C/86540/2023 IN FORCE Mumbai Bench Customs Appeal 2025-01-06

C/86540/2023 — NIKUNJ ASHOK KUMAR PATEL vs MUMBAI-PREV

Subject

NIKUNJ ASHOK KUMAR PATEL vs MUMBAI-PREV

Document text

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I

Customs Miscellaneous Application No. 86831 of 2024

In

Customs Appeal No. 86540 of 2023

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. MUM-CUSTM-PAX-APP-156/2023-24 dated 25.04.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-III)

Nikunj Ashokkumar Patel .… Appellant B-103, Virat Elegance, Opposite Umiya Bungalows JBR Lane, Science City, Sola, Ahmedabad, Gugarat – 380 0060.

Versus

Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), …. Respondent Mumbai-II
2nd Floor, Everest House, 100, Marine Lines (W), Mumbai – 400 002.

APPEARANCE: Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Rajiv Ranjan, Authorized Representative for the Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. M.M. PARTHIBAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

FINAL ORDER NO. A/85032/2025

Date of Hearing: 06.01.2025 Date of Decision: 06.01.2025

Per: S.K. MOHANTY

Heard both sides.

The applicant has filed this miscellaneous application, seeking release of Wrist Watch of ‘Rolex’ Brand, which was seized as a passenger baggage, while arriving of the appellant at C.S.M.I. Airport, Mumbai. Insofar as filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, the first proviso appended to Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 mandates that in respect of the order passed

C/MISC/86831/2024 In C/86540/2023

2 by the Commissioner (Appeals), under Section 129A ibid, for import or export of goods as baggage, the Appellate Tribunal shall have no jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of such order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals). Since, the present appeal relates to seizure of Rolex Watch brought into the country as ‘baggage’, in terms of Section 129A ibid, no appeal shall lie before the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall have no jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of the order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals).

Therefore, the miscellaneous application filed by the applicant is dismissed and the appeal is also accordingly dismissed.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

  (S.K. Mohanty) 

  


 Member (Judicial) 

(M.M. Parthiban) Member (Technical)

SM

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied