C/12033/2019 IN FORCE Ahmedabad Bench Customs Appeal 2024-09-03

C/12033/2019 — Mithilesh N Patel vs Ahmedabad

Subject

Mithilesh N Patel vs Ahmedabad

Document text

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad

REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO.3

Customs Appeal No.12033 of 2019

(Arising out of OIA-AHD-CUSTM-000-APP-27-28-19-20 dated 27/05/2019 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax- AHMEDABAD)

Mithilesh N Patel ………Appellant M/S. Akshar International, B-403, Sarover-4,
Nr. Vrundavan Palm, Opp. Shashwat-3, Vastral Ahmedabad, Gujarat

VERSUS

C.C.-Ahmedabad ………Respondent Custom House, Near All India Radio Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat

WITH Customs Appeal No.12043 of 2019

(Arising out of OIA-AHD-CUSTM-000-APP-27-28-19-20 dated 27/05/2019 passed by Commissioner ( Appeals ) Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax- AHMEDABAD)

Akshar International ………Appellant B-403, Sarovar, Nr. Vrundavan Palm,
Opp-Shashwat-3, Vastral, Ahmedabad Ahmedabad, Gujarat

VERSUS

C.C.-Ahmedabad ………Respondent Custom House, Near All India Radio Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat

APPEARANCE: Ms. Prabhdeep Kaur, Advocate for the Appellant Shri. A R. Kanani, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL), MR. RAJU HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. SOMESH ARORA

Final Order No. 11938-11939 /2024

DATE OF HEARING: 03.09.2024 DATE OF DECISION:03.09.2024

2 | P a g e C / 1 2 0 3 3 , 1 2 0 4 3 / 2 0 1 9 - D B

RAJU

The matter has been listed many times on 10.03.2022, 07.04.2022, 12.05.2022, 18.05.2022, 01.08.2023, 31.08.2023, 12.010.2023, 16.11.2023, 01.02.2024, 28.02.2024, 18.03.2024, 02.04.2024, 13.05.2024 and 05.04.2024. The appellant was given opportunity as a last chance on 1st of February and thereafter and again on 28th of February, 2024. Today also Learned Counsel Ms. Prabhdeep Kaur appearing for the appellant claims to representing the appellants. However, no Vakalatnama has been filed till date.
She is seeking further adjournment. In these circumstances, we do not find any reason to grant further adjournment.
2. The appeal is dismissed. The appellant are at liberty to file for restoration in case, they are able to give any reason for restoration.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open court )

(RAJU) MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

(SOMESH ARORA) MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Prachi

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied