C/11687/2017 — Awin Exim vs Kandla

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad

REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO.3 Customs Appeal No. 11687 of 2017

(Arising out of OIO-KDL-COMMR-PVRR-115-2016-17 dated 15.12.2016 passed by Commissioner of Customs - Kandla)

M/s Awin Exim ……Appellant Arunodaya, Ground Floor, Bapu Bhai Vashi Road, Vile Parle(West), Mumbai-Maharashtra VERSUS C.C. Kandla

    ……Respondent 

Custom House, Near Balaji Temple, Kandla-Gujarat

APPEARANCE None appeared for the Appellant
Shri Himanshu P. Shrimali, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. RAMESH NAIR HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL), MR. RAJU

          FINAL ORDER NO.___10730/2024                          

                                                DATE OF HEARING: 01.04.2024  

DATE OF DECISION: 01.04.2024

RAMESH NAIR

When the matter was called out, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. From the record, it is observed that this appeal has come up for hearing on 11.09.2023, 31.10.2023, 21.11.2023, 02.01.2024, 08.01.2024, 19.02.2024 and today i.e. 01.04.2024. However, no one appeared on any of the said dates, which shows that the appellant is not serious to pursue their appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of Rule 20 of CESTAT procedure Rules, 1982 read with Section 35C (1A) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

Appellant are at liberty to approach this Tribunal if they wish to pursue the appeal by filing an application for restoration of appeal, which can be considered in accordance with law.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open court)

(RAMESH NAIR) MEMBER ( JUDICIAL )

(RAJU) MEMBER ( TECHNICAL ) Neha