C/87247/2022 — -COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)-MUMBAI(AIR CARGO IMPORT) vs SHAH BROTHERS

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I

Custom Appeal No. 87247 of 2022

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. MUM-CUSTM-AMP-APP-1546/2021-22 dated 24.01.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-III)

Commissioner of Customs, .… Appellant Air Special Cargo, Mumbai

Navpada, Sahar Village, Andheri East,
Mumbai – 400 099.

Versus

M/s. Shah Brothers

                             …. Respondent 

A1-115 to 118, Rajlaxmi Commercial Complex, Thane-Bhiwandi Road, Kalher, Bhiwandi, Thane – 421 302.

APPEARANCE: Shri Ram Kumar, Authorized Representative for the Appellant None for the Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. M.M. PARTHIBAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

FINAL ORDER NO. A/85313/2026

           Date of Hearing:  13.02.2026 
                   Date of Decision:  13.02.2026 

Per: S.K. MOHANTY

Heard both sides and perused the case records.

Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order 24.01.2022 passed by the learned Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-III, Revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. The amount involved in the impugned proceedings is Rs. 26,67,590/-.

assed by the learned Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-III, Revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. The amount involved in the impugned proceedings is Rs. 26,67,590/-.

Appeal No. C/87247/2022

2

Insofar as the monetary limit for filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, by deriving the powers conferred in Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued the instructions, from time to time, with the objective in reduction of the Government litigation in the area of Customs. In the latest instruction issued by the CBIC from file F. No. 390/Misc/30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023, the threshold monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs has been prescribed, below which the appeal shall not be filed before the CESTAT. Though at paragraph 2 in the said instructions dated 02.11.2023, there is specific mention of agitating the matter before the Appellate Forum, irrespective of the involvement of the amount on certain issues, but the issue categorized therein are not confirming to the present appeal filed by the Revenue inasmuch as confirmation of differential duty of IGST @ 18% on the impugned goods, is the subject matter of present dispute. Hence, the appeal can be disposed of in terms of the litigation policy formulated by the Government.

Considering the disputed amount of customs duty involved in the present appeal filed by Revenue, being only Rs.

e disposed of in terms of the litigation policy formulated by the Government.

Considering the disputed amount of customs duty involved in the present appeal filed by Revenue, being only Rs. 26,67,590/-, which is below the prescribed threshold limit as per the Instruction dated 02.11.2023, the appeal filed by Revenue in our considered view, is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed under the Litigation Policy of the Government.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

  (S.K. Mohanty) 




 Member (Judicial) 

(M.M. Parthiban) Member (Technical)

SM