IN FORCE Policy Relaxation Committee Advance Authorisation 2023-02-24

DGFT Committee Minutes

Document text

Date of Uploading (22 | 03 /2023 Directorate General of Foreign Trade General of Foreign Trade (PRC Section) Minutes of the Policy Relaxation Committee Meeting of the Policy Relaxation Committee Meetin Held Held on 24.02.2023 under the Chairmanship of Shri Santosh Kumar Sarangi, Director General of Foreign Trade Santosh Kumar Sarangi, Director General of Foreign Trade Meeting No.32/AM23 held on 24.02.2023 The following members were present in the meeting:

Shri S.B.S. Reddy Addl. DGFT
Shri Hardeep Singh Addl. DGFT
Shri Akash Taneja Addl. DGFT
Shri Anil Aggarwal 8001 DGFT
Dr. S.K. Bansal Addl. DGFT Following cases were discussed. The decision taken on the individual cases are as under:- | S.No | No Name of the firm Case No. i: | M/s. All round (India) Vegetable Processing Machines Pvt.

Ltd., HR 2. M/s. Aparna Polyplast Pvt. Ltd., Surat 283 a M/s. Venus Remedies Ltd., Haryana RES) 4. M/s. Shivalikview Steel Trading Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata | 8 | |_ 5. [७३ Jain Recycling Pvt. Ltd., Chennai ese ne | 6. _|Mis. Noor Jewel Impex, Chennai « ts M/s. Centex International Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana haa Li BSL M/s. Bos Natural Flavors Pvt. Ltd., Perumbavoor (oie | 9. __|Mis. Sark Spice Products Pvt Ltd., Kerala 10 10. M/s. Ralson India Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana 11 11, M/s. Indo Rama Synthetics India Ltd., Nagpur 12 12. ___|M/s. Gujarat Raffia Industries Ltd., Gujarat 13 13. |M/s. Premium Polyalloys Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai 14 14. M/s. Swop Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Tamil Nadu 15 15.|M/s. Globe Textiles India Ltd., Ahmedabad 16817 16. M/s.

ustries Ltd., Gujarat 13 13. |M/s. Premium Polyalloys Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai 14 14. M/s. Swop Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Tamil Nadu 15 15.|M/s. Globe Textiles India Ltd., Ahmedabad 16817 16. M/s. Shivam Exports, Thane | 48 17. M/s. Usha International, Mumbai 19 18.__|M/s. Exide Industries Ltd., Kolkata 20 19. |M/s. Devoir Trading Ltd., Mumbai 21 20. ॥४॥/5. Jash Mercantile LLP, Mumbai 22823 Page 1 of 46

_|M/s. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata 24 22. IM/s. Rama Exports, Mumbai 25 to 28 23. M/s. Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad 29 24. M/s. Continental Exports, Mumbai 30 29. M/s. Bajrangbali Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata 31 | 26. _|Mis. Vimbri Enterprises, New Delhi 32 27. M/s. Vanila Food Products, Mumbai 33 28. M/s. Pahwa Manufactures, Sitapur (UP 34835 29. _|M/s. Premier Gun House, New Delhi 36 30. M/s. Arvind Ltd., Anmedabad 37 31. _|M/s. Benzo Chem Industry Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai 38839 32. _|M/s. Fun Zoo Toys, Noida 40 33. M/s. Bharat Resins Pvt. Ltd., Dadra & Nagar 41 34. M/s. Herbul Henna Exports House, New Delhi 42 35. M/s. Shyam Ferro Alloys Ltd., Kolkata 43 to 45 36. M/s. Mudrika Ceramics India Pvt. Ltd., Baroda | 46 | 37. M/s. PI Industries Limited, Rajasthan 47 38. M/s. Krystal Global Engineering Limited, Vadodara 48 39. |M/s. Excel Foods Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore 49850 |_40. _|M/s. Excel Drug House, Kolkata 51 zx M/s. Omprakash Shivprakash, MH 52 42. |M/s. M. Dhirubhai & Co., Kolkata 53 43. M/s. Komatsu India Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram 54 44. M/s. Sara Spintex India Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra 55 45. M/s.

zx M/s. Omprakash Shivprakash, MH 52 42. |M/s. M. Dhirubhai & Co., Kolkata 53 43. M/s. Komatsu India Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram 54 44. M/s. Sara Spintex India Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra 55 45. M/s. Hotel Annamalai International, Madurai 56 | 46. | M/s. Manorama Industries Ltd., Mumbai 57 to 60 47. M/s. Premier Energies Photovoltaic Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad 61 | 48. |M/s. Mercedes-Benz India Pvt Ltd., Pune 62 Case No. 01 Mis. All round (India) Vegetable Processing Machines Pvt. Ltd., HR F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004050AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.3310030650 dated

03.02.2020. This is a review case of PRC Meeting No.18/AM23 (Case No.3) held on 15.11.2022 wherein committee decided to allow EOP extension upto 02.11.2022 subject to payment of composition fees @ 1% per month on the unfulfilled FOB value. The applicant Stated that due to online technical issue they could not apply for EOP with in time because their AA has been issued by DGFT Panipat office Net to Net basis but online show SION. As per new updated of Advance Authorisation portal by DGFT there are required modification/amendment mandatory before applying EO Page 2 of 46 (

extension/Redemption/Clubbing etc. In this regard they had generated many complaints at DGFT portal. Hence they are requesting to allow further six month EOP extension against subject licence. Decision: The Committee after discussing the matter on the basis of justification submitted by the application, decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit a clear request in the matter for taking the decision. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 02 M/s. Aparna Polyplast Pvt. Ltd., Surat F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004087AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.5210043140 dated

08.08.2019. The applicant stated that in the subject licence they have made partial export and imports and there is a shortfall in quantity w.r.t. the imports made and the Authorisation expired for exports. They have fulfilled 59.702% of export obligation quantity wise and hence wish to have an EOP extension for six months in which time they will be able to fulfil the E.O. They have obtained EOP extensions for six months but due to the Covid- 19 situation and the resultant slack in demands from their foreign buyers they could not fulfil the exports. Hence they are requesting to allow further EOP extension for six months to fulfil the balance export. Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of submission made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to allow EOP extension of Advance Authorization No.5210043140 dated 08.08.2019 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fees. This is last and final EOP extension. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Surat) Case No. 03 M/s. Aparna Polyplast Pvt. Ltd., Surat F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004085AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.5210043022 dated

02.04.2019. The applicant stated that in the subject licence they have made partial export and imports and there is a shortfall in quantity w.r.t. the imports made and the Authorisation expired for export. They have fulfilled 88.671% of export obligation quantity wise and hence wish to have an EOP extension for six months in which time they will be able to Page 3 of 46 | Canes

fulfil the E.O. They have obtained EOP extensions for six months but due to the Covid- 19 situation and the resultant slack in demands from their foreign buyers they could not fulfil the exports. Hence they are requesting to allow further EOP extension for six months to fulfil the balance export. Decision: The Committee went through the justification provided by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow EOP extension up to 30.04.2023 against Advance Authorisation No.5210043022 dated 02.04.2019 subject to payment of composition fees. This is last and final EOP extension. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Surat) Case No. 04 M/s. Venus Remedies Ltd., Haryana F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004084AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.3010105043 dated

11.02.2020. The applicant stated that above licence was granted for export of Ceftriaxone Sodium Sterile USP for 3000 Kg with EOP up to 10.08.2021. The product was imported in three part shipments of 3000 Kg and they were unable to export goods due to cancellation of orders by foreign customers during the Covid-19 and have not applied for 1 EO extension because of Covid-19 pandemic. They were unable to export goods to the extent of consumption of raw material of 3000 Kg. They have tried hard to obtain export orders for the said product and have been successful to got the order in the month of November and December, 2022 but the by the time export obligation period has been expired. Hence they are requesting to allow extension in EOP for six months against subject licence. applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to allow EOP extension of Advance Authorization No.3010105043 dated 11.02.2020 for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement subject to payment of composition fees. This is last and final EOP extension. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Ludhiana) Case No. 05 Ms. Shivalikview Steel Trading Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004090AM23 Page 4 of 46

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.0210209046 dated.

12.03.2019, The applicant stated that they had issued above mentioned Advance Authorisation from Addl.DGFT, Kolkata and fulfilled the 5.0. 11,353.68 MT against 5.0. 20,000 MT and import the goods 14,997.70 MT against 21,700 MT allowed as per licence. They have made export of 82.14% in quantity terms against to be exported quantity, therefore there is a short fall in exported quantity i.e. 2469.12 MT. Their plant was shut down in the Covid-19 and freight were also higher side so export were not possible in this period and now they have got export order and hopefully export will be made within next 3 to 4 months. Hence they are requesting to allow EOP extension for six months against subject licence. Decision: The Committee discussed the case at length and found no merit or hardship in the arguments made by the firm and hence it decided to reject the request of the firm for extension in EOP. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 06 M/s. Jain Recycling Pvt. Ltd., Chennai F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00292015AM22

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.0410165804 dated

05.07.2019. This is a deferred case of PRC Meeting No.09/AM23 (Case No. 6) held on 12.07.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case and seek a detailed report including the detail of import and export item from RA, Chennai before taking the final decision. The applicant stated that they had partnership firm in the name of Jain FGL Metal Industries (Existing) and for which they have advance authorisation for the purpose of Duty Free Import and fulfilling the EO as per Norms fixed by the Committee. They have converted the partnership firm to Private Limited Co in the name of Jain Recycling Private Limited on 10.01.2020. They approached to RA and as advised they applied New IEC on 22.05.2020 and thereafter after conversion filed an application of merger of IEC Merger from Old IEC (AANFJ8614Q) to new IEC (AAECJ7416Q on 13.07.2020 in new DGFT module, whereas application of merger was not reflecting in DGFT system. Their merger of IEC has been approved by RA on 09.02.2021 and further license of Jain FGL was transmitted to Jain Recycling and it was approved on 19.07.2021. During this process they have already lost 386 days by the time almost all license date of export was expired and they were not able to export. They have total 21 advance authorisations in which they are going to fulfill EO as per Notification No.28/2015-20 dated 23.09.2021 except this advance authorisation.

they were not able to export. They have total 21 advance authorisations in which they are going to fulfill EO as per Notification No.28/2015-20 dated 23.09.2021 except this advance authorisation. Hence, they are requesting for extension of EO against Advance Authorization No.0410165804 dated 05.07.2019. ry Page 5 of 46 we

Decision: The Committee went through the justification provided by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow EOP extension up to 31.07.2023 against Advance Authorisation No.0410165804 dated 05.07.2019 subject to payment of composition fees. This is last and final EOP extension. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Chennai) Case No. 07 M/s. Noor Jewel Impex, Chennai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00002267AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.0410166578 dated

03.03.2020. The applicant stated that the validity of license has been expired due to seizure of Gold and Gold jewellery by DRI, Kolkata from 10.07.2021 and subsequently released vide their orders dated 01.02.2022 (7 months). As per provisions of Para 2.20 (c) of HBP the authorization will extended for EOP during which its validity has expired under the custody of any Government Agency, by RA, Chennai on 29.04.2022 has not allowed EOP and EOP has already expired on 3.9.2021 and Advance Authorization is under Appendix 4J. They have already fulfilled in terms of quantity for 70.52% and balance 29.48% is to be fulfilled. They have also made exports within 120 days from date of imports and each consignment as provided under Appendix 4J. Due to the urgency of execution of export orders they have got the goods manufactured from supporting manufacturers. Hence they are requesting to allow six month EOP extension to export the balance export. Decision: The Committee discussed the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and it decided toallow EOP extension against Advance Authorisation No.0410166578 dated 03.03.2020 for a period of 90 daysfrom the date of endorsement subject to the payment of composition fees with waiver of 4J condition. No further import will be allowed. For other request firm may approach to concerned Authority/Department. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/ RA-Chennai) Case No.

r request firm may approach to concerned Authority/Department. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/ RA-Chennai) Case No. 08 Mis. Centex International Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana F.No. 01/60/162/365/AM20/PRC & 01/60/162/367/AM20/PRC

Subject: Regularization of EO against Advance Authorization No.3010103022

dated 16.07.2014 and 3010103430 dated 18.03.2015. Page 6 of 46 f t—

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.17/AM23 (Case No. 20 & 21) held on 04.10.2022 & 02.11.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case. The applicant Stated that as per the approval with a composition fee @ 1% on unfulfilled FOB of Rs.45,12,205/- for the period after original EOP i.e. 17.09.2016, the amount payable is coming to Rs.12,18,296/- as the export was made by them in the month of December, 2018. So, extension period comes to be 27 months, means 27% composition fee on FOB value. This is not reasonable and it becomes more than the duty save amount (BCD Rs.2,76,496/- + CVD Rs.7,33,360/- total Rs.10,09,856/-. If they had imported the goods under OGL category then out of total duty of Rs.10,09,856/- CVD amounting to Rs.7,33,360/- was refundable as MODVAT to them. This the duty benefit of BCD Rs.2,76,496/- has only been availed by them. Therefore they are requesting for withdrawal of composition fee of @1% per month on the unfulfilled FOB value as the EO has already been fulfilled by them. Further stated that they could not apply for EOP extension with RLA against two licences due to cancellation of a specific order by GAP. The item imported under these licences were Wool Top, Silk Filament Yarn and Silk Top. The order was cancelled by GAP in July 2015. Once the order was cancelled by GAP they had to look for an alternate customer to export the garments made from the raw material imported under the Advance Licences.

as cancelled by GAP in July 2015. Once the order was cancelled by GAP they had to look for an alternate customer to export the garments made from the raw material imported under the Advance Licences. They found an alternate customer and the Export obligations were fulfilled by Dec 2018. They had received Show Cause Notice in the month of Aug 2018 from Addl.DGFT, Ludhiana. Hence seeking regularisation of above mentioned advance authorisations. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting earlier PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant /PC-4-Division /RA-Ludhiana) Case No. 09 M/s. Bos Natural Flavors Pvt. Ltd., Perumbavoor F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003657AM23

Subject: Extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.1010060029 dated

17.09.2018. This a defer case of PRC Meeting No.23/AM23 (Case No.02) held on 20.12.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case and ask the applicant to submit more detail in support of their request. The applicant stated that the delay in export was due to the late receipt of samples approval from their buyer and the sudden change of Directors and purchase personal of their client was delayed the samples. Therefore, they could not fulfil the EO in time and they need the relaxation for one Bill of Entry / Page 7 of joa

No.8276878 dated 01.01.2018. Hence they are requesting to allow extension in EOP for regularisation purposes against subject Advance Authorisation. Decision: The Committee went through the justification provided by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow EOP extension up to 02.06.2020 against Advance Authorisation No.1010060029 dated 17.09.2018 only for regularization purpose subject to the payment of composition fees. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days of the uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Cochin) Case No. 10 Mis. Sark Spice Products Pvt. Ltd., Kerala F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003730AM23

Subject: Review of PRC Meeting No. 14/AM23 held on 28.09.2022 (case no. 10) in

the case of extension of EOP against Advance Authorization No.1010058476 dated 17.06.2014. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.24/AM23 (Case No.42) held on 27.12.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case for further examination. The applicant stated that decision for the Advance Authorisation No.1010058476 dated 17.06.2014, the EOP extension allowed only till 30.03.2016. But their last export shipment dated is 18.08.2016 as per the authorization. The first import consignment date is 25.06.2014 and last import consignment date is 25.08.2014. Their first export shipment dated is 13.11.2015 and last export shipment is 18.08.2016, but as per endorsed in the authorisation EOP is 90 days from the date of import consignment. But here their export started and completed outside the EOP (i.e. after one year from import consignment) due to pollution control issues in their factory and stop memo received from Kerala Pollution Control Board. Because of these issues they could export only after one year that they got relevant order from Kerala High Court. They were completely exported the relevant EO quantity. They required EOP extension till their last export shipment i.e.18.08.2016. applicant and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow EOP extension up to 18.08.2016 against advance authorisation No.1010058476 dated 17.06.2014 instead of 30-03-16 allowed earlier.

nt and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow EOP extension up to 18.08.2016 against advance authorisation No.1010058476 dated 17.06.2014 instead of 30-03-16 allowed earlier. The firm shall approach RA concerned within 30 days of the uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Cochin) Case No. 11 Mis. Ralson India Pvt. Ltd., Ludhiana F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003934AM23 Page 8 i 46

Subject: Waiver

of Composition fee against Advance Authorization No.3010104289 dated 05.04.2018. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No. 04) held on 05.01.2023 wherein Committee decided to defer the case for further examination. The firm unable to pay the composition fees as levied against the licence and stated that this license represented their “Nylon Colour Tyres “and orders remained low for this category of tyres while a number of orders got cancelled from various overseas markets. A major factor that contributed here was shift of market trend from Nylon Colour Tyres to High- End/Premium Nylon Black tyres due to which a no. of their orders were converted to new categories i.e. colour tyres. These factors compelled them to complete the obligation after the stipulated period. Hence they are requesting to allow EOP extension without composition fees @ 1% per month on unfulfilled FOB value. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting earlier PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant /PC-4-Division /RA-Ludhiana) Case No. 12 Mis.

nts will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting earlier PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant /PC-4-Division /RA-Ludhiana) Case No. 12 Mis. Indo Rama Synthetics India Ltd., Nagpur F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004075AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 3 Advance Authorization No.(i) 5010002730 dated

14.09.2020, (ii) 5010002731 dated 24.09.2020 & (iii) 5010002732 dated 28.09.2020. The applicant stated that they are largest polyester fibre and polyester yarn manufacturing company in India at MIDC Butibori, Nagpur. They have three Advance Licences and against all AA completed 100% EO within stipulated period of 18 months but they could not complete import of raw material due to change the software and technical glitches on website by the RA and they could not amend and revalidate these AA. Their online request dated 15.08.2021 to technical team of DGFT who had helped but they could not rectify the error on time due to unprecedented situation because of outbreak Covid 19 pandemic. It has become difficult to claim any benefit against these authorisations. All three AA were issued in the month of September, 2020 when India was facing the first wave of Corona virus pandemic. The company was complete lockdown for two months and thereafter, 50% functioning of the organization was allowed under supervision and rigid control of the State Govt. Hence they are requesting to allow revalidation of above mentioned Advance Licenses upto 30.06.2023 to import the raw materials. Page 9 of 46 , eo

supervision and rigid control of the State Govt. Hence they are requesting to allow revalidation of above mentioned Advance Licenses upto 30.06.2023 to import the raw materials. Page 9 of 46 , eo

Decision: The Committee discussed the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and it decided to accede to the request of the firm and allowed revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement against 3 Advance Authorisation No.(i) 5010002730 dated 44.09.2020, (ii) 5010002731 dated 24.09.2020 & (iii) 5010002732 dated 28.09.2020. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Nagpur) Case No. 13 Ms. Gujarat Raffia Industries Ltd., Gujarat F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004091AM23

Subject: Revalidation of Advance Authorization No.0811000073 dated 16.12.2020.

The applicant stated that due to Covid-19 period and then after Russia, Ukraine War the shortage of raw materials in their product i.e. petrochemicals and very heavy prices as well as non availability of containers for import as well as heavy fluctuation in exchange rate. Under all these global market scenario, they are unable to import the materials in validation period. Hence they are requesting to allow six month revalidation against subject license. Decision: The Committee examined the case in detail and in view of justification provided by the firm and it decided to allow revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement against Advance Authorisation No.0811000073 dated 16.12.2020. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant! Ahmedabad) Case No. 14 Ms. Premium Polyalloys Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003383AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 2 Advance Authorization No.0310837317 dated

22.07.2020 & 0310835145 dated 02.03.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.20/AM23 (Case No.26) held on 29.11.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit complete detail of export made by them against subject authorization for taking the decision. The applicant stated that due to worldwide Covid-19 they were not able to import the raw material as the foreign seller was not able to fulfil their shipments because of various restrictions imposed. The raw material prices also went high with increase in freight cost which made difficult for them to make import against subject licence. Hence they are requesting to allow six month revalidation against subject licence. Page 10 of 46

Decision: The Committee having examined the case in detail and in view of justification provided by the firm and it decided to allow revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement in the proportionate to the export already made against 2 Advance Authorisation No.0310837317 dated 22.07.2020 & 0310835145 dated 02.03.2020. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/ RA-Mumbai) Case No. 15 M/s. Swop Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Tamil Nadu F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003392AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 7 Advance Authorization No.(1) 0410166862 dated

06.07.2020, (2) 0410166864 dated 06.07.2020, (3) 0410166909 dated 22.07.2020, (4) 0410166979 dated 21.08.2020, (5) 0410166996 dated 26.08.2020, (6) 0410167019 dated 02.09.2020 and (7) 0410167251 dated 06.11.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.22/AM23 (Case No. 18) held on 13.12.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit any proof/evidence of technical error in DGFT Portal in support of their request for taking the decision. The applicant has stated that due to technical error in DGFT portal while transmitted in Customs ICEGATE and same time their license has been expired. They had obtained Seven Advance Authorisation from RA Chennai office and fulfilled partial export obligation against the same. The manufactured goods are customized products, the lead time of manufacturing takes considerable amount of time considering testing to be carried out postproduction. In order to achieve desired finished product, the lead time of manufacturing may take more than a year, hence EOP could not be fulfilled. Out of Seven Advance Authorisation they are seeking revalidation against Four Advance License to import the balance raw materials.

cturing may take more than a year, hence EOP could not be fulfilled. Out of Seven Advance Authorisation they are seeking revalidation against Four Advance License to import the balance raw materials. Hence they are requesting to EOP extension against Seven Advance Licences and Revalidation in respect of 4 Advance Licences as mentioned in the subject. Decision: The Committee observed that the request of the firm is not clear and it decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit a clear request in detail for taking the decision. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 16 Mls. Globe Textiles India Ltd., Anmedabad F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004073AM23

Subject: Issue of fresh DFA from new system against old 2 DFA No.0810144663

dated 22.02.2019 & 0810144456 dated 04.02.2019. fs Page 11 of |~
॥|

The applicant stated that they had received the DFIA transferable license without export details on the license and it is not possible to use this license without Export/Import details. After they have constantly follow-up with Local RA but they said that they cannot issue the same, finally they had filed the application in PRC three times one in Feb 2020 and second in the month of Sept.2020 and third one online in the month of May 2022 but after the file of three times PRC they have not received any reply and solution from DGFT. DFIA license had expired in the month of Feb 2020. Covid-19 started in India Govt. Has decided to revalidate licenses through the notification. All DFIA license are extended for more 6 months validity which are falling between 01.02.2020 to 31.07.2020. This was implemented due to Covid-19 and as per this Notification they are liable to get an extension of 6 months in this DFIA license with validity of dated 31.08.2020 but the license not extended in system. Hence they are questing to issue Fresh DFIA Transferable license in new system. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 17 M/s. Globe Textiles India Ltd., Anmedabad F.No.

n support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 17 M/s. Globe Textiles India Ltd., Anmedabad F.No. HQARPRCAPPLY00004094AM23

Subject: Issue of fresh DFA from new system against old 2 DFIA No.0810146321

dated 14.10.2019 & 0810147232 dated 12.02.2020. The applicant stated that they had received the DFIA transferable license without export details on the license and it is not possible to use this license without Export/Import details. After they have constantly follow-up with Local RA but they said that they cannot issue the same, finally they had filed the application in PRC in the month of May 2022, but after the file of two times PRC they have not received any reply and solution from DGFT. After that they have sent a mail to NIC & EDI for the re-issue the DFIA Transferable license attached with local RA letter for re issue the same but the authority is did not issue the DFIA Transferable license and after that they have file the first PRC for the same matter in the month of May 2022. The matter is still not shorted out and they have not received their two DFIA license since October 2019 and from January 2020. Hence they are requesting to issue Fresh DFIA Transferable license from the New Portal. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. / Page 12 of 46 AY, A?

(Action: Applicant) Case No. 18 Ms. Shivam Exports, Thane F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003815AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 4 DFIA No. (i) 0310734611 dated 03.02.2020, (ii)

0310834614 dated 03.02.2020, (iii) 0310834613 dated 03.02.2020 & (iv) 0310835198 dated 04.03.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.24) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these four DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the difficulties were further compounded by lesser movement of containers, high freight rates and significant increase in the cost of various raw materials and reduced manufacturing activities. The DFIA licence no. 0310734611 dated 03.02.2021, 0310834614 dated 03.02.2021,0310834613 dated 03.02.2021 and 0310835198 dated 03.02.2021 could not used till date. Hence firm has requested for revalidation of 6 month. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to defer the case. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 19 Mis. Usha International, Mumbai F.No. HARPRCAPPLY0000381 1AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 2 DFIA No.0311006698 dated 03.09.2021 & 0811002406 dated 25.08.2021. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.25) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these two DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities.

stated that these two DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested for revalidation of 6 month. Decision: Page 13 of 46

(Action: Applicant) Case No. 20 Ms. Exide Industries Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003822AM23

Subject: Revalidation of DFIA No.0211000353 dated 02.03.2021.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.26) held on 05.01.2023 stated that this DFIA remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 1 year from date of Endorsement. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 21 Ms. Devoir Trading Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003869AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 3 DFIA No.(i) 0310838478 dated

25.09.2020, (ii) 0310835311 dated 09.03.2020 & (iii) 0310835310 dated 09.03.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.27) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these three DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 22 Mis. Jash Mercantile LLP, Mumbai Page 14 of 46 val

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003813AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 6 DFIA No.(i) 0310838414 dated 22.09.2020, (Ii)

0310838099 dated 04.09.2020, (iii) 0310835340 dated 09.03.2020, (iv) 0310721806 dated 23.01.2013, (v) 0810145959 dated 13.08.2019 & (vi) 0310833701 dated 26.12.2019. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.28) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these six DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 23 Mis. Jash Mercantile LLP, Mumbai F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003809AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 7 0718 No.(i) 0310835231 dated 05.03.2020, (ii) 0310824205 dated 04.10.2018, (iii) 0311006923 dated 14.09.2019, (iv) 0310829894 dated 25.06.2019, (v) 0310831149 dated 21.08.2019, (vi) 0310831148 dated 21.08.2019 & (vii) 0310831147 dated 21.08.2019. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.29) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these seven DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Page 15 of 46

Case No. 24 M/s. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003979AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 2 DFIA No.0310837568 dated 07.08.2020 & No.0310837893

dated 26.08.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.30) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these seven DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and (Action: Applicant) Case No. 25 M/s. Rama Exports, Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003799AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 6 DFIA No.(i) 0310838320 dated 16.09.2020, (ii) 0310838326 dated 16.09.2020, (iii) 0310839069 dated 22.10.2020, (iv) 0310834907 dated 17.02.2020, (v) 0310838967 dated 19.010.2020 & (vi) 0310837994 dated 31.08.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.29/AM23 (Case No.28) held on 16.01.2023 stated that these six DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further DFIA could not be utilized and expired due to reverse migration of labour, restrictions of peoples movements and social distancing guidelines in place, distruption in supply chain movements etc. They are unable to procure goods from their original suppliers, who were also similarly affected the DFIAs could not be utilized resulting in expiry of the authorizations.

supply chain movements etc. They are unable to procure goods from their original suppliers, who were also similarly affected the DFIAs could not be utilized resulting in expiry of the authorizations. Hence they are requesting to allow six months revalidation. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and Page 16 of 46 to

(Action: Applicant) Case No. 26 M/s. Rama Exports, Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003800AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 6 DFIA No.(i) 0310829979 dated 28.06.2019, (ii)

0310839125 dated 26.10.2019, (iii) 0310839541 dated 13.11.2020, (iv) 0310839062 dated 22.10.2020, (v) 0310838034 dated 01.09.2020 & (vi) 0310838697 dated 05.10.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.31) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these six DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further DFIA could not be utilized and expired due to reverse migration of labour, restrictions of peoples movements and social distancing guidelines in place, distruption in supply chain movements etc. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 27 M/s. Rama Exports, Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003801AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 7 DFIA No.(i) 0310834976 dated 21.02.2020, (ii) 0310834966 dated 21.02.2020, (iii) 0310831843 dated 26.09.2019, (iv) 0310831828 dated 26.09.2019, (v) 0310828188 dated 05.04.2019, (vi) 0310827783 dated 19.03.2019 & (vii) 0310827361 dated 27.02.2019. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.32) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these seven DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time.

during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further DFIA could not be utilized and expired due to reverse migration of labour, restrictions of peoples movements and social distancing guidelines in place, distruption in supply chain movements etc. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Page 17 of 46 |

Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 28 M/s. Rama Exports, Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003802AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 6 DFIA No.(i) 0310834962 dated 21.02.2020,

(ii) 0310828052 dated 01.04.2019, (iii) 0310828054 dated 01.04.2019, (iv) 0310830463 dated 22.07.2019, (v) 0310831829 dated 26.09.2019 & (vi) 0310829991 dated 28.06.2019. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.33) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these six DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further DFIA could not be utilized and expired due to reverse migration of labour, restrictions of peoples movements and social distancing guidelines in place, distruption in supply chain movements etc. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 29 M/s. Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd., Anmedabad F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004006AM23

Subject: Revalidation of DFIA No.0811002295 dated 11.08.2021.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.22) held on 05.01.2023 stated that due to manufacturing of raw materials in their premises, they are not able to use the issued DFIA license for their purpose and some time after they realize that their requirement for raw materials are in a largely volume but they are not able to fulfill such requirement as per their work force. Now they are again planning for import their raw 7 जा under this license. Hence they are requesting to allow revalidation of subject Decision: Page 18 of 46

(Action: Applicant) Case No. 30 M/s. Continental Exports, Mumbai F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003849AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 3 DFIA No.(i) 0310838862 dated 14.10.2020, (ii) 0310832148 dated 11.10.2019 & (iii) 0310833704 dated 26.12.2019. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.35) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further the manufacturing activities. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and (Action: Applicant) Case No. 31 M/s. Bajrangbali Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata F.No.

ation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and (Action: Applicant) Case No. 31 M/s. Bajrangbali Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004013AM23 Subject: Revalidation of 3 DFIA No.(i) 0210210047 dated 18.08.2020, (ii) 0210210096 dated 14.09.2020 & (iii) 0210209971 dated 09.07.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.27/AM23 (Case No.34) held on 05.01.2023 stated that these three DFIA’s remained unutilized during its validity period in view of the difficulties arisen out of Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Govt as well as by various restrictions imposed by the State Govt. from time to time. Further DFIA could not be utilized and expired due to reverse migration of labour, restrictions of peoples movements and social distancing guidelines in place, distruption in supply chain movements etc. Hence firm has requested revalidation for 6 month from date of Endorsement. Decision: Page 19 of 46 pa
(Action: Applicant)

Case No. 32 Ms. Vimbri Enterprises, New Delhi F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003876AM23

Subject: Revalidation of DFIA No.0311007054 dated 17.09.2021.

This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.29/AM23 (Case No.33) held on 16.01.2023 stated that series of global events have caused massive backlog to their entire supply chain and production plans, starting with Pandemic Covid-19 which caused wide spread global economic disruptions and then the War in Europe between Russia and Ukraine. There is acute shortage of containers leading to unreasonable freights and extreme volatility in exchange rates which has led to slower imp[ort and at time negligible imports. Hence they are requesting to allow six month revalidation against above mentioned DFIA. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 33 M/s. Vanila Food Products, Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003847AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 6 DFIA No.(i) 0310839558 dated 13.11.2020, (ii)

0310838205 dated 10.09.2020, (iii) 0310838869 dated 14.10.2020, (iv) 0310833304 dated 09.12.2019, (v) 0310832769 dated 14.11.2019 & (vi) 0310825596 dated 11.12.2018. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.29/AM23 (Case No.34) held on 16.01.2023 stated that due to Covid-19 induced lockdowns announced by the Central Government from time to time. This has impacted more particularly small and medium business organization. The DFIAs mentioned above could not be utilized due to lesser movement of containers, high freights rates and significant increase in the cost of various raw materials and reduced manufacturing activities. Hence they are requesting to allow six month revalidation against above mentioned DFIAs. Decision: (Action: Applicant) Case No. 34 M/s. Pahwa Manufactures, Sitapur (UP) Page 20 of 46

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003600AM23

Subject: Second Revalidation of Restricted Items Import License No.0619031842

dated 11.09.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.23/AM23 (Case No.15) held on 20.12.2022 stated that they are a manufacturing company & regular importer of raw material for their manufacturing use only. Due to Covid19 production has been disturbed in every factory from where they are procuring these raw material & now due to summer holidays dispatch of material is also delayed. Hence they are requesting to allow validation for import license no.0619031842 dated 11.09.2020. Decision: The Committee discussed the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and it decided to allow revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement against Restricted Items Import License No.0619031842 dated 11.09.2020. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Kanpur) Case No. 35 M/s. Pahwa Manufactures, Sitapur (UP) F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003603AM23

Subject: Second Revalidation of Restricted Items Import License No.0619031843

dated 11.09.2020. This is a defer case of PRC Meeting No.23/AM23 (Case No.14) held on 20.12.2022 stated that they are manufacturing company of making shot gun cartridges and importing some components from GCA countries and import period of subject Advance Authorisation has been expired on 10.09.2022. Due to covid-19 factories across Europe are running 25% of their capacity only, therefore, they are struggling hard to get required raw material. Now their supplier are ready to supply the components around October and November. Hence they are requesting to allow six month revalidation against subject Advance Authorisation. Decision: The Committee discussed the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and it decided to allow revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement against Restricted Items Import License No.0619031843 dated 11.09.2020. This is last and final revalidation .The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Kanpur) Page 21 of 46

43 dated 11.09.2020. This is last and final revalidation .The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Kanpur) Page 21 of 46

Case No. 36 M/s. Premier Gun House, New Delhi F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004047AM23 Subject: Revalidation for License for Restricted Items of Authorization No.0519240593 dated 25.09.2020. The applicant stated that after issue of above license they have started placing orders abroad and invested huge amount with suppliers in abroad but only after few days of grant of import licence Dy.Director DGFT served the SCN upon the applicant. Thereafter applicant had filed the Writ Petition Civil before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court Inter-alia aggrieved by the Show-Cause Notice dated 257" February, 2021 issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Further vide its order dated 19.03.2021 passed in WP High Court was pleased to grant interim protection to the applicant. That as the issue remained pending before the Court. Firm was constrained to stopped the further import of Arms from foreign suppliers. Thereafter vide Order-in-Original dated 16.06.2021 DGFT permitted to release the 28 weapons imported by the Applicant under import authorisation for the purpose mentioned in the original application. Further DGFT also disposed of the SCN dated 25.2.201 and also directed applicant once again to surrender his Import License.

mport authorisation for the purpose mentioned in the original application. Further DGFT also disposed of the SCN dated 25.2.201 and also directed applicant once again to surrender his Import License. The Order-in-Original dated 16.06.2021 led to further filing of Applications before both Hon'ble Delhi High Court was again pleased to grant interim protection to the applicant qua its import license. That WPC 2600/2022 filed before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court as well as various complaints filed before other Forums against the applicant resulted in further delaying the import of Arms under this license. The goods of applicant are now stuck up with foreign dealers, neither they are returning back payment nor able to ship goods. Validity of license has already been expired. Hence they are requesting to revalidation of above mentioned license further 12 months to import the balance items. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and decided to refer the issue to PC-2 Division for examining the matter on file and put up to DG for a decision. (Action: Applicant/PC-2 Division) Case No. 37 M/s. Arvind Ltd., Anmedabad F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004079AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.0819069382 dated 29.09.2021.

The applicant stated that they are one of the top exporters of Textiles, Technical Textiles, Garments and other items USA, Europe and various other countries. The subject MEIS license was issued with the 1 year validity as per the license. The validity of such license was expired on 28" September, 2022. They had used the subject Page 22 of 46 ()

license against their imports and were not able to fully utilize the subject MEIS license due to Covid-19. There is a unutilized balance of Rs. 2,90,154/- under this MEIS license. Hence they are requesting to allow one year revalidation against subject MEIS. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 38 Ms. Benzo Chem Industry Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004076AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.031 9348157 dated 28.12.2021.

The applicant stated that they have obtained the said MEIS scrip for export made from SEZ - Dahej Unit. As per PN No.58/2015-20 dated 10" February, 2017 para 3.06 (a) they have option to choose jurisdictional RA on the basis of Corporate Office/Registered Office/Head Office/Branch Office address endorsed on IE for submitting application under MEIS and SEIS. This option need to be exercised at the beginning of FY. Once an option is exercised, no change would be allowed for claims relating to that year. On the basis of the above they have applied and get the MEIS scrips issued from DGFT Mumbai. But they are unable to register the same with SEZ —Dahej Customs. Hence they are requesting to allow six months extension to get the scrip register and self- utilize. Decision: The Committee having examined the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to accede to the request of the firm and allowed revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of Registration of MEIS No.0319348157 dated 28.12.2021. This is last and_ final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Mumbai) Case No. 39 M/s. Benzo Chem Industry Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004077AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.0319349998 dated 31.12.2021.

Office/Head Office/Branch Office address endorsed on IE for submitting application under MEIS and SEIS. This option need to be exercised at the beginning of FY. Once an option is exercised, no change would be allowed for claims relating to that year. On the basis of the above they have applied and get the MEIS scrips issued from DGFT Mumbai. But they are unable to register the same with SEZ —Dahej Customs. Hence they are requesting to allow six months extension to get the scrip register and self- utilize. Decision: The Committee having examined the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to accede to the request of the firm and allowed revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of Registration of MEIS No.0319349998 dated 31.12.2021. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Mumbai) Case No. 40 Mis. Fun Zoo Toys, Noida F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004095AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.3019045478 dated 04.12.2019.

The applicant stated that they are MSME Category exporter and this scrip was transferred in their favour in December, 2019 having duty credit of Rs. 187478/- and have already utilized duty amount of Rs. 133942/- in BOE No.6272327 dated 28 12.2019 in January, 2020. Thereafter their whole planet faced covid-19 pandemic for two year and during this time their accounts tem worked from home with limited use of files and other documents/information available in software. Thus during this period they had 100% customs duty from Bank accounts without using the scrip having balance of Rs. 53536/- as the file was in the office. Eventually the scrip got expired in December, 2021. Hence they are requesting to allow revalidation of the above mentioned MEIS. Decision: The Committee after examining the case it decided to reject the request of the firm for revalidation of MEIS as the same was found to be without any merit. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 41 Ms. Bharat Resins Pvt. Ltd., Dadra & Nagar F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004099AM23

Subject: Revalidation of RoSCTL No.3219108487 dated 21.10.2021.

Page 24 of 46

The applicant stated that they had purchased above ROSCTL Scrip for Rs.42,10,049/- to be utilised for payment of duty on imports. They have utilised Rs. 22,56,521/- and the balance amount in the Scrip is Rs. 19,53,528/-. This ROSCTL Scrip has expired on 20.10.2022, they noticed the expiry of the scrip and several documents including this Scrip were submitted to the Auditors for half yearly audit. They came to know about the validity of the said script only after received back the documents from the Auditors. During that time around two months, they were helpless and could not utilise this scrip. Hence they are requesting to allow three months revalidation of above mentioned ROSCTL up to March, 2023 to utilise this scrip. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 42 M/s. Herbul Henna Exports House, New Delhi F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004005AM23

Subject: Request to Transfer their online MEIS Application from SEZ Noida to

Addl. DGFT CLA New Delhi against E-Com No.05/02/061/33200/0765/5413 dated 26.8.2022. The applicant stated that they prepare application for grant of Duty Credit Authorization under MEIS Scheme vide E-Com No.05/02/061/33200/0765/5413 dated 26.8.2022 and the exports made by them during Sep.2020 to 31.12.2020 and the last date to submit the application is 31.08.2022 hence after preparing application they tried to submit their application to concern office at Addl. DGFT CLA New Delhi but the system not accepted the same and showing RA Office error that as per para 3.06 for an export year, application are to be submitted to the same RA or in case of then they tried to submit the application at NOIDA EPZ which accepted the application and generate the FILE NO. They have submitted at NOIDA EPZ because their main exports is from SEZ Noida and only few shipments they made out of from SEZ from their other unit which situated outside from SEZ Noida and earlier they selected opt EPZ Noida DGFT office for submission of application as required by the system. Hence they are requesting to allow them to make a fresh application and submission of same or transfer their old application to concerned CLA, New Delhi. Decision: The case was withdrawn, not being a PRC matter. Policy Circular No.46/2015-20 dated 20-02-2023 may be referred. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 43 M/s. Shyam Ferro Alloys Ltd., Kolkata Page 25 of 46 Lo

F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004046AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.0219080226 dated 30.09.2019.

The applicant stated that they could not be utilized MEIS Scrip because the Covid-19 pandemic. The diagrammatic representation where from it will understand that it is how much difficult to utilize manufacture and export merchandises during the period of acute panic of covid-19. In view of the above circumstances, they would request to grant such exemption, relaxation or relief as may deem fit and proper on grounds of terms of para 2.58 of the policy as exemption from policy/procedures. Since these authorizations were obtained for immediate import and since the importation could not be effected due to this epidemic the value of the individual raw materials has gone up substantially and if the extension of validity is allowed they may not be above to import the same. Hence they are requesting to six months revalidation against subject MEIS scrip. firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 44 Mis. Shyam Ferro Alloys Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004048AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.0219087386 dated 07.02.2020.

Case No. 45 M/s. Shyam Ferro Alloys Ltd., Kolkata F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004049AM23

Subject: Revalidation of MEIS No.021 9087385 dated 06.02.2020.

The applicant stated that they could not be utilized MEIS Scrip because the Covid-19 pandemic. The diagrammatic representation where from it will understand that it is how much difficult to utilize manufacture and export merchandises during the period of acute panic of covid-19. In view of the above circumstances, they would request to grant such exemption, relaxation or relief as may deem fit and proper on grounds of terms of para 2.58 of the policy as exemption from policy/procedures. Since these authorizations were obtained for immediate import and since the importation could not be effected due to this epidemic the value of the individual raw materials has gone up substantially and if the extension of validity is allowed they may not be above to import the same. Hence they are requesting to six months revalidation against subject MEIS scrip. firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 46 Mls. Mudrika Ceramics India Pvt. Ltd., Baroda F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004068AM23

Subject: Revalidation of 3 MEIS No.(i) 3419023633 dated 03.10.2022, (ii)

3419023635 dated 03.10.2021 & (iii) 3419024952 dated 24.11.2021. The applicant stated that above mentioned MEIS were granted with the validity of one year. And they have utilised the said licenses for their own import clearance. However, at the time of import of RM on account of the classification of product i.e. HSN they have been granted the provisional assessment of the B/E and accordingly they have paid the import duty in cash as well as through the usage of MEIS license. After completion of the all required formality and paper work at the time of providing final assessment of the imported Cargo Custom has arrived to the final decision of the Excess Import duty collected from Mudrika Ceramics (I) Pvt. Ltd. They have arranged the refund of the excess custom duty in two way i.e. re-creid tof MEIS as well as through Cheque. However, till time of receipt of the final order in hand two MEIS license is expired and another MEIS license is about to expired. On receipt of this order, they have approached the Local RLA and they denied to do needful anything since the original validity of license is expired. Hence they are requesting to revalidation of above mentioned MEIS. Page 27 of Waa

approached the Local RLA and they denied to do needful anything since the original validity of license is expired. Hence they are requesting to revalidation of above mentioned MEIS. Page 27 of Waa

Decision: The Committee went through the statement made by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit a copy of letter from Customs Authority specifying scrips in which recredit is to be done by them. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 47 Mis. PI Industries Limited, Rajasthan F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00170588AM22

Subject: To allow MEIS benefit on account of mismatch in the ITC HS codes

between DGFT and Customs - MEIS claims of approx Rs. 5.11 crores pending since 2019. The applicant stated that please refer Notification No.36/2015-20 dated 17" January 2017 along with Schedule 1 — Import Policy (ITC HS 2017) for Chapter 29, in this schedule HS Code 29299000 has been deleted and 29299090 has been added. This being the case the customs are generating only 29299090 which is the ITC description of 2012 as they do not have 29299000 which is the code as per PN 61/2015-20 dated 73.2017. Code 29299000 does not exist in the custom records and therefore, the S/Bills are being generated only with code 29299090. Therefore, they are unable to submit their MEIS applications to RA Kandla FT resulting in blockage of funds to the tune of Rs. 5.11 crores on account of the above discrepancy/mismatch of HS code for no fault. Their MEIS claims are still pending since 2019 and they are facing huge financial difficulties on this account. They are referred PRC Meeting No.19/20 dated 24.09.2019. Hence they are requesting to allow MEIS benefit of above mentioned script. Decision: The Committee examined the statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and it decided to defer the case for further examination. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 48 M/s. Krystal Global Engineering Limited, Vadodara F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00003289AM23

Subject: To allow MEIS benefit against 31 shipping bills.

This is defer case of PRC Meeting No.19/AM23 (Case No.38) held on 22.1.2022 wherein Committee decided to defer the case and ask the firm to submit a statement mentioning the date of realization and date of uploading the e-BRC of each Shipping Bill for taking the decision. The applicant stated that they have exported the goods with MEIS benefits and submitted required documents along with S/Bill and export realization proof to Bank and requested to issue BRC. The require BRC to apply for Page 28 of 46 fo

MEIS Scripts/License form from Bank which they have exported the goods. But due to some technical reason or migration of computer system of Bank they lost the data from their computer system and due to this they could not issue BRC before December, 2020. Meanwhile, DGFT has stopped applying for MEIS license for the export made before December,2020, hence transaction made before Dec 20 were lapsed for applying MEIS licence and lost benefit. Hence they are requesting to allow permission to claim of MEIS benefit. Decision: The Committee went through the statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to allow MEIS benefit for only 1 Shipping Bill No.2647027 dated 11.03.2019 in which BRC was uploaded in September 2022 without any late cut, out of the above total shipping bills. The Committee did not allow MEIS benefit against the remaining shipping bills as the same were found to be without any merit.

ptember 2022 without any late cut, out of the above total shipping bills. The Committee did not allow MEIS benefit against the remaining shipping bills as the same were found to be without any merit. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Concerned/PC-3 division for necessary updation) Case No. 49 Mis. Excel Foods Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004092AM23

Subject: Condonation in delay of TMA application period of Qtr. Oct. 2019 to Dec.

2019 (ECOM No. 07960085740010148067 dated 18.01.2021). The applicant stated that they have filled up the online application for TMA (Qt.July 2019 to Sept.2019) ECOM was generated successfully but at the time of submission, they received the message saying “submit date exceeded”. Due to Covid-19 vide PN No.67 dated 31.03.2020, the TMA period was extended till March, 2021. They have not been able to submit that application. Due to the pandemic, they could not receive their proceeds on time. This delay in receipt of proceeds resulted in late issuance of EBRC. Due to this delay, they have missed the filing period and the system has not accepted their application. Hence they are requesting to condone the delay and allow TMA benefit for the above mentioned period. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 50 Mis. Excel Foods Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004093AM23 Page 29 i 46

Subject: Condonation in delay of TMA application period of Qtr. July 2019 to Sep.

2019 (ECOM No. 07960085740010139267 dated 13.10.2020). The applicant stated that they have filled up the online application for TMA (Qt.July 2019 to Sept.2019) ECOM was generated successfully but at the time of submission, they received the message saying “submit date exceeded”. Due to Covid-19 vide PN No.67 dated 31.03.2020, the TMA period was extended till March, 2021. They have not been able to submit that application. Due to the pandemic, they could not receive their proceeds on time. This delay in receipt of proceeds resulted in late issuance of EBRC. Due to this delay, they have missed the filing period and the system has not accepted their application. Hence they are requesting to condone the delay and allow TMA benefit for the above mentioned period. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 51 M/s. Excel Drug House, Kolkata F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000010AM23

Subject: Permit Application for TMA period of 3" Quarter of 2019-20.

The applicant stated that it was their first time that they were applying for TMA and they made a mistake by applying the entitlement value less as in their some shipping bills there were more than 1 container exported while they just applied for 1 container. Their CA highlighted this mistake and while they approached RA for cancellation of their application, they cancelled the same so they can re-file but the portal does not allow once the application is submitted whether cancelled or approved. Hence they are requesting to allow permission for TMA for the above quarter. Decision: The Committee went through the statements made by the firm and noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 52 M/s. Omprakash Shivpraksh, MH F.No. HQARPRCAPPLY00000015AM23 Page 30 of hy j /

Subject: Condonation of Delay in submission of online TMA Application for the

period 01 January 2022 to 31 March 2022. The applicant stated that on 31/03/2022 they have tried to upload details for subsidy, initially they have applied for 20 containers - 2 shipping bills was applied just as trial for uploading the details, while applying for other shipping bill they came to know that they can file a single application for the quarter, they were unaware of this rule. Further they have tried to withdraw earlier application (20 containers) but it was not withdrawn within the required time period. Hence they are requesting to consider their application for 455 containers and allow permission TMA benefits. firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant Case No. 53 Mis. M. Dhirubhai & Co., Kolkata F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00000011AM23

Subject: Permit Application for TMA period of 3 Quarter of 2019-20.

The applicant stated that it was their first time that they were applying for TMA and they made a mistake by applying the entitlement value less as in their some shipping bills there were more than 1 container exported while they just applied for 1 container. Their CA highlighted this mistake and while they approached RA for cancellation of their application, they cancelled the same so they can re-file but the portal does not allow once the application is submitted whether cancelled or approved. Hence they are requesting to allow permission for TMA for the above quarter. Decision: The Committee discussed the case at length and found no merit or hardship in the arguments made by the firm and hence decided to reject the request of the firm. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 54 M/s. Komatsu India Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00363874AM22

Subject: To allow drawback benefit of Drawback of Rs.1,05,73,534/- under deemed

exports category to Komatsu Indian Pvt. Ltd., instead and against the desclaimer of Contract manufacturer L&T Construction Pvt. Ltd of Hydraulic Excavator for supply of goods under category 7.02 © Considering :-

Disclaimer certificate of L&T in favor of Komatsu to claim drawback benefit. Page 31 i-_ 46

Komatsu and L&T were joint venture partner. Contract manufacturing by L&T was only for transition period after exit of both partners from JV till manufacturing unit of Komatsu becomes operational in Tamil Nadu on This is defer case of PRC Meeting No.28/AM23 (Case No. 03) held on 11.01.2023 wherein Committee decided to defer the case for further examination. The applicant has stated that they are eligible for benefit of Drawback of Rs.1,05,73,534/- under deemed exports category to Komatsu Indian Pvt. Ltd., instead and against the disclaimer of Contract manufacturer L&T Construction Pvt. Ltd of Hydraulic Excavator for supply of goods under category 7.02 © Considering :-

Disclaimer certificate of L&T in favour of Komatsu to claim drawback benefit.
Komatsu and L&T were joint venture partner.
Contract manufacturing by L&T was only for transition period after exit of both partners from JV till manufacturing unit of Komatsu becomes operational in Tamil Nadu. Hence, they are requesting to allow benefit of Drawback of Rs.1,05,73,534/- under deemed exports category. firm and discussed the matter at length.

unit of Komatsu becomes operational in Tamil Nadu. Hence, they are requesting to allow benefit of Drawback of Rs.1,05,73,534/- under deemed exports category. firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee noted that the applicant has not submitted any cogent reason/ justification in support of any genuine hardship faced by them. Accordingly, the Committee decided to reject the request. (Action: Applicant) Case No. 55 M/s. Sara Spintex India Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00002759AM23

Subject: Acceptance Manual BRC against 2 EPCG Authorisation No.0330032632

dated 15.05.2012 and 0330033395 dated 08.08.2012. The applicant stated that they have submitted e-BRC in respect of all invoices except three Manual BRC. The supplier is not co-operating and they are unable to claim their TED. These invoices pertain to year 2012 the invoice date are 07.07.2012, 14.07.2012 & 31.07.2012 and the e-BRC requirement was introduced by DGFT vide PN No.02 dated 05.06.2012 which mandates to submit e-BRC instead of manual BRC. The concept of e-BRC was new for the trade. As per PN No.08 dated 6.7.2012 which has extended the date of implementation of e-BRC to 17.8.2012 the same read as requests have been received from various stakeholders for extension of the date of mandatory issuance of transmission of electronic BRCs on account of lack of readiness. Accordingly, it has been decided that existing system of physical BRC issuance from Bank may be continued further for a period up to 16.08.2012 for smooth transition. They have availed excise certificate confirming the supplies from supplier & manual Page 32 of 46i.

C issuance from Bank may be continued further for a period up to 16.08.2012 for smooth transition. They have availed excise certificate confirming the supplies from supplier & manual Page 32 of 46i.

BRC from the supplier has been availed and submitted. Hence they are requesting to accept Manual BRC in place of e-BRC against above mentioned EPCG licenses. Decision: The Committee went through the statement made by the applicant and observed that there is merit in the case and therefore decided to accede to the request for accepting the Manual BRC in place of e-BRC for availing refund of TED claim in respect of 2 EPCG Authorisation No.0330032632 dated 15.05.2012 and 0330033395 dated 08.08.2012 subject to confirmation of BRC from the Bank. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Mumbai) Case No. 56 Mis. Hotel Annamalai International, Madurai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00003916AM23

Subject: Request for consideration of payment received from Foreigners in INR

by Hotel industry towards redemption of EPCG License No.3530003915 dated 01.02.2010. This is deferred case of PRC Meeting No.28/AM23 (Case No.15) held on 11.01.2023, wherein Committee defer the case for further examination. This case was rejected in PRC Meeting No.15/AM21 dated 03.11.2020 & 11.1 4.2020 (Case No.07). The applicant has stated that they have following documents (i) Name and Nationality of Foreign Guest who have stayed in the Hotel. (ii) Copies of Passports of all the Foreign Nationals (iii) Copies of invoices duly countersigned by the Foreign national (iv) Statement of EO fulfillment containing the name, nationality passport number f the foreign nationals. (V) The sample copies of Passports invoices countersigned by the foreign nationals and the statement of EO fulfillment containing the Name, Nationality and Passport Number is being submitted with this review application. (vi) All the passport copies and the invoices duly countersigned by foreign nationals will be submitted to the concerned RA. Hence, they are requesting for consideration of payment received from Foreigners in INR by Hotel industry towards redemption of EPCG license no.

reign nationals will be submitted to the concerned RA. Hence, they are requesting for consideration of payment received from Foreigners in INR by Hotel industry towards redemption of EPCG license no. 3530003915 dated 01.02.2010. Decision: The Committee reviewed and discussed the case on the basis of submission made by the applicant along with the comments received from PC-6 Division and observed that there is no merit in firm’s contention and hence decided to maintain rejection of the earlier decision of PRC in its Meeting No.15/AM21 dated 03.11.2020 & 11.11.2020 (Case No.07). (Action: Applicant) Case No. 57 M/s. Manorama Industries Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004342AM23 Page 33 Yo 46 ( |

Subject: Condonation / Waiver of delay beyond 90 days EOP under Appendix 4J

for export product covered under Chapter 45 against 2 Advance Authorization No.0311012533 dated 10.03.2022 & 0311010880 dated 25.01 .2022 with complete waiver of composition fee or in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023. The applicant stated that both the above licenses still has a valid 18 months EOP and the entire EO will be fulfilled separately against both AA with prevailing EOP. Their unit is the only unit in the country producing value added products from Sal Seeds Mahua, Kokum, Dhupa the tree borne seeds which are collected by Hundred Thousands of women forest dwellers from tribal areas from the states of Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Jharkhand, thereby providing sustainable employment to the thousands of tribal population in the country. They are having a Star Export House status since 2007 even though their company falls under MSME. Their new unit for export of Shea Butter, Shea Stearine and Value added products setup in 2019 and their production was started in March 2020 and imposition of lower FFA content parameters from 2.50% to 0.25% by FSSAI in June 2020 for meeting which they had upgraded their plant with additional investment of Rs. 8 crore. After the imports the required exports could not be made in controlled and systematic manner mainly due to shortage of manpower which resulted in actual exports in non sequential way.

of Rs. 8 crore. After the imports the required exports could not be made in controlled and systematic manner mainly due to shortage of manpower which resulted in actual exports in non sequential way. DGFT has been very helpful to the exporting community by providing amnesty scheme automatically extending the export obligation period up to 31.12.2021 vide PN No.28 dated 23.09.2021 without imposing any composition fee on unfulfilled export obligation in view of sever impact of Covid-19 during 2020 & 2021. However, this facility was not provided for the AA issued under Appendix 4J but now their product removed from Appendix 4J. DGFT had firstly imposed the condition of Appendix 4 J in 2018 on Chapter 15 generally under which their HS Code 15159091 of their export product Shea Stearine/Shea Butter automatically felled with this HS Code under Appendix 4 J and it was not possible for them to comply with the condition of export obligation of just 90 days. Later on it was realized by DGFT about the hardship in complying the above condition as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect.

on as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect. At this point of time 1% per month composition fee, which involves huge funds will definitely affect their planning for further timely procurements, product and exports. Hence they are requesting to allow complete waive off the composition fees or allow them the composition fees in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 for regularization purpose with a positive approach to facilitate the exporters to recover from past two years slack down and down fall in India exports and financial losses to the exporters. Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and observed that export item is a tribal agricultural product, which is a seasonal product in nature. Accordingly, the Committee decided to accede to the request for regularization of export already made beyond EOP (i.e.90 days) against 2 Advance Authorisation No.0311012533 dated 10.03.2022 & 0311010880 dated 25.01.2022. The Committee further decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN 0.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made Page 34 of 46 V

ated 25.01.2022. The Committee further decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN 0.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made Page 34 of 46 V

applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting the PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant [PC-4-Division /RA-Mumbai) Case No. 58 Mis. Manorama Industries Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004341AM23

Subject: Condonation / Waiver of delay beyond 90 days EOP under Appendix 4J

for export product covered under Chapter 15 against 2 Advance Authorization No.0310835294 dated 09.03.2020 & 0310839180 dated 28.10.2020 with complete waiver of composition fee or in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023. The applicant stated that they have already fulfilled their EO under said authorizations for regularization to redeem the above AA by submitting their applications for Clubbing process, redemption and issue of EODC no further imports & exports shall be made under the above licences. Their unit is the only unit in the country producing value added products from Sal Seeds Mahua, Kokum, Dhupa the tree borne seeds which are collected by Hundred Thousands of women forest dwellers from tribal areas from the states of Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Jharkhand, thereby providing sustainable employment to the thousands of tribal population in the country. They are having a Star Export House status since 2007 even though their company falls under MSME. Their new unit for export of Shea Butter, Shea Stearine and Value added products setup in 2019 and their production was started in March 2020 and imposition of lower FFA content parameters from 2.50% to 0.25% by FSSAI in June 2020 for meeting which they had upgraded their plant with additional investment of Rs. 8 crore. After the imports the required exports could not be made in controlled and systematic manner mainly due to shortage of manpower which resulted in actual exports in non sequential way.

huge funds will definitely affect their planning for further timely procurements, product and exports. Hence they are requesting to allow 100% complete waive off the composition fees or हम 35 of 46

allow them the composition fees in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 against above two advance authorisation. Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and observed that export item is a tribal agricultural product, which is a seasonal product in nature. Accordingly, the Committee decided to accede to the request for regularization of export already made beyond EOP (i.e.90 days) against 2 Advance Authorisation No.0310835294 dated 09.03.2020 & 0310839180 dated 28.10.2020. The Committee also allowed further 3 months EOP extension from the date of endorsement of these 2 advance authorisations for regularization purpose only. The Committee further decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting the PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant IPC-4-Division /RA-Mumbai) Case No. 59 M/s. Manorama Industries Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004340AM23

Subject: Condonation / Waiver of delay beyond 90 days EOP under Appendix 4J

for export product covered under Chapter 15 against 6 Advance Authorization No.(i) 0310832118 dated 10.10.2019, (ii) 0310835229 dated 05.03.2020, (iii) 0310837364 dated 23.07.2020, (iv) 0310837365 dated 23.07.2020, (v) 0310839128 dated 26.10.2020 and (vi) 0310839181 dated 28.10.2020 with complete waiver of composition fee or in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023. The applicant stated that they shall be completing the entire balance EO within 6 months and will submit the EODC application with clubbing to RA. It will greatly help them to compensate huge financial losses already incurred by them during the Covid-19 pandemic. Their unit is the only unit in the country producing value added products from Sal Seeds Mahua, Kokum, Dhupa the tree borne seeds which are collected by Hundred Thousands of women forest dwellers from tribal areas from the states of Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Jharkhand, thereby providing sustainable employment to the thousands of tribal population in the country. They are having a Star Export House status since 2007 even though their company falls under MSME. Their new unit for export of Shea Butter, Shea Stearine and Value added products setup in 2019 and their production was started in March 2020 and imposition of lower FFA content parameters from 2.50% to 0.25% by FSSAI in June 2020 for meeting which they had upgraded their plant with additional investment of Rs. 8 crore.

extending the export obligation period up to 31.12.2021 vide PN No.28 dated 23.09.2021 without imposing any composition fee on unfulfilled export obligation in view of sever impact of Covid-19 during 2020 & 2021. However, this facility was not provided for the AA issued under Appendix 4J but now their product removed from Appendix 4J. DGFT had firstly imposed the condition of Appendix 4 J in 2018 on Chapter 15 generally under which their HS Code 15159091 of their export product Shea Stearine/Shea Butter automatically felled with this HS Code under Appendix 4 J and it was not possible for them to comply with the condition of export obligation of just 90 days. Later on it was realized by DGFT about the hardship in complying the above condition as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect.

on as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect. At this point of time 1% per month composition fee, which involves huge funds will definitely affect their planning for further timely procurements, product and exports. Hence they are requesting to allow complete waiver off the composition fees or allow them the composition fees in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 against Six Advance Authorisations. Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and observed that export item is a tribal agricultural product, which is a seasonal product in nature. Accordingly, the Committee decided to accede to the request for regularization of export already made beyond EOP (ie.90 days) against 6 Advance Authorisation No.(i) 0310832118 dated 10.10.2019, (ii) 0310835229 dated 05.03.2020, (iii) 0310837364 dated 23.07.2020, (iv) 0310837365 dated 23.07.2020, (v) 0310839128 dated 26.10.2020 and (vi) 0310839181 dated 28.10.2020.

10832118 dated 10.10.2019, (ii) 0310835229 dated 05.03.2020, (iii) 0310837364 dated 23.07.2020, (iv) 0310837365 dated 23.07.2020, (v) 0310839128 dated 26.10.2020 and (vi) 0310839181 dated 28.10.2020. The Committee also allowed further 3 months EOP extension from the date of endorsement of these 6 advance authorisations for regularization purpose only. The Committee further decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting the PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant /PC-4-Division /RA-Mumbai) Case No. 60 M/s. Manorama Industries Ltd., Mumbai F.No. HQRPRCAPPLY00004338AM23

Subject: Condonation / Waiver of delay beyond 90 days EOP under Appendix 4J

for export product covered under Chapter 15 against 2 Advance Authorization No.0311000303 dated 28.12.2020 & 0311009708 dated 22.12.2021 with complete waiver of composition fee or in terms of PN Mp/52 dated 18.01.2023 and to allow clubbing of these two Advance Authorisations for regularization for purpose. The applicant stated that they have already fulfilled 70% of their EO under above said authorization and balance will complete by April/May 2023 to redeem the above Page 37 ye 46

authorisation by submitting their applications for clubbing, redemption and issue of EODC. Their unit is the only unit in the country producing value added products from Sal Seeds Mahua, Kokum, Dhupa the tree borne seeds which are collected by Hundred Thousands of women forest dwellers from tribal areas from the states of Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Jharkhand, thereby providing sustainable employment to the thousands of tribal population in the country. They are having a Star Export House status since 2007 even though their company falls under MSME. Their new unit for export of Shea Butter, Shea Stearine and Value added products setup in 2019 and their production was started in March 2020 and imposition of lower FFA content parameters from 2.50% to 0.25% by FSSAI in June 2020 for meeting which they had upgraded their plant with additional investment of Rs. 8 crore.

arted in March 2020 and imposition of lower FFA content parameters from 2.50% to 0.25% by FSSAI in June 2020 for meeting which they had upgraded their plant with additional investment of Rs. 8 crore. After the imports the required exports could not be made in controlled and systematic manner mainly due to shortage of manpower which resulted in actual exports in non sequential way. DGFT has been very helpful to the exporting community by providing amnesty scheme automatically extending the export obligation period up to 31.12.2021 vide PN No.28 dated 23.09.2021 without imposing any composition fee on unfulfilled export obligation in view of sever impact of Covid-19 during 2020 & 2021. However, this facility was not provided for the AA issued under Appendix 4J but now their product removed from Appendix 4J. DGFT had firstly imposed the condition of Appendix 4 J in 2018 on Chapter 15 generally under which their HS Code 15159091 of their export product Shea Stearine/Shea Butter automatically felled with this HS Code under Appendix 4 J and it was not possible for them to comply with the condition of export obligation of just 90 days. Later on it was realized by DGFT about the hardship in complying the above condition as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect.

on as the Shea Nut are not grown in India and neither has any direct or indirect use in any other industry in India. On 12.12.2022 (PN No.43) Shea Nut/Shea Butter were excluded with immediate effect. At this point of time 1% per month composition fee, which involves huge funds will definitely affect their planning for further timely procurements, product and exports. Hence they are requesting to allow further EOP extension of 6 months for regularisation and complete waive off the composition fees or allow them the composition fees in terms of PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 against two advance licenses. Decision: The Committee examined the case on the basis of statement made by the applicant and discussed the matter at length and observed that export item is a tribal agricultural product, which is a seasonal product in nature. Accordingly, the Committee decided to accede to the request for regularization of export already made beyond EOP (e.90 days) against 2 Advance Authorisation No.0311000303 dated 28.12.2020 & 0311009708 dated 22.12.2021. The Committee also allowed further 3 months EOP extension from the date of endorsement of these two advance authorisations for regularization purpose only. The Committee further decided that for all PRC cases also, a similar dispensation of composition fee as notified earlier vide PN No.52 dated 18.01.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard.

.2023 should be made applicable for a uniform and transparent system and to reduce transaction costs. Accordingly, it was decided that PC-4 should make necessary provisions/ amendment in this regard. All applicants will have 90 days from the date of Amendment in which to approach jurisdictional RA for getting the PRC decision implemented. (Action: Applicant IPC-4-Division /RA-Mumbai) Page ae of 46 x NV

Case No. 61 Mis. Premier Energies Photovoltaic Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004363AM23

Subject: Second Revalidation of License for Restricted Item No.0919026784

dated 24.02.2021. The applicant stated that they have imported (i) Silver Conductor front side metallic past quantity 5800 Kgs. Out of which 2752 Kgs is balance. Valued at Rs.27,52,368. (ii) Silver Conductor paste rear side 2193.5 Kgs was imported. Out of which 372.5 Kgs is balance. Valued at Rs.1,04,09,640/- in the said license to be imported. As the quantity to be imported is still open under this license, they are requesting for second revalidation of License for Restricted Item No.0919026784 dated 24.02.2021. Decision: The Committee discussed the case on the basis of statement made by the firm and it decided to allow revalidation for a period of 6 months from the date of endorsement against License for Restricted Item No.0919026784 dated 24.02.2021. This is last and final revalidation. The firm shall approach RA within 30 days from the date of uploading of the minutes of meeting. (Action: Applicant/RA-Hyderabad) Case No. 62 Mis. Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd., Pune F.No. HARPRCAPPLY00004300AM23

Subject: One time relaxation to import of 251 New Mercedes-Benz Passenger

Cars Model GLB from Country of Manufacture Mexico, under New Bills of Lading issued from Bremerhaven Port, Germany to Mumbai Port, India. The applicant stated that Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd. (MBIL) is a manufacturer of Mercedes-Benz Passenger cars in India at Chakan, Pune (Maharashtra). Apart from manufacturing Mercedes-Benz Cars locally in India to meet their customer requirements, they also import limited number of Completely Build Units (CBUs) which are manufactured in other plants of Mercedes-Benz AG. These 251 Nos. of cars being imported comply with all the conditions of the import policy under Para (2) (ii)(iv) of the Chapter 87 of the import policy. MBIL placed orders for the supply of 251 Nos. of Mercedes-Benz Passenger Car Model GLB in the Global Ordering System of Mercedes-Benz AG, Germany. These GLB units were manufactured in Aguascalientes plant in Mexico and were shipped from Port Altamira, Mexico under 13 separate Bills of Lading to Bremerhaven Port, Germany along with cars meant for other markets for onward shipment to respective destinations. These cars are temporarily stored in Free Trade Zone for onward transit to India and are not Custom cleared from FTWZ. These cars would be shipped from Bremerhaven to India under new Bills of Lading. They have obtained a Confirmation Certificate dated 16.12.2022 from Logistic Free Trade Page 39 of 46

ared from FTWZ. These cars would be shipped from Bremerhaven to India under new Bills of Lading. They have obtained a Confirmation Certificate dated 16.12.2022 from Logistic Free Trade Page 39 of 46

Zone, Partner - 31.6 Auto Tech GmbH & Co. KG of Br 251 Cars arrived from Mexico in the FTZ at Bremer onward shipment to Mumbai, | before the import and arrival 0 Lading issued from Mexi transit Bills of Lading. D Mexico directly to India in October, 202 Shipping Link. All th Duty. Hence they are requesting to allow one time r of 251 cars in India as not under “Single Mumbai port, India but be allowed to import t ndia. Customs advised t ican Port to Mumbai Port, In ” Bill of La e cars will be Customs cleared in India on paymen elaxation be’ from Bremerhaven Port, Germany to Mumbai Port, India. The details of 251 vehicles are as below. emerhaven, Germany that these haven, only for the purpose of hem to seek Policy Relaxation f 251 Cars as all 251 cars are not under “Single” Bill of dia but are under two separate ue to logistical limitations it was not possible to import from 4 as shipping lines could not offer any direct t of full Customs fore the import of arrival ding from Altamira, Mexico Port to hese cars under new Bills of Lading issued SL.No.

ossible to import from 4 as shipping lines could not offer any direct t of full Customs fore the import of arrival ding from Altamira, Mexico Port to hese cars under new Bills of Lading issued SL.No. Order No__| VIN (Vehicle Identification No) [Model __ | SWB Ex-Mexico 1 282510575 | W1N2476142W252445 GLB 220 0 :FX__| MX2274348 a 282510503 | W1N2476152W244353 GLB 220 D KKLUATMO00697 4M_:FX 2 282510495 | W1N2476152W2460S5 GLB 220 D KKLUATM00697 4M _:FX 4 282510501 | W1N2476152W244349 GLB 220 D KKLUATM00697 4M _:FX pens en 282510494 | W1N2476142W241776 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00697 ine 282510500 | W1N2476152W244343 GLB 220 D KKLUATM00697 4M :FX 2 282510493 | W1N2476142W241770 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00697 ie 2) | 282510496 | W1N2476152W246058 GLB 220 D KKLUATMO00697 4M :FX peo es 282510499 | W1N2476152W244338 GLB 220 D 4M TKKLUATMEXI697 | 10 282510502 | W1N24761S2W246064 GLB 220 D KKLUATMO00697 4M :FX 11 282510488 | W1N2476142W241773 GLB 220D:FX| KKLUATMIXI678 | 42 | 282510490 | W1N2476142W241781 GLB 220 0 :FX KKLUATM00678 13 282510497 | W1N2476152W241346 GLB 220 D 4M KKLUATMO00678 14 282510504 | W1N2476152W24263S GLB 220 KKLUATM00678 D 4M :FX 18 282510491 | W1N2476142W241341 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00678 16 282510489 | W1N2476142W241767 GLB 220 D :FX KKLUATMO00678 7 282510492 | W1N2476142W241353 GLB 220 0 :FX |KKLUATM00678 18 282510305 | W1N2476872W204503 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00637 r 19 | 282510303 |W1 N2476872W204785 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00637 20 282510300 | W1N2476872W205707 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM0O6Z7 21

28 282510117 | W1N2476142W194063 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223137 29 282510049 |W1N2476872W193446 GLB 200 :FX yMx2223150_ | 50 30 282510102 |W1N2476142W193676 GLB 220 0 :FX [mx2223150 | 31 282510033 |W1N2476872W 189110 GLB 200 :FX 1Mx2223150 | 32 282510034 |W1N2476872W189S51 GLB 200 :FX [Mx2223137 | 33 282510065 |W1N2476872W192842 GLB 200 :FX [MiX2223137 | 37 34 282510059 ४४॥४247687200190624 GLB 200 :FX [MxX2223150 | 50 35 282510043 |W1N2476872W188692 GLB 200 :FX [MxXZ223137_ | 37 il 36 /॥ 282510070 |W1N2476142W190730 GLB 220 0 :FX }MX2223150 | 50 37 282510066 | W1N2476872W190623 GLB 200 :FX [Mx2223150 | 50 ji, se 282510056 |W1N2476872W192471 GLB 200 :FX ]MxX2223137_ | 3” 39 282510126 |W1N2476142W193814 GLB 220 D :FX IMX2223137_ | 37 40 282510133 |W1N2476142W194099 GLB 220 D :FX ixeoesis7 || 41 282510138 |VWW1N2476142WV194189 GLB 220 D :FX [MX2223137_ | 42 282510116 |W1N2476142W194386

93814 GLB 220 D :FX IMX2223137_ | 37 40 282510133 |W1N2476142W194099 GLB 220 D :FX ixeoesis7 || 41 282510138 |VWW1N2476142WV194189 GLB 220 D :FX [MX2223137_ | 42 282510116 |W1N2476142W194386 GLB 220 0 :FX [Mx2223137 43 282510048 |W1N2476872W190558 GLB 200 :FX IMx2223150 | 50 44 282510103 |W1N2476142W193562 GLB 220 D :FX IMx2223137 | 45 282510042 |W1N2476872WW188690 GLB 200 :FX IMX2223137 | | 46 | 282510134 |W1N2476142W194117 GLB 220 D :FX [Mx2223137 | 37 47 282510208 |W1N2476872W198541 GLB 200 :FX [Mx2229037_ | 48 | 182510796 |W1N247687ZW177845 GLB 200 :FX |Mx2229037 | 1 49 | 182510761 |W1N2476142W179183 GLB 220 D :FX IMX2229037 | Ls 182510722 |W1N2476872W178424 GLB 200 :FX IMx2220037 | 51 | 182510711 | 0711 |W1N2476872W177050 GLB 200 :FX [MX2229037 | 62 182510687 |W1N2476142W176068 GLB 220 D :FX [Mx2229037 53 482510765 |W1N2476142W177480 GLB 220 D :FX |Mx2229037 | 54 482510706 |W1N2476872W179161 GLB 200 :FX |Mx2229037 | 55 182510688 |W1N2476142W180841 GLB 220 D :FX |Mx2229037 | 110 66 | 182510794 |W1N2476872W177420 GLB 20D :FX IMXZ229037 i 57 182510764 |W1N2476142W177528 GLB 220 D :FX JMX2229037 | y 58 | |_ 182610712 | W1N2476872W178287 GLB 200 :FX [Mx2220037_ कि 182510791 |W1N2476152W178211 GLB 220D4M |MX2229037 FX | 60 | 182510778 |W1N2476142W178650 GLB 220 0 :FX ]Mx2229037_ 61 | 182510732 | 0732 |W1N2476872W178221 GLB 200 :FX IMXx2229037_ | 62 282510222 |W1N2476872W201769 GLB 200 :FX [शा 63 282510214 |W1N2476872W201995 GLB 200 :FX 1MxX2229037 _| | 654 | 282510199 |W1N2476872WW203397 GLB 200 :FX

178221 GLB 200 :FX IMXx2229037_ | 62 282510222 |W1N2476872W201769 GLB 200 :FX [शा 63 282510214 |W1N2476872W201995 GLB 200 :FX 1MxX2229037 _| | 654 | 282510199 |W1N2476872WW203397 GLB 200 :FX [mx2229037 | [65 | 282510224 |W1N2476872WZ03118 GLB 200 :FX [Mx2229037 | | 66 | 282510228 |W1N2476872W203116 GLB 200 :FX ]Mx2229037 | 67 282510122 |W1N2476142W202644 GLB 220 D :FX [Mx2229037 | 6 | 282510210 |W1N2476872W202101 GLB 200 :FX |MX2229037 | ) 69 | 282510220 |W1N2476872W202568 GLB 200 :FX IMx2229037 | 70 282510118 |W1N2476142W202703 GLB 220 0 :FX [Mx2229037 | 71 282510201 |W1N2476872W203370 GLB 200 :FX ]Mx2229037 | 72 282510215 |W1N2476872W202789 GLB 200 :FX |Mx2229037 Page 41 of Va है
Va

GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 82 282510227 |W1N2476872W202648 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 83 282510306 |W1N2476872W204716 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 a 182510720 |W1N2476872W180591 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 |. 8588 | 282510223 |W1N2476872W203051 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 | 66" | 282510219 |W1N2476872W203431 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 87 282510301 |W1N2476872W204735 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATMO00631 88 282510230 |W1N2476872W203462 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 | 89 282510302 |W1N2476872W204703 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATMO00631 } 9 | 282510307 |W1N2476872W204502 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 91 282510225 |W1N2476872W201818 GLB 200 :FX MX2229037 92 282510311 |W1N2476872W204439 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 93 282510308 |W1N2476872W204660 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 | 4 | 282510304 |W1N2476872W204S61 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 | 9 | 282510310 |W1N2476872W204408 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00631 ; 6 | 182510787 |W1N2476142W178S14 GLB 220D:FX |MX2229037 97 182510766 |W1N2476142W177448 GLB 220 D :FX MX2229037 ;

115 182510767 |W1N2476142W177582 GLB 220D:FX |MX2226474 116 182510702 |W1N2476872W179138 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 117 182510769 |W1N2476142W178593 GLB 220D:FX |MX2226474 ) 18 | 18 182510723 |W1N2476872W180340 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 119 182510792 |W1N2476152W177536 CLB 220 D 4M MX2226474 120 182510727 |W1N2476872W178248 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 121 182510733 |W1k2476872W178015 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 122 182510725 |VW1N2476872W177155 GLB 200 :Fx MX2226474 123 182510798 |W1NZ476872W179202 GLB 2¢Q :FX MX2226474 124 482510704 |W1N2476872W179065 GLB 20D :FX MX2226474 125 182510684 |W1N2476142W180797 GLB 220D:FX |MX2226474 126 282510205 |W1N2476872W198543 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 127 282510211 |W1N2476872W198443 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 128 282510217 |W1N2476872W198320 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 129 282510209 |W1N2476872W/198446 GLB 200 :FX MX2226474 130 182510716 |W1N2476872W178553 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATMO00618 131 182510713 |W1N2476872W179035 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 132 282510216 |W1N2476872W198439 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATMO00618 133 182510721 |W1N24768Y2W179528 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 134 182510762 |W1N2476142W179226 GLB 220D:FX |KKLUATM00618 135 182510748 |W1N2476872W178360 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 136 182510730 |W1N2476872W177742 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 137 182510708 |W1N2476872W177999 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 138

KLUATM00618 135 182510748 |W1N2476872W178360 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 136 182510730 |W1N2476872W177742 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 137 182510708 |W1N2476872W177999 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 138 182S10795 |W1N2476872W177108 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATMO00618 139 182510718 |W1N2476872W179900 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 140 282510076 |W1N2476152W197236 GLB 220 0 4M KKLUATM00618 :FX 141 182510700 |W1N2476872W179178 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 142 182510738 |WM2476872W177844 GLB 2D0 :FX KKLUATM00618 143 182510717 |W1N2476872W179170 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 144 182510799 |W1N2476872W179195 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 145 182510728 |W1N2476872W179047 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 146 282510212 |W1N2476872W198172 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 147 182510752 |W1N2476872W177056 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 | 148 | (182510715 |W1N2476872W179084 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 149 182510701 |W1N2476872W179182 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 150 182510745 |W1N2476872W180557 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 151 182510707 |W1N2476872W179112 CLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 152 182510714 |W1N2476872W178911 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 153 182510734 |W1N2476872W/179068 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 | ibe | 54 282510203 |W1N2476872W198106 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 155 182510703 |W1N2476872W178362 GLB 20D ‘Fx KKLUATM00618 156 182510751 |W1N2476872W179067 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 157 182510729 |W1N2476872W177500 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 158 182510710 |W1N2476872W177551 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 Page 43 of a r

56 182510751 |W1N2476872W179067 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 157 182510729 |W1N2476872W177500 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 158 182510710 |W1N2476872W177551 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00618 Page 43 of a r

2W195865 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 :FX 179 282510077 |W1N2476152WW195966 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 1FX 180 282510088 |W1N24 6152W195797 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 :FX 181 282510137 |W1N2476142W194142 GLB 220 0 7 |MX2223526 182 282510075 |W1N2476142W194126 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 183 282510082 |W1N24761S2W195634 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 1FX 184 282510060 |W1N2476872W191075 GLB 200 :FX MX2223526 185 282510085 |W1N2476152W195789 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 :FX छिtणिv 282510078 |W1N2476152W195669 GLB 220 0 4M MX2223526 :FX 187 282510080 |W1N2476152WW195748 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 1FX 188 282510099 |W1N2476152W197003 GLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 :FX 189 282510127 |W1N2476142W193767 GLB 220 0 :FX MX2223526 190 282510110 |W1N2476142W193872 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 191 282510112 |W1N2476142W193899 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 192 282510121 |W1N2476142W194122 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 193 182810735 |W1N2476872W190238 GLB 200 :FX IMx2223526 | Page 44 of 46

3526 191 282510112 |W1N2476142W193899 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 192 282510121 |W1N2476142W194122 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 193 182810735 |W1N2476872W190238 GLB 200 :FX IMx2223526 | Page 44 of 46

194 282510132 |W1N2476142W193778 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223S26 19S 282510104 |W1N2476142W193526 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 196 282510129 }W1N2476142W193815 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 197 282510124 |W1N2476142W193746 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 198 282810111 |W1N2476142W194329 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 | 199 | 282510105 |\W1N2476142W193678 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 200 282510136 |W1N2476142WW196088 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 201 282510123 |W1N2476142W193742 GLB 220 D :Fx MX2223526 202 282510101 |W1N2476142W193432 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 203 282510125 |W1N2476142W196076 GLB 220 0 :FX MX2223526 204 282510115 |W1N2476142W193978 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 205 282530135 |W1N2476142W193902 CLB 220 0 :FX MX2223526 206 282510130 |W1N2476142W193859 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 207 282510081 |W1N2476152W195792 CLB 220 D 4M MX2223526 17२ 208 282510114 |W1N2476142W194470 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223S26 209 282510109 |W1N2476142W193935 GLB 220D:FX |MX2223526 210 282510108 |W1N2476142W194485 GLB 220 D :FX MX2223526 211 282510054 |W1N2476872W191007 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 212 182510781 |W1N2476142W187426 GLB 220 D :FX MX2Z21319 213 282510030 |W1N2476872W189258 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 214 282510064 |W1N2476872W190489 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 215 282810072 |W1N2476142W190316 GLB 220 D :FX MX2221319 | 216 | 282510028 |\W1N2476872W188641 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 217

FX MX2221319 214 282510064 |W1N2476872W190489 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 215 282810072 |W1N2476142W190316 GLB 220 D :FX MX2221319 | 216 | 282510028 |\W1N2476872W188641 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 217 182510736 |W1N2476872W188756 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 218 282510022 |W1N2476B72W188479 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 219 182510775 |W1N2476142W186693 GLB 220 D :FX MX2221319 220 282510032 |W1N2476872W189090 GLB 200 :FX VX2221319 221 282510031 |W1N2476872W187819 GLB 200 :FX MX222 1319 222 282510024 |VV1N2476872W188971 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 223 182510750 W1N2476872W186076 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 224 182S10754 W1N2476872W186118 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 225 182510753 W1N2476872W 186004 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 226 182510797 W1N2476872W 185656 GLB 200 :Fx MX2221319 227 182510746 \W1N2476872W186027 IGLB 200 :FX IMX2221319 228 282510045 \W1N2476872W189039 (513 200 :FX IMX2221319 229 282510058 |W1N2476872W190759 IGLB 200 :FX IMX2221319 230 282510063 |W1N2476872W190573 LB 200 :FX IMX2221319 231 282510053 |W1N2476872W191261 (७18 200 :FX MX2221319 232 282510074 |W1N2476142W18956S IGLB 220 0 :FX MX2221319 233 282510037 |W1N2476872W189349 (51.8 200 :FX MX2221319 234 282510029 |W1N2476872W189453 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 235 282510026 |W1N2476872W189528 GLB 200 :Fx MX2221319 236 282510052 |W1N2476872W190270 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 237 182510749 | W1N2476872W186008 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 maa Page 45 of 46 oe 5 amei

282510026 |W1N2476872W189528 GLB 200 :Fx MX2221319 236 282510052 |W1N2476872W190270 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 237 182510749 | W1N2476872W186008 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 maa Page 45 of 46 oe 5 amei

238 282510073] W1N2476142W191370 GLB 220D:FX |MX2221319 239 182510724 | W1N2476872W188433 GLB 200 :FX MK2221319 240 282510067) W1N2476872W 190090 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 241 282510061] W1N2476872W189769 GLB 200 :FX MX2221319 242 182510741] W1N2476872W186709 GLB 200 :FX KKLUATM00608 243 182510785] W1N2476142W187826 GLB 220 D :FX KKLUATMO00608 | 244s 182510782] W1N2476142W187892 CLB 220 D :FX KKLUATMO00608 245 182510698 | W1N2476142W187448 GLB 220D:FX__| KKLUATM00608 246 182510693] W1N2476142W187926 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00608 247 182510696] W1N2476142W187629 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00608 248 182510783 | W1N2476142W187865 GLB 220D:FX | KKLUATM00608 249 182510776 | W1N2476142W187321 GLB 220 0 77 | KKLUATM00608 250 182510695) W1N2476142W186701 GLB 220 0 :FX__| KKLUATMD0608 251 182510697} W1N2476142W187594 GLB 220 D :FX KKLUATM00608 Decision: The Committee went through the justification provided by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to accede to the request of the firm to allow import of 251 New Mercedes-Benz Passenger Cars as detailed mentioned above.

rovided by the firm and discussed the matter at length. The Committee decided to accede to the request of the firm to allow import of 251 New Mercedes-Benz Passenger Cars as detailed mentioned above. The Committee also allowed to import these cars under New Bills of Lading issued from Bremerhaven Port, Germany to Mumbai Port, India and its plying on Indian roads subject to necessary permission/NoC from Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH).. (Action: Applicant). wR Page 46 of 46

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis has been generated for this document yet.