← Archive
C/10532/2023 IN FORCE Export policy & incentives ·?

C/10532/2023 — KIVVA IMPEX vs Customs Ahmedabad

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST ZONAL BENCH AT AHMEDABAD

REGIONAL BENCH – COURT NO. 01

CUSTOM Appeal No. 10532 of 2023 CUSTOM (EH) Application No. 10247 of 2023

[Arising Out Of AHD-CUSTM-000-APP-604-22-23 Dated-13.03.2023 Passed By Commissioner of CUSTOMS-Customs Ahmedabad] KIVVA IMPEX …..Appellant Plot no 28, 5th floor, Krishna chambers Mohan ni chal varachha road Surat, Gujarat-395006

VERSUS

Customs Ahmedabad
…..Respondent Office Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Customs 1st Floor, Custom House, Opposite Old High Court, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380009

APPEARANCE: Shri. S Suriyanarayanan, Advocate for the Appellant Shri. A R Kanani, Superintendent (Authorized Representative) for the Appellant

CORAM: HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL), MR. RAJU HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. SOMESH ARORA

              FINAL ORDER NO. A /      10135      /2024 

                                                                     DATE OF HEARING:10.01.2024 
                                                                     DATE OF DECISION:10.01.2024 

RAJU This application have been filed for early hearing application. In the matter, the learned Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the matter relates to demand of Customs Duty on account of the appellants failure to produce the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC).

e learned Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the matter relates to demand of Customs Duty on account of the appellants failure to produce the Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC). Learned Counsel pointed out that at the time of hearing before Commissioner (Appeals), the EODC was not available and therefore, the matter was adjudicated against them. However, after the issue of order by the

2 | P a g e C / 1 0 5 3 2 / 2 0 2 3 - D B

Commissioner (Appeals), the applicant has received the EODC certificate and therefore, the matter may be listed for early hearing. When the consent for both the parties, we take up the appeal for final disposal at this stage itself. The Commissioner did not have the benefit of EODC which was obtained on 27.04.2023 and copy of same has been placed by them in their appeal papers.
2. Considering the facts, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the original adjudicating authority to examine the EODC certificate and decide a fresh.
3. Appeal is allowed by way of remand. Miscellaneous application stands disposed of.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)

(RAJU)
MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

 (SOMESH ARORA) 

MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

Prachi

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Subject

KIVVA IMPEX vs Customs Ahmedabad

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 18040 --apply.

Citation copied