C/89399/2014 IN FORCE Mumbai Bench Customs Appeal Import policy & restrictions ·? 2024-12-24

C/89399/2014 — CC (IMPORT) NHAVASHEVA vs ADARSH STAINLESS PVT. LTD.

Subject

CC (IMPORT) NHAVASHEVA vs ADARSH STAINLESS PVT. LTD.

Document text

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I

Customs Appeal No. 89399 of 2014 And Customs Cross Objection No. 93118 of 2015

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 2675(Group-IV)/2014(JNCH)/ IMP-2544 dated 03.07.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai- II)

Commissioner of Customs (Imp.), Nhava Sheva .… Appellant JNCH, Nhava Sheva, Uran Raigad, Maharashtra – 400 707

Versus

M/s Adarsh Stainless Pvt. Ltd.

…. Respondent 

Room No. 70, 5th Floor, Moti Mansion Building, No. 2 -12, 5th Khetwadi Road, Black Road, Mumbai – 400 004

Appearance: Shri D.S. Mann, Authorized Representative for the Appellant

Shri Stebin Mathew, Advocate for the Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

FINAL ORDER NO. A/87542/2024

Date of Hearing: 24.12.2024 Date of Decision: 24.12.2024

PER: S.K. MOHANTY

Heard both sides and perused the case records.

When the matter was called out for hearing, learned Advocate for the respondent pointed out that the amount of disputed duty involved in this appeal filed by Revenue is less than Rs.50 lakhs. He submits that since the amount involved is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the appeal may be dismissed under Litigation Policy Circular No. 390/Misc/163/2010-JC dated 17.8.2011 as amended by Instruction vide F. No. 390/Misc/30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023 issued by the Board.

C/89399/2014 2

The submissions made by the learned Advocate for the respondent is considered. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed under Litigation Policy No. 390/Misc/30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023.

Cross objection filed by the respondent also stands disposed of.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

  (S.K. MOHANTY) 

  


 MEMBER (JUDICIAL) 

Sinha

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied