C/87232/2019 — CONSOLIDATED SHIPPING LINE I PVT LTD vs NHAVA SHEVE - II
CONSOLIDATED SHIPPING LINE I PVT LTD vs NHAVA SHEVE - II
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
WEST ZONAL BENCH
Customs Appeal No. 87232 of 2019
(Arising out of Order-in-Original No. 16/2019-20/Commr/MS-II/JNCH dated 22.05.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (NS-II), JNCH, Nhava Sheva)
Consolidated Shipping Line I Pvt Ltd. 1008, Lodha Supremus, Saki Vihar Road Andheri East, Mumbai …..Appellant
VERSUS
Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva II
JNCH, Nhava Sheva
…..Respondent
APPEARANCE: Shri G B Yadav, Advocate for the appellant Shri D S Mann, DC (AR) for the respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. AJAY SHARMA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FINAL ORDER No: 86157/2025
DATE OF HEARING : 22.04.2025 DATE OF DECISION : 30.07.2025
Per: AJAY SHARMA
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant− a shipping agent, against the impugned Order-in-Original dated 22.05.2019 whereby a penalty of `20 lakhs has been imposed on the appellant under Section 114 of Customs Act, 1962. 2. On the allegation of fraudulent export of ‘soap stone powder’ in place of ‘bulk drugs’ the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) initiated investigation. Consequent thereto, a
- 2 - C/87232/2019 show-cause notice dated 01.07.2008 was issued to various persons including the appellant herein which culminated in the Order-in-Original dated 24.08.2012 confirming the allegations and imposing penalty of `1.5 crores on the appellant, in addition to penalties etc. imposed on the other co-noticees in the show- cause notice (supra). The said Order-in-Original was challenged by co-noticees before this Tribunal by way of filing of various Customs Appeals viz. Appeal Nos. C/1175/2012 etc. in the year
The appellant did not get the show-cause notice (supra)
and when they came to know about the aforesaid Order-in-
Original, they challenged the same before this Tribunal
contending that the show-cause notice had never been served
upon it, resulting in ex-parte imposition of penalty of Rs.1.5
crores on them by the learned Commissioner. On the Appellant’s
appeal, this Tribunal vide Final Order No. S/110/13/CSTB/C-I
dated
19.12.2012
set
aside
the
order-in-original
dated
24.08.2012 qua the appellant and remanded the matter for
denovo adjudication with a direction to ensure compliance with
the principles of nature justice.
4.
Pursuant thereto, the show-cause notice (supra) was
served on the appellant on 22.10.2013. After re-adjudication,
the impugned order dated 22.05.2019 has been passed imposing
penalty of `20 lakhs on the appellant under Section 114 of the
Customs Act, 1962.
- 3 - C/87232/2019
It has been submitted at the bar that the appeal of other
co-noticees viz. C/1175/2012 etc. arising out of the same show-
cause notice dated 01.07.2008 has been disposed of by this
Tribunal vide Final Order No. A/86746-86761/2019 dated
18.09.2019 whereby the order impugned therein had been set
aside and the matters were remanded to the Adjudicating
Authority for fresh decision on all issues, including penalty under
section 114 ibid as proposed in the show-cause notice. In the
aforesaid order, a reference was also made about the penalty
imposed on the present appellant as well.
6.
In view of the aforesaid submission and without going into
the merits, I am of the opinion that the instant appeal also
deserves to be remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for a
fresh decision along with that of other co-noticees. Accordingly,
the impugned order is set and the matter is remanded to the
Adjudicating Authority to decide the same afresh in accordance
with law after due compliance with the principles of natural
justice and uninfluenced by any previous finding.
7.
The appeal is therefore allowed by way of remand.
(Pronounced in open Court on 30.07.2025)
(Ajay Sharma) Member (Judicial)
//SR
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.