C/85105/2023 — LUPIN LTD vs -COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)-MUMBAI(AIR CARGO IMPORT)
In force — no superseding record on file.
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I
Customs Early Hearing Application No. 87050 of 2025 (on behalf of appellant)
In
Customs Appeal No. 85105 of 2023
(Arising out of Order-in-Original CAO No. CC-GSS/12/2022-23 ADJ.(I)/ACC dated 02.12.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Import), ACC, Mumbai)
M/s Lupin Limited
.… Appellant
Kalpataru Inspire, 3rd Floor,
Off Western Express Highway,
Santacruz (East), Mumbai – 400 055
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Import), ACC, Mumbai …. Respondent Air Cargo Complex, Sahar, Andheri (East), Mumbai – 400 099
APPEARANCE: Shri Jatin Arora, Advocate for the Appellant
Shri Mahesh Patil, Authorized Representative for the Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. M.M. PARTHIBAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. A/86771/2025
Date of Hearing: 07.11.2025 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025
PER: S.K. MOHANTY
Applicant/appellant has filed this miscellaneous application, praying for early hearing of appeal on the ground that the classification dispute in respect of the imported goods i.e., ‘Crimp Pumps’ of various types and configurations, involved in the present appeal is no more res integra, in view of the Final Order No. A/85262/ 2025 dated 25.02.2025 passed by this Bench of the Tribunal, which was subsequently upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, reported in 2025 (7) TMI 1279 – SC.
in view of the Final Order No. A/85262/ 2025 dated 25.02.2025 passed by this Bench of the Tribunal, which was subsequently upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, reported in 2025 (7) TMI 1279 – SC. Therefore, prayer made by the applicant is considered and accordingly, the miscellaneous application filed by the applicant/appellant is allowed.
2 C/85105/2023
On a query from the Bench, whether the appeal can be taken up for hearing and disposal today, in view of the fact that the issue in hand has already been settled as per the above referred judgement, learned Authorized Representative appearing for the Revenue has not raised any objection for the same. Therefore, with the consent of both sides, this appeal is taken up for hearing and disposal today on merits.
We find that the issue with regard to classification of imported goods
i.e., ‘Crimp Pumps’ is no more open for any debate, in view of the Final Order
dated 25.02.2025 (supra) passed by this Tribunal. The Tribunal in the said
order has held that the classification claimed by the importer under CTI 8413
5010 / 8413 5090 is proper and correct, inasmuch as at the time of import,
the goods remain as ‘appliance used for spraying or dispersion of liquid’
called as ‘Crimp Pump for nasal spray along with its components or parts’.
Since the said order dated 25.02.2025 has also been upheld by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court, by rejecting the appeal filed by the Revenue, we are of the
view that the issue arising out of the present dispute is no more res integra.
has also been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by rejecting the appeal filed by the Revenue, we are of the view that the issue arising out of the present dispute is no more res integra.
Therefore, we do not find any merits in the impugned order passed by the learned adjudicating authority. Accordingly, the same is set aside and the appeal is allowed in favour of the appellants.
(Dictated and pronounced in open court)
(S.K. MOHANTY)
MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
(M.M. PARTHIBAN) MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
Sinha
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
LUPIN LTD vs -COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)-MUMBAI(AIR CARGO IMPORT)
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 23484 --apply.