C/86348/2020 IN FORCE Mumbai Bench Customs Appeal 2026-02-05

C/86348/2020 — COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-NHAVA SHEVA - V vs COROB INDIA P LTD

Subject

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS-NHAVA SHEVA - V vs COROB INDIA P LTD

Document text

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO. I

Customs Cross-objection Application No. 85187 of 2021 In Customs Appeal No. 86348 of 2020

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 657 (Gr.V)/2020 (JNCH)/Appeal-II CRC-I/2023/(JNCH) Appeals dated 30.04.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), JNCH, Nhava Sheva, Mumbai-II)

Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-III

.… Appellant Centralised Review and Appeal Cell. NS-V Jawaharlal Nehru Customs House, Nhava Sheva, Tal : Uran, Dist: Raigad – 400707.

Versus

M/s Corob India Pvt. Ltd.

 …. Respondent 

Plot No.10, 13 & 13A GIDC, Somnath Road, Daman, Gujarat – 396215.

APPEARANCE: Shri Mahesh Patil, Authorized Representatives for the Appellant Shri S.K. Mathur, Advocate for the Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR. M.M. PARTHIBAN, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

FINAL ORDER NO. A/85251/2026

Date of Hearing: 05.02.2026 Date of Decision: 05.02.2026

PER: S.K. MOHANTY

Heard both sides and perused the case records.

Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order 30.04.2020 passed by the learned Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Nhava Sheva, Mumbai-II, Revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. The amount involved in the impugned proceedings is Rs.25,87,899/-.

Insofar as the monetary limit for filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, by deriving the powers conferred in Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued the instructions, from time to time, with the objective in

Appeal No. C/86348/2020

2 reduction of the Government litigation in the area of Customs. In the latest instruction issued by the CBIC from file F. No. 390/Misc/30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023, the threshold monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs has been prescribed, below which the appeal shall not be filed before the CESTAT. Though at paragraph 2 in the said instructions dated 02.11.2023, there is specific mention of agitating the matter before the Appellate Forum, irrespective of the involvement of the amount on certain issues, but the issue categorized therein are not confirming to the present appeal filed by the Revenue inasmuch as confirmation of differential duty on finalization of provisional assessment is the subject matter of present dispute. Hence, the appeal can be disposed of in terms of the litigation policy formulated by the Government.

Considering the disputed amount of refund of customs duty involved in the present appeal filed by Revenue, being only Rs.25,87,899/-, which is below the prescribed threshold limit as per the Instruction dated 02.11.2023, the appeal filed by Revenue in our considered view, is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed under the Litigation Policy of the Government. Cross-objection filed by respondent stands disposed of.

(Dictated and pronounced in open court)

  (S.K. MOHANTY) 

  


 MEMBER (JUDICIAL) 

(M.M. PARTHIBAN) MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

SM

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied