← Archive
C/10193/2023 IN FORCE RoDTEP / Drawback / Remission ·?

C/10193/2023 — HUMAN BIOSCIENCE INDIA LIMITED vs AHMEDABAD

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, WEST ZONAL BENCH : AHMEDABAD

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. 2 CUSTOMS Appeal No. 10193 of 2023-DB [Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No AHD-CUSTM-000-APP-591-22-23 dated 24.01.2023 passed by Commissioner of CUSTOMS-AHMEDABAD]

HUMAN BIOSCIENCE INDIA LIMITED

…. Appellant 142/P 143/P VILLAGE VASANA CHACHARWADI AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT-382213 VERSUS

Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad

.... Respondent CUSTOM HOUSE, NEAR ALL INDIA RADIO NAVRANGPURA,
AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT APPEARANCE :

None for the Appellant Shri Himanshu Nachane, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent

CORAM:

HON’BLE DR. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE MR. SATENDRA VIKRAM SINGH, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

DATE OF HEARING/ DECISION: 11.11.2025

FINAL ORDER NO. 11049/2025

MR. SATENDRA VIKRAM SINGH :

None appeared from the appellants side. The record shows that the matter was listed earlier four times but no one appeared. Today it is 5th time.

Learned AR mentions that the issue involved is relating to recovery of drawback amount and therefore, appeal against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) should have been filed before Revisionary Authority, Additional Secretary to the Government of India.

Proviso to Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 states that:-

f Commissioner (Appeals) should have been filed before Revisionary Authority, Additional Secretary to the Government of India.

Proviso to Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 states that:-

2 Appeal No. C/10193/2023-DB

[Provided that no appeal shall lie to the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall not have jurisdiction to decide any appeal in respect of any order referred to in clause (b) if such order relates to, - (a) …. (b) …. (c) payment of drawback as provided in Chapter X, and the rules made thereunder.”

In view of the above legal position, the bench is inclined to dismiss the appeal filed by the appellant without jurisdiction. The appellant may pursue their matter at appropriate forum i.e. Revisionary Authority, Government of India, if they desire so.

The appeal is dismissed in above terms.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open court)

      (Dr. Ajay Krishna Vishvesha) 
         Member (Judicial) 











        (Satendra Vikram Singh) 
         Member (Technical) 

KL

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Subject

HUMAN BIOSCIENCE INDIA LIMITED vs AHMEDABAD

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 19475 --apply.

Citation copied