C/85907/2025 — SAMARTH DIAMONDS vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-AIR SPECIAL CARGO
In force — no superseding record on file.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
WEST ZONAL BENCH
CUSTOMS APPEAL NO: 85907 OF 2025
[Arising out of Order-in-Original No: UM/CUS/HD/07/2024-25/ADJN/APSC dated 13th August 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Airport Special Cargo, Mumbai.]
Samarth Diamonds
EC 7092 Bharat Diamond Bourse, BKC, Bandra (E) Mumbai – 400051
… Appellant versus
Commissioner of Customs (II)
Airport Special Cargo
Awas Corporate point, Makwana Centre, Andheri (E),
Air Cargo Complex, Sahar, Mumbai-400059
…Respondent APPEARANCE: Shri Neeraj Hande, Advocate for the appellant Shri Deepak Sharma, Deputy Commissioner (AR) for the respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MR C J MATHEW, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
FINAL ORDER NO: 85078/2026
DATE OF HEARING:
22/01/2026 DATE OF DECISION: 22/01/2026
PER: C J MATHEW That ‘A diamond is forever’, from a coinage by Mary Frances Gerety for De Beers and arguably acclaimed as the slogan of the century, haunts the import of that precious stone by the appellant, M/s Samarth
diamond is forever’, from a coinage by Mary Frances Gerety for De Beers and arguably acclaimed as the slogan of the century, haunts the import of that precious stone by the appellant, M/s Samarth
2
C/85907/2025
Diamonds, with the submission that the diamonds were not yet
‘forever’ even as these were diamonds not cutting any ‘ice’ for
being allowed benefit of exemption available, by notification1,
exclusively for ‘rough diamonds’ , is at the heart of this dispute.
2.
The appellant herein, M/s Samarth Diamonds, imported
twelve consignments of ‘rough diamonds sawn’ valued at
₹27,21,11,098 that, though corresponding to tariff item 7102
3100 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975 with standard
rate of duty therein but owing to exemption supra, were cleared
without payment of duty. The jurisdictional customs authorities
were not convinced that ‘sawn diamonds’ were, as yet, ‘rough
diamonds’ requiring further cutting before ‘forever’ and initiated
proceedings for recovery of duty not paid leading to fastening of
liability of ₹ 2,31,85,567 under section 28 of Customs Act, 1962,
along with applicable interest under section 28AA of Customs Act,
1962 besides being imposed with penalty of like amount under
section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 and further penalty under
section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962.
3.
nder section 28AA of Customs Act,
1962 besides being imposed with penalty of like amount under
section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 and further penalty under
section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962.
3.
Learned Counsel submitted that, in a manner the issue
stands settled with recourse having been taken by the Central
Government to section 28A of Customs Act, 1962 precluding such
proceedings where duty had not been paid and enabling refund of
duty if paid.
1 [no. 50/2017-Cus dated 30th June 2017]
3
C/85907/2025
4.
Learned Authorized Representative submitted that the
impugned order was legal and proper as the impugned notification
had not been amended till 1st February 2022 to incorporate
additional description goods therein and the clearances in the inter
regnum extended with like benefit, by notification2, only after
adjudication had been completed.
5.
From
‘
Whereas, the notification no. 50/2017-Customs, dated the
30th June, 2017 of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue (hereinafter referred to as the said
notification) allowed duty free import of goods of the description
"Rough diamonds (industrial or non-industrial)" falling within
Chapter 71 as specified against serial number (S.No.) 345 of the
said notification;
2.
And whereas, the said notification was amended by
notification no.
trial or non-industrial)" falling within Chapter 71 as specified against serial number (S.No.) 345 of the said notification; 2. And whereas, the said notification was amended by notification no. 02/2022-Customs, dated the 1st February, 2022, allowing duty free import of goods of the description "Simply Sawn Diamonds" falling under the sub-heading or tariff Items "7102 21, 7102 3100" (hereinafter referred to as the said goods) by inserting serial number (S.No.) 345A, subject to condition number 110 that "If, the importer produces before the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, a certificate issued under Kimberly Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) certifying that the imported goods are diamonds, not further worked than simply sawn", with effect from 2nd February, 2022; 3. And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that a
2 [notification no. 70/2024-Cus (NT) dated 23rd October 2024]
ffect from 2nd February, 2022; 3. And whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that a
2 [notification no. 70/2024-Cus (NT) dated 23rd October 2024]
4 C/85907/2025 practice was generally prevalent regarding non-levy of duty of customs leviable under the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with the notification no. 50/2017- Customs, dated the 30th June, 2017, as amended, on the said goods imported into India during the period from 1st July, 2017 to 1st February, 2022; 4. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 28A of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, hereby directs that the whole of the duty of customs leviable under the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with the said notification, if any payable on the import of the said goods, during the period from 1st July, 2017 to 1st February, 2022, but for the said practice, shall not be required to be paid in respect of import of the said goods.’ in the notification under section 28A of Customs Act, 1962, we take note of the chronology of developments and find that the impugned goods are, indeed, entitled to be relieved of duty liability. 6. In view of the finality accorded thereby, nothing further remains in this dispute. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside to allow the appeal. (Dictated and pronounced in the open court)
(JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA)
President
(C J MATHEW)
Member (Technical)
*/as
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
SAMARTH DIAMONDS vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-AIR SPECIAL CARGO
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 23647 --apply.