entitled to or accustomed to, which have expired on the
Effective Date, and follow the dues procedure prescribed for the
purpose upon payment of prescribed fees. The contract with third
parties shall be subject to consent of such parties. It is clarified that
continuance of approvals shall not be refused on account of
extinguishment of any dues under Code and extension or renewal
thereof shall not be denied on account of past insolvency of the
Corporate Debtor. No action shall lie against the Corporate Debtor
for any non-compliances arising prior to the date of approval of
Resolution Plan, however, such non-compliances shall be cured, if
necessitated to keep the approval in force, after approval of the plan
within period stipulated in the Resolution Plan. The Compliances
under the applicable law for all the statutory appointments by the
Corporate Debtor shall be completed within 12 months, where after,
the necessary consequence under respective law may follow.
f. No orders levying any tax, demand of penalty from the Corporate
Debtor in relation to period up to approval of the Resolution Plan
shall be passed by any authority and such demand, if created, shall
not be enforceable as having extinguished in terms of approved
Resolution Plan.
g. The carry forward of losses and unabsorbed depreciation shall be
available in accordance with the provisions of Income Tax Act, and
the Income Tax Department shall be at liberty to examine the same.
h. An application for compounding/condoning shall be filed in
accordance with the procedure specified in respective law or
concerned authority, however, no fine or penalty shall be imposed for
non-compliances till the date of approval of this Plan or such further
period as is permitted in terms of this Order.
i. ROC shall update the records and reflect the Corporate Debtor as
‘Active’ upon filing of pending returns/forms after payment of normal
fees (not additional fee). In case such filing is not permitted by the e-
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 44 of 46
filing portal, the ROC shall accept such forms/returns in physical
format and manage to upload the same by back-end without
requiring payment of additional filing fees leviable for the period upto
approval of Resolution Plan. The Corporate Debtor shall be exempted
from using the words “and reduced”.
j. The Resolution Applicant, the Corporate Debtor and the assets of the
Corporate Debtor forming part of the Resolution plan shall have
immunity, privileges and protection as is available in the form and
manner stated in Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016.
k. The relief, concession or waiver contemplated in the approved
Resolution Plan under any of its part shall be available to the
Corporate Debtor only to the extent as enumerated above and such
relief, concession or waiver shall not extend to its subsidiaries, joint-
ventures or associates/affiliates, who have not been subjected to
resolution in the present CIRP process of Corporate Debtor. However,
it is clarified that no claim or action shall lie against the Corporate
Debtor in relation to any financial or any kind of obligation of
subsidiaries, joint-ventures or associates/affiliates, whether past or
arising in future.
ORDER 17. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Regulations 38 and 39 of the CIRP Regulations, and is feasible, viable and capable of effective implementation.
- Resolution Plan submitted by Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited is hereby approved under Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 45 of 46
Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Resolution Plan shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors (including Central Government, State Government or any local authority), guarantors and all other stakeholders.
-
It is clarified and observed that any relief, concession or waiver sought in the Resolution Plan, which has not been specifically dealt with in sub-paras (a) to (k) of para 16 hereinabove, or which is not permissible in terms of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and the decision in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Abhilash Lal & Ors., or is otherwise contrary to the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with the applicable Regulations, shall be deemed to have been rejected.
-
Further, the relief, which is not specifically provided, should not be treated as being allowed. Even if no relief or concessions are granted by the authorities concerned, then also SRA is bound to implement the Resolution Plan effectively without taking shelter of refusal by authorities concerned by non- implementation of the plan. Nevertheless, the SRA will also have liberty to file an appropriate Application, if so required for seeking any specific relief which is not granted hereinabove and/or denied by the concerned authority. The Resolution Applicant to give an undertaking that the submission of the Resolution Plan is unconditional, and the granting or refusal of the relief/concessions will not affect the implementation of the Plan.
-
The RP has submitted that the plan does not contravene any provisions of law. We also noted that the plan does not contravene any provisions of the law for the time being in force. Thereby, the provisions of Section 30(2)(e) have been complied with.
-
Henceforth, no creditors of the erstwhile Corporate Debtor can claim anything other than the liabilities referred to supra.
NCLT Indore Bench
CP(IB) 22 of 2023
Page 46 of 46
-
The Monitoring Committee/ Resolution Professional will submit a quarterly report to the Registry till the implementation of the Plan
-
The Resolution Professional shall forward all records relating to the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.
-
The Resolution Applicant shall take necessary steps for implementation of the Resolution Plan in a time-bound manner.
-
The moratorium under Section 14 shall cease to have effect from the date of this order.
-
As a result, the Application bearing IA(IBC)(PLAN) 2/2026 stands allowed & disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/-
MAN MOHAN GUPTA BRAJENDRA MANI TRIPATHI
MEMBER (TECHNICAL) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.