← Archive
IN FORCE

Adjudication order of penalties u/s 454(5) of Companies Act, 2013 in the matter of M/s. ENTEGRA LIMITED

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

.

oOo

:

==> picture [32 x 14] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Wie<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [445 x 202] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Been e<br>ANd GAN BASS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br>ORINC He AAA pay ? — MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS<br>vidi ba<br> fre arate fe? OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR<br>aaat as joaregpael WESTERN REGION<br>Taree’, Uradt Aisa, EVEREST’, 5th Floor,<br>too, Alla Bled, Hay Yoooo? 100, Marine Drive, Mumbai, 400 002<br>PTA: WCWWS3 / WRG / BWW (Dir) rd.west@mea.gov.in<br>Re |<br>‘39 JUL 2025<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [17 x 22] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> =e<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

  1. ENTEGRA LIMITED,

    • 2, Niranjan, 99, Marine Drive, Marine Lines, Mumbai, Mumbai City, Maharashtra 400002, India.
  2. Mukul S. Kasliwal,

    • B-5 Rashmi Building Byramji Gamadia Road, Cumballa Hills, Mumbai 400026, Maharashtra.

3. Rajesh Mendiratta,

Flat No. B-1, 6 floor, Prithvi C.H.S. Ltd, 21 Altamount Road, Mumbai 400026, Maharashtra.

Sub: Appeal under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 2013 in the matter of ENTEGRA LIMITED for violation of Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 — reg.

Sir,

==> picture [15 x 19] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> ma<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

==> picture [1 x 3] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> |<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

I am directed to refer to this Directorate’s Letter dated 27/06/2025 and subsequent mail dated 27/06/2025 on the captioned subject. In this connection, a personal hearing was given to the appellant(s) on 17/07/2025 to show cause as to why they had filed an appeal in physical mode on 30/04/2025 without filing requisite e-form ADJ and that to after a period of 474 days against the Adjudication Order dated 12/01/2024 passed by Registrar of Companies, Mumbai. However, none attended the said hearing nor replied to the letter and mail dt.27/06/2025.

In this connection, your attention is drawn to Section 454(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 4(1) & (2) of the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 which states that —

,

.

a

~

“Section 454(6): Every appeal under sub-section (5) shall be filed within sixty days from the date on which the copy of the order made by the adjudicating officer is received by the aggrieved person and shall be in such form, manner and be accompanies by such fees as may be prescribed.

the date on which the copy of the order made by the adjudicating officer is received by the aggrieved person and shall be in such form, manner and be accompanies by such fees as may be prescribed.

Rule 4(1): Every appeal against the order of the adjudicating officer shall be filed in writing with the Regional Director having jurisdiction in the matter within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of the order of adjudicating officer by the aggrieved party, in Form ADJ setting forth the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanies by a certified copy of the order against which the appeal is sought......

Rule 4(2): Every appeal filed under this rule shall be accompanied by such fee as provided in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.”

In view of the above, the present appeal filed in physical mode without filing requisite e-form ADJ and after a period of 474 days is rejected without going into the merit of the case with directions to the appellant(s) to pay the penalty imposed by the Registrar of Companies, Mumbai vide Adjudication Order dt. 12/01/2024 immediately as the present appeal in physical mode after limitation period is not admissible under law.

This issues with the approval of the Regional Director, WR.

oa Ve ICLS) DEPUTY DIRECTOR

Copy to:

The Registrar of Companies, Mumbai, with directions to file prosecution under Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013, against the company and every officer of the company, if they fail to deposit the penalty imposed upon them vide Adjudication Order dt. 12/01/2024.

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 24209 --apply.

Citation copied