DGFT Committee Minutes
Minutes of the Policy Relaxation Committee Meeting No. 40/AM14 held on 11.03.2014 at 11.30 A.M. PRC Meeting was held under the Chairmanship of DGFT. List of officers present in the meeting is given below: 1. Shri K.C. Rout Addl. DGFT 2. Shri Jaikant Singh Addl. DGFT 3. Shri Darshan Singh Jt. DGFT 4. Shri Jay Karan Singh Jt. DGFT 5. Shri Hardeep Singh Jt. DGFT 6. Shri Akash Taneja Jt. DGFT 7. Shri S.K. Samal Jt. DGFT 8. Shri A.K. Srivastava Jt. DGFT 9. Shri S.K. Mohapatra Dy. DGFT The decision taken on the individual cases are as under:
Case No.1. M/s Oil and natural Gas Corporation Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/914/AM14/EFGC (PRC) PRC Meeting No. 40/AM14 dated 11.03.2014
Subject: Request for revalidation of DFIA No. 0310641133 dated 08.07.2011.
The committee observed that since there is no import duty on crude oil, therefore, the applicant is advised to surrender the DFIA. No purpose would be served by allowing revalidation of DFIA when there is no duty on input.
Case No.2. M/s Gujarat Raffia Industries Limited, Gandhinagar.
F.No. 01/60/162/916/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0810101282 dated 11.07.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.3. M/s Ebullient Packaging Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/915/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310614361 dated 04.02.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.4. M/s RR Kabel Limited, Vadodara.
F.No. 01/60/162/917/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310616010 dated 15.02.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.5. M/s RR Kabel Limited, Vadodara.
F.No. 01/60/162/918/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310615138 dated 09.02.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.6. M/s Videocon Industries Limited, Aurangabad.
F.No. 01/60/162/919/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310635751 dated 13.06.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.7. M/s Videocon Industries Limited, Aurangabad.
F.No. 01/60/162/920/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310635754 dated 13.06.2011.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.8. M/s Nilkamal Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/899/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310634819 dated 07.06.2011.
The committee observed that eBRC was not mandatory in May 2012 and also that nothing had prevented the applicant from completing its imports prior to waiver of bond. Therefore the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.9. M/s Cipla Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/295/AM13/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of DEPB No. 0310538374 dated 17.09.2009.
The Committee reviewed its earlier decision dated 24/09/2013 in the light of the fresh submissions made by the applicant including letter from Asstt. Commissioner of Customs and decided to revalidate the DEPB for a further period of three months from the date of endorsement on Authorization or upto 30.6.2014 whichever is earlier. (Action: RA Mumbai)
Case No.10. M/s Calyx Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/921/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0310559471 dated 10.02.2010.
The committee considered the request of the applicant and decided that exports affected within 48 months from the date of issue of the Authorization i.e. upto 28.2.2014 shall be accounted for regularization purpose. However, this will be subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on FOB value of exports made outside the original EOP. The applicant has also the option of regularizing the Advance Authorization taking the benefit of PN 22 dt. 12.8.2013.
Case No.11. M/s Calyx Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/922/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0310709519 dated 18.09.2012.
The committee noted that the firm has made no considerable exports within the original export obligation period against the above Advance Authorisation as such there is no merit for consideration. The committee decided to reject the request. The applicant is hereby directed to get their case regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. (Action: RA Mumbai If the party fails to get the case regularized in terms of Para4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT (D&R) Act. 1992 and submit an Action Taken Report).
Case No.12. M/s Calyx Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/923/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0310707803 dated 05.09.2012.
The committee noted that the firm has made no considerable exports within the original export obligation period against the above Advance Authorisation as such there is no merit for consideration. The committee decided to reject the request. The applicant is hereby directed to get their case regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP.
(Action: RA Mumbai If the party fails to get the case regularized in terms of Para4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT (D&R) Act. 1992 and submit an Action Taken Report).
Case No.13. M/s Piramal Enterprises Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/652/AM13/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of Advance Authorization No. 0310497128 dated 10.12.2008 for regularization.
The Committee went into the details of the submissions made by the applicant and noted that the applicant had made imports before receiving the approval of the regulatory bodies i.e. USFDA. The committee, however, taking into consideration the delay in receiving approval of the regulatory bodies decided the following: I. Export obligation period be extended from 06 months to 12 months i.e. upto 31/12/2009 from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization of exports already effected and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. IV. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 31.12.2009 i.e. after 12 months from date of first import. V. PC18 condition stands waived on these exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP. VI. The applicant has also the option of regularizing the Advance Authorization under PN 22 dt. 12.8.2013 (Action: RA, Mumbai)
Case No.14. M/s Gandhar Oil Refinery India Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/902/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing of 4 Advance Authorization No. 0310517468 dated 27.04.2009, 0310533741 dated 13.08.2009, 0310552393 dated 23.12.2009 & 0310571491 dated 27.04.2010. The Committee noted that the applicant has sought clubbing of 4 Advance Authorizations and last date of export under AA No.0310571491 dated 27/04/2010 is 19/04/2012 i.e. within 36 months of earliest Authorization. The Committee also observed that the party had not furnished the last date of export in respect of one of the authorizations. The committee therefore decided the following: I. Clubbing of the 4 Advance Authorisations as referred above be allowed irrespective of issue of EODC for waiver of bond. II. This is only for regularization of exports already effected and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. III. Exports made within 48 months from the date of earliest Authorisation shall only be taken into consideration for EO fulfilment and clubbing subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP in the earliest Authorisation. RA shall examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15%. The 15% value addition for evaluating
entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the Authorisations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the Authorisations. IV. Even after clubbing, shortfall, if any, may be regularised on payment of Customs Duty + Interest in terms of Para4.28 of H.B.P or may avail the benefit of Public Notice no. 22 dt. 12.8.2013. (Action: RA, Mumbai)
Case No.15. M/s Gandhar Oil Refinery India Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/900/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing of 2 Advance Authorization No. 0310544575 dated 09.11.2009 & 0310608036 dated 27.12.2010. The Committee decided the following: I. Clubbing of the 2 Advance Authorisations as referred above be allowed irrespective of issue of EODC for waiver of bond. II. This is only for regularization of exports already effected and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. III. Exports made within 48 months from the date of earliest Authorisation shall only be taken into consideration for EO fulfilment and clubbing subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP in the earliest Authorisation. RA shall examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15%. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the Authorisations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the Authorisations. IV. Even after clubbing, shortfall, if any, may be regularised on payment of Customs Duty + Interest in terms of Para4.28 of H.B.P or may avail the benefit of Public Notice no. 22 dt. 12.8.2013. (Action: RA, Mumbai)
Case No.16. M/s Elins Switch Boards Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/905/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of nonfiling of Bill of export for the supplies made against Advance Authorization No. 0710058236 dated 30.06.2008 for regularization purpose. The committee noted the request and it was decided that RA may accept documents towards discharge of export obligation provided there is a corroborative evidence i.e. ARE1/Excise attested invoice bearing the details of advance authorization/file number under which goods were removed for discharge of export obligation. RA may check that ARE1 bears the details of authorization on it and no drawback has been claimed on duty free inputs by the recipient i.e. the SEZ unit. (Action: RA Bangalore)
Case No.17. M/s Elins Switch Boards Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/911/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of nonfiling of Bill of export for the supplies made against Advance Authorization No. 0710060131 dated 25.09.2008 for regularization purpose. The committee noted the request and it was decided that RA may accept documents towards discharge of export obligation provided there is a corroborative evidence i.e. ARE1/Excise attested invoice bearing the details of advance authorization/file number under which goods were removed for discharge of export obligation. RA may check that ARE1 bears the details of authorization on it and no drawback has been claimed on duty free inputs by the recipient i.e. the SEZ unit. (Action: RA Bangalore)
Case No.18. M/s Elins Switch Boards Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/913/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of nonfiling of Bill of export for the supplies made against Advance Authorization No. 0710062730 dated 04.02.2009 for regularization purpose. The committee noted the request and it was decided that RA may accept documents towards discharge of export obligation provided there is a corroborative evidence i.e. ARE1/Excise attested invoice bearing the details of advance authorization/file number under which goods were removed for discharge of export obligation. RA may check that ARE1 bears the details of authorization on it and no drawback has been claimed on duty free inputs by the recipient i.e. the SEZ unit. (Action: RA Bangalore)
Case No.19. M/s Elins Switch Boards Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/912/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of nonfiling of Bill of export for the supplies made against Advance Authorization No. 0710061003 dated 12.11.2008 for regularization purpose. The committee noted the request and it was decided that RA may accept documents towards discharge of export obligation provided there is a corroborative evidence i.e. ARE1/Excise attested invoice bearing the details of advance authorization/file number under which goods were removed for discharge of export obligation. RA may check that ARE1 bears the details of authorization on it and no drawback has been claimed on duty free inputs by the recipient i.e. the SEZ unit. (Action: RA Bangalore)
Case No.20. M/s Apar Industries Ltd, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/426/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for grant of Duty Drawback for supply made against invalidation letter – under Para 8, 3 (b) of the FTP read with Para 8.3.1(ii) of the HBP VI. The Committee observed that Policy Circular 16 dated 15/03/2013 categorically clarifies the provision of FTP. This circular does not make any amendment in the Policy hence applies retrospectively. Supplies of goods to Advance Authorization holder against Invalidation are exempted ab – initio from the payment of Excise Duty hence question of refund of TED does not arise. However, the applicant is eligible for refund of duty drawback for duty paid on inputs provided CENVAT Credit has not been availed.
Case No.21. M/s Magsons Exports, New Delhi.
F.No. 01/60/162/897/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Permission to return drawback and regularize the Advance Authorization No. 0510230773 dated 14.11.2008 for the purpose of redemption or EOP extension. The committee did not accede to the request and advice the firm to regularize the case under PN 22 dt. 12.8.2013.
Case No.22. M/s United Phosphorus Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/741/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for consideration of 6 S/bills of Acephate 97% DF made under Advance Authorization No. 0310640059 dated 04.07.2011 towards discharge of export obligation of Authorization No. 0310557234 dated 27.01.2010. The Committee decided the following: I. The exports made through following 6 S/bills shall be taken into account for discharge of export obligation against Advance Authorization No. 0310557234 dated 27.01.2010 DEEC354/2011 dated 10.10.2011 DEEC378/2011 dated 21.10.2011 DEEC395/2011 dated 25.10.2011 DEEC411/2011 dated 04.11.2011 DEEC413/2011 dated 05.11.2011
DEEC455/2011 dated 26.11.2011 II. The applicant shall submit declaration/undertaking that no other benefits have been availed/ will not be availed in future and the shipping bill shall not be taken into account for discharge of any other Authorization. III. RA shall ensure that above mentioned 6 S/bills have not been taken into account towards discharge of export obligation against Advance Authorization no. 0310640059 dated 04.07.2011 (Action: RA, Mumbai)
Case No.23. M/s Cito Chem Industries Pvt. Ltd, Indore.
F.No. 01/60/162/582/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for restoration of the quantity of import item, value authorization & revalidation for 6 months in respect of Advance Authorization No. 1110022043 dated 18.03.2010. The Committee observed that the applicant had imported 51Kgs raw material vide B/E No.213553 dated 04/06/2010. However, on examination of goods, it was found that the goods were not upto the set parameters hence the said goods were reexported vide S/B No.4263514 dated 07/10/2010. There is no provisions to deal with such situation for Advance Authorization, however, for DFIA, provisions in the Para 4.35 are available. The Committee, therefore, decided to apply same analogy to Advance Authorization also. Accordingly, goods reexported vide S/B No. 4263514 dated 07/10/2010 may be recredited in the Advance Authorization and Authorization shall be revalidated for 3 months from the date of endorsement. It is further clarified that recredit of quantity of goods shall be allowed only to the extent of quantity reexported. And, recredit of CIF value shall be allowed to the extent of 95% of CIF value debited for import of 51 Kgs. (Action: Customs Authority & RA, Bhopal)
Case No.24. M/s Cito Chem Industries Pvt. Ltd, Indore.
F.No. 01/60/162/583/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for restoration of the quantity of import item, value authorization & revalidation for 6 months in respect of Advance Authorization No. 1110022293 dated 28.04.2010. The Committee observed that the applicant had imported 99 Kgs raw material vide B/E No.213553 dated 04/06/2010. However, on examination of goods, it was found that the goods were not upto the set parameters hence the said goods were reexported vide S/B No.4263514 dated 07/10/2010. There is no provisions to deal with such situation for Advance Authorization, however, for DFIA, provision in the Para 4.35 are available. The Committee, therefore, decided to apply same analogy to Advance Authorization also. Accordingly, goods reexported vide S/B No. 4263514 dated 07/10/2010 may be recredited in the Advance Authorization and Authorization shall be revalidated for 3 months from the date of endorsement. It is further clarified that recredit of quantity of goods shall be allowed only to the extent of quantity reexported. And, recredit of CIF value shall be allowed to the extent of 95% of CIF value debited for import of 99 Kgs.
(Action: Customs Authority & RA, Bhopal)
Case No.25. M/s MIRC Electronics Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/77/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request to waive off not mentioning of Advance Authorization No. 0310428698 dated 04.05.2007 on the respective sales invoices and details of exempted material used is not appearing on the sales invoices. The committee observed that the said Authorization was obtained to import “LCD Panel Electronics” and to supply the LCD TV to EPCG Authorization holder. LCD TV can’t be manufactured without use of LCD Panel. The Committee, therefore, decided to regularize the case provided documentary evidences from the recipient of goods are submitted confirming receipt of LCD TV as per specification in the Invalidation Letter. (Action: RA Mumbai)
Case No.26. M/s Taurus Private Limited, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/155/AM13/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for reconsideration of decision by Grievance Redressal Committee in the matter of Condonation of nonmentioning the Advance Authorization details in the shipping bills in two Advance Authorization Nos. 0710050495 dated 08.03.2007 & 0710046466 dated 01.08.2006. The committee considered the fresh submission of the firm and decided to reiterate its earlier decision taken in PRC meeting no. 09/AM13 dt. 12.06.2012 as no corroborative evidence has been produced, thus rejecting the request of the firm to condone the nonmentioning the details of Advance Authorization in the shipping bills in two Advance Authorization Nos. 0710050495 dated 08.03.2007 & 0710046466 dated 01.08.2006. The applicant is advised to get the case regularized in terms of PN22 dated 12/08/2013. (Action: RA Bangalore If the party fails to get the case regularized in terms of PN22 dated 12/08/2013 read with PC8 dt. 25.10.2013 or Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT (D&R) Act. 1992 and submit an Action Taken Report).
Case No.27. M/s Rubber Products Limited, Thane, Maharashtra.
F.No. 01/60/162/655/AM14/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for review of PRC decision dated 27.09.2011 with regard to period of revalidation in respect of DFIA No. 0310480939 dated 01.08.2008.
The Committee reviewed its earlier decision dated 27/09/2011 in the light of the fresh submissions made by the applicant and since there was a delay on the part of RA Mumbai for a period of 30 days, the committee decided to revalidate the DFIA for a further period of 30 days from the date of endorsement or upto 30.4.2014 whichever is earlier. (Action: RA Mumbai)
Case No.28. M/s Arvind Limited, Ahmedabad.
F.No. 01/84/50/143/AM10/DESV
Subject: Request for enhancement of inputs against Advance Authorization No. 0810083511 dated 12.10.2009.
The Committee observed that the party was one of the applicants in getting the CIF value of chemical enhanced from 14% to 26% of FOB value of exports. The Committee, therefore, decided to allow benefits of PN 88 dated 27/12/2011 to the applicant. However, CIF value of chemicals will be enhanced as applied or upto 26% of FOB value whichever is less.
Case No.29. M/s Haldia Petrochemicals Limited, Kolkata.
F.No. 01/60/162/744/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of the following 61 Advance Authorizations.
1 210122139 13.01.2009 2 210137455 04.02.2010 3 210142919 04.06.2010 4 210143018 07.06.2010 5 210144772 09.07.2010 6 210145837 30.07.2010 7 210145858 02.08.2010 8 210146188 10.08.2010 9 210146328 12.08.2010 10 210149113 11.10.2010 11 210149110 11.10.2010 12 210150407 11.11.2010 13 210151572 06.12.2010 14 210151653 07.12.2010 15 210152835 29.12.2010 16 210152845 30.12.2010 17 210152846 30.12.2010 18 210154018 27.01.2011 19 210153623 17.01.2011 20 210154214 01.02.2011
21 210156142 14.02.2011 22 210154872 15.02.2011 23 210155033 18.02.2011 24 210155593 01.03.2011 25 210155759 03.03.2011 26 210155758 03.03.2011 27 210156141 14.03.2011 28 210156465 22.03.2011 29 210156661 23.03.2011 30 210156653 23.03.2011 31 210157411 07.04.2011 32 210157411 07.04.2011 33 210157708 13.04.2011 34 210158012 21.04.2011 35 210158394 29.04.2011 36 210158612 09.05.2011 37 210158805 12.05.2011 38 210158991 18.05.2011 39 210159339 23.05.2011 40 210159662 30.05.2011 41 210159770 01.06.2011 42 210159774 01.06.2011 43 210160139 10.06.2011 44 210160919 22.06.2011 45 210161207 24.06.2011 46 210161211 24.06.2011 47 210161881 06.07.2011 48 210167749 19.08.2011 49 210166534 22.09.2011 50 210166629 23.09.2011 51 210166733 23.09.2011 52 210167049 29.09.2011 53 210167090 29.09.2011 54 210167257 30.09.2011 55 210167142 30.09.2011 56 210167258 30.09.2011 57 210167881 21.10.2011 58 210167970 24.10.2011 59 210168071 24.10.2011 60 210179539 09.07.2012 61 210188734 17.04.2013
The committee decided to grant extension of EOP upto 48 months from the date of issue of Advance Authorization only in such cases where the EO has been fulfilled to the extent of 50% or more (quantity wise), even on prorata basis. If the EO fulfillment in respect of any of these Advance Authorizations, within original EOP, is below 50% (quantity wise), then no further extension may be allowed.
Case No.30. M/s Dhoot Compack Limited, Ahmednagar (Maharashtra).
F.No. 01/60/162/925/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of Advance Authorization No. 0310592738 dated 16.09.2010.
The justification given in support of their contention could not convince the Committee hence the Committee did not accede to the request.
Case No.31. M/s Ajanta Pharma Limited, Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/304/AM10/EFGC (PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing of 4 Advance Authorization Nos. 0310205441 dated 02.06.2003, 0310205693 dated 03.06.2003, 0310288651 dated 27.08.2004 & 0310297558 dated 19.10.2004. The Committee reviewed its earlier decision dated 12/10/2010 in the light of the fresh submissions made by the applicant and decided the following: I. Clubbing of the 4 Advance Authorisations as referred above be allowed. II. This is only for regularization of exports already effected and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. III. Exports made within 48 months from the date of earliest Authorisation shall only be taken into consideration for accounting and clubbing subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP in the earliest Authorisation. RA shall examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15%. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the Authorisations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the Authorisations. IV. Even after clubbing, shortfall, if any, may be regularised on payment of Customs Duty + Interest in terms of Para4.28 of H.B.P or may avail the benefit of Public Notice no. 22 dt. 12.8.2013. (Action: RA, Mumbai)
Case No.32. M/s Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited, Bangalore.
F.No. 01/60/162/901/AM14/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for conversion of nontransferable DFIA to transferable Authorization.
1. 0710090389 dated 24.08.2012
2. 0710090298 dated 21.08.2012 3. 0710090296 dated 21.08.2012 4. 0710090304 dated 21.08.2012 5. 0710090709 dated 13.09.2012 6. 0710090708 dated 13.09.2012 7. 0710090474 dated 30.08.2012 8. 0710090302 dated 21.08.2012 9. 0710090250 dated 16.08.2012 10. 0710090303 dated 21.08.2012 The committee observed that transferability is not allowed for inputs under SION J270 to J 296 as per General Note no. 14 of the General Notes for Textiles in HBP Vol.II. Therefore the committee did not accede to the request of the firm.
Case No.33. M/s Nicomet Industries Ltd. Mumbai.
F.No. 01/60/162/138/AM12/EFGC (PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of 6 months for Advance Authorization no. 0310407977 dt. 14.11.2006.
The committee considered the fresh submission of the firm and reviewed its earlier decision taken in PRC meeting no. 20/AM12 dt. 29.8.2011 in the light of the fact that the applicant had faced genuine hardship due to closure of its operation on the direction of Goa State Pollution Board and Hon’ble High Court Mumbai. The committee also taking into account that the applicant had to approach Norms Committee to change its export product, decided to grant extension in EOP for a further period of 6 months from the date of endorsement or upto 30.09.2014 whichever is earlier. The applicant is advised to submit the Authorization for endorsement to RA as early as possible. They are further advised to start discharging their stipulated balance export obligation on the basis of this minutes without waiting for the endorsement on the Authorization by RA. (Action: RA Mumbai)
Case No.34. Reference received from Norms Committees.
F.No. 01/81/162/494/AM13/DESII PRC Meeting No. 40/AM14 dated 11.3.2014
Subject: PRC condoned delay in filing representation beyond 4 months for consideration by NCII in following cases.
SL. No. Name of the Firm AA No. & date Date of communication Representation made on 1 M/s Tema India Ltd. 0310288604 dated 20.04.2005 20.09.2013
27.08.2004 2 M/s Sterlite Technologies Limited 0310701351 dated 09.07.2012 10.06.2013 31.10.2013 3 M/s Sterlite Technologies Limited 0310699774 dated 26.06.2012 13.09.2012 11.10.2013 4 M/s Sterlite Technologies Limited 0310694893 dated 16.05.2012 13.09.2012 11.10.2013 5 M/s Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd. 0510241176 dated 12.05.2009 04.03.2010 14.09.2013 The meeting ended with a Vote of Thanks to the Chair.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis has been generated for this document yet.