Compounding order under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013 for violation of Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 in the matter of M/s. Harishakti Infrapromoters Private Limited

BEFORE THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR (NORTHERN REGION)

Company Application No. RDNR/HARISHAKTI/COMP/441/2025/AB5974558 In the matter of the Companies Act, 2013 - Section 441 And

In the Matter of HARISHAKTI INFRAPROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED having Registered office at E-321, Kamla Nagar, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282005.

In the matter of:

1. Harishakti Infrapromoters Private Limited.

2. Mr. Neeraj Kumar Agarwal, (Director). 3. Mrs. Neha Agarwal, (Director).

...Applicant(s)

Present: Mr. Tarin Rawat, Ld. PCS. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Assistant Director.

....For Applicant(s) ....Presenting Officer

Date of Hearing: 02.01.2026

INTERIM ORDER

• |. Anapplication under section 441 of theCompanies Act, 2013, for compounding of default committed u/s 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 was filed by the aforesaid Applicants vide Form GNL-1 through SRN AB5974558.

2. Facts presented by the Presenting Officer:

||Factors|to|be|Considered|Considered|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|(i)|The gravity||ofoffence:|offence:|The Applicant Company has failed to hold the Annual|
||||||General Meeting (AGM) within the stipulated time period|
||||||pursuant to the provision of section 96 ofthe Companies|
||||||Act, 2013.TheAGMof thecompany forthe financial year|
||||||ended 31.03.2024 was required to be held on or before|
||||||30.09.2024 but the same was held on 16.10.2024 (16 days|
||||||delay), hence default.|
|(ii)|The act|is|intentional||or | Unintentional.|
||unintentional:|||||
|(iit)|The maximum|||punishment| Section 99 ofThe Companies Act, 2013:||
||prescribed|||for<br>such||
||offences, such <br>imprisonment|||as fine or | "Ifany default ismade inholding ameeting of thecompany<br> or both fine | in accordance with the section 96 or section 97 or section||
||and imprisonment:||||98 or in complying with any directions ofthe Tribunal, the|
||||||companyand every officerofthecompanywho is in default|
||||||shall be punishable with fine whichmay extend to one lakh|
||||||rupeesand in the caseofacontinuingdefault, with a further|
||||||fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for every|
||||||dayduringwhichsuchdefaultcontinues"|

==> picture [110 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

ntinuingdefault, with a further| ||||||fine which may extend to five thousand rupees for every| ||||||dayduringwhichsuchdefaultcontinues"|

**==> picture [110 x 53] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Ga Wie Als<br>Age oe ‘i Zig? OS<br>{hy eee ey<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 1 of 3

## Fine reported/recommended by the ROC, is as follows: 

Name of | Fine Additional | Total Fine applicants (in Rs.) Fine (in Rs.) in Rs.) * Harishakti 1,00,000/- | 75,000/1,75,000/Infrapromoters Private Limited. sealedMr. Neeraj | 1,00,000/- | 75,000/1,75,000/Agarwal. eal aa Agarwal. *For the purpose of additional fine: Rs. 5000/-X 15 days= Rs. 75,000/Companies: (v) The period of default: Financial Year 2023-24. (15 days delay) <a (vi) Whether petition —_ for | Suo-Moto application filed by the Applicants. compounding is suo-moto before or after notice from the Registrar of Companies or after imposition of the punishment or during the pendency of a proceeding: (vil) Whether defaulter has | The Petitioner Company has made its default good in made good of the default: | respect of the contravention of Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 by holding the AGM for the F.Y. 2023-24 on 16.10.2024 and has also filed AOC-4 eform approved. Te videBeatersSRN N26162131 dated 06.01.2025 and MGT-7 eform (viii) | Financial Condition of the | During the course of hearing Ld. PCS confirms that the Company and __ other | turnover of the Company is Nil as per MGT-7 filed for the defaulter: FY 2023-24. i(ix) Similarears: offence | No. (x) The act of defaulters is | No. prejudicial to the interest of the member(s) or company or public interest or not: AG ae A company, etc: tz, soto) Os Page 2 of 3 aig Te ot 224 N . og)

ence | No. (x) The act of defaulters is | No. prejudicial to the interest of the member(s) or company or public interest or not: AG ae A company, etc: tz, soto) Os Page 2 of 3 aig Te ot 224 N . og) 

(xiii) | Any other factor relevant to | Ld. PCS prays for leniency as the default was unintentional. the case: and incidental and the applicants had no direct and cogent intention to contravene the law. 

3. Compounding Fee levied for the default committed under Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 for F.Y. 2023-24 is as follows: 

**==> picture [425 x 101] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
S. No. Applicant Name Default period Compounding fee payable<br>by the applicant (in INR)<br>| Harishakti Infrapromoters F.Y. 2023-24 Rs. 1,00,000/-<br>Private Limited.<br>Mr. Neeraj Kumar Agarwal. FLY. 2023-24 Rs. 50,000/-<br>Mrs. Neha Agarwal. F.Y. 2023-24 Rs. 50,000/-<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


- 4, Payment to be made within 15 days. 

5. Any other details: Nothing as such. 

Signed on the _ day of January 2026 at New Delhi.

## REGIONAL DIRECTOR (NR) 

12924— 12%30 Dated 09. JANJAN 20s“nine

## Entd. . RDNR/HARISHAKTI/COMP/441/2025/AB5974558 

1. Harishakti Infrapromoters Private Limited. 

- E-321, Kamla Nagar, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282005. 

2. Mr. Neeraj Kumar Agarwal. 

- E-321, Kamla Nagar, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282005. 

3. Mrs. Neha Agarwal. 

- E-321, Kamla Nagar, Agra, Uttar Pradesh-282005. 

4. Registrar ofCompanies, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. 

**==> picture [100 x 104] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
JED<br>fe. [oe] [os] 4gaNOF<br>La Oe ee<br>“ALY wk ce<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Page 3 of 3