DGFT Minutes
In force — no superseding record on file.
THE POLICY RELAXATION COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING NO. 33/AM13 HELD ON 18.12.2012 AT 11.15 A.M. UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF Dr. A.K PUJARI, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE. PRC Meeting was held under the Chairmanship of DGFT and list of officers present in the meeting is given below: 1. Shri. V.K. Srivastava Addl. DG 2. Shri Mukesh Bhatnagar Addl.DG 3. Shri K.C. Raut Addl. DG 4. Shri S.K. Samal Jt. DGFT 5. Shri Jaikaran Singh Jt..DGFT 6. Shri Hardeep Singh Jt.DGFT 7. Shri Ajay Kumar Srivastava Jt. DGFT 8. Shri A.K. Mishra Stats Advisor 9. Shri S.K. Mohapatra DDG 10. Smt. Sonika Khattar FTDO The decision taken on the individual cases are as under:
Case No.1. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/601/AM13/EFGC(PRC) PRC Meeting No. 33/AM13 dated: 18.12.2012
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310546265 dt. 18.11.2009.
The committee did not find any cogent reason given by firm warranting relaxation. Request is rejected.
Case No.2. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/598/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310548794 dt. 02.12.2009.
Case No.3. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/603/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310511176 dt. 12.03.2009.
This case was reconsidered by PRC and did not find any new reasons. Hence decided to reject the request.
Case No.4. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/597/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310545835 dt. 16.11.2009.
Case No.5. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/602/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310513711 dt. 30.03.2009.`
Case No.6. M/s Ram Ratna International, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/569/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310526294 dt. 29.6.2009.
Case No.7. M/s Daman Polythread Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/669/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310479761 dt. 22.7.2008
Case No.8. M/s Riddhi Pharma, Ankleshwar
F.No. 01/60/162/677/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization No. 3410026882 dt. 23.4.2010.
The reason cited by the firm that due to commercial viability they could not utilize the licence is not convincing to the committee hence the request is rejected.
Case No.9. M/s United Phosphorus Limited.
F.No. 01/60/162/674/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance licence no. 0310549699 dt. 8.12.2009.
The reason cited by the firm that due to commercial viability they could not utilize the licence is not convincing to the committee hence the request is rejected.
Case No.10. M/s SuperMax Personal Care Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/616/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310573730 dt. 11.5.2010
The committee noted that the acquisition/merger was done with due diligence. The party was well aware at that time that assets and liabilities of the company is being acquired. Hence the committee did not agree to revalidate the authorizations.
Case No.11. M/s SuperMax Personal Care Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/615/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310549396 dt. 07.12.2009.
The committee noted that the acquisition/merger was done with due diligence. The party willfully acquired assets and liabilities of the company. Hence the committee did not find sufficient reasons to revalidate expired authorizations.
Case No.12. M/s SuperMax Personal Care Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/614/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310558930 dt. 08.2.2010.
The committee noted that the acquisition/merger was done with due diligence. The party willfully acquired assets and liabilities of the company. Hence the committee did not find sufficient reasons to revalidate expired authorizations.
Case No.13. M/s SuperMax Personal Care Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/617/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310558932 dt. 08.2.2010.
The committee noted that the acquisition/merger was done with due diligence. The party willfully acquired assets and liabilities of the company. Hence the committee did not find sufficient reasons to revalidate expired authorizations.
Case No.14. M/s Essar Steel Limited.
F.No. 01/60/162/681/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for Revalidation of following 6 advance authorizations.
1. 3110032304 dt. 16.01.2008 2. 3110032732 dt. 15.02.2008 3. 3110033082 dt. 13.03.2008 4. 3110034741 dt. 06.08.2008 5. 3110035694 dt. 08.10.2008 6. 3110039311 dt. 20.07.2009 The committee noted that the acquisition/merger was done with due diligence. The party willfully acquired assets and liabilities of the company. Hence the committee did not find sufficient reasons to revalidate expired authorizations.
Case No.15. M/.s Ritik International, Kolkata
F.No. 01/60/162/687/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of DFIA No 0210091669 dt. 24.07.2006.
Case No.16. M/s Western Cables Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/386/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310540617 dt. 7.10.2009.
Deferred for obtaining report from RA.
Case No.17. M/s Lily India Pvt Limited, Kolkata
F.No. 01/60/162/688/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of DFIA no. 0210094419 dt. 16.10.2006.
Case No.18. M/s Parixit Industries Limited, Ahmedabad
F.No. 01/60/162/691/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 3410026404 dt. 18.2.2010.
The reason cited by the firm that due to commercial viability they could not utilize the licence is not convincing to the committee. Hence the request is rejected.
Case No.19. M/s Stanpacks (India) Limited.
F.No. 01/60/162/692/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of advance authorization no. 0410113156 dt. 19.4.2010.
Case No.20. M/s Acharya Chemicals, Thane
F.No. 01/60/162/694/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Revalidation of advance authorization no. 0310554363 dt. 8.1.2010.
Case No.21. M/s Medreich Limited, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/350/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for waiver of destruction or reexport towards the excess import due to less ratification of norms of advance authorization no. 0710060093 dt. 24.9.2008. After discussion in length, the following decisions were taken: Condition of PC18 is waived to the extent of raw material consumed and exported subject to following conditions. i) Such waiver is subject to payment of duty + interest on excess import made as per norm ratified by the Norms committee. ii) Submission of certificate issued by respective Excise Authority regarding consumption of whole imported raw material in the resultant products so exported. (Action :RA Bangalore)
Case No.22. M/s Medreich Limited, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/690/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for regularize the advance licence no. 0710072438 dt. 24.6.2010 by payment of Customs duty + interest for the export made under DEPB scheme. The Committee agreed to waive off condition of reexport/destruction of imported raw material as stipulated in Policy Circular 18 dt. 30.10.2007 as the firm has stated to have already utilized the imported raw material fully by exporting the product manufactured from these under DEPB. This waiver is allowed subject to payment of Custom duty + interest on exempted material used and exported under DEPB shipping bills. The case may be regularized accordingly. (Action :RA Bangalore)
Case No.23. M/s Medreich Limited, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/649/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension against advance licence no. 0710084048 dt. 18.11.2011 issued under PC9 condition. After discussion in length, the following decisions were taken: Condition of PC18 is waived to the extent of raw material consumed and exported subject to following conditions. i) Such waiver is subject to payment of duty + interest on excess import made as per norm ratified by the Norms committee. ii) Submission of certificate issued by respective Excise Authority regarding consumption of whole imported raw material in the resultant products so exported. (Action :RA Bangalore)
Case No.24. M/s JMW India Pvt. Limited, Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/695/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of advance licence no. 0510203141 dt. 1.5.2007.
The committee decided that the exports made against the Ecom number of the application may be considered against advance authorizations if the authorization is issued against the same Ecom reference. RA is directed to take necessary action regarding considering of those exports for discharge of export obligation. (Action : RA CLA, Delhi)
Case No.25. M/s JMW India Pvt Limited, Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/ 678/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of advance licence no. 0510203142 dt. 1.5.2007..
The committee decided that the exports made against the Ecom number of the application may be considered against advance authorizations if the authorization is issued against the same Ecom reference. RA is directed to take necessary action regarding considering of those exports for discharge of export obligation. (Action : RA CLA, Delhi)
Case No.26. M/s Piramal Enterprises Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/652/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for regularization of advance licence no. 0310497128 dt. 10.12.2008.
Deferred for obtaining the details of the approval got from regulatory body by the firm after expiry of EOP. (Action : Applicant)
Case No.27. M/s Glenmark Generics Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/667/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310581585 dt. 01.07.2010.
After deliberating the case in length the following decisions were taken: i. Export obligation period is extended from 12 months to 18 months from the date of first import consignment. ii. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. iii. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. iv. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 18 months from date of first import. v. PC18 condition is waived on this exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP. (Action : RA, Mumbai)
Case No.28. M/s Glenmark Generics Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/666/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310608261 dt. 28.10.2010..
I. Export obligation period is extended from 12 months to 18 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose.
III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition IV. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 18 months from date of first import. V. PC18 condition is waived on this exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP.
Case No.29. M/s Glenmark Generics Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/675/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310462983 dt. 27.02.2008..
I. Export obligation period is extended from 6 months to 12 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition IV. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 12 months from date of first import. V. PC18 condition is waived on this exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP.
Case No.30. M/s K.B. Dhondale Silk Throwing Factory, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/635/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0710065822 dt. 8.7.2009.
The committee noted that the firm has not made any exports under the above Advance Authorizations. The Committee further noted that no cogent reason has been cited evidencing genuine hardship as to why no exports could be made within stipulated period. The Committee therefore did not consider the reason as genuine hardship warranting policy relaxation. Thus, request is rejected.
(Action : RA, Bangalore; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.31. M/s Oil Country Tubular Limited, Hyderabad
F.No. 01/60/162/676/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0910039441 dt. 29.9.2009.
i) Export obligation period is extended for 6 months in continuation i.e. upto 31.3.2013. ii) This is subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on unfulfilled FOB value of exports and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. iii) This is further subject to verification by RA that EO as claimed to have been fulfilled more than 50% (even if prorata) within the valid EOP. iv) The applicant is advised to submit the licence for endorsement to RA as early as possible. v) RA shall take action against the party under Rule 7 read with Rule 14 of FT(Regulation) Rules, 1993 if statement of more than 50% of exports (even if prorata) already made is found to be false/incorrect. (Action : RA Chennai)
Case No.32. M/s Dhampur Speciality Sugars Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/685/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence No. 0510249717 dt. 22.9.2009.
i) Export obligation period is extended for 6 months in continuation i.e. upto 31.3.2013.. ii) This is subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on unfulfilled FOB value of exports and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. iii) This is further subject to verification by RA that EO as claimed to have been fulfilled more than 50% (even if prorata) within the valid EOP. iv) The applicant is advised to submit the licence for endorsement to RA as early as possible.
v) RA shall take action against the party under Rule 7 read with Rule 14 of FT(Regulation) Rules, 1993 if statement of more than 50% of exports (even if prorata) already made is found to be false/incorrect. (Action : RA Chennai)
Case No.33. M/s Chillies Export House Limited, Tamil Nadu
F.No. 01/60/162/683/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for EOP extension of 4 advance licence no. 3510027843 dt. 7.10.2009 (2) 3510031593 dt. 23.9.2010 (3) 3510032266 dt. 16.12.2010. (4) 3510034413 dt. 20.6.2011 1. Advance authorization no. 3510027843 dt. 7.10.2009 does not required any EOP extension as the shipment is made within last date of the months in terms of para 2.12.4 of HBP. Extension in EOP is also not required against authorization no. 3510034413 dt. 20.6.2011 as shipment was made within its validity. 2. The request for EOP extension for authorization no. 3510031593 dt. 23.9.2010 and 3510032266 dt. 16.12.2010 is rejected. (Action : RA, Coimbatore )
Case No.34. M/s Simpex Pharma Pvt Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/684/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension beyond 12 months for advance licence no. 0510294947 dt. 29.6.2011.
i) Export obligation period is extended from 12 months to 18 months in continuation from the date of first import consignment i.e. upto 28.2.2013. ii) This is subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on unfulfilled FOB value of exports and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP.
iii) This is further subject to verification by RA that EO as claimed to have been fulfilled more than 50% (even if prorata) within the valid EOP. iv) The applicant is advised to submit the licence for endorsement to RA as early as possible. v) RA shall take action against the party under Rule 7 read with Rule 14 of FT(Regulation) Rules, 1993 if statement of more than 50% of exports (even if prorata) already made is found to be false/incorrect. (Action : RA CLA, Delhi)
Case No.35. M/s United Phosphouirs Limited.
F.No. 01/60/162/657/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310497332 dt. 11.12.2008.
The committee noted that no considerable exports have been made by the firm within the original period, hence the committee did not agree with the request. Request is rejected.
Case No.36. M/s K.B. Dhondale Silk Throwing Factory, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/628/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0710065824 dt. 8.7.2009.
The committee noted that the firm has not made any exports under the above Advance Authorizations. The Committee further noted that no cogent reason has been cited evidencing genuine hardship as to why no exports could be made within stipulated period. The Committee therefore did not consider the reason as genuine hardship warranting policy relaxation. Thus, request is rejected. (Action : RA, Bangalore; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.37. M/s BDH Industries Limited.
F.No. 01/60/162/473/AM10/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for EOP extension to regularize the export completed alongwith Amendment & Revalidation required for amendment for closure purpose of advance licence 310292171 dt.17.9.2004.
The Committee rejected the request of the firm as there is no merit for consideration as the authorization is too old. It was decided that the cases may be finalized as per the provisions of the FTP. (Action : RA, Mumbai; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.38. M/s Aarti Industries Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/658/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance authorization no. 0310535665 dt. 28.8.2009.
i) Export obligation period is extended for 6 months from the date of endorsement or upto 31.7.2013 which ever is earlier. ii) This is subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on unfulfilled FOB value of exports and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. iii) This is further subject to verification by RA that EO as claimed to have been fulfilled more than 50% (even if prorata) within the valid EOP. iv) The applicant is advised to submit the licence for endorsement to RA as early as possible. v) RA shall take action against the party under Rule 7 read with Rule 14 of FT(Regulation) Rules, 1993 if statement of more than 50% of exports (even if prorata) already made is found to be false/incorrect. (Action : RA Chennai)
Case No.39. M/s Pirmal Enterprises Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/654/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for regularization of advance licence no. 0310503785 dt. 23.1.2009.
I. Export obligation period is extended from 6 months to 12 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition
IV. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 12 months from date of first import. V. PC18 condition is waived on this exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP.
Case No.40. M/s Ashish Life Science Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/574/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310525767 dt. 25.6.2009 for regularization purpose.
I. Export obligation period is extended from 6 months to 12 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition
Case No.41. M/s Wockhardt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/697/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension for advance licence no. 0310651197 dt. 30.8.2011
i) Export obligation period is extended for 12 months to 18 months in continuation from the date of first import consignment ii) This is subject to payment of composition fee @ 0.5% on unfulfilled FOB value of exports and minimum value addition of 15% as prescribed under para 4.1.6 of FTP. iii) This is further subject to verification by RA that EO as claimed to have been fulfilled more than 50% (even if prorata) within the valid EOP. iv) The applicant is advised to submit the licence for endorsement to RA as early as possible. v) RA shall take action against the party under Rule 7 read with Rule 14 of FT(Regulation) Rules, 1993 if statement of more than 50% of exports (even if prorata) already made is found to be false/incorrect.
(Action : RA Chennai)
Case No.42. M/s Bhandari Foils & Tubes Limited, Dewas M.P.
F.No. 01/60/162/696/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension oif advance lkicence no. 0310477163 dt. 2.7.2008.
The committee noted that no considerable exports have been made by the firm within the original period, hence the committee did not agree with the request. Request is rejected. (Action : RA, Bhopal/ applicant; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report
Case No.43. M/s Ajanta Pharma Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/748/AM10/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of the advance licence No. 0310340855 dt. 25.7.2005 issued under PC9.
The Committee reiterated its earlier decision of PRC meeting no. 09/AM13 dt. 12.6.2012 and once again rejected the request of the firm as there is no merit in the facts/reasons for reconsideration. However PC18 condition is waived on export. (Action : RA, Mumbai/ applicant; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report
Case No.44. M/s Mak controls & Systems (P) Limited, Coimbatore
F.No. 01/60/162/689/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 3210037022 dt. 7.1.2008
Deferred for obtaining details from RA as to why request for issuance of duplicate authorization was rejected. (Action : RA, Coimbatore)
Case No.45. M/s Tagros Chemicals India Limited, Chennai
F.No. 01/60/162/793/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance loicence no. 0310275423 dt. 17.6.2004.
The Committee rejected the request of the firm as there is no merit for consideration as the authorization is too old. It was decided that the cases may be finalized as per the provisions of the FTP.
Case No.46. M/s Rama Cylinders Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/307/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing of advance l;icence no. 310378424 dt. 1.5.2006 with 0310595140 dt. 4.10.2010
The Committee noted the request of the firm and decided to reject as the gap between the above two authorizations is substantial and the Committee therefore did not agree to club these authorizations. The applicant is advised to get the cases regularized separately in terms of para 4.28 of HBP. (Action : RA, Mumbai; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.47. M/s Synthite Industries Limited, Kerala
F.No. 01/60/162/655/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing against advance licence no. 1010038934 dt. 8.6.2010 & 1010039098 dt. 17.6.2010
I. To allow clubbing of 2 above advance authorizations as referred above. II. Extension of 6 months from the expiry of initial obligation period is allowed for AA no. 1010038934 dt. 8.6.2010. This is subject to composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP for clubbing and regularization. RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and to ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. III. Exports effected within 18 months from the date of import of first consignment under earliest authorization shall only be taken into account for clubbing purpose. IV. RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, Cochin)
Case No.48. M/s Veekay Polycoats Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/653/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing and amendments against advance licence no. 0510210878 dt. 22.10.2007 & 0510271038 dt. 20.8.2010. i) To allow clubbing of 2 advance authorizations as referred above subject to the condition that SION for both the products are available for backward integration. . ii) This is only for regularization and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. Excess import if any may be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. iii) RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. iv) RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, CLA Delhi)
Case No.49. M/s HPL Additives Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/389/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing of two advance licences Nos. 0510214101 dt. 28.12.2007 & 0510247406 dt. 10.8.2009
i) To allow clubbing of 2 advance authorizations as referred above. ii) This is only for regularization and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. Excess import if any may be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. Only exports which is affected within the extended validity of earliest authorization shall only be taken into account for clubbing purpose.
iii) RA may grant necessary extension in EO in the earliest authorization subject to composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP for clubbing and regularization. RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. iv) RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, CLA, Delhi)
Case No.50. M/s Haldia Petrochemicals Limited, Kolkata
F.No. 01/60/162/672/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing of following14 advance licences :
1) 0210115683 dated 4.8.2008 2) 0210115956 dated 11.8.2008 3) 0210116134 dated 14.8.2008 4) 0210116276 dated 19.8.2008 5) 0210116282 dated 19.8.2008 6) 0210116473 dated 25.8.2008 7) 0210117161 dated 10.9.2008 8) 0210117252 dated 10.9.2008 9) 0210117373 dated 12.9.2008 10) 0210117509 dated 16.9.2008 11) 0210118454 dated 14.10.2008 12) 0210120213 dated 26.11.2008 13) 0210140650 dated 7.4.2010 14) 0210142700 dated 28.5.2010 i) To allow clubbing of 14 above advance authorizations as referred above. ii) This is only for regularization and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. Excess import if any may be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. Only exports which is affected within the extended validity of earliest authorization shall only be taken into account for clubbing purpose. iii) RA may grant necessary extension in EO in the earliest authorization subject to composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP for clubbing and regularization. RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating
o directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating
entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. iv) RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, Kolkata)
Case No.51. M/s Motherson Sumi Systerms Limited, Noida
F.No. 01/60/162/659/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing and redemption of (3) advance licences 0510204921 dated 14.06.2007, 0510215301 dated 22.01.2008 and 0510227382 dated 12.09.2008. i) To allow clubbing of 3 above advance authorizations as referred above. ii) This is only for regularization and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. Excess import if any may be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. Only exports which is affected within the extended validity of earliest authorization shall only be taken into account for clubbing purpose. iii) RA may grant necessary extension in EO in the earliest authorization subject to composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP for clubbing and regularization. RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. iv) RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, Kolkata)
Case No.52. M/s National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Hyderabad
F.No. 01/60/162/857/AM12/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for EOP extension/clubbing of advance licence nos0910030114 dt. 27.4.2007 (2) 0910033602 dt. 9.4.2008. i) To allow clubbing of 2 advance authorizations as referred above.
ii) This is only for regularization and closure purpose and not for any further exports/imports. Excess import if any may be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. Only exports which is affected within the extended validity of earliest authorization shall only be taken into account for clubbing purpose. iii) RA may grant necessary extension in EO in the earliest authorization subject to composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made beyond the stipulated EOP for clubbing and regularization. RA is also directed to examine the case in terms of Para 4.1.6 of FTP and ensure value addition of minimum 15% or as stipulated in the authorization whichever is higher. The 15% value addition for evaluating entitlement is to be applied on the entire FOB and CIF of the authorizations to be clubbed. RA should ensure proper accounting of the duty free inputs with reference to the export product while clubbing the authorizations. iv) RA may do clubbing subject to the condition that no adjudication order is issued against any licence to be clubbed. (Action : RA, Kolkata)
Case No.53. M/s R&R Impex Pvt. Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/458/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for redemption of their DFIA No. 0510202593 dt. 17.4.2007 which is not accepted by Zonal Jt.DGFT, New Delhi for the minor lapse of GSM on the shipping bill. After discussion in length, it was decided to reject the request of the firm on the ground that GSM of fabrics could not change in the resultant product. From the facts it is evident that relevant fabric imported under authorization was not consumed in the resultant product. The applicant is therefore directed to get the case regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. (Action : RA, CLA, Delhi; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.54. M/s Umedica Laboratories Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/1546/AM11/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 03204584 dt. 3.2.1997 for regularization..
I. Export obligation period is extended upto 30.6.1999.
II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition
Case No.55. M/s D.K. Jaganath Silk Twisting Factory, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/114/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0710063775 dt. 23.3.2009.
Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 19.6.2012. (Action : RA, Bangalore; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.56. M/s United Phosphorus Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/233/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of six months against advance licence no. 0310497542 dt. 12.12.2008
Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 10.7.2012.
Case No.57. M/s Bhageria Dye Chem Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/920/AM12/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for EOP extension and clubbing of advance licence no. 0310071111 dt. 31.01.2001 & 0310071107 dt. 31.1.2001 for closure purpose. Deferred for obtaining report from RA as to why clubbing under PN 79 dt. 13.10.2011 was not considered?
(Action : RA Mumbai)
Case No.58. M/s Nissan FerroCast Limited, Kolkata
F.No. 01/60/162/172/AM12/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0210111296 dt. 10.4.2008
The committee noted that there was some delay on the part of RA in implementing the PRC decision taken in its meeting dt. 21.6.2011 and therefore decided to grant EOP extension for 3 months from the date of endorsement or 30.4.2013 which ever is earlier. (Action : RA Kolkata)
Case No.59. M/s Hindustan Platinium Pvt. Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/920/AM12/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for reduction in value addition & composition fee for the following (10) advance licences
1. 0310530391 dated 23.07.09 2. 0510292885 dated 9.6.11 3. 0310623208 dated 24.03.11 4. 0310590622 dated 01.09.10 5. 0310600428 dated 06.11.10 6. 0310648356 dated 12.08.11 7. 0310551804 dated 21.12.09 8. 0310665383 dated 17.11.11 9. 0310605923 dated 13.12.10 10. 0310622679 dated 22.03.11 The committee noted that it was known to the party that value addition for the product is 15% and in spite of that they obtained 10 advance authorizations for huge value. However, it was decided to seek information from the party that what was the items of export and import under said authorizations. On receipt of the information PCIV will examine the issue. (Action : RA applicant)
Case No.60. M/s Cipla Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/295/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation of DEPB licence no. 0310538374 dt. 17.9.2009
Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected the same reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 30.12.2012.
Case No.61. M/s Umedica Laboratories Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/1210/AM12/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310502028 dt. 9.1.2009 for regularization..
The committee rejected the request for EOP extension as the firm has failed fulfilled balance EO within the extended validity granted earlier by PRC in its meeting no. 09/AM13 dt. 12.6.2012 against above authorizations. The firm is therefore is directed to get the case regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. (Action : RA,Mumbai; If the party fails to get the case regularised in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP within a month from the date of communication of this decision, RA shall take action against the firm under the provision of FT(D&R) Act. 1992 and report)
Case No.62. M/s Cromption Greava Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/350/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for clubbing of 3 advance authorization nos. (1) 0310243851 dt. 24.12.2003 (2) 0310498983 dt. 19.12.2008 (3) 0310499138 dt. 22.12.20208. Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 29.8.2011.
Case No.63. M/s PME Power Solutions (India) Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/94/180/443/AM12/PC4 Subject: Request for clarification substitute/ alternate import item allowed under fixed SION i.e. export items Transformers of different KVA for clubbing and redemption of advance licence no. 0510227538 dt. 16.9.2008 & 0510227539 dt. 16.9.2008.
Deferred
Case No.64. M/s Concept Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/1498/AM10/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of Advance authorization no. 0331273 dt. 8.2.1995
After discussion in details, it was decided that RA shall examine the case considering exports obligation on prorate basis with respect to actual import made utilizing aggregate CIF value under the authorization. After fixation of revised obligation, if still, there is shortfall the same may be regularized in terms of Policy Circular 28 dt. 22.9.2000. (Action : RA Mumbai)
Case No.65. Reference from (9) cases from Norms II Section
F.No. 01/81/162/494/AM13DESII Subject: Regarding (9) cases of modification of adhoc norms NC M/No. 16/81 and 17/81 scheduled for 6th & 20 th November 2012. The committee granted postfacto approval for consideration of request beyond 4 months for fixation of norms in terms of Para 4.7.6 of HBP.
Case No.66. M/s Medreich Limited, Bangalore
F.No. 01/60/162/702/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension for advance licence no. 0710055121 dt. 28.12.2007
I. Export obligation period is extended from 6 months to 12 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition
(Action : RA, Bangalore)
Case No.67. M/s Vimal Corp Care Pvt. Limited, Gandhi agar
F.No. 01/60/162/671/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for revalidation & enhancement of advance licence no. 0810087930 dt. 1.4.2010..
The reason cited by the firm that due to commercial viability they could not utilize the licence is not convincing to the committee hence the request is rejected.
Case No.68. M/s JMW India Pvt Limited, Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/700/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of advance licence No. 0510203144 dt. 1.5.2007.
The committee decided that the exports made against the Ecom number of the application may be considered against advance authorizations if the authorization is issued against the same Ecom reference. RA is directed to take necessary action regarding considering of those exports for discharge of export obligation. (Action : RA, CLA New Delhi)
Case No.69. M/s JMW India Pvt. Limited, Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/699/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of advance licence No. 0510203140 dt. 1.5.2007
The committee decided that the exports made against the Ecom number of the application may be considered against advance authorizations if the authorization is issued against the same Ecom reference. RA is directed to take necessary action regarding considering of those exports for discharge of export obligation. (Action : RA CLA, Delhi)
Case No.70. M/s JMW India Pvt. Limited, Delhi
F.No. 01/60/162/701/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for redemption of advance licence No. 0510203139 dt. 1.5.2007.
The committee decided that the exports made against the Ecom number of the application may be considered against advance authorizations if the authorization is issued against the same Ecom reference. RA is directed to take necessary action regarding considering of those exports for discharge of export obligation. (Action : RA CLA, Delhi)
Case No.71. M/s Piramal Healthcare, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/703/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for EOP extension of advance licence no. 0310514000 dt. 1.4.2009
I. Export obligation period is extended from 6 months to 12 months from the date of first import consignment. II. This is only for regularization and closure purpose. III. This is subject to a payment of composition fee @ 0.5% of FOB value of export made outside the original EOP and minimum value addition IV. The applicant has to pay duty +interest on inputs consumed and exported after 12 months from date of first import. V. PC18 condition is waived on this exports to the extent of requirement of reexport/destruction certificate on export made outside the extended EOP.
Case No.72. M/s Piramal Healthcare, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/704/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing of advance authorization Nos. 0310541088 dt. 9.10.2009 (2) 0310600129 dt. 4.11.2010
After detailed discussion following decisions were taken: i) Allow clubbing of two above mentioned authorizations. ii) Export effected within 12 months from the date of import of first consignment under AA no. 0310541088 dt. 9.11.2009 shall only be taken into account for clubbing.
iii) Shortfall if any shall be regularized in terms of Para 4.28 of HBP. iv) Value addition of 15% shall be maintained in terms of para 4.1.6 of FTP
Case No.73. M/s Vidyut Metalics Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/995/AM12/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for regularization and EOP extension for advance licence no. 0310317008 dt. 16.2.2005 upto 30.4.2009.
Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 7.2.2012.
Case No.74. M/s Vidyut Metalics Pvt Limited, Mumbai
F.No. 01/60/162/994/AM12/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for regularization and EOP extension for advance licence no. 0310317465 dt. 18.2.2005 upto 15.7.2009.
Justification and reasoning cited by the applicant are not convincing to the committee hence rejected reiterating the earlier decision of PRC meeting held on 21.2.2012
Case No.75. M/s Tata Elkxsi Limited, Bangalore
F.No. 01/93/180/06/AM13/PC2(B)
Subject: Regarding permission to import o11 Prototype vehicles.
The Committee considered the case and granted expost facto approval to relax the provisions of Para 2(II) (f) of Import Licensing Note of Chapter 87 for import of 11 prototype vehicles.
Case No.76. M/s Amtek Railcar Car Industries Limited, New Delhi
F.No. 01/89/180/60/AM12/PC2(A) Subject: Request for grant of relaxation in provision of CMVR 1989 and Rules 126 of CMVR 1989 for import of Locotractor. The committee considered the case and granted relaxation of the provisions contained in policy conditions 2 (II) (a) (b) (c) of Chapter 87 for import of the one locotractorModel LOK 1400 from M/s. Zephir (Italy)
Case No.77. M/s Teracom Limited, Noida
F.No. 01/60/162/706/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of Nonmentioning the details of DFIA Licence No. 0510224652 dt. 29.7.2008 in the shipping bill number 6691731 dt. 23.9.2008 for regularization purpose for closure & Redemption of DFIA and also not mentioning of DFIA No. 0510224652 dt. 29.7.2008 & 0510222473 dt. 19.6.2008 in common 6 S/Bills. Deferred for obtaining clear data from applicant whether these are free shipping bills if file no. or authorization are not mentioned. (Action : Applicant)
Case No.78. M/s Teracom Limited, Noida
F.No. 01/60/162/705/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of Nonmentioning the details of DFIA Licence No. 0510224092 dt. 28.12.2007 in the shipping bill number 6817137 dt. 10.11.2008 for regularization purpose for closure & Redemption of DFIA and also not mentioning of DFIA No. 0510227452 dt. 15.9.2008 & 0510224092 dt. 28.12.2007 in common 6 S/Bills. Deferred for obtaining clear data from applicant whether these are free shipping bills if file no. or authorization are not mentioned. (Action : Applicant)
Case No.79. M/s Teracom Limited, Noida
F.No. 01/60/162/661/AM13/EFGC(PRC) Subject: Request for condonation of Nonmentioning the details of DFIA Licence No. 0510224652 dt. 29.7.2008 in the shipping bill number 6717069 dt. 1.10.2008 for regularization purpose for closure & Redemption of DFIA and also not mentioning of DFIA No.0510227452 dt. 15.9.2008 & 0510224652 dt. 29.7.2008 in common 4 S/Bills.
Deferred for obtaining clear data from applicant whether these are free shipping bills if file no. or authorization are not mentioned. (Action : Applicant)
Case No.80. M/s Repro Value Added Printer Solutions
F.No. 01/60/162/ 707/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: Request for clubbing of following 28 DFIAs:
S.No. DFIA No. Date 1 0310485390 05/09/2009 2 0310399484 14/09/2006 3 0310404764 18/10/2006 4 0310412024 13/12/2006 5 0310412456 18/12/2006 6 0310424728 28/03/2007 7 0310425450 03/04/2007 8 0310426972 17/04/2007 9 0310425764 05/04/2007 10 0310431463 01/06/2007 11 0310440103 20/08/2007 12 0310440414 22/08/2007 13 0310440511 23/08/2007 14 0310441226 29/08/2007 15 0310447637 24/10/2007 16 0310454247 17/12/2007 17 0310454256 17/12/2007 18 0310485398 05/09/2008 19 0310460816 13/02/2008 20 0310465587 18/03/2008 21 0310465707 19/03/2008 22 0310467108 02/04/2008 23 0310472046 26/05/2008 24 0310472127 27/05/2008 25 0310475197 18/06/2008 26 0310477710 07/07/2008 27 0310481023 04/08/2008
28 310500864 01/01/2009 Under DFIA scheme, authorization or material imported is freely transferable after fulfillment of stipulated export obligation. Hence clubbing facility is not allowed under the scheme. The committee, therefore, rejected the request for clubbing of DFIAs. (Action : RA, Mumbai. The party may be asked to get the case regualrised within a month period from the date of communication of this decision. In case of failure, necessary action under the provision of FT(D&R) Act, 1992 shall be initiated.)
Case No. 81 Reference received from Norms Committees
F.No. 01/60/162/ 707/AM13/EFGC(PRC)
Subject: PRC condoned delay in filing representation beyond 4 months for consideration by NC in following cases.
NCII S.N. Name of the firm AA No. and date Norms ratified on Representation made on 1. M/s Asiatic Electricls and Switchgear Pvt. Ltd. 0510239236 dated 31.03.2009 24.11.2009 15.03.2012 2. M/s Vijai Electricals Ltd. 0910047197 dated 20.06.2011 07.12.2011 30.08.2012 3. M/s Vijai Electricals Ltd. 0910047301 dated 24.06.2011 30.08.2011 30.08.2012 4. M/s Vijai Electricals Ltd. 0910035596 dated 18.10.2008 20.01.2009 25.10.2012 5. M/s A1 Fence Products Co. Pvt. Ltd. 0310420517 dated 22.02.2007 21.08.2007 21.08.2012 6. M/s Minox Metal (P) Ltd. 0710069470 dated 19.01.2012 06.07.2010 09.10.2012 7. M/s Narayan Powertech (P) Ltd. 3410015923 dated 24.04.2006 13.06.2006 30.10.2012 8. M/s Narayan Powertech (P) Ltd. 3410015668 dated 20.03.2006 13.06.2006 30.10.2012 9. M/s Narayan Powertech (P) Ltd. 3410017503 dated 28.11.2006 16.10.2006 30.10.2012 Norms CommitteeIV
0.10.2012 8. M/s Narayan Powertech (P) Ltd. 3410015668 dated 20.03.2006 13.06.2006 30.10.2012 9. M/s Narayan Powertech (P) Ltd. 3410017503 dated 28.11.2006 16.10.2006 30.10.2012 Norms CommitteeIV
S.No. Name of the firm Adv. Autho. No. M.No. & Date Date of communication of earlier decision Representation submitted on Present status 1. Benzo Chem Indus. Ltd, 0310528642 dated 13.7.2009 32/13 7.11.12 6.6.2011 8.11.2011 Approved 2. Ajanta Pharma Ltd, Mumbai 0310529278 dated 16.7.2009 32/13 7.11.12 25.6.2010 10.3.2011 do 3. Banco Products (I) Ltd, 3410016660 dated 10.08.2006 35/13 28.11.12 28.5.2008 9.8.2011 do NCI Sl. No. Name of the firm Adv. Autho. No. M. No. & Date Date of communication of earlier decision Representation submitted on Present status
- M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai 0410106106 dt.14.07.2009 NC No. 20/11 dt.17.08.2010 27.10.2010 19.10.2011 NC Approved
- M/s. GEA BGR Energy 0410108791 dt.23.10.2009 NC No. 10/11 dt.08.06.2010 18.08.2010 14.11.2011 NC Approved
nai 0410106106 dt.14.07.2009 NC No. 20/11 dt.17.08.2010 27.10.2010 19.10.2011 NC Approved 2. M/s. GEA BGR Energy 0410108791 dt.23.10.2009 NC No. 10/11 dt.08.06.2010 18.08.2010 14.11.2011 NC Approved
System India Ltd., Chennai 3. M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai 04101089109 dt.08.04.2010 NC No. 26/11 dt.28.09.2010 16.11.2010 14.11.2011 NC Approved 4. M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai 0410092979 dt.02.01.2008 1. Rejected in NCI in its meeting No.34/10 held on 01.12.2009 2. Ratified in NCI in its meeting No.20/11 held on 17.08.2010 3. Ratified in NCI in its meeting No.05/12 held on 31.05.2011 4. Rejected in NCI in its meeting No.17/12 held on 15.11.2011 1. NCI decision communicated to the firm /RA vide letter dated 27.01.2010 2. NCI decision communicated to the firm /RA vide letter dated 27.10.2010 3. NCI decision communicated to the firm /RA vide letter dated 19.07.2011 4. NCI decision communicated to the firm /RA vide letter dated 16.12.2011 02.01.2012 NC Approved 5. M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai 0410108614 dt.16.10.2009 NC No. 20/11 dt.17.08.2010 27.10.2010 08.11.2011 NC Approved
firm /RA vide letter dated 16.12.2011 02.01.2012 NC Approved 5. M/s. GEA BGR Energy System India Ltd., Chennai 0410108614 dt.16.10.2009 NC No. 20/11 dt.17.08.2010 27.10.2010 08.11.2011 NC Approved
- M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mubmai 0310696095 dt.24.05.2012 NC No. 12/13 dt.04.09.2012 24.09.2012 10.10.2012 NC Approved
- Metso Paper India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon 0510283097 dt.04.02.2011 NC No.13/12 dt.20.09.2011 21.10.2011 14.01.2012 NC Approved
- Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Mumbai 0310584600 dt.22.07.2010 NC No.13/12 dt.20.09.2011 21.10.2011 10.07.2012 NC Approved
- Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Mumbai 0310593860 dt.24.09.2010 NC No.23/12 dt.31.01.2012 17.05.2012 09.07.2012 NC Approved The committee considered expostfacto approval for consideration of request beyond 4 months for fixation of norms in terms of Para 4.7.6 of HBP. The Committee ended with the Vote of Thanks to the Chair.
Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.
No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 10459 --apply.