IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH- I

IA No. 11 of 2024 IN CP(IB) No. 1015 of 2019 Under Section 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 r/w Regulation 39 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016

IA No. 11 of 2024 In the Application of
Dr. Rajendra M. Ganatra

 …Resolution 

Professional/Applicant

In the matter of Shailen S Gala (HUF) and Ors. …Financial Creditors

Versus

Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited …Corporate Debtor Order Delivered on : 02.05.2024

Coram:
Hon’ble Member (Judicial) : SH. Justice Virendrasingh G. Bisht (Retd.) Hon’ble Member (Technical) : SH. Prabhat Kumar

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024 IN CP(IB) No. 1015 of 2019

Page 2 of 27

Appearances: For the Applicant : Mr. Vinod Kothari, Mr. Aayush Kothari, Mr. Mahendra Rahlan, Ms. Suyesha Kakarla, Mr. Chinmay Bhojane, Advocates

ORDER

Per: Virendrasingh G Bisht, Member (Judicial)

The present Application is moved by Resolution Professional
Dr. Rajendra M. Ganatra ( “Applicant”) under Section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) r/w Regulation 39(4) of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) for seeking approval of the Resolution Plan of Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with Mr. Mukesh M.

y Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) for seeking approval of the Resolution Plan of Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with Mr. Mukesh M. Doshi (“Successful Resolution Applicant/SRA”) under the provisions of Section 31(1) of the Code, for Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) and for passing order/appropriate direction that this Tribunal may deem fit in the present matter.

Brief Facts 2. The Corporate Debtor’s CIRP was initiated vide this Tribunal’s Order dated 19.09.2019 and Mr. Arundeep Singh Pathania was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (“IRP”) of the Corporate Debtor.

3. At the 1st CoC meeting dated 22.10.2019, the CoC resolved to appoint Dr. Rajendra M. Ganatra, the Applicant herein, as the Resolution Professional. The Application for confirmation of IRP as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor was allowed by this Tribunal vide Order dated 24.09.2019.

nt herein, as the Resolution Professional. The Application for confirmation of IRP as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor was allowed by this Tribunal vide Order dated 24.09.2019.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 3 of 27

4. The Public Announcement was made in Form A dated 28.09.2019 inviting claims from the creditors of the Corporate Debtor and the CoC of the Corporate Debtor was constituted on 16.10.2019.

5. On 11.11.2019, the CoC approved the appointment of Mr. Jigar Shah and Mr. Puneet Tyagi (“Registered Valuers”) as valuers for valuation the Corporate Debtor. The average fair value of the Corporate Debtor was determined as Rs. 98,93,33,793/- (Rupees Ninety Eight Crores, Ninety Three Lakhs, Thirty Three Thousand, Seven Hundred and Ninety Three Only). The average liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor was determined as Rs. 78,98,63,738 (Rupees Seventy Eight Crores, Ninety Eight Lakhs, Sixty Three Thousand, Seven Hundred and Thirty Eight Only).

6. The Resolution Professional published Form G dated 10.12.2019 along with detailed Invitation of Expression of Interest (“EOI”) and received two EOIs, i.e. from Aman Infra and Ozone Homes Private Limited. However, only Ozone Homes Private Limited qualified as Aman Infra failed to pay the requisite refundable process participant fees. Pursuant to the approval of the Request For Resolution Plan (“RFRP”) by the CoC, the Resolution Professional issued the Information Memorandum (“IM”) to the Resolution Applicant on 21.01.2020.

rsuant to the approval of the Request For Resolution Plan (“RFRP”) by the CoC, the Resolution Professional issued the Information Memorandum (“IM”) to the Resolution Applicant on 21.01.2020.

7. At the 3rd CoC meeting held on 17.02.2020, the Resolution professional declared the Final List of Prospective Resolution Applicants (“PRAs”) which comprised of only Ozone Homes Private Limited.

8. Accordingly, Ozone Homes Private Limited submitted its Resolution Plan along with an affidavit dated 19.02.2020 stating that it is eligible under Section 29A of the Code. As pet the decision of the CoC at its 4th meeting, the Resolution Applicant was required to submit a revised Resolution Plan incorporating the suggestions made by the CoC

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 4 of 27

members. On 06.03.2020, the Resolution Applicant sought more time to submit the Resolution Plan.

9. On 12.03.2020, the Resolution professional filed an application bearing IA No. 914/2020 seeking an extension of 90 days beyond 180 days of the CIRP period before this Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed this application vide Order dated 20.11.2020.

10. The Resolution Applicant submitted the revised Resolution Plan on 07.07.2020. Thereafter, at the 6th CoC meeting held on 20.07.2020, the CoC considered and approved the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant with a vote of 99.99%. Subsequently, an application dated 26.08.2020 bearing IA No. 1312/2020 was filed before this Tribunal for the approval of the Resolution Plan.

he Resolution Applicant with a vote of 99.99%. Subsequently, an application dated 26.08.2020 bearing IA No. 1312/2020 was filed before this Tribunal for the approval of the Resolution Plan.

11. While IA 1312/2020 was pending adjudication, the Successful Resolution Applicant (“SRA”), i.e. Ozone Homes Private Limited and the Ozone Group faced financial distress and on 22.03.2022, they sent an e-mail to the Resolution Professional seeking to withdraw from the NCLT proceedings for approval of their Resolution Plan. Accordingly, the Resolution Professional filed an affidavit dated 04.04.2022 before this Tribunal for suitable directions in the matter.

12. Consequently, at the 9th CoC meeting held on 04.09.2022, and which concluded after two adjournments on 25.10.2022, the CoC resolved to undertake the following – a) pray to the Tribunal for rejection/withdrawal of the Resolution Plan of the SRA which was pending adjudication b) request further 90 days for issue of fresh Form-G for CIRP of the Corporate Debtor c) forfeit the Rs. 10 lakhs deposited by the SRA as Performance Guarantee in accordance with the RFRP terms and use that amount to meet the CIRP cost.

esh Form-G for CIRP of the Corporate Debtor c) forfeit the Rs. 10 lakhs deposited by the SRA as Performance Guarantee in accordance with the RFRP terms and use that amount to meet the CIRP cost.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 5 of 27

13. Accordingly, an application bearing IA No. 3858/2022 was filed by the Resolution Professional before this Tribunal on 25.11.2022. The Tribunal allowed the Resolution Professional’s prayers vide Order dated 21.11.2023. The period from the date of filing of IA 1312/2020 till the date of its withdrawal and extension of time period of another 90 days for completion of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor was also granted.

14. Consequently, the Resolution Professional published a fresh Form G dated 26.11.2023 inviting EOIs. The Resolution Professional received 3 EOIs from – a) Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with Mr. Mukesh M. Doshi b) Shree Naman Developers Private Limited c) Eka Townships Private Limited in consortium with DOTOM Buildcon LLP.

15. However, only Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with
    Mr. Mukesh M. Doshi was found to be an eligible PRA. The updated IM, RFRP and Evaluation Matrix were provided to the eligible Resolution Applicant on 20.12.2023. The Resolution Applicant submitted the Resolution Plan on 20.01.2024. The Resolution Plan was considered at the 12th CoC meeting held on 27.01.2024. The CoC deliberated upon the Resolution Plan and proposed certain modifications which were accepted by the Representative of the Resolution Applicant.

d at the 12th CoC meeting held on 27.01.2024. The CoC deliberated upon the Resolution Plan and proposed certain modifications which were accepted by the Representative of the Resolution Applicant. Accordingly, the Resolution Applicant submitted a revised Resolution Plan dated 31.01.2024. On 01.02.2024, the Resolution Applicant clarified certain errors in the Resolution Plan through a letter.

16. Their Resolution Plan was approved by the CoC with 99.36% votes through the e-voting conducted between 31.01.2024 and 03.02.2024.

17. The Successful Resolution Applicant has remitted Rs. 50 lakhs as Performance Security in the designated account of the Corporate Debtor

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 6 of 27

in accordance with the RFRP. The amount has been kept as Fixed Deposit with the lien of the creditors till continuance of the Performance Security.

Salient Features of the Resolution Plan 18. The key features and summary of the final Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant and as approved by the COC are as under:

A) AMOUNT UNDER THE RESOLUTON PLAN
i) The resolution plan is based on the current approval of restricted height of 15.24 metres which has resulted in reduction in the sale area to 22,781 sq.ft. which is 35.83% of the maximum carpet area of 63,581 sq.ft. assumed by the valuers. The nominal value of the Corporate Debtor’s project based on 22,781 sq.ft. of RERA sale carpet area is Rs.37.09 as explained in the paragraph above.

t area of 63,581 sq.ft. assumed by the valuers. The nominal value of the Corporate Debtor’s project based on 22,781 sq.ft. of RERA sale carpet area is Rs.37.09 as explained in the paragraph above. Based on the restricted height as above, the amount envisaged in the Resolution Plan is Rs. 66.231 crore (inclusive of loan and working capital), as under: Sr. No. Sources Rs. Crore 1 CIRP cost 5.000 2 Allocation to secured financial creditor to be paid upfront 15.800 3 Allocation of 5% of admitted claims to unsecured financial creditors to be paid in the form of RERA carpet area (535 sq.ft.) 2.400 4 Allocation to operational creditors to be paid upfront 0.031 5 Loan and working capital infusion (Need-based, from RA) 43.000

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 7 of 27

Total 66.231

ii) The height of the project has been restricted to 15.24 metres due to the presence of the Signal Transmitting Station of Defence Forces in terms of Defence Ministry’s notification No. SRO 150 u/s 7 of Works of Defence Act, 1903. Since a number of buildings had already been allowed unrestricted height earlier, the Corporate Debtor moved Bombay High Court by way of a Writ Petition (L) No. 337 of 2015. The matter is yet to be disposed of.

of buildings had already been allowed unrestricted height earlier, the Corporate Debtor moved Bombay High Court by way of a Writ Petition (L) No. 337 of 2015. The matter is yet to be disposed of.

iii)Although the above allocation to the creditors constitutes full and final settlement in terms of the Resolution Plan, the Resolution Applicant has proposed that in case the full height approval materializes following disposal of the Writ Petition within two years from the Trigger date (maximum of 45 days from the date of resolution plan approval), it will repay the remaining 95% of the dues of unsecured creditors amounting to Rs. 45.69 crore in the form of additional RERA carpet area allocation of 10,153 sq.ft. In this case, the total amount envisaged in the Resolution Plan would be
Rs. 85.921 crore (inclusive of loan and working capital), as under:
Sr. No. Sources Rs. Crore 1 CIRP cost 5.000 2 Allocation to secured financial creditor to be paid upfront 15.800 3 Allocation of 5% of admitted claims to unsecured financial creditors to be paid in the form of RERA carpet area (535 sq.ft) 2.400 4 Allocation of the remaining 95% of admitted claims to unsecured financial 45.690

dmitted claims to unsecured financial creditors to be paid in the form of RERA carpet area (535 sq.ft) 2.400 4 Allocation of the remaining 95% of admitted claims to unsecured financial 45.690

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 8 of 27

creditors to be paid in the form of RERA carpet area (10,153 sq.ft.) 5 Allocation to operational creditors to be paid upfront 0.031 6 Loan and working capital infusion (Need- based, from RA) 43.000 Total 111.921

iv) The payment of CIRP cost, and allocation to the creditors (with restricted height approval), as envisaged under the Resolution Plan shall be made in the following manner as summarized at Clause 10.3 of the Resolution Plan.

Sr. No. Particulars of Claim
Type of Claim
Admitted Amount (INR) Settlement Amount (INR) 1.
CIRP Costs At actuals

5,00,00,000 2.
Secured Financial Creditors
Secured 1,57,85,77,747 15,80,00,000 3.
Unsecured Financial Creditors Unsecured 48,08,95,929

2,40,44,797 Refer to Note 1 4.
Operational Creditors Unsecured 3,05,69,540 3,05,695 5.
Employees and Workmen NA (No claim) NA NIL 6.
GRAND TOTAL 52,83,05,695

ured 48,08,95,929

2,40,44,797 Refer to Note 1 4.
Operational Creditors Unsecured 3,05,69,540 3,05,695 5.
Employees and Workmen NA (No claim) NA NIL 6.
GRAND TOTAL 52,83,05,695

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 9 of 27

Note 1: As mentioned above, the Unsecured Creditors have been assigned area in 2 phases, total allocation of 10,686 sq.ft. at a rate of
Rs. 45000/- per sq. ft., the estimated value is Rs. 48,08,95,931/- (Rupees Forty Eight Crores Eight Lakhs Ninety Five thousand Nine Hundred Thirty one Only) .

B) TREATMENT OF CIRP COSTS
i) CIRP costs as on March, 2024 of Rs.5,19,11,102/- (Rupees Five Crores Nineteen Lakhs Eleven Thousand One Hundred and Two only) to be paid in priority to the other creditors under the Resolution Plan.

ii) Any further increase will be paid by the Resolution Applicant.

C) TREATMENT OF SECURED FINANCIAL CREDITORS
i) The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay the Secured Financial Creditor in the manner set out in the Resolution Plan which is extracted and reproduced herein below.

D) TREATMENT OF UNSECURED FINANCIAL CREDITORS
i) The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay the unsecured Financial Creditors by allotting area in two phases. In phase 1, the SRA will allocate 534.33 sq. ft. area the value of which is estimated to be Rs.2,40,44,797/- (Rupees Two Crores Forty Lakhs Forty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Seven only) (Clause 7.1) The allocation will be in following manner as set out in Schedule II of the

e Rs.2,40,44,797/- (Rupees Two Crores Forty Lakhs Forty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Seven only) (Clause 7.1) The allocation will be in following manner as set out in Schedule II of the

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 10 of 27

Resolution Plan -

ii) In phase 2, the SRA will allocate 10,153 sq. ft. area the value of which is estimated to be Rs.45,68,51,134/- (Rupees Forty Five Crores Sixty Eight Lakhs Fifty One Thousand One Hundred and Thirty One only) (Clause 7.1). The allocation will be in following manner as set out in Schedule II of the Resolution Plan -

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 11 of 27

E) TREATMENT OF DISSENTING FINANCIAL CREDITORS
i) It is respectfully submitted that the Dissenting Financial Creditors shall be paid as per section 30(2) of the IBC, they shall not be paid less that at least the amount payable to them in accordance with Section 53(1) of IBC in the event of liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. They shall be aid in priority to the Consenting Financial Creditors. It may be observed that the Resolution Plan was voted with 99.36% votes in favour and only one abstention with 0.64%

e Debtor. They shall be aid in priority to the Consenting Financial Creditors. It may be observed that the Resolution Plan was voted with 99.36% votes in favour and only one abstention with 0.64%

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 12 of 27

vote. The abstaining creditor itself is undergoing CIRP.

ii) Total Bid Value shall not change.

F) TREATMENT OF OPERATIONAL CREDITORS
i) The Resolution Applicant proposes to pay to the Operational Creditors an amount of Rs. 3,05,695/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Five Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety five) against the total claim of Rs.3,05,69,540 /- (Rupees Threes Crores Five lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Forty only)

ii) The Operational Creditors shall be paid in priority to the other creditors within 57 days of approval of the Plan.

iii)The above claim covers statutory claims received from Income Tax Department of Rs. 2,98,58,950/- (Rupees Two Crores Ninety Eight lakhs Fifty Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty only).

iv) There are no claims received from workmen or employees

G) PAYMENT TOWARDS WORKING CAPITAL AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
i) The Resolution Applicant shall infuse fresh fund of Rs.22,00,000/- or higher towards working capital to successfully complete the Project with speedy implementation.

L AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
i) The Resolution Applicant shall infuse fresh fund of Rs.22,00,000/- or higher towards working capital to successfully complete the Project with speedy implementation.

ii) Apart from Working Capital mentioned above, the equity and loan from the promoters will be Rs.21,05,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Crores and Five Lakhs only) to meet the upfront payment commitment of Rs.20,83,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Crores and Eight Three Lakhs only) towards CIRP costs and payment to creditors.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 13 of 27

H) TERM OF THE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
i) The term of the Resolution Plan shall be of 36 months from the Effective Date to Closure Date for Phase I and another 36 months from the date of Full Height Approval, if received.

I) CONCESSIONS AND RELIEFS
i) The Resolution Plan is based on the assumption of running the Corporate Debtor’s operation on a fresh slate. Towards this, the Resolution Plan envisages the following:
a. In para 13.2 of the Resolution Plan, the SRA has sought certain waivers/ reliefs/concessions, dispensations, other rights and benefits. b. In para 13.3, the SRA has sought immunity from any past and existing defaults / non-compliance/ lapses in relation to the CD or by the CD or by its erstwhile promoters, board of directors, management and any other person. c. In para 13.4, the SRA has sought certain tax and stamp duty related exemptions / waivers. d. In para 13.5, the SRA has sought immunity from anti- corruption provisions.

nt and any other person. c. In para 13.4, the SRA has sought certain tax and stamp duty related exemptions / waivers. d. In para 13.5, the SRA has sought immunity from anti- corruption provisions. ii) It is pertinent to mention that in para 13, the SRA has stated that any disallowance or non-grant of the reliefs (by the Adjudicating Authority) will not impact the effectiveness or implementation of the Resolution Plan and the same should not be viewed as conditionalities to the implementation of this Resolution Plan or any time line for such implementation.

J) MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE CORPORATE DEBTOR
i) The present directors would cease to be directors and the team of Resolution Applicants shall manage the affairs of the Corporate

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 14 of 27

Debtor.

ii) Mr. Mayur Gandhi and Mr. Kaushal Doshi shall be in management and control of the Corporate Debtor.

iii)The SRA shall induct experienced professionals with proven track record in the organization. Existing employees may be replaced or removed to bring in operational efficiencies.

K) SUPERVISION OF THE PLAN
i) The Monitoring Committee for supervising the implementation of the Plan shall comprise of the Resolution Professional, a nominee of the Resolution Applicant, one member of the COC in consultation and deliberation with other members of the COC.

Statutory Compliance 19.

ll comprise of the Resolution Professional, a nominee of the Resolution Applicant, one member of the COC in consultation and deliberation with other members of the COC.

Statutory Compliance 19. In compliance of Section 30(2) of IBC, 2016, the Resolution Professional has examined the Resolution plan of the Successful Resolution Applicant and confirms that this Resolution Plan: a) Provides for payment of Insolvency Resolution Process cost in a manner specified by the Board in the priority to the payment of other debts of the corporate debtor; b) Provides for payment of debts of Operational Creditor in such manner as may be specified by the board which shall not be less than (i) the amount to be paid to such creditors in the event of liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 53; or (ii) the amount that would have been paid to such creditors, if the amount to be distributed under the Resolution Plan had been distribute in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 53 in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor.

uch creditors, if the amount to be distributed under the Resolution Plan had been distribute in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 53 in the event of liquidation of the corporate debtor.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 15 of 27

c) Provides for management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor after approval of Resolution Plan; d) The implementation and supervision of Resolution Plan;
e) Does not prima facie contravene any of the provisions of the law for time being in force, f) Confirms to such other requirements as may be specified by the Board. g) As per the Affidavit, the Resolution Applicant is not covered under 29A.

In compliance of Regulation 38 of CIRP Regulations, the Resolution Professional confirms that the Resolution plan provides that a) The amount due to the Operational Creditors under Resolution Plan shall be given priority in payment over Financial Creditors. b) It has dealt with the interest of all Stakeholders including Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors of the Corporate Debtor. c) A statement that neither the Resolution Applicants nor any related parties have failed to implement nor have contributed to the failure of implementation of any other Resolution Plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority in the past. d) The terms of the plan and its implementation schedule. e) The management and control of the business of the Corporate Debtor during its term. f) Adequate means of Supervising its implementation.
g) The Resolution Plan Demonstrate that it addresses
i.

The management and control of the business of the Corporate Debtor during its term. f) Adequate means of Supervising its implementation.
g) The Resolution Plan Demonstrate that it addresses
i. The cause of the Default ii. It is feasible and viable iii. Provision for effective implementation iv. Provisions for approvals required and the time lines for the same. v. Capability to Implement the Resolution Plan

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 16 of 27

The Resolution Professional has submitted Form-H under Regulation 39(4) of the CIRP Regulations to certify that the Resolution Plan as approved by the CoC meets all the requirements of the IBC and its Regulations, the relevant parts of which are reproduced below : FORM H COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

(Under Regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 I, Rajendra M. Ganatra, an insolvency professional enrolled with Insolvency Professional Agency of Institute of Cost Accountants of India and registered with the Board with registration number IBBI/IPA-003/IP-N00049/2017-18/10363, am the resolution professional for the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited.
1. The details of the CIRP are as under: Sl. No.

17-18/10363, am the resolution professional for the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited.
1. The details of the CIRP are as under: Sl. No. Particulars Description
1 Name of the CD Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited 2 Date of Initiation of CIRP 19/9/2019 3 Date of Appointment of IRP 26/9/2019 (Order dated 24/9/2019 received on 26/9/2019) 4 Date of Publication of Public Announcement 28/9/2019 5 Date of Constitution of CoC 16/10/2019 6 Date of First Meeting of CoC 22/10/2019 7 Date of Appointment of RP 18/11/2019

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 17 of 27

8 Date of Appointment of Registered Valuers 11/11/2019 9 Date of Issue of Invitation for EOI 10/12/2019 Again pursuant to Hon’ble NCLT’s order dated 21/11/2023 on: 26/11/2023 10 Date of Final List of Eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants 8/1/2020 Again pursuant to fresh issue of invitation for EOI on: 20/12/2023 11 Date of Invitation of Resolution Plan (i) 3/1/2020 (ii) 21/12/2023 12 Last Date of Submission of Resolution Plan
(i) 2/2/2020 (ii) 21/1/2024 13 Date of Approval of Resolution Plan by CoC (i) 20/7/2020 (E-Voting concluded on 25/7/2020) (ii) 30/1/2024 ( E-Voting concluded on 03/02/2024) 14 Date of Filing of Resolution Plan with Adjudicating Authority (i) 26/8/2020 (ii) 9/2/2024 15 Date of Expiry of 180 days of CIRP (i) 16/3/2020 (ii) Extended CIRP period expiry: 19/2/2024 16 Date of Order extending the period of CIRP (i) 20/11/2020

(i) 26/8/2020 (ii) 9/2/2024 15 Date of Expiry of 180 days of CIRP (i) 16/3/2020 (ii) Extended CIRP period expiry: 19/2/2024 16 Date of Order extending the period of CIRP (i) 20/11/2020 (ii) 21/11/2023 17 Date of Expiry of Extended Period of CIRP 19/2/2024 (Pursuant to Hon’ble NCLT’s order dated November 21, 2023) (ANNEXURE-13) 18 Fair Value Rs. 98,93,33,793/- 19 Liquidation value Rs. 78,98,63,738/-

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 18 of 27

20 Number of Meetings of CoC held Twelve 3. I have examined the Resolution Plan received from Resolution Applicant Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with Mr. Mukesh M. Doshi, and approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Mayurpankh Fine Builders Private Limited. 4. I hereby certify that- (i) the said Resolution Plan complies with all the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (Code), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (CIRP Regulations) and does not contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force. (ii) the Resolution Applicant Krishnir Realtors Private Limited in consortium with Mr. Mukesh M. Doshi, has submitted an affidavit pursuant to section 30(1) of the Code confirming its eligibility under section 29A of the Code to submit resolution plan. The contents of the said affidavit are in order. (iii) the said Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC in accordance with the provisions of the Code and the CIRP Regulations made thereunder.

The contents of the said affidavit are in order. (iii) the said Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC in accordance with the provisions of the Code and the CIRP Regulations made thereunder. The Resolution Plan has been approved by 99.36% of voting share of financial creditors after considering its feasibility and viability and other requirements specified by the CIRP Regulations. (iv) The voting was held pursuant to the meeting of the CoC on January 30, 2024 where I sought vote of members of the CoC by electronic voting system which was kept open at least for 24 hours as per the regulation 26. 7. The amounts provided for the stakeholders under the Resolution Plan is as under:

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 19 of 27

(Amount in Rs. lakh) Sl. No.

Category of Stakeholder * Sub-Category of Stakeholder Amount Claimed Amount Admitted Amount Provided under the Plan# Amount Provided to the Amount Claimed (%)

(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

1 Secured Financial Creditors (a) Creditors not having a right to vote under sub- section (2) of section 21 NA NA NA NA

(b) Other than (a) above:

(i) who did not vote in favour of the resolution Plan NA NA NA NA

(ii) who voted in favour of the resolution plan
15,785.78
15,785.78 1,580.00 10.01%

Total[(a) + (b)] 15,785.78
15,785.78 1,580.00 10.01%

2 Unsecured Financial Creditors (a) Creditors not having a right to vote under sub- section (2) of section 21 691.69
691.69
0 0%

)] 15,785.78
15,785.78 1,580.00 10.01%

2 Unsecured Financial Creditors (a) Creditors not having a right to vote under sub- section (2) of section 21 691.69
691.69
0 0%

(b) Other than (a) above:

(i) who did not vote in favour of the resolution Plan 130.99 130.99 0 0%

(ii) who voted in favour of the resolution plan
7069.22 4,677.97 240.45@ 3.40%

Total[(a) + (b)] 7,891.90 5,500.65 240.45 3.05%

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 20 of 27

3 Operational Creditors
(a) Related Party of Corporate Debtor
NA NA NA NA

(b) Other than (a) above:

(i)Government 298.76 298.59 2.99 1.00%

(ii)Workmen
0 0 NA NA

(iii)Employees
0 0 NA NA

(iv) For services rendered 7.11 7.11 0.071 1.00%

Total[(a) + (b)] 305.87 305.70 3.06 1.00%

4 Other debts and dues

NA NA NA NA

Grand Total

23,983.55 20,442.86 1,823.51 7.60%

*If there are sub-categories in a category, please add rows for each sub-category.

Amount provided over time under the Resolution Plan and includes estimated

value of non-cash components. It is not NPV.
@ In case the Corporate Debtor receives full building height approval, the total settlement value payable to unsecured financial creditors will be 4677.97 lakhs (treating the solitary non-voter’s share as zero since the liquidation value to unsecured creditors is zero). In that case the % of amount provided to amount claimed for unsecured financial creditors will be 66.17%, and the % of amount provided to amount claimed for total claims will be 27.1% (of total claims, and 31.80% of admitted claims) instead of 7.60%.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 21 of 27

11. The time frame proposed for obtaining relevant approvals is as under: Sl. No. Nature of Approval
    Name of applicable Law Name of Authority who will grant Approval When to be obtained 1 Full building height approval The Works of Defence Act, 1903 (Section 3) Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India Within one year 2 NOC or approval for change in control of the Corporate Debtor (if required)
    Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 Slum Rehabilitation Authority Within one year

12. The Resolution Plan is subject to the following contingencies (Elaborate the contingencies):
    i. In terms of the SRA approval, the sale building was proposed to be constructed as Basement + Ground Floor + 6 upper storied towers with a total built up are under free sale building of 4,758.58 sq.m. (51,220 sq.ft.).

approval, the sale building was proposed to be constructed as Basement + Ground Floor + 6 upper storied towers with a total built up are under free sale building of 4,758.58 sq.m. (51,220 sq.ft.). However, in January 2012, the Defence Ministry sent a letter to Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, insisting on construction restriction, for projects in 500 yards periphery of its Signal Transmitting Station close by, in terms of Defence Ministry’s notification No. SRO 150 u/s 7 of Works of Defence Act, 1903. This resulted in the Corporate Debtor’s building height being restricted to 15.24 metres. The height restriction has left the Corporate Debtor with less than 50% of the sale area. ii. The height restriction has been challenged by the Corporate Debtor in Bombay High Court by way of Write Petition 337 or 2015, based on the plea that the project falls outside the prescribed 500 yards periphery, and reported shifting of the Singal Transmitting Station, etc.

High Court by way of Write Petition 337 or 2015, based on the plea that the project falls outside the prescribed 500 yards periphery, and reported shifting of the Singal Transmitting Station, etc.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 22 of 27

iii. Owing to the uncertainty of the outcome of the Writ Petition, the Resolution Plan has been formulated based on the current approved height of Ground + 3 floors and the sale area of 22,781 sq.ft. of RERA carpet area. iv. If the height restriction is lifted and full height is permitted after disposal of the writ petition, the Resolution Plan envisages Phase-II in which further three floors would be constructed, when the remaining carpet area of about 40,351 sq.ft. (after acquiring and consuming 35% of fungible FSI) would be constructed. In such a case, the Resolution Plan envisages payment of the remaining dues of the unsecured creditors aggregating Rs. 45,68,51,134/- by way of allocation of 10,153 sq.t. at a rate of Rs.45,000/sq.ft. v. While the allocation for CIRP cost and creditors (described as total Bid Value by the Resolution Applicant) of Rs.23,23,50,492/- constitutes full and final settlement of all the admitted claims, the Resolution Applicant’s commitment of allocating 10,153 sq.ft. of RERA carpet area will enhance the total allocation to Rs. 68,92,01,626/-.
15. Provide details of section 66 or avoidance application filed / pending. Sl. No.

ment of allocating 10,153 sq.ft. of RERA carpet area will enhance the total allocation to Rs. 68,92,01,626/-.
15. Provide details of section 66 or avoidance application filed / pending. Sl. No. Type of Transaction Date of Filing with Adjudicating Authority Date of Order of the Adjudicating Authority Brief of the Order 1 Preferential transactions under section 43

IA No. 1200 of 2020 has been filed on 21/8/2020 for avoidance of preferential transactions u/s 43, 45, 49 and 66 of IBC and potential undervalued / fraudulent transactions. Matter is pending for adjudication. 2 Undervalued transactions under section 45 3 Extortionate credit transactions under section 50 4 Fraudulent transactions under section 66

On perusal of the Resolution Plan, we find that the Resolution Plan provides for the following:
a) Payment of CIRP Cost as specified u/s 30(2)(a) of the Code.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 23 of 27

b) Repayment of Debts of Operational Creditors as specified u/s 30(2)(b) of the Code. c) For management of the affairs of the Corporate Debtor, after the approval of Resolution Plan, as specified U/s 30(2)(c) of the Code. d) The implementation and supervision of Resolution Plan by the RP and the CoC as specified u/s 30(2)(d) of the Code.

The RP has complied with the requirement of the Code in terms of Section 30(2)(a) to 30(2)(f) and Regulations 38(1), 38(1)(a), 38(2)(a), 38(2)(b), 38(2)(c) & 38(3) of the Regulations.

The RP has complied with the requirement of the Code in terms of Section 30(2)(a) to 30(2)(f) and Regulations 38(1), 38(1)(a), 38(2)(a), 38(2)(b), 38(2)(c) & 38(3) of the Regulations.

The RP has filed Compliance Certificate in Form-H along with the Plan. On perusal the same is found to be in order. The Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC by majority of 99.36%.

The Resolution Applicant has sought certain reliefs and concessions, which we have dealt with below –

a) Clause 13.2 of the Resolution Plan : Waivers/Reliefs/ Concessions, Dispensations, Other Rights and Benefits Reliefs sought vide Clause No. 13.2 i), ii), iii), iv), viii) and x) are allowed. However, reliefs claimed vide Clause 13.2 v), vi), vii) and ix) shall be considered by respective authorities subject to adherence of the provisions, procedure and compliances of relevant laws.

b) Clause 13.3 of the Resolution Applicant : Indemnity for any past and existing defaults/non-compliance/lapses by the Erstwhile Promoters, Board of Directors, Management and any other person All reliefs sought under Clause 13.3 of the Resolution Plan are allowed.

d existing defaults/non-compliance/lapses by the Erstwhile Promoters, Board of Directors, Management and any other person All reliefs sought under Clause 13.3 of the Resolution Plan are allowed.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 24 of 27

c) Clause 13.4 of the Resolution Plan : Tax and Stamp Duty Exemptions As regards the reliefs sought vide Clause 13.4 of the Resolution Plan, as per extant provisions in the relevant statute and subject to adherence of the prescribed procedures, the authorities will consent.

d) Clause 13.5 : Anti-corruption provisions and immunity The relief sought under Clause 13.5 of the Resolution Plan is allowed.

The Resolution Applicant has also assumed that the IBC is a complete code and NCLT is empowered to grant a single window clearance for all actions contemplated under this Resolution Plan, which shall be granted upon the approval of the Resolution Plan by the NCLT. However, this cannot be allowed as it shall be subject to adherence of procedure and compliances of relevant laws.

In K Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank & Others (in Civil Appeal No.10673/2018 decided on 05.02.2019) the Hon’ble Apex Court held that if the CoC had approved the Resolution Plan by requisite percent of voting share, then as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the Resolution Professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT).

solution Plan by requisite percent of voting share, then as per section 30(6) of the Code, it is imperative for the Resolution Professional to submit the same to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). On receipt of such a proposal, the Adjudicating Authority is required to satisfy itself that the Resolution Plan as approved by CoC meets the requirements specified in Section 30(2). The Hon’ble Apex Court further observed that the role of the NCLT is ‘no more and no less’. The Hon’ble Apex Court further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan “as approved” by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors. Even in that enquiry, the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority can reject the Resolution Plan is in reference

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 25 of 27

to matters specified in Section 30(2) when the Resolution Plan does not conform to the stated requirements.

In view of the discussions and the law thus settled, the instant Resolution Plan meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code
and Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the Regulations. The Resolution Plan is not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and is in accordance with law. The same needs to be approved. Hence, ordered.

The Resolution Plan along with the Addendum thereto annexed to the Application is hereby approved.

of the Code and is in accordance with law. The same needs to be approved. Hence, ordered.

The Resolution Plan along with the Addendum thereto annexed to the Application is hereby approved. It shall become effective from this date and shall form part of this order with the following directions:

i. It shall be binding on the Corporate Debtor, its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority to whom a debt in respect of the payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force is due, guarantors and other stakeholders involved in the Resolution Plan.

ii. The approval of the Resolution Plan shall not be construed as waiver of any statutory obligations/liabilities of the Corporate Debtor and shall be dealt by the appropriate Authorities in accordance with law. Any waiver sought in the Resolution Plan, shall be subject to approval by the Authorities concerned in light of the Judgment of Supreme Court in Ghanshyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v/s. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, the relevant paragrahs of which are extracted herein below:

“95. (i) Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the

ny Limited, the relevant paragrahs of which are extracted herein below:

“95. (i) Once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 26 of 27

claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of the resolution plan shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan;

(ii) 2019 Amendment to Section 31 of the I&B Code is clarificatory and declaratory in nature and therefore will be effective from the date on which the Code has come into effect;

(iii) consequently, all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued.”

iii. The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Mumbai, Maharashtra for information and record.

The Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA) shall accordingly be amended and filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Mumbai, Maharashtra for information and record. The Resolution Applicant, for effective implementation of the Plan, shall obtain all necessary approvals, under any law for the time being in force, within such period as may be prescribed.

iv. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code shall cease to have effect from this date.

MUMBAI BENCH- I IA No. 11 of 2024

Page 27 of 27

v. The Applicant shall supervise the implementation of the Resolution Plan and file status of its implementation before this Authority from time to time, preferably every quarter.

vi. The Applicant shall forward all records relating to the conduct of the CIRP and the Resolution Plan to the IBBI along with copy of this Order for information.

vii. The Applicant shall forthwith send a certified copy of this Order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant, respectively for necessary compliance.

      Sd/-                                                                             Sd/- 

Prabhat Kumar

Justice V.G. Bisht Member (Technical)

Member (Judicial)
/SP/