C/11859/2015 IN FORCE Ahmedabad Bench Customs Appeal 2026-03-13

C/11859/2015 — Mono Steel India Ltd vs Kandla

Subject

Mono Steel India Ltd vs Kandla

Document text

1 | P a g e

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad

REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO. 01

Customs Appeal No. 11859 of 2015

(Arising out of OIA-KDL-CUSTM-000-APP-026-031-15-16 dated 09/07/2015 passed by the Commissioner of CUSTOMS-KANDLA)

Mono Steel India Ltd …..Appellant
202, Pruthvi Complex, Kala Nala, BHAVNAGAR, GUJARAT VERSUS

C.C.-Kandla …..Respondent Custom House, Near Balaji Temple, Kandla, Gujarat

WITH  Customs Appeal No. 11860 of 2015 (Atul K Agarwal)  Customs Appeal No. 11861 of 2015 (Chimanlal Shah)  Customs Appeal No. 11862 of 2015 (Bhupatbhai Shah)  Customs Appeal No. 11863 of 2015 (Hitesh C Shah)  Customs Appeal No. 11864 of 2015 (Jaysukhlal Shah)

(Arising out of OIA-KDL-CUSTM-000-APP-026-031-15-16 dated 09/07/2015 passed by the Commissioner of CUSTOMS-KANDLA)

APPEARANCE: None appeared for the Appellant Shri Aakash Singh, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. SANJIV SRIVASTAVA,MEMBER ( TECHNICAL )
HON'BLE. Dr. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA, MEMBER(JUDICIAL)

Final Order No.10253-10258/2026

                                                         DATE OF HEARING:13.03.2026 
                                                    DATE OF DECISION:13.03.2026 

Dr. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA

None is present for the appellant. Learned Authorised Representative is present for the department. We have been informed that already five times the appeals have been adjourned. From the record, it is observed that this appeal has come up for hearing on 24.04.2023, 15.09.2023, 07.11.2023
29.04.2023 and 05.08.2025. It appears that the appellant is not interested

2 | P a g e S T / 1 1 8 5 9 - 1 1 8 6 4 / 2 0 1 5 - D B

in pursuing the case. Therefore, as per the inherent power vested in this Tribunal as noted in 2009 (244) ELT 497 (Bom.) CHEMIPOL Vs. UNION OF INDIA, the present appeal has become liable to be dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. Therefore, the appeals are dismissed.

(Dictated & Pronounced in the open court)

(SANJIV SRIVASTAVA)) MEMBER ( TECHNICAL )

(Dr. AJAYA KRISHNA VISHVESHA) MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) Prachi

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.

Citation copied