← Archive
IN FORCE

Adjudication order for violation of section 42(9) of Companies Act, 2013 in the matter of M/s. CHALASANI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED.

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

Page 1 of3 F. No:9/03/ADJ/SEC.42(9) of 2013 /ROC(AP)/RD(SER)/2025)1 +9. NG BEFORE THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTH EAST REGION

MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, HYDERABAD IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF CHALASANI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED .....

1.M/s. CHALASANI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED + aera _ | # 50-53-14, Gurudwara Lane Seethammadhara, | sreypor QLSrATOiE S| Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, 530013. om ' 2. Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Chalasani | } Plot No.19, Balaji Bay Mount, | orespM AL DIRESTSS | Tarakarama Nagar, Near IT SEZ, HESSOF ert jyper Peda Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam-530045, Learmen se 29} Andhra Pradesh, India. 3.Mr. Saileesh Chalasani Plot No.19, Balaji Bay Mount, Tarakarama Nagar, Near IT SEZ, : Peda Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam-530045, Andhra Pradesh, India. bettie ADpeallants

3.Mr. Saileesh Chalasani Plot No.19, Balaji Bay Mount, Tarakarama Nagar, Near IT SEZ, Peda Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam-530045, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Date of hearing: 29.05.2025 Present: Mr. S. Hari Kishore Babu, CS

ORDER

  1. This is an appeal filed under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 |

by the above appellants in e-form ADJ vide SRN AB3122651 dated 31.03.2025 against the adjudication order Petition No. PO/AD3J/022025/VW/00092 dated 24.02.2025 under section 454 read with section 42 (9) of the Companies Act, 2013 passed by the Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh for default in compliance with the requirements of Section 42 (9).

  1. Registrar of Companies in his order of adjudication has stated that due to delay in filing the return of allotment within prescribed period from the date of allotment. Hence, the penalty is imposed as per Section 42(9) of the Companies Act, 2013. ME

Page2 of 3

  1. ROC, Andhra Pradesh had issued e adjudication notice dated 24.02.2025 and imposed a penalty vide their adjudication order No. PO/ADJ/022025/VW/00092 dated 24.02.2025, Rs. 1,80,000/- on Company and Rs. 1,80,000/on its defaulting officers., namely Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Chalasani, Director and Mr. Saileesh Chalasani, Director (total aggregating to Rs.5,40,000/-). :

  2. Aggrieved by the said order dated 24.02.2025, the applicants herein have filed the instant appeal and the matter was fixed for hearing on 29.05.2025. The authorized representative, Mr. S.Hari Kishore Babu, Company secretary appeared on behalf of the appellant.

rein have filed the instant appeal and the matter was fixed for hearing on 29.05.2025. The authorized representative, Mr. S.Hari Kishore Babu, Company secretary appeared on behalf of the appellant.

  1. The Authorised Representative of the appellant stated that the company was required to file the form in January, 2023 but could file it only in July, 2023 due to issues in the portal. Appellant has provided General Circular No.4/2023 dated 21.02.2023 issued by Ministry of Corporate of Affairs extending the time for filing PAS-03 e-form till 31.03.2023.

  2. In view of the circular placed are recorded by the appellant the period of January to March 2023, is exempted from the period of delay. The period of delay is thus counted from 01.04.2023 to 04.07.2023 i.e., 95 days. The order of the AO is modified reducing the penalty in accrodance of the period of delay at Rs. 1000/- for each day of default.

  3. The penalty is modified to an amount of Rs. 95,000/- for company and Rs. 95,000/- for each director who were directors/promotors in default j.e., Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Chalasani and Mr. Saileesh Chalasani (total aggregating to Rs. 2,85,000/-)

  4. Accordingly, the appellants have paid the penalty and Mr. Surendra Kuchipudi, CS, Authorised Signatory vide email dated 31.05.2025 has

7

Page3 of 3

: furnished the payment of challans with respect to the Adjudication of violation of section 42 (9) of CA 2013 are as under:

==> picture [426 x 238] intentionally omitted <==

7

Page3 of 3

: furnished the payment of challans with respect to the Adjudication of violation of section 42 (9) of CA 2013 are as under:

==> picture [426 x 238] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----<br> Named & Designation Receipt/SRN Adjudication<br>of the Applicant(s) challan & Penalaty paid<br>dated by the<br>30.05.2025. applicant(s)<br>Amount (in Rs.<br>1 M/s. Chalasani Hospitals 1- 95,000/-<br>Private Limited 17949984942-<br>C<br>2 |Ms. Vijayalakshmi 1- 95,000/-<br>Chalasani 17945671677-<br>C<br>3. |Mr. Saileesh Chalasani 1- 95,000/-<br>17946502613<br>-C<br>Rs.<br>| Total Adjudication Penalty (amount in 2,85,000/-<br>----- End of picture text -----<br>

.

  1. In view of the compliance made by the Applicants stated above, this final order is issued to the Appellants. The Appeal is hereby disposed of. Issued under my hand and seal on this the ....l14. day of JS)...Dou"2025. iN JESUS EMT BRAT, RICHA KUKREJA . ** », REGIONAL DIRECTOR(S.E.R.) ae gaxtata /HYDERABAD

Copy for information and necessary action to:

  1. Registrar of Companies, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada.

  2. The Joint Secretary, E-Governance Cell, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi. (

Cell, | | ke on Ne Delhi. ( . Ge 2-8s. ARM BHT RICHA KUKREJA WE3e 2 '” REGIONAL DIRECTOR(S.E.R.) cannes gavrara /HY DERABAD

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 24205 --apply.

Citation copied