IN FORCE SEZ / EOU / FTWZ

Agenda for 78th Meeting of the BOA for SEZ to be held on 3rd July, 2017

Reliability

In force — no superseding record on file.

Document text

_ ee

| _ Agenda for the 78" meeting of the Board of Approval tobeheldon een grd July, 2017, at 11.00 A.M. in the Room No. 47, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi

Ae in -—~Ttem'N0.78.1: Requests forextension of validityof formal approvals (12 proposals)" nn . BoA in its meeting held on 14% September, 2012, examining similar cases observed asunder:8 : oe oo “The Board advised the Development Commissioners to recommend the requests | ee forthatextension offormal approval beyond 5"year and onwards only afier satisfying the developer has taken sufficient steps towards operationalisation of the — : project andfurther extension is based on justifiable reasons. Board also observed that extensions may not be granted as a matter ofroutine unless some progress has ; . been made on ground by the developers. The Board, therefore, after oo, _. deliberations, extended the validity of the formal approval to the requests for ; extensions beyond fifth years for a period of one year and those beyond sixth ee oe yearfor a period of 6 monthsfrom the date ofexpiry oflast extension”. a oe (i) Request of M/s. HBS Pharma SEZ Pyt. Ltd., for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting up of sector specific SEZ for: a Pharmaceuticals at Panoli Industrial Estate, District Bharuch, Gujarat beyond : 16-06-2017 . oS : . Name of the developer - . M/s.HBS Pharma SEZ Private Limited a i a . Sector Oo ; Pharmaceutical - | , | Location os Panoli Industrial Estate, District Bharuch, Gujarat aod _ on | / Extension : Formal approval to the developer was granted on 17-06. 2008.

imited a i a . Sector Oo ; Pharmaceutical - | , | Location os Panoli Industrial Estate, District Bharuch, Gujarat aod _ on | / Extension : Formal approval to the developer was granted on 17-06. 2008. The developer has been granted 06 (six). extensions, last extension on 12-07-2016 © = validity period of which was upto 16-06-2017. The developer has requested for further So . extension upto 16-06-2018. The SEZ stands-notified as on date. So ; Present Progress: Se 7 . He Dc (a) Details of business Plan oe - oe . ‘S.No. |Type of cost a Proposed Investment (Rs. In lakhs). |., »: Oo 1. Land Cost | 6990.17 ": . - 2, |TC o talnstruction>Cost | 8060.4| 15050 6 3 © ) eT. : So ;

. . .

==> picture [561 x 631] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- (a) Incremental investment since last extension:- a ae 7 so made so far (Rs. in| investment. (Rs. in . ee _ | lakhs). up.to . | lakhs) since © last | a2 -| 25" April 2017 extension —_- a - (b) Details of physical progress till date:- oo roe a . S.No. | Authorised activity: ) % —— |% Deadline* for . a 7 a 7 during last | balance work | one year mo, 2. |ConereteRoads 100%, | , i iesPipelines Network _ _ | Entry | 11. .| Availability of Water, from . - * Detailed Reasons for delay: DC KASEZ has stated that the approved SEZ units have not . "started construction yet, but one unit has performed ground breaking. a ~ ~ . Recommendation by DC _ . “This Zone has fully developed roads, drainage, water supply etc.

SEZ units have not . "started construction yet, but one unit has performed ground breaking. a ~ ~ . Recommendation by DC _ . “This Zone has fully developed roads, drainage, water supply etc. and an admin a complex, Last year. one unit has taken LOA and carried out ground breaking. Another — unit has taken LOA on 28-04-2017. In view of bright prospect of units coming up, it is” recommended to extend validity ofLOA ofdeveloper by another year.” - a 7 The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. © / 3 OS ----- End of picture text -----

To, a . .

==> picture [585 x 702] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- oe (ii) | Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd for further extension of the validity) period of formal approval, granted for setting up of Multi Services - SEZ at Kalamboli . beyond 25/01/2016. . . . . . i ~~~"Naimeof the Developer: M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt.Ltd . Sector : . Multi Services ee , oe : . Location — '-: Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra a . . Extension . : Formal approval to the developer was granted on 26/07/2007. | : . The SEZ was notified on 28.08.2008. The developer has been granted 7 extensions so far, last : extension was granted on 27/08/2015, validity of which was up to 25/01/2016. ‘The developer has requested for further extension up to 25/01/2017. The request- was forwarded _ to BOA on 22.12.2016. No further request. has been received from the Developer for . extension of LOA beyond 25.1.2017. ee . .

urther extension up to 25/01/2017. The request- was forwarded to BOA on 22.12.2016. No further request. has been received from the Developer for . extension of LOA beyond 25.1.2017. ee . . oo HS Present Progress: oe ao . - a) Details of business plan :- = ; os - a Type of Cost | Proposed Investment (Rs. a CO - on : _ | In lakhs/Crores . : i , | | 2 | [Construction] cost “| 323.13 Cr. a . 456.44 Cr. ae : . b) Incremental investment since last extension :- ° ee Co oeType of cost : |-Total. Investment made Incremental Investment | ; . [so far (Rs. . ‘—In/} (Rs.In Crores) since last . oe ' | lakhs/Crores) up to'| extension i fs | December 2015 . | Land cost’: 133,31 Cr. _ 3 Construction 1 323.13 Cr. — | NIL oo } ; (c) Details of Physical progress tilldate:- eo Se DO Sr. No.. | Authorized | |.% - | % completion | Deadline for completion of activity during last one | balance work : . . - . ear = ; |— - 4 BoundaryChain ~~ WallLink | 14.23 Kms fo,|. NIL - ~ |JanSEZ 2017 to be operatioalised by. . oe 2 Initial - Land | Completed | . - NIL a ne . . -| | Development . E oo oe ee ° 3 Custom _ | Completed NIL]. oo ne . bonded areal °° |: . . . . eS Z - | materialfor storage=.of |fs. mo . . oe . 7 | 4 | External [0.8 Kms NIL“ SO - : wo Pipelines | oe a ----- End of picture text -----

; ) . Detailed Reasons for delay : In their application the Developer has stated that they are . _ unable to. get the SEZ operationalized as the State Govt. of Maharashtra has not enacted the == * : state SEZ Act. In the absence of the state SEZ Act and Policy the entrepreneurs are not _ . ________[willing][ to][set] up[ units][ inthe] SEZ, : . _° The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for , LOA extensions: Moreover the Developer has failed to submit approval/recommendation of. - the State Govt. of Maharashtra, which is required to be submitted as per the condition - . imposed by BOA while granting last extension. °— an . Do : . . .Recommendation by DC: Se : oe oe , : . - DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further: extension of: , | The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. oo ii) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd for further extension of the validity period of formal approval, granted for setting.up of Multi Product - SEZ at Dronagiri beyond 29/01/2016. . ns | . . 7 oe . . Name of the Developer: : M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. ; | : Sector -: Multi Product oo, : a . oe Location — . .1 ~Dronagiri, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra a _ — . Extension _:Formal approval to the developer was granted on 30/07/2007. . The SEZ was notified on. 21.11.2007.

Multi Product oo, : a . oe Location — . .1 ~Dronagiri, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra a _ — . Extension _:Formal approval to the developer was granted on 30/07/2007. . The SEZ was notified on. 21.11.2007. The developer has been granted’ 7 extensions so far, ~ last extension’ . _ developer has requestedwas -grantedfor furtheron 27/08/2015,extensionvalidity up to 29/01/2017.of which. wasThe requestup to was29/01/2016.forwardedTheto _ BOA on 22.12.2016. No further request has been received from the Developer.for extension — of LOA beyond 29.01.2017. . ne Present Progress Lo oe ; re — a Details of business plan :- a , : oo ae oe ‘| Sr. No. | Type.of Cost ~ | Proposed Investment (Rs. In; en . __.\ | lakhs/Crores) . i : Land cost. . ; 1729.13 Cr Le . Construction cost «| 2323.42.Cr | | ast a Total 4052.55Cr. fo SS : b) Incremental investment since last extension :- ; oS Sr.No. | Type of cost ' | Total Investment. made| Incremental BS . : ; ‘so far (Rs. ‘In| Investment (Rs. | _ . : ; _| lakhs/Crores) up to| In Crores) since | December 2015 last extension _. i913Cr , Land[cost] - : , Oo Material Procurement| -- a | Construction 2323.42 Cr. : Total | 4052.55Cr. Po .

ondition. imposed by BOA while granting last extension. a oa / ‘Recommendation b DC: . ee a 7 = ae oe - oe 7 DC, Navi Mumbai has’ not recommended the request for further extension of . i | . Te - __. The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. | . a i | (iv). Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd for further extension of the validity — period of formal approval, granted for setting up of Gems & Jewellery SEZ at Ulwe beyond 26/02/2016. : a ao a ~~ Name of the Developer: _- M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. . oe - Sector . > Gems & Jewellery . 7 | oo Oo Location : : Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra: FT, . ae . - . ... Extension ° tee Formal approval to the developer was granted on 27/02/2009. ; a . The SEZ was notified on 3.9.2009, The developer has been granted 06 extensions so far, last . . extension was granted on 19/05/2015, validity of which was upto 26/02/2016. The . . developer has requested for further extension up to 26/02/2017. The request was forwarded to ; : _... BOAon22.12.2016. No further request has been received from the Developer for extension / . of LOA beyond 26.02.2016. a . _ 7

. oe a a

nsion up to 26/02/2017. The request was forwarded to ; : _... BOAon22.12.2016. No further request has been received from the Developer for extension / . of LOA beyond 26.02.2016. a . _ 7

. oe a a

==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

. a, : a | | bonded Area So ee a fe 1130sq. mtrs. | ce _

==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- | ----- End of picture text -----

‘Detailed Reasons for delay : In their application, the Developer has stated that they are unable to get the SEZ operationalized as the State Govt. of Maharashtra has not enacted the - state SEZ Act. In the absence of the state SEZ Act and Policy the entrepreneurs are not - willing to set up units in the SEZ. SC | ; The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for LOA extensions. Moreover the Developer has. failed to submit approval/recommendation of the State Govt. of Maharashtra, which is required to be submitted as per the condition imposed by BOA while granting last extension. a 7 .

. . . .

_ Recommendation by DC : . So . DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further extension of +. The request is placed before BOA for its consideration, = eo

;

: :

==> picture [580 x 700] intentionally omitted <==

Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further extension of +. The request is placed before BOA for its consideration, = eo

;

: :

==> picture [580 x 700] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- “~~ (v) . Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. for further extensionof the validity "periodbeyond. “of26/02/2016. formal ‘approval,. granted for settingwe upof Multi Services= SEZ. at”Ulwe-. ~ ~~ “Name ofthe Developer: M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. . Sector : Multi Services. a . . ot Location : Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra - : , . Extension . : Formal approval to the developer was granted on 27/02/2009. The SEZ. was notified on 3.9.2009,The developer has been granted: 06 extensions so far, _ last. extension was granted on 19/05/2015, validity of which was up to 26/02/2016. The . developer has requested for further extension up to 26/02/2017. The request was forwarded to BOA on 22.12.2016. No further request has been received: from ‘the Developer for a ‘extension of LOA beyond 06/02/2017. . . oe _ Present Progress : a. . cee : a - (a) Details.of business plan :- - - ne , No. Type of Cost _ | Proposed(Rs. In lakhs/CroresInvestment : re ~ L_2 | Construction cost : , ms (b), Incremental investment since last éxtension:- | Le . a Type of cost | Total ~~ Investment | Incremental pode. fo No. | a ee _|made so far (Rs. In| Investment (Rs. In : Se . 7 _°. +. | Jakhs/Crores)- up. to} Crores) — since: last : — 7 to. __... | December 2015 extension . : Land cost.

al pode. fo No. | a ee _|made so far (Rs. In| Investment (Rs. In : Se . 7 _°. +. | Jakhs/Crores)- up. to} Crores) — since: last : — 7 to. __... | December 2015 extension . : Land cost. | aee Material Procurement f--|NI | Construction - [Total [343.69 Cr --.. (¢) Details of Physical progress till date :- oo a Sr. Authorized activity | % completion| %° completion | Deadline _ for a -....* + *| during last one | completion — of ce _ So year balance work OO i “ 1 | Boundary Wall © | 7.56 kms. NIL SEZ to - be’ | oo . a 7 ae operationalised by} =~ : be | So a : Z ‘| Feb 2017, | | : 2° | Const. of custom | 1130 sq. mtrs..] NIL es eee a bonded area a coe . ee Detailed Reasons for delay: In their application, the Developer has’ stated that they are - unable to get the SEZ operationalized as the State Govt. of Maharashtra has not enacted the state SEZ Act. In the absence of state SEZ Act and Policy the entrepreneurs to setup unitsin the SEZ. = = a are. not willing . ----- End of picture text -----

7 ; .

ooo" LOA extensions. Moreover the State Govt. of __. ..... imposed by by BOA while oo | RecommendationbyDC::)

; ~The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also‘while applying for / - LOA extensions. Moreover the developer has failedto submitapproval/recommendationof the State Govt. of Maharashtra, which is required to be submitted as per the condition ..... imposed by by BOA while granting lastextension | RecommendationbyDC::) ne . , ae ce

val/recommendationof the State Govt. of Maharashtra, which is required to be submitted as per the condition ..... imposed by by BOA while granting lastextension | RecommendationbyDC::) ne . , ae ce

a, DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further extension of

. The request is placed before BOA for itsconsideration. _ Z ; - (yi) “Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai IT/ITES-A for further extension of the validity | oO -period of formal approval, granted for setting up of IT/ITES SEZ at Kalamboli beyond . 25/01/2016, oe - ee _ Name of the Developer: M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. Be 7 | . ‘Sector | + ITATES oo , - : : . | Location 4 *Kalamboli, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra . 7 .

. Extension ; 7 : .- Formal approval to the developer was granted on 26.7.2007. . The SEZ was notified on 11.8.2008. The developer has been granted 7 extensions, last — - : extension was. granted:on 27/08/2015, validity of which was up to.25/01/2016.The. : developer has requested for further extension up to 25/01/2017. The request was forwarded to . BOA on 22.12.2016. No further request has been received from the Developer for extension | | of LOA beyond 25.1.2017;_ a oo ee — Present Progress: ee | . | _ | . (a) Details of business plan :- a, . , . . | Sr. No. | Type of Cost. — Proposed Investment - mo (Rs. In lakhs/Crores) || 4 re . oe 352.40Cr. , Oe yo

017;_ a oo ee — Present Progress: ee | . | _ | . (a) Details of business plan :- a, . , . . | Sr. No. | Type of Cost. — Proposed Investment - mo (Rs. In lakhs/Crores) || 4 re . oe 352.40Cr. , Oe yo

| (b) Incremental investment since last extension :- ne a | Sr.No. | Type of cost ~~ _ | Total Investment made Incremental Investment . Se—. too ef— . ~ lakhs/Crores)|December-\so far. 2015(Rs.up In|to | (Rs.lastextension.. In Crores).i=>sincei| . . | 100.81Cr NI jo - 3 24434Cr NI Total 354515 Cre po

||_||(c) Details ofPh sical progress tilldate :-<br>|<br>|<br>.!<br>—|a|a|a||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|ee||||Sr.Now Authorized activity |% completion |% ~completion’)Deadline<br>~~ for||7||||
|oe||,|during last one |completion<br>of|||||
||-<br>a||=<br>=<br>a<br>-|year<br>**_**|<br>balance work.<br>1°. |BoundaryWall<br>3.47kms.<br>NIL<br>|<br>SEZ to be<br>.<br>ChainLinkFencing |0.14Kms<br>~ |operational by Jan|||||
||||||.|||
||||2<br>|<br>Custom<br>Bonded<br>|.<br>—<br>.<br>NIL<br>-<br>|<br>Area for storage of |Completed<br>—<br>Oo<br>e<br>material<br>;<br>°<br>||a||||
||||3<br>Externalpipeline<br>| 0.8kms.<br>{NID<br>0.|||||
||oo|.|-<br>Initial<br>Land {Completed<br>©<br>|<br>-<br>,|||||
|a|||Development<br>.|.||||
|.|_|_|Detailed Reasons fordelay: In their application the Developer’ has statedthat they are<br>|<br>unable to get the SEZ operationalized as theStateGovt.ofMaharashtrahas not enacted the.<br>state SEZ Act.

etailed Reasons fordelay: In their application the Developer’ has statedthat they are<br>|<br>unable to get the SEZ operationalized as theStateGovt.ofMaharashtrahas not enacted the.<br>state SEZ Act. In the absence ofstateSEZ Act and Policythe entrepreneurs are not willing<br>ne<br>to setupunits intheSEZ.<br>:<br>me,<br>|:|||.|i|
|ee<br>.<br>_<br>.|||_ TheDeveloper has given thesamereason/reasons inthepast also whileapplying for<br>LOA extensions. Moreover the developerhas failed to submit approval/recommendation of<br>.<br>the. State Govt. of Maharashtra, which is required to be submitted as per. the’ condition<br>;<br>imposedbyBOAwhilegranting lastextension<br>.<br>.<br>-||;|||
||||RecommendationbyDC:<br>So|||||
||.||DC,NaviMumbaihasnotrecommendedtherequestforfurtherextensionof|aa|.|||

. The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. oe, : (vii) Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt.Ltd for further extension of the validity. period of formal approval, granted for setting up of IT/ITES — A: SEZ at Ulwe beyond | Name of the Developer: ~ M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd: _ | rr 8 Sector : ITATES-A an ae ~. Location :.. Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra oo ot 7 , Extension > Formal approval to the developer was granted on 25/10/2007. » . The SEZ was notified on 27.5.2008.The developer has been granted 07 extensions so far, ~~ Jast extension was granted on 30/12/2015, validity of which’ was up to.24/10/2016. The = developer has requested for further extension up to. 24/10/2017. The. request. ‘was forwarded . to BOA 0n 22.12.2016, . .

nted on 30/12/2015, validity of which’ was up to.24/10/2016. The = developer has requested for further extension up to. 24/10/2017. The. request. ‘was forwarded . to BOA 0n 22.12.2016, . .

oo

| oo

~ In their application, the Developer has stated that although the SEZ is ready but they Oe are not able to find any units mainly because the State Govt. of Maharashtra has not enacted willingthe stateto SEZset up-unitsAct. Ininthethe SEZ.absence of . state SEZ Act and Policy' theaentrepreneurs are| not . = The Developer has given-the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for. - LOA extensions. In addition, following infrastructure required under Rule 5(A) of SEZ. Rules,-2006 for IT units, has not been provided by the Developer so far; i oS . a) Twenty. four hours uninterrupted power supplyat a stable frequency, te, b) Reliable connectivity for uninterrupted and secure data connection. . . c) Provision for central air conditioning system. oe = ° os d) A ready to use finished plug and play facility for the end user. _ a a

; Recommendation by DC: re | noe — 7 It is apparent from-the above that. the matter is not progressing any further inspite of . considerable loss of time and stalemate continues. - | DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further extension of LOA. — mo Ds a | | The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. ; an oy - (viii). Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai IT/ITES-B for further extension of the validity co period24/10/2016of formal approval, granted for settingup of IT/ITES -‘B SEZ at Ulwe beyond . a ool - . Name of the Developer:. | M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. | OC . , | Location oe _ + Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra . Oe | no . , Extension :.

ettingup of IT/ITES -‘B SEZ at Ulwe beyond . a ool - . Name of the Developer:. | M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt. Ltd. | OC . , | Location oe _ + Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra . Oe | no . , Extension :. Formal approval to the developer was granted on 25/10/2007. The SEZ was notified on 8.5.2008. The developer has been granted 07 extensions so far, last extension was granted on 30.12.2015, validity ‘of which was up to 24.10.2016. The . developer has requested for further extension up to 24/10/2017. The request was forwarded = _. - to BOA on 22.12.2016, . . a . . Present Progress: 7 ; oe . _ oe a, (a) Details of business plan - ; Z | | . Sr.No. |Type of.Cost - | Proposed Investment a , | _ _| (Rs. In Jakhs/Crores : 29.76 Cr : . oo , 150.71 Cr. wf . . ; Total -| 180,47. Cr. . - oe | - (b) Incremental investment since last extension = Oe _ | Sr. No. | Type of cost Total Inyestment made | Incremental Investment - so far (Rs. In | (Rs. In Crores) since . . mo Jakhs/Crores) up __to | last extension _ | August 2016 — | 1 |Land cost 29.76.Cr | NIL |. Se 2 Material‘Procurement | -- ~ NIL : md 3 Construction. 150.71 Cr. PNP a | Total 180.47 Cr. oe = ee . (c) Details ofPhysical progress tilldate:Te | : : a. Sr. No. | Authorized activity | % completion | % completion |Deadline. _ for - . . 4 . . | during last one | completion of , . a oo year . balance work —° . 1. .| Boundary Wall 3.28 Kms. NIL SEZ is developed | - . Ce [oe and ready . -

==> picture [581 x 135] intentionally omitted <==

uring last one | completion of , . a oo year . balance work —° . 1. .| Boundary Wall 3.28 Kms. NIL SEZ is developed | - . Ce [oe and ready . -

==> picture [581 x 135] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- “3 Internal[Storm Water Road drain_—*(.2435Murs,[2611 Mtr. [NIL[NIDSSidS . , ok I nternalT duct Waterlaid. lines | 1112MiO97 M rs, | | | N IDTO - 6 Bridge across water |Completed — NIL ‘| channel — ope 7 IT/ITES building of | Completed . : : 195000 sq. ft super |” a - built up area a ----- End of picture text -----

. .. Detailed Reasons for delay : In their application, Developer has stated that although the _ SEZis ready but they are not able to find any units mainly because the State Govt. of . : Maharashtra has not enacted the state SEZ Act. In the absence of state SEZ Act and Policy | - the entrepreneurs are not willing to set up units.in the SEZ. ° . "The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for LOA extensions. In-addition, following infrastructure required under Rule 5(A) of SEZ Rules, a 7” 2006 for IT units, has not been provided by the Developer so far; , , Se | Z a) ‘Twenty four hours uninterrupted power supply at a stable frequency. a oo b) Reliable connectivity for uninterrupted and secure data connection. , -¢) Provision for central air conditioning system. : _ d) Aready to use finished plug and play facility forthe end user... oo oe ‘Recommendation by DC : . re a | .

upted and secure data connection. , -¢) Provision for central air conditioning system. : _ d) Aready to use finished plug and play facility forthe end user... oo oe ‘Recommendation by DC : . re a | . Co It is apparent from the above that the matter is not progressing any further inspite of = . . ' considerable loss of time and stalemate continues. ts mo . DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended. the request for further extension of . “The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. \ oe (ix). Request of M/s. Navi Mumbai SEZ. Pvt. Ltd for further extension of the validity : - ; period of formal approval, granted for setting up of IT/ITES - C SEZ at Ulwe beyond oe 21/11/2016 : : | rs ‘Name ofthe Developer: |. M/s Navi Mumbai SEZ Pvt.Ltd. 7 - . . 7 oe . - Sector a os ITES ; . Oo i - Location : Ulwe, District Raigad, Maharashtra ee . '. 7 _ -. TheExtensionlast SEZ was notified on: 12.3.2009.Formal approval toThe developerthe developerhas been wgr a nteds granted07 extensionson 22.11.2007,so far, ; extension was granted on 30/12/2015, validity of which was up to 21/11/2016. The _ - developer has requested for further extension up to 21/11/2017. The request was forwarded to BOA 0n 22.12.2016. o oe oy

re | : :

. , .

==> picture [580 x 578] intentionally omitted <==

loper has requested for further extension up to 21/11/2017. The request was forwarded to BOA 0n 22.12.2016. o oe oy

re | : :

. , .

==> picture [580 x 578] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- -. Present Progress: a . nn (a) Details of business plan [:-] oe : . a Oe . Sr.No. | Type of Cost . | Proposed. Investment! — — i (b) Incremental investment since last éxtension :- ee — Sr. No.-| Type of cost . | Total Investment made so | Incremental . . fe | far (Rs. In Jakhs/Crores) | Investment. (Rs. In vo, re te ; : 4 extension Le | Land cost __ | 8.37 Cr. : 2.| Material Procurement |---|. 2 Se - | Total 149.22 —* -(¢) Details of Physical progress till date ;- ou a oe . Sr. No. | Authorized activity | % ~ .|% completion | Deadline for - ; i | one year balance work | : 1 | Boundary Wall NIL: SEZ is developed and oeoe| Internal Road | 750 Mtrs; |NIPready. 3__| InternalStorm Water Water lines drain a | 869 Mtrs. [NE (Tductlaid Utility | 842Mus [NIL : “7 crossing pipe a | Developed plots + Ready for . Detailed Reasons for delay : In their application, the Developer has stated that although the ~ SEZ is ready but they.are not ableto find any units mainly because the State Govt. of , Maharashtra has not enacted the state SEZ Act. In the absence of StateSEZ Act and Policy . ‘the entrepreneurs are not willing to set up units inthe SEZ. Se oe The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for LOA , extensions.

SEZ Act and Policy . ‘the entrepreneurs are not willing to set up units inthe SEZ. Se oe The Developer has given the same reason/reasons in the past also while applying for LOA , extensions. In addition, following infrastructure required under Rule 5(A) of SEZ Rules, 2006 for IT Units, has not been provided by the Developer so far, oo _ ----- End of picture text -----

_ -

a) Twenty four hours uninterrupted power supply at a stable frequency. = oe b) Reliable connectivity for uninterrupted and secure data connection... ~ a ¢) Provision for Central Air conditioning system. ' oe d) A ready to use finished plug and play facility for the end user. © a

==> picture [64 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- 7 -~ . an ----- End of picture text -----

. ‘ .Q wl! . Recommendation by DC: oo . 7 OF It is apparent from the above that the matter is not progressing any further inspite of considerable loss of time and stalemate continues. Uo . DC, Navi Mumbai has not recommended the request for further extension of - . The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. , . ) ~ (x) ~~ Request of M/s. GOCL Corporation Limited (Formerly Gulf Oil Corporation — Ltd.) for further extensionof the validity perid of formal approval, granted for setting _ up of IT/ITES/BPO/Electronic Hardware SEZ at Kattigenahalli & Venkatala Villages, a _ Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore, Karnataka beyond 17" June, 2017 , . 7 oe Nameof the Developer ... : M/.s GOCI Corporation Limited (Formerly Gulf Oil . oo .

SEZ at Kattigenahalli & Venkatala Villages, a _ Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore, Karnataka beyond 17" June, 2017 , . 7 oe Nameof the Developer ... : M/.s GOCI Corporation Limited (Formerly Gulf Oil . oo . ~- CorporationLtd. 0 2 ee | oo - Sector : ITATES/BPO/Electronic Hardware oo _ - Location SO : Bangalore oo - . - oo - of Extension - : Formal: approval to the developer was granted on 18" June, a 2009. The developer has been granted five extension, last extension of 12" July,, 2016, , validity period of which was upto 17™ June, 2017. The developer has requested for. further oe ° ~ extension upto 17™ June, 2019. The SEZ stands notified as on date. . Co ) ; : Pope Present Progress: -, vf) te Rs.In lakhs/Crores) Ss oe ; Rs. 6599.00 lakhs vo . ||Total | Rs. 101299.00 lakhs . _(b) Incremental investment since last extension :- . Ss _ | Sr.No. | Type of cost Total Investment made so| Incremental os mo . te | far (Rs. In lakhs/Crores) |Investment. (Rs. In|: | | : eo . | up to 31.03.2017 Crores): since last ae . 4. | extension a , 1 | Land cost oe : Present market value _ | obna2. - Rs.Rs. 6599.0022275.00 lakhs-lakhs NILRs. 5095.00 lakhs: . a Rs. 9098.00 lakhs Rs. 1731.00 lakhs. LfTotal Rs. 7972.00 lakhs | 6826.00Rs, lakhs | _° ” (c) Details of Physical progress till date :- . eee Sr-No. | Authorized activity. | % | —-.| % completion | Deadline for | . ; oo . . ~ foe completion’ - || oneduringyear —last.| completionbalance work— of I

==> picture [595 x 709] intentionally omitted <==

orized activity. | % | —-.| % completion | Deadline for | . ; oo . . ~ foe completion’ - || oneduringyear —last.| completionbalance work— of I

==> picture [595 x 709] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- Phase-II (block-2) Dec2017, | [LA |Nil PhaseIV NN 8% po _. Detailed Reasons for delay: . . . oe DC CSEZ has stated that- | . i oe i (a) As part of the envisaged business plan, phase-1 of project is complete in allrespect, . =. = (b) Occupancy certificate, a prerequisite for any client tomove-in has been obtained from me 7 Karnataka Industrial‘Area Development Board, Bangaluru, =, . ont _. (c) The-leasing scenario has been weak during the last couple of years. an ae ~. (d) In spite of our best. efforts of interacting with industry reputed consultants, no IT ae tenant has taken up the built up space, which is ready since 04 May, 2016. . ‘(e) Efforts to lease out the property are expected to fructify as present discussion are on: , , . with prospective. clients such as cerher Healthcare, Target, Northern Trust etc. 7 ~-< (f) Envisaging better IT ITES environment going forward they have embarked on the | | second phase of the project, having reached 57% tilldate oe (g) Blue print for the third phase of the project is under preparation with the designers. «| . * DC CSEZ has recommended that the proposal for extension of validity of LoA by a a period of one year w.e.f, 18.06.2017 may be considered favourably. po, cee The request is placed before BOA for its consideration.

ed that the proposal for extension of validity of LoA by a a _ period of one year w.e.f, 18.06.2017 may be considered favourably. po, cee The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. wo (xi) Request of M/s. Mayar Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. for further = 9 > . extension of the validity of formal approval, granted for setting up of Biotechnology a - Sector Specific SEZ at Village Rahka and Nimoth, Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon (Haryana) = beyond 13.07.2017,. 0 Oo . Name of the developer .: M/s. Mayar Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. anSector~ . Loeation oe - os~ (Haryana): VillageBiotechnologyRahka sector.andneNimoth,eS Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon. a. . . Extension a . .: Formal approval to: the developerwas granted on . a . 14.07.2008. The developer has been granted 06 9 vs . ee . extensions, last extension was granted vide DOC letter’ ee a dated.17.05.2016 which was upto. 13.07.2017..The. - . . a an developer has requested.for further extension upto. . - | Present Progress:we i . 13.07.2018.mT The SEZPestands notified aseeon date. . : . (a) Details of business plan:- . Pe Fos oe Oo ; | 7 ao Proposed Investment : - eo -1 | LandCost foo: 130.00 Ls ; |[2 | ConstructionCost pO ~~ 428.10 oo 3 | Plant& Machinery _ 7 i; 75.00 oe 7 Other Overheads- we | 130.95 pO [| = . ’ Total: 764.05 ee i ----- End of picture text -----

r>|[2 | ConstructionCost pO ~~ 428.10 oo 3 | Plant& Machinery _ 7 i; 75.00 oe 7 Other Overheads- we | 130.95 pO [| = . ’ Total: 764.05 ee i ----- End of picture text -----

|__..___»<br>oo<br>ae|(b)Investmentmade so far& incrementalinvestmentsincelastextension:-<br>oe<br>g.<br>.<br>.<br>| TotalInvestment| Incremental investment since<br>|<br>=<br>No<br>TypeofCost<br>.<br>. madesofar<br>|.<br>lastextension<br>-<br>;<br>:<br>(Rs.inCrore)<br>_(Rs.inCrore)<br>|<br>_ 1 [LandCost<br>S00|(b)Investmentmade so far& incrementalinvestmentsincelastextension:-<br>oe<br>g.<br>.<br>.<br>| TotalInvestment| Incremental investment since<br>|<br>=<br>No<br>TypeofCost<br>.<br>. madesofar<br>|.<br>lastextension<br>-<br>;<br>:<br>(Rs.inCrore)<br>_(Rs.inCrore)<br>|<br>_ 1 [LandCost<br>S00|(b)Investmentmade so far& incrementalinvestmentsincelastextension:-<br>oe<br>g.<br>.<br>.<br>| TotalInvestment| Incremental investment since<br>|<br>=<br>No<br>TypeofCost<br>.<br>. madesofar<br>|.<br>lastextension<br>-<br>;<br>:<br>(Rs.inCrore)<br>_(Rs.inCrore)<br>|<br>_ 1 [LandCost<br>S00|(b)Investmentmade so far& incrementalinvestmentsincelastextension:-<br>oe<br>g.<br>.<br>.<br>| TotalInvestment| Incremental investment since<br>|<br>=<br>No<br>TypeofCost<br>.<br>. madesofar<br>|.<br>lastextension<br>-<br>;<br>:<br>(Rs.inCrore)<br>_(Rs.inCrore)<br>|<br>_ 1 [LandCost<br>S00|a|a||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|a|106.28<br>|1764||||||||
|.|(c)Details of Physical progress tilldate :~<br>_<br>ee||.||a|||
|TE<br>:<br>rn|Now]<br>a<br>es<br>completion | ‘during last.

>S00|a|a||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|a|106.28<br>|1764||||||||
|.|(c)Details of Physical progress tilldate :~<br>_<br>ee||.||a|||
|TE<br>:<br>rn|Now]<br>a<br>es<br>completion | ‘during last. |completionof<br>ae<br>-<br>a,<br>os<br>asondate | «oneyear<br>|<br>balance work||||-|||
|-<br>-||2. °)Water> treatment. plant, water. supply<br>100%<br>0%:<br>~<br>NA’<br>_<br>| lines (dedicated lines up to source),|<br>ee<br>af<br>mo||co||cs|.||
||‘|.<br>| ‘waterchannels ofappropriate capacity<br>7|po||||-||
|La<br>oo|3.<br>| Sewage and. garbage<br>disposal. plant,<br>100%<br>=|.<br>~<br>0%<br>— NA<br>-.<br>| pipeline<br>.<br>and<br>— other.<br>‘necessary<br>oa|||||||
||__.-_|<br>disposal, Sewagetreatment plants.<br>:<br>ee|||||||
||4,<br>Electrical, Gas and Petroleum Natural<br>100%<br>0%<br>NA|yo.|||7||)|
|:|~. |necessary sub-stations of appropriate;<br>9<br>_|<br>capacity, pipelinenetwork etc.<br>Se<br>**e**<br>:<br>SFY||||7|||
|a|5. | Effluent treatmentplantandpipeline<br>100%<br>|<br>0%<br>NA|||||||
|ao||<br>andotherinfrastructure for effluent<br>=<br>|<br>“|.<br>.<br>.<br>.|.||||||
|-<br>|_|<br>treatment,<br>a<br>|<br>ov<br>facilities includinginternet connectivity.|<br>=<br>oe<br>Rainwaterharvesting plant<br>|~=—100%<br>=f<br>0%<br>NA<br>.<br>|<br>8.

“|.<br>.<br>.<br>.|.||||||
|-<br>|_|<br>treatment,<br>a<br>|<br>ov<br>facilities includinginternet connectivity.|<br>=<br>oe<br>Rainwaterharvesting plant<br>|~=—100%<br>=f<br>0%<br>NA<br>.<br>|<br>8. |Landscapingandwaterbodies<br>NA<br>9.|WiFi and /orWimaxServices<br>-<br>0%||||||.|ae|||
|||_NA|||||||
|.|Boundarywall ©.<br>_<br>0%,<br>NA||||7|||
||Factorysheds inprocessingarea<br>| 100% |<br>=~0%:<br>|.<br>NA<br>Officespaceforcustoms andsecurity<br>NA||.<br>oy||:|-||
||staff-notexceeding<br>500 sqm.<br>:<br>.<br>;||.||.|||
||Detailed Reasons fordelay:<br>7<br>re|||||||
||_-<br>The developer has mentioned that 19.65 acres area of Processing Zone is fully|||=||||
|_|developed andconfined by2.2KMlongand2.4meterheightboundary wall.The Processing|||||||
|.|Zonemainly comprises ofthefollowing:-.—<br>-<br>CS<br>oe<br>~||||.|||
|SS|- Custom officebuilding<br>><br>227.11. Sqm.<br>a|||||||
|5BEZPlot<br>3<br>46078.95Sqm.<br>.<br>.||||||||

, 7

7 |

. . | —

==> picture [563 x 708] intentionally omitted <==

|.||| |SS|- Custom officebuilding > 227.11. Sqm. a||||||| |5BEZPlot 3 46078.95Sqm. . .||||||||




, 7 

7 | 

. . | — 

**==> picture [563 x 708] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
a Biosafety Plot ; 2438.11Sqm oe oe<br>ae 7 Bio port Building 23760.7 Sqm. . ce.<br>_ The developer has also mentioned that they. are in an advanced stage of negotiation<br>~- with some of the clients for taking space in the Bio Port on lease and commence operation, as”<br>ce. well as for taking land on lease for settingup units related’to Biotechnology. The developer<br>has also furnished photographs showing infrastructure developed in SEZ. — . ,<br>Recommendation by DC: ~~ i .<br>ae : DC, NSEZ has recommended the request of extension of LOA fora period of one<br>year upto 13.07.2018. 7 . Se a OC<br>a . -. The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. 7.<br>(xii). Request of M/s. Metro Valley Business Park Pvt. Ltd. for further extension of the<br>_ Validity of formal approval, granted for setting upof IT/ITES SEZ at 5 milestone,<br>_ Village Gwal Pahari, Gurgaon-Faridabad Road, Distt. Gurgaon (Haryana) beyond — .<br>Name of the developer : M/s. Metro Valley Business Park Pvt. Ltd.<br>:<br>. Sector IT Sector .<br>‘Location vo : 5m milestone, Village _Gwal Pahari, ‘Gurgaon-. . .<br>Extension _ Faridabad Road, Distt. Gurgaon (Haryana) a<br>oe - ' + Formal approval to the developer was granted on .<br>.<br>a . 06.11.2006. The developer has been granted 06 .<br>extensions, last extension was granted by BoA in its<br>oe.

on (Haryana) a<br>oe - ' + Formal approval to the developer was granted on .<br>.<br>a . 06.11.2006. The developer has been granted 06 .<br>extensions, last extension was granted by BoA in its<br>oe. | "meeting held on’ 03.04.2014 which was upto |<br>05.05.2015. The developer has requested for further<br>.<br>. ae extension upto May, 2020. The SEZ stands notified as<br>_.. Present Progress: eeue, ondate.Sn| - L . oe .<br>(a)Details [of][ business] [plan:-] oe Z : _<br>oe S. nro “me pean a Proposed Investment<br> No. Type of Cost -s.inCrore) |<br>1 |LandCost s—~S {120.00<br>. 2. |Construction Cost r . 7 . 244.00° .<br>.<br>3 __|Plant& Machinery __ . oe * 60.00<br>, OO-. | 4 Otheri) - Overheads:Pre-Operative Expanses . -, oo 22.00<br>a ii). , Interest During.Construction . 54.00. .<br>.<br>_ - | iti) Contingency oe ; 26.00 Oo .<br>fo oo . Total: | --—_—-526.00<br>(b) Investment made so far & incremental investment since last extension:- | ,<br>og. os | -<br>Ss. | Total Investment ; Incremental<br>Sob ai. investment since<br>. . No. . ‘Type of Cost . made so far .<br>. . . | (Rs. in Crore) last extension<br>. — a (Rs.inCrore)<br>Land Cost | __ | 120.30 0.00”<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


: . 

. 

**==> picture [41 x 49] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
.<br>.<br>Oo .<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


> . -

picture text -----**<br>


: . 

. 

**==> picture [41 x 49] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
.<br>.<br>Oo .<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


> . - 

4 | Other Overheads: - oo, , | : . .. -| ii) Business Promotion & Travel Ve 2.30 0.10 : —_ lit) Other office expenses, Guarantees & | = = 7.20 1.80: ae Assets. eT . . (c) Details of Physical progress till date :- . ; . . S. | **.** . Authorized activity % completion | % completion] _—Deadline for ~/ | No. = | asondate |. duringlast | completion of balance : one year work oo . Boundary wall 0% Within 4 months of | SO Excavation for Basement 0% |. renewal of approvals Detailed Reasons for delay: = . oe . _ 9 yearsThe developerago, the project has initiallymentionedgotthatdelayeddespiteas itthetookfactnearlythat the4 SEZyears.to wasobtainnotifiedthe morerequisitethan Z : clearances. (due to State Government Department delay). The developer _has further / . mentioned that due to illegal change in mutations by local revenue authorities of the , State Govt. in collusion with Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon (MCG) the project got / delayed. Oe . . . oS Besides, Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Haryana vide its letter dated ~~ a 28/12/2016 had conveyed. that as per ordersofHon’ble CM, Haryana, all the lapsed - permissions pertaining to Metro Valley SEZ may be restored afresh with a minimum_validity n, ‘periodList of ofApprovals three years,to beso restoredas to ensure(as per thatletterthe receivedproject isfromimplemented Haryana Govt.)in a timeare bound as under:- manner. .

a minimum_validity n, ‘periodList of ofApprovals three years,to beso restoredas to ensure(as per thatletterthe receivedproject isfromimplemented Haryana Govt.)in a timeare bound as under:- manner. . 

. 

. . . _ 

| | : 

. | oa 

i) Formal Approval and extensions _ : ~. ti). EconomicBond-Cum-Legal[Zone-IT/ITES.] Undertaking. for development,. ioperations; of the| Special . iti) Demarcation of Processing and Non-Processing Zone. 7 Oe iv) Approval of Building Plan (expired on 31.12.2015). : ees - Subsequently, vide letter dated 28.02.2017, 28.02.2017, the Haryana Govt. Haryana Govt. Govt. informed that restoration that restoration restoration ) 

Subsequently, vide letter dated 28.02.2017, 28.02.2017, the Haryana Govt. Haryana Govt. Govt. informed that restoration that restoration restoration - Competentof permissions Courtshould of Law be insubject the matter.to extension ofLOA bySe DOC and order: / decision. of 

- 

Further, vide letter dated 07.03.2017, the Director of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Haryana asked the developer to submit revised undertaking towards implementation of the _ SEZ project at own risks & cost, within 07 days failing which recommendation to Govt. of India for extension of 3 years shall be withdrawn. In turn, the developer vide its. letter dated 10.04.2017 claims to have submitted the revised undertaking to Deptt. of Industries on 08.03.2017, however nd confirmation from the Haryana Govt. has been received so far. 

. 

.

its. letter dated 10.04.2017 claims to have submitted the revised undertaking to Deptt. of Industries on 08.03.2017, however nd confirmation from the Haryana Govt. has been received so far. 

. 

. 

Recommendation byDC: mo . ar a a | a . DC, NSEZ has recommended the request of extension of LOA for a period upto . _, 05.05.2018.sHowever in view of litigation involved it is also recommended that views of ° State Government of Haryana may also be ascertained to know latest position in the~~~ ~~ matter. ue 4 . Item No. 78.2 Requests for extension of LoP beyond 3" Year onwards (6 proposals) _ a / : " ; « As per Rule 18(1) of the SEZ Rules, the approval Committee may approve or , °.. reject a proposal for setting up of Unit in a Special Economic Zone, oe - oe Cases for consideration of extension of Letter of Permission (LoP)s i.r.o units in . noe os SEZs are governed by Rule 19(4) of SEZ Rules. . . 7 : ¢ Rule 19(4) states. that an LoP shall be valid for one year. First Proviso grants , . . _.. power to DCs for extending the LoP not exceeding 2 years. Second Proviso grants a _ ' farther power to DCs for extending the LoP for one more year but subject to the - — - upcondition of the Unit that two-thirds of activities including construction, relating to the setting - is complete and a Chartered: Engineer’s certificate to this effect is . ce submitted by the entrepreneur. - _ on a . - e Extensions beyond 3™ year (in cases where two-third activities are not complete) — oe So _..@ ‘BoAand 4"can yearextend are grantedthe validity by BoA.for a period of one year at|a time. .

on a . - e Extensions beyond 3™ year (in cases where two-third activities are not complete) — oe So _..@ ‘BoAand 4"can yearextend are grantedthe validity by BoA.for a period of one year at|a time. . , 4 * There is no time limit up to which the Board can extend the validity 0)extension.ofRequestLetterof M/sofLancoApproval SolarbeyondPrivate28.06.2017Ltd in M/sforLancoa periodSolar ofPvt.oneLtdyearSEZupto—for — | . 28.06.2018, co a, ce a LOA issue on (date): 29062011 on °° @ Nature of business of Unit: Manufacture of Solar Products i.e Polysilicon, Ingots, | ~ Wafers & Associated materials/products. , . . @ No of extension : 03 extensions issued by.DC, VSEZ oe _ _ © LOA valid upto (date) :28.06.2017. ; . . e Request : For further extension for one year , up to (date) 28.06.2018. ee : _ , Present Progress: = ~ noes a | ee, - (a) Details of business plan: Oo oe — , a |. SLNo |. Type of Cost eT Proposed Investment | vo , — : : ~ : (Rs. In cores) © - , 8 1 Civil & Structural Work and Plant and M/c.PoP |. 2000.00 : an Exp, Interest during construction ete. * ; oo SO Total | Z . |--2000.00, : . 

**==> picture [596 x 702] intentionally omitted <==**

8 1 Civil & Structural Work and Plant and M/c.PoP |. 2000.00 : an Exp, Interest during construction ete. * ; oo SO Total | Z . |--2000.00, : . 

**==> picture [596 x 702] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
(b) Incremental Investment made so far and. incremental investment since. last<br>. . extension: oo nen es<br>| |<br>- oe, SLNo| Type of Cost. a Total Investment [Incremental |<br>Cp<br>ce . . tS. madeRs. Croes) so far (In- lastInvestmentextensionsince(Rs. |.° | aeoe<br>. _ i In cores) pe .<br>1 | | Civil & Structural Work and - ~» 1642.72 ~ 231.72 fo .<br>. Plant and M/c. PoP Exp, Interest _ a Oo<br>-<br>| during construction ete. fo. ST Spo<br>- Total | 842.72 8|<br>. "(c) Details of Physical Progress till date:- pon! . .<br>| | S.No Activity.’ | % Completion % Completion | Deadline for , .<br>a fe : a | during last one | completion a<br>mo : | year ao | of balance .<br>a “|:<br>. .<br>es work .<br>Civil Work Done _April’2018 ~<br>. | ImportedPlant & M/c |_| 90% 5% — April’2018 oe<br>_ Detailed Reasons for delay: ) oo<br>(i). The entrepreneur has stated that International Economic Slowdown has delayed the . oO<br>project. . , - | wo . oe ee<br>- (ii) Dumping of Solar Products by China and other Countriesin India. © -* Pe<br>- .. Recommendation of DC VSEZ: = =  — | ; a oo |<br>:<br>+... DC, VSEZ has recommendedthe request of extension of LOA for a period of one Oo<br>oe year upto 28, 06.3018. . .<br>soe _ The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. |<br>Gi) Request of M/s PreciStat IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

t of extension of LOA for a period of one Oo<br>oe year upto 28, 06.3018. . .<br>soe _ The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. |<br>Gi) Request of M/s PreciStat IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. for extension of Letter of<br>7<br>_ Permission (LoP) beyond 31.05.2017 for a period of one year upto 30.05.2015. a:<br>oe LOP issue on (date) : 31.05.2013 ; =. oy ee 7<br>_.<br>-@ Nature of business of Unit: IT/IT Enabled Services — -<br>foe - . @ No of extension : 03 extensions issued by DC, VSEZ . a OS<br>os ¢ LOA valid upto (date).:31.05.2017 Boe co .<br>a .<br>* Request : For further extension for 5” year, up to date 30.05.2018. » me oS .<br>wo Present Progress: o a . 7 | Be a<br>coe. (a) Details of business plan: ° pe ; os | ae a , -<br>oo | SLNo Type of Cost a . = -| Proposed Investment |<br>oO Co, . Start .of operations, capital; investment. in| —_23.86.crores(Rs. In cores) OS<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


a 

**==> picture [584 x 659] intentionally omitted <==**

nt |<br>oO Co, . Start .of operations, capital; investment. in| —_23.86.crores(Rs. In cores) OS<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


a 

**==> picture [584 x 659] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
```text
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||
|.|‘||.|]|Totalinfrastructure,employment-|salarieswork:|stationsand computersoperatingandserversexpenditure, etc|23.86|crores.~|.|_.|.|oo|
|ho|oo|(b) Incremental|Investment|made|so|far|and|incremental|investment|since|last|=|
|os|extension:|-|:|
|:|.|SL.No.|Type of cost|.|—|Total|investment made|so.|Incremental|
|||
|_|Se|far.|(in Rs. crores).|_||‘||Investmentlast|extension .|since(in||-|
|:|
|a|Rs.|crores|oF|
|Se|1.|||Capital investment|1.21|Jo|
|| _|a|.|‘(c)|Details of business plan:|an|oe|:|||||
|za|"SE|SNo|||Activity|‘[%Completion[%|[Deadline|forl|°|
|OO|||Completion||-completion|of|-|
|||.|a|a|,|--.|||[oneduringyear~|last-|| balance_|work.|.|,an|
|ae)12.|||CivilFirst|StructureOps|floor-flooring,|85%| 100%|||100%40%|T2018|
|:,|Data|cabling,|_|electrical|||completed|©|——|
|=|work,|plumbing,|doors|and|||||
|.|‘windows,|Glass’|elevation,|So|
|2|False|ceiling,|lighting|-|
|7|»|3.-||Power|commence|.|and||100%|~|||100%.|jo|
|:|certified|by|APEPDCL|on||completed|{||||Co|fo|
|oo>)..|__4._|5,|‘Transportation,6"Furniture June, 2017 and work©|Cafeteriastationsa|||Inprogress Planning.So|.|[||.|a|[30|June,So 2017.|||||
|.|3.|‘L+|| and Housing logistics|under way|_-|7|
|8|:|6.|||Operation|team|transition|July, 2017|i|]|
|.|a|ina planned mariner|a|.|

astationsa|||Inprogress Planning.So|.|[||.|a|[30|June,So 2017.|||||
|.|3.|‘L+|| and Housing logistics|under way|_-|7|
|8|:|6.|||Operation|team|transition|July, 2017|i|]|
|.|a|ina planned mariner|a|.|
|7.|:|yf|;|
|||First|operation|floor|150|August,|
|_|_||seater|start of operations|-|.|ee|2017|
|||
|Reasons for delay:-|.|a|||oe,|ns|:|
|_|aa|Delay|in.|installation|of|the|transformer|and|commissioning|of|the|power|by|||
|APEPDCL as|well|as fabricationof custom workstation by the workstation vendor.|
|/|Recommendation|of|DC VSEZ:-|;|
|.|—|
|||
|.|
|DC, VSEZ has recommended|the request of extension of|LoA for aperiod|ofone year|||-|7|
|ce|
|-.|upto|30.05.2018|i|oe|.|OO|oe,|
|CO|The request is-placed before BOA for its consideration.|—|.|.|

----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [13 x 200] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- : | ] | : ----- End of picture text -----

oo 7

co a

(iii) ~~ Request of M/s. KPIT Technologies Ltd,, in the Pune MIDC SEZ for extension of a Letter of Approval (LOA) beyond 28.06.2017 for 1 year up to 28.06.2018. = ; e LoP issued on : 29.06.2011. . : . a So --@ . Nature of business of the Unit: IT/ITES>7 ence a * No of Extensioris: Request for 6” year extension. _ | e LOA valid up to: 28.06.2017. © | e . Request: For further extension for 1 year, up to 28,06,2018. ee . a Present Progress: . : st : a : (a) Details of Business plan: a ote . . oe a : Rs. In Crores i}

==> picture [558 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

extension for 1 year, up to 28,06,2018. ee . a Present Progress: . : st : a : (a) Details of Business plan: a ote . . oe a : Rs. In Crores i}

==> picture [558 x 198] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- a, (b) Total Investment made so far and incremental investment since last extension: . ce] -. made so far (Rs. | Investment since last a : ; |In Crores) as on [| extension (inRs — _. |.31.03.2017. | Crores) a re : Machinery/ Other Assets . | Machinery = aa a . Lote : _ 68.0305 oe ----- End of picture text -----

) -

(c) Details of physical progress till date:

. me _

==> picture [561 x 156] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . No,. ) Completion | Completion | completion of . . . | during last | balance work . a : | one year op BPO Blocks/Arrival > | work fo ee ie :  | Block/Food Court/Amenity | completedfor | =f . “|. | Block = PhasesD fo . LB| 2. | Parking Space/ Health & Fitness | 10% } [28%] 31.08.2017. | 4. |{areneGenerator Room.ou/Electricwore ’———[80%ee~~ | 80% ~ 31.08.2017 ----- End of picture text -----

|.||i<br>7<br>a||.<br>Substation/FO Generators (To<br>«|<br>|<br>oo<br>augmentMSEB Power)/Chiller<br>:/ Plant/UPS Room/ Distribution<br>substation/HSDYard<br>InternalRoadswithstreet<br>=<br>=—s«<br>[80%<br>|_| Lighting andsignage’s|||<br>+~+|80%||<br>+~+|80%||<br>+~+|80%|_<br> |31082016<br>no|_<br> |31082016<br>no|i||.|Pe|Pe|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||Boundarywalls/Gates/Fencing/<br>| 90%|||90%|||30.06.2017|~|||||.|
||<br>:<br>|||.|||.

16<br>no|_<br> |31082016<br>no|i||.|Pe|Pe|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||Boundarywalls/Gates/Fencing/<br>| 90%|||90%|||30.06.2017|~|||||.|
||<br>:<br>|||.|||. 76 |AllElectricalWork/BMS/Air<br>[70%<br>Conditioning/Fire Protection<br>| system/Rain WaterStorage.<br>a<br>od<br>.Tank/Gas Bank/Biogas Plant|f|«(|<br>:|70%<br>_||30.11.2017<br>TS<br>.<br>7|||||.|||
|a<br>DevelopmentofLandscaping/<br>.|30% ~<br>-|||||||30%<br>|||31.12.2017|||||.||
|.||||a SewageTreatmentPlant/Water |50%<br>.<br>TreatmentPlants<br>ef||fp|| 50% ~~ ~——‘|31.08.2017<br>ea||||||||ee|
|||||NetworkingPassiveWork|||70%|||||||||
||||||||||||||||||
|-||||Final FireNOC||||||||||,||
||oo|||BuildingCompletionCertificate||||||||||||
|:<br>.|||||<br>Recruitment ofEmployees/<br>NA<br>|||-|TNA||| 31.05.2018|||||||
|||cy<br>Induction /Training<br>:||||||||||||||
|,||||Golive<br>_<br>{NA|||TNA||[01.06.2018|||||||
|.||_||Detailed reasons fordelay:<br>.<br>BS|||||||||||7|
|—--.<br>Ot|oe<br>Asperthe entrepreneur, themajorreasonfordelayinimplementation oftheproject is<br>_<br>duetothe project size which itselftakes more time to complete, Almost all progress on<br>ground has happened during last one year only.The unit has also stated that construction-<br>- required multiple approvals in terms of building plan approval, provisional fire NOC,<br>.<br>Environmental clearance, which has consumed timeand after obtaining all suchapprovals<br>onlythey could startthe constructionwork:<br>.<br>a||||||||||||.||:|)<br>.|
|||||RecommendationbyDC:<br>ee||—_<br>-|||.<br>-||||||.|

h has consumed timeand after obtaining all suchapprovals onlythey could startthe constructionwork: . a||||||||||||.||:|) .| |||||RecommendationbyDC: ee||—_ -|||. -||||||.|




Recommendation byDC: ee —_ - . _ Development Commissioner SEEPZ SEZ has recommended the request of extension of LOA for period of 1 year up to 28.06.2018. 

/ ; 

_ The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. , ' (iv) — Request of M/s. Biomedical Life Sciences Private Limited in the Zydus - it - Pharmaceutical-SEZ, Matoda, Ahmedabad for extension of Letter of Permission (LOP) | : beyond 23-06-2017 for 01 (one) year more upto 23-06-2018. ee oe « LOP issued on (date): 06-06-2008, validated by DC, after prolonged judicial case, ; SO and thereafter by BoA/DOC after appeal ¢ Nature of business of the Unit:- 1) Foldable Intra Ocular Lens; and 2) Foldable Lenses. 

, 

7 o- 

ar .® No of Extensions: 02 (two) by DC, Kandla-SEZ: ive. 31-03-2011, and thereafter by - . : . e BoALOP aftervalid appeal up to (date) accepted23-06-2017 in the 61" meeting helda on 03-04-2014a -_ oe| _® Request: For further extension for 01 (one) year,up to23-06-2018. i "Present Progress: - a te Mo . . _ , (a) Details of Business plan: | - me : oo | SLNo. | Type of Cost : co — Proposed Investments - - 1. = _(Rs. in crores) _ ee |Lan& Buil **d** ing _ a | I oo FactoryPlant&Plant&& BuildingMachineryMachinery & Equipment Equipment fo|.|. 13.00750ne|750ne|ne|| -. Total 24.00 24.00 oe | (b) ‘Incremental ‘investment made so. far and incremental. investment since last extension:i-a oo te oe . | . S.No.

hinery & Equipment Equipment fo|.|. 13.00750ne|750ne|ne|| -. Total 24.00 24.00 oe | (b) ‘Incremental ‘investment made so. far and incremental. investment since last extension:i-a oo te oe . | . S.No. | Type of Cost of Cost ~ | Total” Investment Incremental investment oP | tnade so. far (Rs.:in|in| since last extension (Rs. oe ; crores) incrores) oe 2. Factory Building 11.19 fo 5.00 : | Plant. & -Machinery. &. & & 612 0°. 5.49. . _ : , ae | Equipment ee Ep oo Lf Total 17.31 1050 — oe oo -. (c) Details Details of physical progress physical progress progress till date- dateSg oo ae _ [S.No. | Activity | % completion completion | % completion Deadline for} - 

I oo FactoryPlant&Plant&& BuildingMachineryMachinery & Equipment Equipment fo|.|. 13.00750ne|750ne|ne|| -. Total 24.00 24.00 oe | (b) ‘Incremental ‘investment made so. far and incremental. investment since last extension:i-a oo te oe . | . S.No. | Type of Cost of Cost ~ | Total” Investment Incremental investment oP | tnade so. far (Rs.:in|in| since last extension (Rs. oe ; crores) incrores) oe 2. Factory Building 11.19 fo 5.00 : | Plant. & -Machinery. &. & & 612 0°. 5.49. . _ : , ae | Equipment ee Ep oo Lf Total 17.31 1050 — oe oo -. (c) Details Details of physical progress physical progress progress till date- dateSg oo ae _ [S.No. | Activity | % completion completion | % completion Deadline for} - es re oe during. last | completion of; ee| vo | i ore year’ balance work - Factory Building | *100% 7 2... | Plant &Machinery& ~ *100% “Equipment - : ' a - *as informed by applicant unit and as per current bysiness planning.

ompletion of; ee| vo | i ore year’ balance work - Factory Building | *100% 7 2... | Plant &Machinery& ~ *100% “Equipment - : ' a - *as informed by applicant unit and as per current bysiness planning. : a Detailed Reasons for delay: Delays from getting mandatory/regulatory approval. . _. from various agencies like Food and Drugs Control Administration for drug manufacturing | - licence: oO a . _ rs a ~ Recommendation by DC’ 2, - Le | . DC, Kandla-SEZ has recommended the requestof extension of LOP for a period of. | O01 (one) year up to 23-06-2018. re . , -.. The request may beplaced before BOA for its consideration. So ote | ee eee te bo wt ee DA Loses on . ee wo ee ee ete fe 

(v) Request of M/s. Bremels Rubber Industries Private Limited in the ASPEN SEZ. _(@ormerly Synefra SEZ) Palimar, Nandikaur :Village, Padubidri, Udupi Taluk, 5 a | Karnataka for extension of Letter of Permission (LOP) beyond three years up-to —--25,06.2018, Pe ee! Ce ~@ LoP issued on (date): 26.06.2013 ne = | o. Nature of business of the Unit: M/s. Bremel Rubber Industries Private. Limited = | ae 8 No of Extensions: Three extensions by DC Cochin SEZ. . : : ¢@ LOP valid upto (date) 25.06.2017 BO e Requests: For further extension for one year, up to (date) 25.06.2018 Co Present Progress: SO oO | - . (a) Details of Business plan: | aa : oO . Proposed Investment (Rs. in crores) ae Land& Building = ~——‘{ Rs.19.31 crores a . Machinery (Revised) Rs.4.12 crores . . a , — L |Total R8.23.43 crores ee . a , oe (b) Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment - _ : SI.

and& Building = ~——‘{ Rs.19.31 crores a . Machinery (Revised) Rs.4.12 crores . . a , — L |Total R8.23.43 crores ee . a , oe (b) Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment - _ : SI. No.‘since-| Type oflast Costextension:Total investment made | IncrementalooInvestment since| | 7 __( so far (In Rs crores last extension (in Rs crores) | - - i Land =. -& | Rs.17.08 crores: - Rs:3.02eecrores. po . . | Building . ee Da : . Rs.3.07 crores ..._| Rs.0.72:crores - nef — | |Total Rs.20.15 crores | Rs.3.74 croresoe | Cee a __(c) Details ofphysical p rogress till date:oe _ : Sl.No. | Activity % % Deadline for completion of a: .er . completion | completion balance work - . . ee a oneduring last _ . oo , 7 year | _ a 1 [Land & | 90% | 30% «31.12.2017, a eo Machinery | 75% _ | -20% _|:31.03.2018 , ae Total a | wy . . Detailed reasons for delay: DC CSEZ has stated that due to the poor market . condition the contract work got delayed. Power-connection expected within a couple of months. - : . Dy . ne | Recommendation by DC: _ oe i . a co . one yearDC up Cochinto (date) SEZ25.06.2018, has recommended the request of extension7 of LOP for . a perioda of a The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. : oe | 

(vi) Request of M/s. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in the VSEZ SEZ for extension of _ Letter of Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 of Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 beyond.07.06.2017 for a period of one year a period of one year period of one year of one year one year year upto 07.06.2018.

d.07.06.2017 Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 beyond.07.06.2017 for a period of one year a period of one year period of one year of one year one year year upto 07.06.2018. 

_ Letter of Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 of Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 Permission (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 (LoP) beyond.07.06.2017 beyond.07.06.2017 for a period of one year a period of one year period of one year of one year one year year upto 07.06.2018. a , | * LOA issue on (date): 08.06.2020 e. Nature of‘business of Unit: Manufacture of Pharmaceutical formulations - injection. e No of extension : 03 extensions approved byDC, VSEZ 7 7 ¢ LOA valid upto date :07.06.2017. i ol oe . e Request : For further extension for 5year up to date 08.06.2018. , . - Present Progress: . . oo . | a ne | ~ ‘(a) Details of business plan: - 7 ; . | : | | . - a SeSI.No Typees of Cost . _ | Proposed(Rs. In Investmentcores). . . d | Manufacture of pharmaceutical formulations— | «300.00 . oo injectables Dees oe oo - Oo a : fo |Total 300.00 oo | (b) Incremental Investment made so far and incremental investment since last : extension: i . . Oa . oo ~SLNo} | Type of Cost - |Total Investment | Incremental Doe - ae ; | made so far (In Investment since ~ oe . ; . : so Rs. Croes) | last extension (Rs. fo . oo, eo [In cores) ae : 1. | Building plant& machinery BI9A8. 5245 ee —(¢) Details of Physical Progress till date:: a . 7 7 | S.No |. “Activity | % Completion «|-% Completion during Deadline.

Rs. fo . oo, eo [In cores) ae : 1. | Building plant& machinery BI9A8. 5245 ee —(¢) Details of Physical Progress till date:: a . 7 7 | S.No |. “Activity | % Completion «|-% Completion during Deadline. for | ee | Jast one year (*) | completion of : eee ee ee ee __[balancework fo | , sl Building ‘|.--100% | Already completed | Already re . — , . 0 Gp completed) oO oo 2 Installation of 100% Already © completed | Already | me . DOOR machinery | - fe) _ -.| completed . . Detailed Reasons for delay: . a . a | | a oo _’ (*) The entrepreneur has stated that the work on building, plant and machinery completed a . . . in all respects. Presently. runs are in progress of different formulations. USFDA oo inspection for granting permission for commencing commercial production is ~~ awaited.— oo De a - So eo _ ~ Recommendation of DCVSEZ: BO coe DG,. - year upto VSEZ08.06.2018. has recommended,0 the request_ of extension of LOA fora period of one ~ : | wepeepeteclin eee ee pee hen oan ee a a sedenge Wepre + ge nenlig yee 

. .

VSEZ: BO coe DG,. - year upto VSEZ08.06.2018. has recommended,0 the request_ of extension of LOA fora period of one ~ : | wepeepeteclin eee ee pee hen oan ee a a sedenge Wepre + ge nenlig yee 

. . 

| The request is placed before BOA for its consideration. ne | se 7 Lo . Item No. 78.3 Requests for co-developer (3 proposals) . mo Se (i) —. Request of M/s. GAR & Son Builders LLP for co-developer in the sector specific —— SEZ for IT/ITES at Sy. No. 107, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy. District, Telangana being developed by M/s. GAR Corporation Pvt. Ltd. oo . 7 The above mentioned SEZ stands notified over an area 2:22 hectares... .['] oe | oo in M/s. GAR & Son Builders LLP hassubmitted a proposal for becoming a co-developer the aforesaid SEZ for construction, development, investment in.the development of internal and external infrastructure, leasing, operation maintenance of tower — III and Tower-. IV (Total 4 towers.are being developed in the SEZ, overan area of 2.63 acres of land. oe _, Co-developer agreement dated 25" March, 2017 entered into with the developer has. been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. 360 crores, a | : i ae DCThe VSEZ request has of recommendedthe co-developerthe is proposal. submittedOo for consideration of BoA. 7 . ~ (ii) Request of M/s. Felix IT Society for co-developer in the sector specific SEZ for _ : _ IT/ATES at Sy No. 141 & 142, Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana being developed by M/s. BSR Builders LLP . -. . .

loper in the sector specific SEZ for _ : _ IT/ATES at Sy No. 141 & 142, Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana being developed by M/s. BSR Builders LLP . -. . . The above mentioned SEZ starids notified over an area 1.16 hectares, . Do oe Mis. Felix IT Society has submitted a proposal for becominga co-developer in the. _ aforesaid SEZ to develop the authorized operations such as interior fittings and services, entire electrification of the building, HVAC, Fire Fighting Systems and all interiors like built ce oo ~ - to suit systems which will enable Plug & Play facility and also provide 100% power back-up, - uninterrupted power supply or as per.the clients requirements and the co-developer shall operate and maintain. on 4 : , been Co-developer agreement dated 24% March, 2017 entered into with the developer has. provided. The proposed amount of investment by the co-developer in the SEZisRs.14 crores. - Bot a . So 7 DC VSEZ has recommended the proposal. . . / | The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. . _ . - (iii) Request of M/s. Reliance Aerostructure Limited for co-deyeloper in the multi Oo . product SEZ at Nagpur, Maharashtra being developed by M/s. Maharashtra Airport _ . ; Development Company Ltd. (MADC) 7 - 7 ae , a The above mentioned SEZ stands notified over an area 1578.41 hectares. . | M/s. Reliance Aerostructure Limited has submitted a proposal for becoming a co_...

elopment Company Ltd. (MADC) 7 - 7 ae , a The above mentioned SEZ stands notified over an area 1578.41 hectares. . | M/s. Reliance Aerostructure Limited has submitted a proposal for becoming a co_... developer over an area of 1 04 acres in the aforesaid SEZ for development of Aerospace Park - oe with related infrastructure facilities and services in SEZ, for development, maintendnce and repair of infrastructure -at site including security, fire protection. system, water treatment, 2 

2 dee 

> . storm drainage & sewage. disposal, HVAC systems, landscaping & water - bodies, housekeeping services, transport,PMC services, access control & monitoring, road network, Hos commercial or industrial construction, advertising & marketing and other consultancy ‘services and undertaking other authorized operations as per Instruction No. 50. dated . 15.03.2010 issued by MoCl. They propose to undertake varied nature of activities related to 

> : - Aerospace Industry under Government of India Make in India mission, to name the few:~ - : a (i)(ii) AssemblyAssembly line and manufacture and manufacture ofof fixed Aerostructure wing aircraft.for commercial transport: osaircraft. — . . . So. : (ii)~ Assembly-lineCommercialtse.and manufacture= 9. ofRotaryen wing or Helicopters. forne both Defence& _ . ~ a (iv) aircraftMaintenance, platformRepairand systems:& Overhaul for transport, ) Helicopter and: Fighter : class . | y) Centre of Excellence, R&D, Training, Skill Development in the Aerospace Sector. oo _(vi) Machining,Cluster of SBUsComposites:wwith - Tier I, II & III Supplyoo.

Helicopter and: Fighter : class . | y) Centre of Excellence, R&D, Training, Skill Development in the Aerospace Sector. oo _(vi) Machining,Cluster of SBUsComposites:wwith - Tier I, II & III Supplyoo. ChaineeComprising Forging,: . (vii) Avionics, Electronic Welfare, Communications and other sub-assembly lines. (viii) Ancillary. and component manufacturing units to support after Sales. . ; - requirements/modifications ofusers, . an . oP . Co-developer agreement dated 19 June, 2017 entered into with the developer has - been provided. The proposed amount of investment by the co-developer in the SEZ is Rs. oo 101.12 crores. . So os 

> ~ DC MIHAN recommendation is awaited. ~ oo ee The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. oo ar . Item No. 78.4 : Change of Shareholding Pattern Cases (10 proposals) . ee With a view to promote the ease of doing business in India and that restructuring of : a entity/ business is a fairly common occurrence, BOA in its 69" meeting held on 23.02.2016 - - decided that provisions ofRule 74A shall not apply to SEZ Units that do not exit or opt out of the SEZ Scheme by transferring its assets and liabilities to another person and the SEZ Unit : 

> , continues to operate as a.going concern in the ‘situations mentioned above. The UACs ~ concerned, may consider such requests under Rule 19(2) ofthe SEZ Rules, 2006. — ; oO

and the SEZ Unit : 

> , continues to operate as a.going concern in the ‘situations mentioned above. The UACs ~ concerned, may consider such requests under Rule 19(2) ofthe SEZ Rules, 2006. — ; oO 

> _. aequisitions' - In-so farhappenas BusinessgloballyTransferas a result. Agreementof Businessis concerned,TransferitAgreement was explainedwhichthatresultcertainin 7 transfer of the SEZ unit ofthe Indian company on a going concern basis to the acquirer. The 

> 7 BOA decided that such cases resulting in change ofownership would be decided on merits by - 7 the Board ofApprovals on a-case to case basis. a Se es oo __* Proposal toincorporate the above decision of BoA in SEZ Rules, 2006 has been’ approvedand was sent to DLA for vetting. Cg : oe (i) » Request of M/s. AON HR Services India Pvt. Ltd., a unit inIT/ITES SEZ of M/s. . Candor Gurgaon One Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd., Village Tikri, Sector-48, Gurgaon - (Haryana)for transfer of shares exceeding 50% to another entity —‘regarding, ° oO The unit was granted LOP dated 22.02.2017 for setting up a unit in the IT/ITES SEZ of oo M/s. ‘Candor Gurgaon. One Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd. at Village Tikri, Sector-48, Gurgaon ee i cn ee i DR

oO The unit was granted LOP dated 22.02.2017 for setting up a unit in the IT/ITES SEZ of oo M/s. ‘Candor Gurgaon. One Realty Projects Pvt. Ltd. at Village Tikri, Sector-48, Gurgaon ee i cn ee i DR 

(Haryana) for service activities namely ‘Information Technology & Information Technology Lo . . Enabled Services namely Back ‘Office Operations, Call Centre, Data Processing, Human So Resources, Payroll, Revenue Accounting, Support Centre and website services’, a | _ Details of shareholding pattern of the company are given below: , SScn | Shareholding pattern before transfer: : , So Ds Name of shareholder we No. of shares held | % share - oo - . 1. Aon Mauritius Holdings _ 70,09,998 [99.99% . 2. Sandeep Kumar Aggarwal (nominee of | 02* on 0.01% — 9 . : : Aon Mauritius Holdings) . _. eae os oe Total, —_ 7010000 **_** | 100% . . oo _ *Though, at the time of project application, the unit had submitted CA certified shareholding * details showing only01 nominee share in the name of Sandeep Kumar Aggarwal. . . ‘Shareholding pattern after transfer (as on 03.05.2017): _ Bo , Name of shareholder — _.__| No, of shares hold | % share. | | . . 1. Blackstone GPV Capital Partners | 70,09,998 | 99.99% OE ; Mautitius) VI-C FDI Ltd. _ a dt. , 2. Sandeep Kumar Aggarwal (nominee of |02. © ~ 0.01% so Blackstone GPV Capital Partners} ~ ; . . : Mauritius) VI-C FDI Ltd. i oo. Total: | 7010000 - 100% ~ Recommendation of DC: a . oe 7 . Development Commissioner, NSEZ has recommended the proposal. No reason for | change in shareholding pattern has been indicated. . a . | .

o. Total: | 7010000 - 100% ~ Recommendation of DC: a . oe 7 . Development Commissioner, NSEZ has recommended the proposal. No reason for | change in shareholding pattern has been indicated. . a . | . The request ofthe unit is submitted for consideration ofBoA. 7 - (ii) Request of M/s. Moldex Composites Pvt. Ltd, Plot No.194 & 195 a unit in Surat SEZ, for transfer of shares exceeding 50% to another entity . The unit was granted LoP dated 25.02.2008 for manufacturing of Articles of Carbon’ oe . __ Fibers under chapter 68 of ITC(HS) Code and the same is valid upto 25.07.2020. 9 : . Details of shareholding pattern of the company are given below: - . . - . oo Shareholding pattern before transfer oor os Dob ee : _|-Name of shareholder No. of Shares held | % of shareholding oe Kishore Rajda 5,000 - {0.50% | on ee | - _Dinesh Jain 10,000 1.00% — _— , o | Sanjay Jain | 12,500 [125% a : Yash Ashar ‘1,250 0.13% ee ae | CO . TarlaGurpreet Rajda Ashar - _-_|~_| 1,2502,500 [0.25%[013% do : oo | | Dr, Robert Neumann _| 2,99,625 . 29.96% oe a ‘Jan Thomson ~ | 2,29,500 — F22.95% o 

| 

a . . 7 , | OS | 

! 

> , _ [Charles Neumann 4500 045% sd ae -| Mathew’George . , 10,000... 1.00%.. ees eee Parag Rajda 423,875. 42.39%. io cS , 

> | | Shareholding pattern after transfer , cee | 

> . | Name of shareholder ‘No. of Shares held. | % of shareholding. a foot vi : Kishore Rajda **|** 0.00% 5 : [YashAshar = | 000%: oO | / ae. [TarlaRajda 0.00% re a . oo Gurpreet Ashar =" 0.00% |.

> . | Name of shareholder ‘No. of Shares held. | % of shareholding. a foot vi : Kishore Rajda **|** 0.00% 5 : [YashAshar = | 000%: oO | / ae. [TarlaRajda 0.00% re a . oo Gurpreet Ashar =" 0.00% |. 

> ; _ .| Dr. Robert Neumann | 1,51,770_ |: 15.18% po a. Charles Neumann. | 4,500. 045% . . Parag Rajda 2,14,875 21.49% a 7 _ ‘Rockman Industries Ltd. |.5,02,605 ~*~. 50.26% ai OO **~** Recommendation of DC: . - se - — So ” Development Commissioner, Surat has recommended the proposal. No reason for. : ~: change in shareholding pattern has been indicated, , foes oe _. The request of the unit is submittedfor consideration of BoA, 9 ee 

> ) (iii) Request of M/s. Cargill Business Services India Pvt. Ltd., a unit in DLE Cyber ~ 7 City Developers Ltd. IT/ITES SEZ at Gurgaon (Haryana) for transfer of shares — exceeding 50% to another entity. ; : oO . } The unit was grantedLOP dated 31.05.2010 for setting up a unit in the IT/ITES SBZ of : 

> _ M/s. DLF Cyber City Developers. Ltd. at Sector-24& 25A, DLF Phase-IIl, Gurgaon . . , (Haryana) for service activities namely - ‘TTITES such as data processing, back office . . ~ . operations, revenue accounting services & support centre, ~ on - | 8 Details ofshareholding pattern of the company are given below: | Pon : - a - Shareholding pattern before transfer: | : Name of shareholder _| No. of shares held | ~ % share : . Cargill Asia Pacific Holding Pte. Ltd., 138 — 623879. 100% = |. OO 7 , Market Street, #.17-01 Capital Green, Singapore — .

fore transfer: | : Name of shareholder _| No. of shares held | ~ % share : . Cargill Asia Pacific Holding Pte. Ltd., 138 — 623879. 100% = |. OO 7 , Market Street, #.17-01 Capital Green, Singapore — . oe = So | (out of 623879 shares, 1 share is held by Munish a pe a Bhatia as nominee of Cargill Asia Pacific Holding | . an - | Pte. Ltd) oo oe foe , . 

Shareholding pattern aftertransfer (as on 19.01.2017): See : Name of shareholder _ Cargill India Pvt. Ltd., Y-65, Ground floor, Hauz No. of623879 shares hold %100% share - oo _ | Khas, New Delhi— 110016. ve ; oe : - (Out of 623879 shares, 1 share is held by Munish |” ee 7 Bhatia asnomineeof Cargill India Pvt.Ltd.) . . 7 Recommendation of DC: . - 7 **O** . ' | | Development Commissioner, NSEZ has-recommended the proposal. No reason for change in shareholding in shareholding shareholding pattern has been indicated, eS been indicated, eS indicated, eS eS . 

. 

, change in shareholding in shareholding shareholding pattern has been indicated, eS been indicated, eS indicated, eS eS . . The request of the unit is submitted for consideration of BoA. os . So (iv) Request of M/s. R. B. Industries, a unit in Kandla SEZ for change in partnership | deed and shareholding pattern aS ee 7 M/s R.B. Industries, KASEZ is an approved unit for manufacturing of Pan Masala _ andGandhidhamPan Masala. Containing Tobacco-Gutkha in Kandla: Special” Economic Zone, | - oT vide LoP dated 14.07.2014. The unit is requesting for change in partners of the oo. . _ . Details of profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm are given below: .

in Kandla: Special” Economic Zone, | - oT vide LoP dated 14.07.2014. The unit is requesting for change in partners of the oo. . _ . Details of profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm are given below: . - , a , : The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm before change in; | partnership: = . . co a oe , _ | SLNo. [NameofPartnersofPartners _[ShareinProfit/Loss] - 02. — | ShriShri DilipGitaprasad Sharma ShriShri DilipGitaprasad SharmaShri DilipGitaprasad SharmaGitaprasad Sharma 30%: z a , | _ ae Bhardwaj : a : Shri Gaurav Joshi Joshi 40% . : **O** 

, _ | SLNo. [NameofPartnersofPartners _[ShareinProfit/Loss] Sharma z a | - 02. — | ShriShri DilipGitaprasad Sharma ShriShri DilipGitaprasad SharmaShri DilipGitaprasad SharmaGitaprasad Sharma 30%: , _ ae Bhardwaj : a : Shri Gaurav Joshi Joshi 40% . : **O** , The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm after change. in partnership: a ae . . . oo ae Name of. Partners ! Share in Profit/ Loss| - A | 01._-| Shri Dilip Sharma ~ ~ 10% ; we, : 02. Shri Gitaprasad > 10% . ae ne 7 — Bhardwaj rs . 7 a oY |03.| Shri Gaurav Joshi T 40% | oO | 04, | Shri Arun 40% . ‘DC, Kandla SEZ has-recommended the proposal stating that there is more than 50% = change in-shareholding. : oo et ee . | **o** oo The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA. po . 

**==> picture [20 x 81] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
a<br>.<br>a<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>

l is submitted for consideration of BoA. po . 

**==> picture [20 x 81] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
a<br>.<br>a<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


sy (v) Request of M/s. Regent Ropes, a unit in Kandla SEZ for change in partnership oo . deed and shareholding pattern a oe ee . |. M/s Regent Ropes, KASEZ is an approved unit for manufacturing of Plastic Ropes, a Plastic Granules & Plastic Grinding and Trading activity of 1. Seesame Seeds, H.P.S. Ground = ' Nut & Cotton 2, FIBC Jumbo. bags, virgin Plastic Aglomarates and Adhesive Tapes as - amended from time to time vide LoA dated 22.01.2002. The LoA is valid up to 20.12.2018. oo ‘Unit has informed that Shri Hiren Dhirajbhai Shah and Shri Bhavik Arun Varaiya have retired as partners from the firm and Shri Raj Suresh Shah has joint as new partner. s, 

a Details of profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm are given below: | 7 | . . ~ . -.The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm before change in: - ; -... partnership: | - . co . oo Name of the Partner __ 7 Share in Profit/Loss: . . : a oe ShriShri HirenSuresh Dhiraj SwarupchandShah Shah Zz-_| 33.33%33.33%. ae7 . oS | Shri Bhavik Arun Varaiya : 33.33% _ : ~ - The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio. of the firm: after change’ in a partnership: oe : . a | Ss [S1.No. | Name of the Partner Shares Held — -|. ee . | ae — [2.____| ShriShri RajSureshSureshSwarupchand Shah Shah . [51% aoe a . | _ DC, Kandla SEZ has recommended the proposal stating that there is more than 50% _ 7 | change in shareholding. .

. ee . | ae — [2.____| ShriShri RajSureshSureshSwarupchand Shah Shah . [51% aoe a . | _ DC, Kandla SEZ has recommended the proposal stating that there is more than 50% _ 7 | change in shareholding. . . . : : a _ a __. The proposal is submitted for considerationofBoA. : (vi) ~ Request of M/s. Aksasia Creations Pvt. Ltd., a unit in Noida SEZ, for transfer of . shares exceeding 50% to another entity. re oo : i. The.above mentioned unit was granted LOA on 21/02/2005 for manufacturing of “G) . Garments including garmentsof leather; (ii) Leather & Leatherite-PU Goods such as‘ Back coos an Packs, Mobile Covers, Laptop & iPad Cases, Purses, Office bags, Photo Frame, Various Box’ . Covers, Wallet, Belt & Other Decorative Items made with Leather/Fake-Leather and Other _ Accessoriesand creating design for goods ete.; (iii) Gift Items with leather finish, Trims, co : “Covering and leather with metal combo such as brass, stainless steel, copper & other metals -used as combination with leather & Fake Leather (PU)”. - . ee z ‘Details of shareholding pattern of the company are given below: -. | Se | | Shareholding pattern before transfer: ee _ : ee a co ae . Name ofshareholder .. No. ofshares held % of shareholding ia | | Shri Arvind Singh ____200000 | Smt. Priti Singh | 22000 _ 

| 

- 

oo 

| = ! oo oe 

; i

tern before transfer: ee _ : ee a co ae . Name ofshareholder .. No. ofshares held % of shareholding ia | | Shri Arvind Singh ____200000 | Smt. Priti Singh | 22000 _ 

| 

- 

oo 

| = ! oo oe 

; i 

~ Shareholding pattern after transfer: - - | , oe , a a . oo “| Name of shareholder [ No. of shares held _ %o of shareholding: 7 | : : _ | ShriSmt. ArvindChhayaSingh Devi: | 133200044400 |60% - | Smt. Vatika Arya a 44400 a Recommendation by DC: a . a . | pattern hasDC, been NSEZ indicated.has recommendedoo the proposal.oe No reason foroechange in shareholding: oo a The proposal is submitted for consideration of BOA. a . | = (vii) Request of M/s. Aries International, a. unit ‘in’ Kandla SEZ for change in oo partnership deed and shareholding pattern tes es . oe Plastic| M/s Aries International, a partnership firmis an approved unit for manufacturing of ce bags, Salt tablets and trading activity of Plastic. Sheets and bags (all items-except . prohibited, mn canalized and restricted items), . ae - a oe _ Details of profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm are given below: a : _ .partnership:The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing. ratio of- the firm. beforea change . in . Sl. Name ofthe Partner “Share in Profit/Loss 7 cd - 7 oo a No. |. pariah rere ones Sf | 1. | Shri. Denu Ashok Kapania. PG . a ma Smt. Mala Denu Kapania : , a The shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm after change in oe partnerships oe Bo oo wi . Sl. |Name of the Partner Loo, ne Shares in Profit/Loss : oo a ore |_| Shi.Rahul Mahesh Yadav as .

reholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm after change in oe partnerships oe Bo oo wi . Sl. |Name of the Partner Loo, ne Shares in Profit/Loss : oo a ore |_| Shi.Rahul Mahesh Yadav as . .-° |23__| | Smt.GauribenShri.Denu'AshokMaheshbhai Kapania_- Yadav.So| 10%40%, so ps | LF DC, Kandla SEZ has recommended the proposal. on os co The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA. . ° . ae ; . (viii) Request of M/s. Prasar’ Enterprises, a unit in Kandla SEZ for change in ~ i partnershipdeed and shareholding pattern. os oe - | oo . M/s. Prasar Enterprises, KASEZ is engaged in’ the manufacturing activity of Plastic - . . . Articles, Acrylic in Primary Forms, Ropes of Plastics ete. in terms of LoP dated 22.03.1996 woe 

in 

: Le . : : 

as amended/extended from time to time. The change in partnership is owing to old age of = - Shri P.C. Parekh,° oS oe oo oe se ; Details of profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm are given below: —. = | ae . The. shareholding pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio’ of the firm before change in | partnership: oe : a . . Name ofthe Partners ~ Share in Profit/Loss — 7 Shri Pravinchandra C. Parekh re Oo | |3,[Smt.] Shri Atul[Chetna] Pravinchandra[ Atul][Parekh:] Parekh Bo | : The shareholding ‘pattern/profit-loss sharing ratio of the firm after change in eS ~* partnership: - a ei a on a LSL.No. | Name ofthe Partuers . _. Shri Atul Pravinchandra Parekh. _, {85%| Share inProfit/Loss | 7 . Smt. Chetna Atul Parekh _s% oe DC, Kandla SEZ has recommended the proposal. | lets . nT The proposal is submitted for consideration ofBoA. .- ; . a : .

ndra Parekh. _, {85%| Share inProfit/Loss | 7 . Smt. Chetna Atul Parekh _s% oe DC, Kandla SEZ has recommended the proposal. | lets . nT The proposal is submitted for consideration ofBoA. .- ; . a : . 7 (ix) - Request of M/s. Hewlett Packard Private Limited, a unit in TRIL SEZ, Chennai | for change of name to M/s. EIT Service India PrivateLtd. = co , M/s Hewlett Packard Private Ltd., was granted LoP on 25.02.2011 has submitted a ; a _.,rS **e** questrvice forIndiachangePrivatein name’Ltd. The fromname M/s. change Hewlettrequest Packard Globalis consequentSoft Privateon changeLtd.ofto their M/s,name EIT ~ effected in the RoC on 05.01.2017. Ss soe re . ‘The unit has submittedthe following shareholding pattem, = , ; Present shareholding pattern of M/s. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Private Lid. Le Shareholders Name | - | No of Shares,| % ofholdings | Indian/Foreign os . _. Held , 2 - : : Hewlett PackardBV. Colorado | 123999.92a a oo 2. Hewlett Packard Emmen|} 1” - | 0.08 — . ; Foreign © , oy BV _ re eee po. | - Changed shareholding pattern of M/s. EIT Service India Private Ltd. - ; : “| SO Shareholders Name | No of Shares % of holdings: Indian/Foreign ns a - | Held — oo |. | a ES Gatriam HoldingBV | 1028 82.90 : : oe RS Berlin BV | 17.01 ] , -._3. | BS Globalsoft Holdco BV_| 1 : . 

, 

; 

**==> picture [593 x 632] intentionally omitted <==**

gn ns a - | Held — oo |. | a ES Gatriam HoldingBV | 1028 82.90 : : oe RS Berlin BV | 17.01 ] , -._3. | BS Globalsoft Holdco BV_| 1 : . 

, 

; 

**==> picture [593 x 632] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
; oo<br>—_<br>Sl.No. List of Directors oS . oe a : - 7 7<br>_ | M/s. Hewlett Packard Global Soft M/s. EIT Service India Private Ltd. ne<br>«Private Ltd. a S/Shri :<br>co Lo Mr. Thomas Thoppil. — - Prakash Madakshira Sathyanarayana |<br>2. Mtr, Sridhar Reddy NVP. Tendulkar |” : 7<br>. Mr. P.V. Venkatachalam _ Marshal Correis __ 2 : :<br>DC, MEPZ has recommended the proposal. _- Be On<br>- | a .<br>The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA.. | cn oe , - | .<br>| (x). Request of M/s Cargill Business Services India Pyt. Ltd. a unit in M/s Primal ,<br>, Projects Private Ltd, SEZ for transfer of shares exceeding 50% to another entity. oo<br>The unit was granted LoP on 20.05.2014 for undertaking authorized operations namely .<br>, Information _Technology/ Information Technology — Enabled — Services (nature of ©<br>activities/authorized operations). a I ;<br>. | ‘Details ofshareholding pattern of the company are given below: . oo re<br>) o Shareholding pattern before transfer. ee oo . .<br>a -: | Name of shareholder - : No.-of share held T% of shareholding | - i<br>;<br>| Cargill Asia Pacific Holding . ° | 6,23,878 “|}99.9999° ns<br>| Pte.Ltd.( Non-Resident es re oO ,<br>i | Munish Bhati( a sanominee of | ~ . Poo. 00001 a a<br>os<br>* Cargill Asia Pacific Holding Pte. | ee -<br>oe . Share holding pattern after transfer’ a ;<br>.

| Pte.Ltd.( Non-Resident es re oO ,<br>i | Munish Bhati( a sanominee of | ~ . Poo. 00001 a a<br>os<br>* Cargill Asia Pacific Holding Pte. | ee -<br>oe . Share holding pattern after transfer’ a ;<br>. 7 a Name of shareholder: | No. ofshares held ‘| % of shareholding af 7<br>|<br>| Cargill India Pvt. Ltd | ~ " 6,23,878.-F'99.9999°<br>/<br>. | (Resident Company) oo ae eee er .<br>-Munish Bhatia (as a 4 ~ 10,0001 a .<br>nominee of Cargill : Woe eee<br>. —  LIndia PvtLtd | ee eee = )<br>oe; Company’sIn thisbusiness regard theand unit‘all hasassets informedand liabilitiesthat therein willrespect not beof anythe changesaid unitin the natureoccupied ofby © .<br>2 United Health Group shall continue. They have also undertaken that all Government taxation = = |<br>and other liabilities will continue to be completed with by the company. In this connection .  _<br>the required documents submitted by: the unit have been forwarded to DOC vide letter dated<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>

to be completed with by the company. In this connection .  _<br>the required documents submitted by: the unit have been forwarded to DOC vide letter dated<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


6, Recommendation by-DC, CSEZ: - nee a . a a : : It has been observed that there is 99.9999% change in shareholding of the company. | . ' ~~“ changeHoweverunderthe unitRule.has19(2)..neitherHenceproposedit is recommendedany transfer underthat Rulethe proposal 74 A nor doesmay beit[placed] envisage[before] any - the BOA for consideration, he ; os . , The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA. a 7 a - , Oo So | a -Ttem No. 78.5 : Miscellaneous Cases (8 proposals) an Co oe * 6) Request of M/s. ZF Wind Power Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd. a unit in M/s. Aspen eeee . Infrastructures Ltd., SEZ, Coimbatore for approval of the BoA for undertaking repair/reengineering etc., of gear box units manufactured by DTA units , a ~ DC MEPZ has stated that the same proposal was taken up in the BoAs 46" meeting a held on 31.05.2011 and the Board’s decision, was as follows “The Board after deliberations —- we7 boxes.approvedBoAtheclarified unit’s requestthat suchfor undertakingrepairs/re-engineering third partyactivities repair/re-engineeringwould be carried activitiesout onlyof gear on reoe i _. gearboxes imported from outside India and subject to. the condition that the repaired. gear: , boxes: including waste, scrap etc.,. should be re-exported as per Rule 18(4)(d) of the SEZ _. Rules, No repair/re-engineering activities are permitted for gear boxes etc., from DTA”.

epaired. gear: , boxes: including waste, scrap etc.,. should be re-exported as per Rule 18(4)(d) of the SEZ _. Rules, No repair/re-engineering activities are permitted for gear boxes etc., from DTA”. ce ~ - Since the Board’s decision for their same earlier proposal was rejected during 2011 as ' and more than 6 years have passed, under the present scenario and to compete in the market _ ; eo for survival, the unit has requested the same'again. . oe The unit has stated that there is no restriction in the SEZ Act, 2005 and SEZ Rules, =” 2006 for carrying out the above referred activity. Also they have stated that all the applicable a . duties and taxes will be paid by them on repair/re-engineering and reconditioning carried out , on gear boxes manufactured by third party and received by them from DTA. _ a Again the unit has stated that this is purely a business facilitation measure to curtail. - competition, will have a significant impact on their manufacturing activity and the ability to . withstand competition and the revenue from. the repair/re-engineering and reconditioning activity will not be in excess of 5% of their total revenue.. rs . . ‘The unit has stated that they are the only integrated wind gear box manufacturing - company in India having facility to manufacture, ‘test and assemble gear boxes. Also the unit ~ . - has stated that they will receive the payments for this type of service activity in Indian ., Rupees. mS , Be De MEPZ has recommended the proposal. Coe . 7 7 a ‘The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA. oe ee . _ ; _ . (it). Requests of M/s.

his type of service activity in Indian ., Rupees. mS , Be De MEPZ has recommended the proposal. Coe . 7 7 a ‘The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA. oe ee . _ ; _ . (it). Requests of M/s. Anita Exports, a unit in KASEZ for renewal of LoA for a . extension of recycling of plastic waste and scrap. og - ne MIs. Anita Exports was granted LoP on 15.05.1996 for procuring of worn and used oe clothing and for recycling plastic waste and scrap. The unit vide letter dated 11.09.2014 requested . 

ms | —, . 

'._. 

. . 

for the approval ofrenewal for recycling of plastic waste and scrap. The last transaction in plastic re | ‘recycling business during the year 2005-2006 was up to the extent of 25.40. lacs. errr mo . As the MoC is conducting and reviewing the policy in connection with plastic recycling . "Items, KASEZ extended LoA for six months. The LoA was further teiiewed Vide letter No, © -KASEZ/IA/GA-6498/Vol-V/7530 dated 13.09.2006 for five years subject to condition that the units engaged in. recycling of plastic waste should obtain all necessary Environment Clearances from GPCB. Further, the original LoA was split into two LoAs one for plastic recycling unit and . second - for worn & used clothing unit. Thereafter, they’ got a new plot on 24.04.2008 and they os Started construction. The construction works for plastic recycling was completed in March 2012 and were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc.

c recycling was completed in March 2012 and were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc.of policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. ofplastic recycling units by the Moc.plastic recycling units by the Moc. recycling units by the Moc. units by the Moc. by the Moc. the Moc. Moc. me, 

> and were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. were awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. awaiting the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. the finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. finalizationof policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc.of policy ofplastic recycling units by the Moc. ofplastic recycling units by the Moc.plastic recycling units by the Moc. recycling units by the Moc. units by the Moc. by the Moc. the Moc. Moc. me, co The .LoA was lastly renewed upto 30.11.2013 and they have applied for renewal of LoA ee _» _, forand plasticit was recycling.decided to The be withdrawn above proposal as the was DC considered had at that in time the 61* meeting not recommend held onthe proposal 03.04.2014as . . _. there was business activity iro. recycling of plastic waste/scrap in the unit since 31.10.2011. .

considered had at that in time the 61* meeting not recommend held onthe proposal 03.04.2014as . . _. there was business activity iro. recycling of plastic waste/scrap in the unit since 31.10.2011. . oe, DC, KASEZ has now forwarded the proposal for consideration ofBoA. | ; . . . Te The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. | rn oe . ' . oe (iii). Request of M/s Adani Power Limited., a Co-Developer in Adani Ports and | mo Special Economic Zone(APSEZ), Mundra for transfer of its Mundra Power Plant to its a _ Subsidiary Adani Power(Mundra) Limited... —- : _ **.** Adan Power Limited:, Mundra a Co-Developer is owning and operating aThemal - Power Plant in APSEZ. The Power Plant was established in 2007 andis spread overalandof = = eo 293.8810 Ha. It has capacity of 4620 MW(5 X 660 MW and 4 X 330 MW). Total investment _ . 7 | 

> . on the Power Plant is Rs 24,200 Crores with. 975 Nos. of employees, . | | 

> - ; Adani Power Ltd is a Holding Company having following subsidiary companies as Srno Nameof the ~ Business Capacity |. Station . . . Company foe. . . re 

> ; a - osA. . (MaharastraAdani Power).Ltd. _. TPP. | oo3300MW - . Tiroda _ cemo 2. Adani Power TPP = |_-:1320MW Kawai | . . . 3: _(Rajasthan)Udupi PowerLtd. | ~~ TPP 1200MWoS, “Udupi: | 7 . Corporation Ltd. : : 4,

aharastraAdani Power).Ltd. _. TPP. | oo3300MW - . Tiroda _ cemo 2. Adani Power TPP = |_-:1320MW Kawai | . . . 3: _(Rajasthan)Udupi PowerLtd. | ~~ TPP 1200MWoS, “Udupi: | 7 . Corporation Ltd. : : 4, 

> | . -#Adani Power -. a - _ ( Jharkhand) Ltd. a 5. Adani Power - ES | _ (Mundra) Ltd ; ; , : - #Setting up 1600 MW TPP atGodda. - | i | Adani_ Power Limited now proposes to transfer. the Letter of Approval (LoA) . including authorized operations, assets and liabilities pertaining to Mundra Plant facilities to . 

> | _. its subsidiary company M/s Adani Power (Mundra) Ltdon a going concern on slump ae exchange basis to undertake seamless continuity of the Co-developer’s activities, subjectto ’ oe, statutory and regulatory approvals, as may be required. ; ane an - Valuation Details- ra Te — _ | a Adani Power Ltd.. got valuation of the TPP, Mundra done by M/s BSR and Associates Se nO LLP. Vide: valuation report dated 06.06.2017 as considered by the Boardof Directors of == Adani Power Ltd. and Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd., following is the summary ofvaluationi 

> _. | Enterprise Value of the plant. oe 22474.80 , . a — [Less:Debt2171.80) a ~ -..: | Less: Debtlike items’ ~~ | (934.70) oo a we , _ | ValueAdd: Cashof theand plantCashpostequivalentsDebt-and Cash - | 337.600106.00 i a , -...... Shareholding Pattern after implementation of Scheme of Arrangement- Adani Power . ane (Mundra) Ltd. > : Te So on ee a 

> . Pre Scheme of Arrangement:ren . | oo - ae - [Name of the Shareholder - | No.of shares held’ | % of the shareholding . So | . Adani Power Ltd( Including | 49500 99% | oe

Ltd. > : Te So on ee a 

> . Pre Scheme of Arrangement:ren . | oo - ae - [Name of the Shareholder - | No.of shares held’ | % of the shareholding . So | . Adani Power Ltd( Including | 49500 99% | oe 

> . nominees) —_ -_ |e || Adani Power (Tharkband) Ltd [500.1% . _ +. | Total Shareholding — f50000, | 100% Post Scheme of Arrangement:ee oe . -. | Name ofthe Shareholder **_** | No. of shares held | % of the shareholding | Adani Power Ltd( Including | 106049500. | 99.99%. ; mo SS | nominees) ee ae oT . | / -_. | Adani Power (Sharkhand) Ltd 500.| [0.01% | ed : Total Shareholding - — _|.106050000 | 100% ye SO . DC, APSEZ has recommended the proposal.» oe . ee ree | . a 3 The request is placed before'BoA for its consideration. . 7 oo oo | (iv) Transfer of ownership of M/s eBay India Pvt. Ltd. a unit in Primal Project Pvt. ° Ltd. SEZ, Bangalore to M/s ES Online Services India Pvt. Ltd: under Rule 19 of SEZ _ . 

> Rules, 2006 CO ' Be . Be . 

> . - The above mentioned unit was granted LoP dated 02.06.2015 for ‘undertaking . . _. .. - activities/authorizedauthorized operation operations).namely “CustomizedThey have.Informationsubmitted Technology.a proposal Software”(naturefor change in theof . ; _ entrepreneur from M/s eBay India Pvt Ltd., to M/s ES Online Services India Pvt Ltd, under -.-UnderstandingRule 19of the SEZwhereRules,both 2006.the entitiesThese twohave companies haveagreed on an in-Principle entered intobasis a Memorandumthat M/s eBay of wee India. Pvt Ltd would sell and M/s ES Online Services India Pyt'Ltd would’ purchase on a

itiesThese twohave companies haveagreed on an in-Principle entered intobasis a Memorandumthat M/s eBay of wee India. Pvt Ltd would sell and M/s ES Online Services India Pyt'Ltd would’ purchase on a 

. going concern basis the entire software development business of M/s eBay India. Pvt Ltd., . . continue(the SEZ unit).. After transferof SEZ unit on a SLUMP SALE basis, the SEZ unit would to operate as it currently operating, though under M/s ES Online Services IndiaPvt = i _.. Ltd and will undertake to abide by the terms and conditions subject to which LOA was . 7 initially granted to M/s eBay India Pvt Ltd., in terms of Rule 19 of the SEZ Rules; 2006. © They have also undertaken that all Government Taxation and other liabilities will continue to | ' bethe completed following with documents. by the which company. were forwardedIn this connection, to Ministry they vide alsoletter have datedsubmitted115.2017 the copy of **0** _ en _,.. 1. Certificate of Incorporation of M/s ES Online Services India PyvtLtd. oo . : . 2. Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of M/s ES Online Services . - India Pvt Ltd. - alte . RL cies . a 7 , . . _ 3. Copy of Memorandum of Understanding signed by both the companies. a . . . 4. Details of Directors of M/s ES Online Services India Pvt. Ltd. in relation to taking OW over SEZ unit of M/s eBay India Pvt. Ltd. a . . Ses . 5. Declaration and Undertaking from M/s ES Online Services India Pvt Ltd in relation to . taking over SEZ unitof M/s eBay IndiaPvtLtd an .

ing OW over SEZ unit of M/s eBay India Pvt. Ltd. a . . Ses . 5. Declaration and Undertaking from M/s ES Online Services India Pvt Ltd in relation to . taking over SEZ unitof M/s eBay IndiaPvtLtd an . oa In this regard the unit has informed that there will not be any change in the natureof = . company’s business and all assets and. liabilities in respect of the said unit occupied byM/s 2, eBay India Pvt Ltd shall continue, They have also undertaken that all Government taxation and other liabilities will continue to be completed withby the company. — - oo - ~ Recommendation of DC, CSEZ: . . . oo It has been observed that in the instant case, there is only changeof entrepreneurand ssi . the unit has neither proposed any transfer under Rule 74A nor does it envisage any change . . under Rule 19(2).. Hence it is recommended that the proposal may be placed before the BOA oe for favorable consideration. Se re a : oe, a The proposal is submitted for consideration of BoA, rs i . ~ -(v) — Request of M/s. T&V Holdings Private Limited ‘co-developer in the sector : specific SEZ for IT/ITES at Vallancherry village, Guduyanchery, Chengalpattu TK, oo Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, being developed by M/s. Estancia IT Park — - . - Limited for surrender of SEZ area to an extent of 1.71 hectares. Ss ee Dose _ M/s. T&V Holdings Private Limited has been granted co-developer status in the ' above mentioned SEZ by the BoA in its 63" meeting held on 18" September, 2014 setting up, operations and maintenance of the area, over an area of 5.27 hectares for carrying out the a .

tatus in the ' above mentioned SEZ by the BoA in its 63" meeting held on 18" September, 2014 setting up, operations and maintenance of the area, over an area of 5.27 hectares for carrying out the a . following authorized-operations, in accordance with the co-developer agreement entered into | , with the developer:on - 1. Development, maintenance & repair of infrastructure at site including Security. - services rae a te re 2. Building management systems for an optimal level of building intelligence, . . - facilitating predictive maintenance = wo 3. ‘Fire Protection system ~~ . . ve, . —... 4. Water treatment ) ne | Ye _ 5. Storm drainage and Sewage disposal ) , 6. Water supply distribution network and sewerage system network | - . , 

> So | oT, -House-keeping services ©. | , . 

> . 8... Access control and monitoring Pas 2 

> : : . -- 9,..10. RoadCentralized networkair conditioningcea with systems for. human and machine comfort “11. Adequate amenities/ support services like restaurant/ food court, Conferencingto ~ = ; support the main activity os a: ae . 12. Common area Maintenance services; These relate to operation and maintenance of . common areas, terraces/ refuge areas etc. - oo Doe es Now, the co-developer has requested for permission to surrender the SEZ area to an

nce services; These relate to operation and maintenance of . common areas, terraces/ refuge areas etc. - oo Doe es Now, the co-developer has requested for permission to surrender the SEZ area to an 

> ~ andextentto retainof 1.713.56hectareshectaresof ofland landback to developto'the developerinfrastructuralon accountfacilities.of change in business plan— —_ DCObjection Certificate. MEPZ videfrom letterAuthorized dated 04.05.2017Office andhasstated recommendedthat since the the proposal alongwithland. will remain with No ° a the Developer and is not being de-notified, the need for recovery of dues may not arise. . a ne ‘The request of the co-developer is submitted for consideration ofBoA. . Co . (vi) ‘Request of M/s. Jubilant Infrastructure Limited a sector specific SEZ for . a Chemical at village vilayat, Taluka Vagra, District Bharuch, Gujarat, for addition of | area of 18.55900 hectares. | | . a : Oo _ Mys. Jubilant Infrastructure Limited SEZ stands notified over an-area of 107.16.50 . hectares. _ . . oe | Now, the developer has requested for addition of 18.55900 hectares of area (which is. — moreSEZ thanis 125.72400010% of existinghectares.area)The landto the abovefor existing mentionednotifiedSEZ therebySEZ is onmakinglease the-totalfrom areaof.Gujarat , Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), a Government of Gujarat undertaking, and the _ additional area now’sought for notification is also on lease basis from GIDC. . ) DE KASEZ has recommended the proposal. = Co a . , The proposal of the developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. ee

onal area now’sought for notification is also on lease basis from GIDC. . ) DE KASEZ has recommended the proposal. = Co a . , The proposal of the developer is submitted for consideration of BoA. ee 

> : (vii). Appeal of M/s. Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, a unit in MEPZ against order dated | 18.01.2017 passed by UAC, MEPZ. eo - 

> | ~~ ‘Phe aforesaid appeal was considered in the 75th BoA meeting held on 8th March, Co eo 2017. After hearing all concerned, it was noted’ that the Unit’ is in SEZ only, and its authorized operation is development of software (IT/ITES) and therefore it was felt that these ) 

> _ services are required to market its product and increase exports.. Therefore, after detailed . . deliberations, the appeal was allowed for the addition of the above services required for its = : oo authorized - operations viz. Sponsorship services, Selling of time or space slots for 7 managementadvertisements, Promotion or marketingof brand of goods/services/events services, Event oe services and Tour operator services bythe Unitin SEZonly. : 7 . mn, . However, the DGEP vide D.O. letter dated:11.05.2017 has stated that vide D.O. letter oe _ dated 10.03.2017 is has requested DoC not to consider the appeal ofabove unit on the following grounds:= oe : oe

er, the DGEP vide D.O. letter dated:11.05.2017 has stated that vide D.O. letter oe _ dated 10.03.2017 is has requested DoC not to consider the appeal ofabove unit on the following grounds:= oe : oe 

(a) An unit/developer in a SEZ is entitled to exemptions from Service Tax on taxable © - . services provided to carry on the authorized operations under section 26 (1)(e) of the oe , SEZ Act, 2005. : . (b) The enabling notification No. 12/2013-Service Tax’ dated 01.07.2013 issued’ in this . : regard also clearly states that. duty free service can be availed by SEZ unit or , — developer for authorized operations only... ne - _ “. (e) These services are not needed for authorized operations of developmentof software + by the unit and this view was also taken by the UAC on its own wisdom while . , rejecting the proposal ofthe unit. = ae . - It has been stated that appeal has been allowed unilaterally by DoC as the request to - _ + add these services under the ambit of authorized operations of the unit has been objected to by DoR. It has further been stated that under the Trarisaction of Business Rules 1961, DoC is _-» bound to have consultation and concurrence of DoR on all fiscal concessions and Policy _. issues having revenue/financial implications in SEZ matters. As the'said decision has revenue vs implication in terms of exemption from Service Tax, DoC should have. considered the views of DoR as being communicated vide the said DO letter dated 10.03.2017 while deciding the oe appeal on this issues.

cation in terms of exemption from Service Tax, DoC should have. considered the views of DoR as being communicated vide the said DO letter dated 10.03.2017 while deciding the oe appeal on this issues. It has been pointed out that as per Section 8(6) of the SEZ Act, 2005, all oO : ve thereservationacts of thein Boardincorporatingshall be thesedecidedservices by generalunderconsensusthe ambitof theof authorizedMembers. Since,operations, DoR hadthe. . oe decision of the Board is unilateral and not based on general. consensus and therefore, this - decision is not as per‘the provision of the SEZ Act. =. 0 ~ : It has further been stated that DoR has sufficiently raised. its concern on this issue ~ which seemed to be not being considered by DoC while allowing the appeal of M/s. Zoho oO . Corporation. As this may have revenue implication in future in terms of exemption benefit of . Service Tax to the unit, it has again requested to reconsider the views of DoR contained in = 8 said DO letter dated10.03.2017, . Oe Placed before'the BoA for consideration, . (viii) Request of Medium Irrigation Project Division, Govt. of Gujarat, Ankleshwar for the permission of allotment of 2500 (approx) sq. mts. of land in Non processing area oe "(Port Area) at Dahej SEZ, Dist.. Bharuch for boat berthing for Narmada parikarma _ — 0 DC, Dahej has informed that the’ Medium Irrigation Project Division, Govt. of _ Gujarat has requested for permission of allotment of 2,500 (approx:) sq. mts of land in Non a . Processing area (Port Area) in Dahej SEZ Dist.

that the’ Medium Irrigation Project Division, Govt. of _ Gujarat has requested for permission of allotment of 2,500 (approx:) sq. mts of land in Non a . Processing area (Port Area) in Dahej SEZ Dist. Bhatuch for Boat’ Berthing facility for ae Narmada Parikrama Pilgrims and this request was discussed in the Unit Approval. Committee : meeting of Dahej SEZ. Developer of Dahej SEZ i.e. M/s. Dahejd SEZ Limited has agreed to . a _ allot 2500 (approx.) sq. mtrs. in the Non Processing Area (Port Area) of Dahej SEZ. The applicant informed that no SEZ benefits will be availed by them to construct the jetty, and - they will obtain all necessary approvals and permissions from the concerned departments to _ construct the jetty. After detailed deliberations, it was observed that Natmada Parikarma is an _ event of great religious importance in which large of pilgrims take part. The jetty will be. yO constructed. in the Non-Processing Area without taking any SEZ benefits therefore it was decided by the: members of UAC that the proposal of the applicant for construction of jetty | _ may be forwarded to the BoA for approval. ' ne . .., On the basis ofUAC decision DC has-reconimended the proposal for approval. He : eS 5 

**==> picture [595 x 702] intentionally omitted <==**

| _ may be forwarded to the BoA for approval. ' ne . .., On the basis ofUAC decision DC has-reconimended the proposal for approval. He : eS 5 

**==> picture [595 x 702] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
~ Rule Position — ee ; re ao<br>-<br>: Rule 11 (1) of SEZ, 2006 provide as under:-~ aa :<br>~°"-" - () Where the social or commercial infrastructure and other facilities are =<br>ce - permitted to be used by both the Special Economic Zone and Domestic Tariff a<br>: Area entities: No exemptions, concessions or. drawback shall be admissible for oe<br>- creation of such infrastructure.. The Customs. duty,‘ Central Excise duty, Service<br>_<br>_ Tax, and such other Central levies and tax benefits already availed for creation of © :<br>. : such infrastructure shall be refunded by the Developer in full, without interest. .<br>.. *- However, in casesof short payment of the amount interest will have to be paid at<br>- the rate of fifteen per cent per annum from the day the said amount. becomes<br>payable to the date of actual payment. Utilisation of SEZ land shall be subject to<br>oe +» following conditions:. _ ss Boe<br>:<br>. (a) the land is to be put to only such use which is as per the regulations of the<br>os concerned State Government or local bodies; oa a ne<br>, : (b) if. any exemption of reftind has been taken from State or local taxes like,<br>So<br>_.. Stamp duty, change of land uses, etc., the same shall be refunded back to State nf<br>_ Government or local authorities and a certificate to this effect shall be — a<br>--.

l taxes like,<br>So<br>_.. Stamp duty, change of land uses, etc., the same shall be refunded back to State nf<br>_ Government or local authorities and a certificate to this effect shall be — a<br>--. * produced from-the concerned authorities; a pha Oh, me,<br>(c) No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the concerned State Government shall<br>7 be produced before the consideration of the request by Board of Approval :<br>_ (BoA). State Government may issue No Objection Certificate (NOC) taking oe,<br>-. . into consideration (a) and (b) above. Sa mo<br>— . - The request is placed before BoA for its consideration. a . ae oe,<br>OS . Item No. 78.6 : CancellationofFormal Approval =» a<br>So In terms ofRule 6(2)(a) ofSEZ Rules, Formal Approval is validfor a period of three .<br>. years by which time at least one, unit has to commence production and the SEZ becomes<br>operational from the date of commencement ofsuch production. Proviso to this rule provides | a.<br>for extension of this Formal Approval by Board of Approval, for which the Developer will<br>, submit his application in Form Cl to the concerned DC, who shall, within 15 daysforwarditto. |. .<br>the Board with his recommendations. Sr , —— Oo ,<br>7 In the following 62 cases, the developers have neither requested. for extension of LoA eo<br>oo nor for notification. As such it seems that the developers are not interested in the project. The — oe<br>-. matter is placed before BoA for further directions. The details of cases are as under:- .<br>7 1. CSEZ | *15 (As per Annexure A) | *Out of 15 cases, one developer M/s.

in the project. The — oe<br>-. matter is placed before BoA for further directions. The details of cases are as under:- .<br>7 1. CSEZ | *15 (As per Annexure A) | *Out of 15 cases, one developer M/s. Cochin Port Trust |<br>7| S ooos hassuch,expressedDC, CSEZinabilityhas recommendedto proceed withfor thecancellationproject. As.|of| .<br>; Formal Approval, 2. So :<br>coe, 2... ; NSEZ_ .| 16 (As-per Annexure B) Out of 16 cases, developers of 9 cases (M/s. Delhi State |.<br>.<br>oe ae Indust. & Infra. Develop. Corp Ltd., M/s. Delhi State.,<br>; ss re Indust. & Infra. Develop. Corp Ltd., M/s. Pioneer<br>cee Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Sukhm Infra. Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Lark | | .<br>. _ a Projects Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Mansarovar Indust. Develop.<br>. ok ___.. | Corp.. M/s. Uttar. Pradesh State Indust. Develop. Crop.<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. 

| 

applied. for LoA extension nor notification of SEZ. As|. such, DC, NSEZ has recommended for cancellation of | ; Formal Approval of thése 9 LoAs,

br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. 

| 

applied. for LoA extension nor notification of SEZ. As|. such, DC, NSEZ has recommended for cancellation of | ; Formal Approval of thése 9 LoAs, 

-“. Ttem no. 78.7 Appeals before BoA Appeals). a . . ".. @ — Appealof M/s. Steria (India) Limited, a unit in NSEZ against order dated 25.05.2017 passed by UAC, NSEZ.._ | pS OS oo ; ' - M/s, Steria (India) Limited had set up three SEZ units in 2010-11 at Sea view , _. Developer Pvt. Ltd., lot No. 20 & 21, Sector 135, Noida, Uttar Pradesh with the objectiveto = consolidate the existing EoU and also to set up new SEZ units for new business co ; Co, _ opportunities. The Steria. SEZ unit-1 and Steria SEZ unit-3-were granted LoA upto 30.08.2021 and. Steria SEZ unit-2 granted LoA upto 30.03.2021. Therefore, on 13.01.2017 ~ - - they applied to NSEZ to unify/merge the present SEZ units (three) of Steria India. | SO Gist of order appealed. against — NSEZ vide letter dated 25.05.2017 informed the appellant that the proposal was. considered_. in the approval committee meeting held on 05.05.2017 and in view ofDepartment = | . of Commerce letter dated 23.03.2017 . that there is no specific provision in SEZ Act and . Rules for merger of LoAs, the Approval Committee decided to reject the proposal. Oo Lo — a Contents of Appeal HE : . The Appellant in Appeal dated 29.05.2017 (Annexure-1) to NSEZ to unify/merge the present SEZ units (three) of Steria India owing to following reasons and as per ease of business policy ofGovernment of Indiaz-. = ne rr oo a ; . « Single SEZ unit.

xure-1) to NSEZ to unify/merge the present SEZ units (three) of Steria India owing to following reasons and as per ease of business policy ofGovernment of Indiaz-. = ne rr oo a ; . « Single SEZ unit. will enhance the operational -efficiencies from business — os . '_. perspective and these units are operational for more than 5 years and are meeting =» . e theSteria NFESEZcriteriaunit.2as& per3 theare proposed SEZ Rules.to merge.. with Steria. SEZoe Unit-1, whichis_ not 7 : . : having income tax benefit from the beginning and proposed merged: single SEZ Lo _. unit will not be eligible for Income Tax benefits without Revenue loss to the , Government of India, . me , : e Further, they have stated that there will be no impact in forecast ofRevenue and NFE earning due to proposed unification/merger ofthe SEZ units. — = _ However, the DC NSEZ/UAC vide letter dated 25.05.2017 on the basis of decision-of . Approval Committee in its. meeting held on 05.05.2017 has observed that there is no specific ~ _ provisionmerger of in LoAs SEZ Actof Unit-2 and Rulesand forUnit-3 merger ofinto LoALoAsof and Unit-1 accordinglylocated rejectedin IT/ITES the proposalSEZ of M/s. for . oo we Seaview Developers Pvt. Ltd, at Noida (UP). BO

s SEZ Actof Unit-2 and Rulesand forUnit-3 merger ofinto LoALoAsof and Unit-1 accordinglylocated rejectedin IT/ITES the proposalSEZ of M/s. for . oo we Seaview Developers Pvt. Ltd, at Noida (UP). BO 

“° * “Agerieved by the above decision passed by the UAC/NSEZ, the units have cited that | | | a earlier similar cases/proposals had also come up before the BoA:| oo, ) - (a) The BoA in. its 52" meeting held on 30.03.2012 in respect of M/s. RBS India | Developnient Centre Private Limited for merger of two SEZ units located inITTITES : _-.. SEZ at Gurgaon, Haryana being developed by M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Limited had : '-. -remanded the proposal back to UAC for its consideration and decision. Subsequently, the UAC in its meeting has approved the merger of two SEZ units subjec **t** o condition that the unit shall not be entitled for income tax benefits. The existing projections of ; | ms - _ both LoPs be merged and LoA’granted to unit-II be stand cancelled for all intent and _ . . purposes. . re bo . oa! 7 . —- (b) The BoA in its 54" meeting held on 30.07.2013 remanded the request of M/s. Sapient . a Consulting Private Limited for merger of two SEZ units (Unit-II & Unit-HII) located , on _. in ITATES SEZ of M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Ltd. at Gurgaon, Haryana back to UAC ~ nS with the. directions that proposals which are within the competence of UACs/DCs — 7 need not be brought before BoA. Subsequently, the UAC after due deliberations _ , decided to approve the merger of LoA dated 03.11.2011 granted to Unit-II with LoA . - dated 03.11.2011. granted to Unit-III subject to.

t before BoA. Subsequently, the UAC after due deliberations _ , decided to approve the merger of LoA dated 03.11.2011 granted to Unit-II with LoA . - dated 03.11.2011. granted to Unit-III subject to. execution of a revised Bond-Cum-. LUT & further subject to: condition that the unit shall not be entitled for income tax : benefits. The existing projections of both LoAs be merged and LoA granted to Unit-II - . be stand cancelled for all intent and purposes (Annexure-2). . . | , ~ _Rule Position a a ; | There is no provision in SEZ Act and Rules for such mergerofLoA, . . an _. The appeal is placed before the BoA for consideration. : ee Pee, Gi Appeal of M/s. Onnsynex ‘Ventures Private Limited, a unit in NSEZ against oe order dated 23.05.2017 passed by UAC, NSEZ — . . ce Mls, Onnxynex Ventures Private Limited vide its letter dated 24.04.2017 applied to ro . NSEZ for setting up of a warehousing and trading unit in NSEZ for different types of _ Warehousing (general warehousing, Temperature Controlled Storage, Cold Storage, Vault 7 _ facility), Trading and Value added services such as repacking, relabeling ete. with modern & . oo _ advance facilities. Po pe Gist of order appealed against , oe i a | +» NSEZ vide its letter dated 23.05.2017 informed the appellant that ‘the proposal was © oot. . considered by the Approval Committee on 03.05.2017 and that the proposal was for setting _ . upRules,a warehousing2006 and thatunit therewhichis canno beFTWZset-upsetonlyup inin anNSEZ.

was © oot. . considered by the Approval Committee on 03.05.2017 and that the proposal was for setting _ . upRules,a warehousing2006 and thatunit therewhichis canno beFTWZset-upsetonlyup inin anNSEZ. FTWZIninview termsofofthisRuleand18(5)referringof SEZ.to / ts section 15(3) of SEZ Act, 2005 the Approval Committee rejected the proposal with So — - observation that thepromoters if they want to set up a unit for trading and value added © . services, they may file a separate application. oo Be ‘ . fol. 

a Contents of Appeal. - . : noe OS ce a bo ; ' . The appellant in its ‘Appeal dated. 08.6.2017 (Annexure-3). has stated that the proposal was made for Warehousing arid Training unit under Rule 76 of SEZ Rules, 2006 in , a mult-product SEZ; however it has been misinterpreted; and instead was considered as an © So __. application-ofwhich requires FTWZfor an unitestablishmentunder terms of aof FTWZ Rule 18(5)and’ hence& Rulethe 5(2)(c)applicationof SEZwasRules,rejected2006 on a 7 grounds of non existence of FTWZ setup in NSEZ vide letter dated 23.05.2017. . - | Rule Position ae Bn | (a) Rule. 18(5) of the SEZ Rules provides that the Units in Free Trade and Warehousing , . ae . Zones or Units in Free Trade and Warehousing Zone set up in other Special Economic , _ Zone, shall be allowed to hold the goods on account of the foreign ‘supplier for dispatches. as per the owner’s instructions and shall be allowed for.trading with or , _.. . without labeling, packing or re-packing without any processing. — . 7 .

count of the foreign ‘supplier for dispatches. as per the owner’s instructions and shall be allowed for.trading with or , _.. . without labeling, packing or re-packing without any processing. — . 7 . (b) Rule 76 of the SEZ Rules treats Trading and:warehousingas “services” ce ee . . oO The appeal is placed before the BoA for consideration. oe . : a (iii) Appeal of M/s. Sujan Oil & Gas Infra Logistics, a unit in KASEZ against order dated 11.04.2017 passed by UAC, KASEZ : . . ! M/s. Sujan Oil & Gas Infra Logistics, a unit in KASEZ granted approval on a 22.10.2009 for warehousing activity of oil exploration activities. The appellant vide application dated 04.03.2017 has requested for broad banding to include imported fertilizers a in bulk and to repack the same into small bags of 5, 10, 15, 20-kgs and 25 kgs andeven S50. kgs bags for export to gulf countries. - _ > . oS | oO - Gist of order appealed against a . en . The UAC/KASEZ. vide letter dated 10.04.2017 has informed that the proposal for . 7 broad-banding to include fertilizers of warehousing in the existing LoA has been discussed in the 111 UAC meeting held on 22.03.2017 and Committee after due deliberations decided to . oe reject the proposal of the unit as fertilizers are very sensitive items and also’ its import is possible only through State Trading Enterprises. — co . | oo Contents of Appeal . | : oo - 3 _ - . The appellant in its Appeal dated 12.5.2017 (Annexure-4) has stated that they had | '. requested for permission for broad-banding for import of fertilizers in bulk including urea for .

: oo - 3 _ - . The appellant in its Appeal dated 12.5.2017 (Annexure-4) has stated that they had | '. requested for permission for broad-banding for import of fertilizers in bulk including urea for . ot exports after re-packagingin smaller packets. Further, the appellant stated that fertilizers fall’. Soe under chapter 31 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and all items falling under this Chapter is -.. _. freely importable except urea falling under Chapter heading 3102.10 00, import of urea is channelized and allowed through State Trading Enterprises, i.e. MMTC and India Potass a Limited subject to para 2.11 of Foreign Trade Policy. Pe . .. - Further, the appellant has stated that for export all items restricted are required license | and approval of BoA as per instruction no. 47 dated 04.03.2016 issued by DoC. The appellant has stated that Approval Committeehas erred in considering that fertilizers can be imported - 

oe 

._ 

only through State Trading Enterprises. However; the fact is that all fertilizers are importable Do. freely except urea which can be import only through the State Trading Enterprises. The oes _ instruction no. 47 dated 04.03.2010 issued by DoC has clarified that any SEZ unit can import ee prohibited items subject to condition that is such case’shall be placed before BoA, sothat the. _ . -. views of DGFT and DoR can be taken before taking the decision. However, the Approval— — ... Committee erred in terming the item. as sensitive, as fertilizer is no where termed. as a co ‘sensitive item. ee oe, : SC

d DoR can be taken before taking the decision. However, the Approval— — ... Committee erred in terming the item. as sensitive, as fertilizer is no where termed. as a co ‘sensitive item. ee oe, : SC 

_ . - Rule Position So . . _ Dee | Proviso below Rule 19 of SEZ Rules provides that the Approval Committee may also a _.approve proposals for broad-banding, diversification, enhancement of capacity change in the items of manufacture or service activity, if it meets the requirementsof prodof r **u** lection,18. oo oe aa a ‘The appealis placed before the BoA for consideration. . 

i 

oo 

: 

**==> picture [578 x 728] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
woo,<br>Se wa) ZD<br>. . \<br>S zz<br>.<br>;<br>S . ~) wa ft Ze s<br>ibaaol c ealee 2S< ra . 33 : ~a3| ag) 2& EE? Sl Senr Z|©zo| mewe<br>oc]  @ a an Als g Sales els<br>Ae) ES]os mB DO ygoo “GBsBlea] S ameie 5)<br>8 2: .B,a] ge] 3 dt<br>, anst dz BR. a8 Bgars oy 2] 8 ae<br>m4 RN. oe —+—3 2 § EE] Be Sle S| Sie e\go<br>. a a) ¢& ||:<br>: ; E aoe)§ 5 af8 5 S <S aaP) “s|gSo, 3a)Ela)21Bl §53] | aS<br>: oOfe)a= |. <5=|Sol@ & RPaeBe . ey) . EgAyet~ Ey25 2z}“|| 4]<rm | 2] §y se|era |<br>. as 8 =a < <2<br>BS.i > : 5 2. =o 3 . e. s‘ [es]> sm aSERSSEeY — tzsg =&ESEa!BSoS32 YiY Fics5=We» 58 WiOIAols.BIE Ss5s 5els2/8or<br>‘ : eo a 28 Be QE s Fé ><. = S op QFGQ vBa5 BSS f a ; |=5139 .<br>= Rid SEP— . FERREFer og$2 EE8 aeSt 8 osa Rl og 5 . ;<br>BEea:a ZB.a] PSEEES5 3 PoeESPELEOSa yp2 & EeS|FPopeeeYo  g282.

5els2/8or<br>‘ : eo a 28 Be QE s Fé ><. = S op QFGQ vBa5 BSS f a ; |=5139 .<br>= Rid SEP— . FERREFer og$2 EE8 aeSt 8 osa Rl og 5 . ;<br>BEea:a ZB.a] PSEEES5 3 PoeESPELEOSa yp2 & EeS|FPopeeeYo  g282. =: wel5:aaRYz8| Jox2%EA] Qe[| 23a]= o&=<br>BEE 3s gps 5S ma 3 | is<br>BS ro<br>Be El Sie ic a SiaGs ies)ge ae82365| 25 i S| Be<br>; =a<br>Z| . Zz ain ZzB zlZ| Zox om2 Ak6<br>| - - 18<br>a ; —j .<br>= =<br>at HSRPaCaS a SI .. 2<i asD = a] a ;<br>= aa 3 og<br>‘ =<br>\ pmBaege e es?Ssa saE NN] &. =i A a mney A].AL Bl . ies= . Fils=IS .<br>: . : — : NI©o<br>; i<br>afgg— rsbo Swl tNs . x. tows= i>a 4). ala1 er0cae ¢boS =S°a 6PIN|=<br>:<br>BL oe ——|55 |.<br>“><br>el<br>Z2/ F5| Fzez] s so] 8<br>. S32] =] 38 ° 4 wle. ey<br>8EasE| 28 ee5 = BF8sg ge]Se) 28)s2 2] 24)8 220s &|saE &<br>eT<br>_> eee B Nig a<br>oO S|]. aaoe wo is>& S a = A<br>: 58 SE) 2s Sol.. 5 S Ele al»Flo ele.S14<br>-ewSF 5asCn> Eswas =eos a> t 2 a |Saio I.<br>2Lb a> Ba — SB) Ss<br>oo - =eBh ang — go£ Balrc=ieelS|: : seSeeyBe ro esgS=nwBoSsSe) l ooanaes)ee!OFCfa}SSSalis=28 =|aBlkShe els BrggSieB/S 5fon§a slg215ai<br>i=]=3= —N oOeg ’&S2— : . 23=] 3soSgO ; aoea.5= welfooS| | ¢omOf4 3izE> (| ent)2>Sisols |SN -<br>a =§8 ty , PFty ty © Re bol.<br>eeN —_Oo= 2== rorS8 —8la= S|g S& BIAaa@ |sfo) :<br>A<br>es<br>2)= N<br>=<br>=<br>o<br>-<br>o<br>_ 8<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


- 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
.<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


‘ 

:! bas to 

i 

: 

aan og\ : . 

.

-----**<br>


- 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
.<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


‘ 

:! bas to 

i 

: 

aan og\ : . 

. 

```text
||||||||||||.||||||_||||||5<br>a2]<br>-<br>i)||my||iA||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|'|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|bas|||||||||||||||||||||oo|.|Olea<br>fe]<br>iF8| Se]<br>BEB)<br>BIRS|) &S}<br>°<br>Fis<br>SyB e<br>eg<br>$5<br>5<br>2.<br>.<br>g|<br>3<br>“4||cS<br>FE<br>ae<br>28<br>=<br>=|||-<br>:|
||||||||||||||||||||||,||“|<br>6<br>=e<br>&,<br>=.<br>&||o<br>BL||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||g<br>~<br>&||||||
|oo<br>‘<br>.||,|||,|||||.|||<br>a<br>oo<br>;||||||||||:|<<br>ilaot<br>:<br>S252SPSS shes] Fuze<br>SpODPE<br>2SRi eS<br>Be<br>BsAB SE<br>SSSIRES| BEE<br>ovuy<br>Sails<br>2 € ge<br>oe<br>Ry<br>B &<br>of<br>S#REEs<br>se Ex] bss=<br>8.3.<br>ag<br><|5<br>=<br>rE<br>fo<br>fon<br>a<br>—<br>="<br>=<br>FS<br>SefEReSe<br>rs!| cs].<br>Tome 221<br>Fsio<br>0.<br>oe<br>°<br>Sip vie<br>aes 5<br>eS<br>nie 4<br>Na<br>ad<br>2<br>gq<br>.<br>aes<br>=<br>’<br>BS<br>eo||||||||
|||||||an||||||||o|||||||.|a|we TQ<br>;|||ae|||
||.|||||||||||||||||||||3|Fo<br>:||||||
|aan<br>og\<br>\<br>.<br>_|||.|||,|.|,||.<br>oO||||He<br>.|;|||||,|;||—<br>><br>.<br>a}<br>3<br>=<br>=<br>,<br>ras<br>ee)<br>ee<br>a<br><|<br>a)<br>5<br>=<br>w<br>ies}<br>aes!<br>g<br>it:<br>oe|=I<br>4<br>6<br>><br>3<br>a<br>Bp<br>oo||||.|
||||||||||;|,||.|||||||||||©<br>©<br>oo<br>:<br>NS)||||||

br>=<br>,<br>ras<br>ee)<br>ee<br>a<br><|<br>a)<br>5<br>=<br>w<br>ies}<br>aes!<br>g<br>it:<br>oe|=I<br>4<br>6<br>><br>3<br>a<br>Bp<br>oo||||.|
||||||||||;|,||.|||||||||||©<br>©<br>oo<br>:<br>NS)||||||
||.|||||||||||||oO,||||:|||:|’<br>.<br>.|Foal<br>Sxl<br>2m<br>3 8Se<br>gli gel]<br>ae<br>adie a<br>al<br>a3<br>BFF<br>SP)<br>SF<br>cat<br>ua<br>we<br>p||Pog<br>go<br>a 3<br>5,=<br>tn|;|||
|||||)||||||||||.|‘||||||||REloFl 2B)<br>oo &<br>—~Pieol Sel<br>oF<br>t<br>ine]<br>.<br>No<br>:||a &<br>~ B|:<br>to||||
|‘||||||||||||:|:|:<br>.||||||||:|— Als a<br>oa<br>oS<br>A a<br>“el<br>a]<br>@ el.<br>7 8<br>Qa<br>fam<br>fam<br>a||7.<br>NO<br>eI<br>.<br>re||||
||||||||||||||;|.<br>,||oo||||||:|oH<br>><br>g<br>=<br>3<br>5<br>=<br>;<br>ZA<br>><br>x<br>*<br>foo<br>i)<br>1)<br>.|.-|¥.<br>yy 8<br>S 0<br>=8<br>NS|in|:||
||||||||||;|||||||.|||||||2<br>iS<br>H||||||

==> picture [19 x 6] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- . ‘ ----- End of picture text -----

: : : ° . : :

==> picture [2 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

’ a

. ‘ ----- End of picture text -----

: : : ° . : :

==> picture [2 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

’ a

||||||||||||||||||||||iN||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||||||||7|||||*<br>-||||||ta||
||||||||||||||||||||.||Vo||
||ae||||a|af||ue|N|_<br>We||Ne)||_|Ne<br>—|oo||||||.|
|os<br>.|;|.<br>:||||ze<br>;<br>5<br>2)<br>Fe)<br>ey<br>~|<br>e| <br>A<br>Y)<br>on<br>.<br>°<br>'sS<br>g<br>Lad|ZS <br>gre<br>Bt<br>>| <br>BE]<br>eS]<br>S|<br>3 8]<br> <F<br>CA<br>—_<br>gs<br>a<br>a.<br><<br>x]<br>me||"<br>igs!<br>lone:<br>an)<br>o<br> Ses Ser Sls}. § §<br>A<br>B25<br>8 8s 8 Bik}<br>2s<br>9<br>e Zi6 gs<br>o Sle<br>=e &.<br> So<br>og Siege<br>ge<br>g<br>“EBESESSE)<br>2)<br>GF <br>BeESseey]<br>ol<br>8<br>825<br>2s. 2 spy<br>z<br>|<br>Fis<br>oe<br>Y Ble<br>=F<br>|<br>als 3 3S 3 Sig<br>&<br>y<br>=<br>o.<br>a,<br>S<br>io)<br>=<br>2<br>TA|.<br>w<br>ee ed<br>Zle3 gles<br>ee)<br>~IA &<br>OQ<br><<br>:<br>=]<br>=]<br>:<br>i)<br>5<br>a<br>a<br>sh<br>.<br>Poy<br>&.<br>a<br>g||||||S FIZIOS CIAO<br>UO<br>Solis & Slo & &<br>S15<br>gS<br>=<br>B®<br>eg =<br>3 =<br>@ |e |S<br>ws<br>2)<br> ZCREEZE<br>eSPeseess<br>|8<br>525 ©<br>@5/<br>IP OEP ye<br>Go|<br>2 ges&<br>oO<br>-<br>Oo<br>=,<br>—<br>—<br>= 2).<br>ge).

& Slo & &<br>S15<br>gS<br>=<br>B®<br>eg =<br>3 =<br>@ |e |S<br>ws<br>2)<br> ZCREEZE<br>eSPeseess<br>|8<br>525 ©<br>@5/<br>IP OEP ye<br>Go|<br>2 ges&<br>oO<br>-<br>Oo<br>=,<br>—<br>—<br>= 2).<br>ge). 22<br>a<br>a<br>Qa<br>=|<br>5<br>+<br>ot<br>;<br>;||SE]||.|Z<br>=|o<br>So<br>at.<br>©<br>slel<br>Sh]<br>FE)<br>ala<br>=<br>aipl.<br>ary<br>fe<br>ioe<br>3<br>.<br>a||||
|ee<br>,<br>a<br>=.<br>=<br>S22) Sl<br>>fynl<br>3<br>By]<br>/<br>BE<br>s2|<br>Zz<br>B,||||||||-<br>ao)<br>f|<br>&<br>8]<br>Z|BE)<br>PR<br>2%]<br>g|os)<br>S<br>ec:<br>&<br>4S<br>4<br>‘Ss2<br>a<br>3<br>=<br>8]<br>B28)<br>2]<br>BE)<br>|.<br>sg]<br>8<br>=|2<br>OS<br>pan rnn<br>-<br>#B<br>fs<br>5<br>=a<br>3]<br>oo ce<br>ES<br>—<br>23<br>ee <|<br>| 88<br>5<br>5<br><<br>el<br>Bos<br>ge);<br>se<br>3<br>%<br>1B||||||||||||:|
|.:|7||||aa]<br>Zaf<br>&8)|8 &<br>ope<br> go<br>a 7<br>Q||¥|<br>s|<br>e|<br>a<br>=|ww<br>¢8|<br>BS<br>wn<br>>|o<br>mB ue<br>.£/ ee<br>z<br>5<br>ne<br>Oo<br>g|,|=|<br>a]<br>Fy<br>3||Ss<br>© og<br>38<br>Ze|o<br>i)<br>- g/g<br>E.<br>EE<br>.||||=<br>&<br>al--1oe<br>—)<br>>||:||
||\|.||||5|ot<br>5||z|. <br> ne)|£<br>v|z<br>=<br>vu<br>a||\<br>=<br>a||oo<br>Tr!<br>a|S)<br>S)<br>ia<br>m||||&<br>219<br>e|¢||;||
|aan<br>:<br>,|||||=<br>i<br>-<br>oo<br>_<br>=<br>a<br><S oe<br>ede ed<br>|<br>=<br>S|<br>28)<br>_| |<br>Fie<br>—<br>'<br>pre<br>.<br>yy) £&<br>ee<br>ee|oe<br>=<br>=<br>&e)<br>.

|&<br>219<br>e|¢||;||
|aan<br>:<br>,|||||=<br>i<br>-<br>oo<br>_<br>=<br>a<br><S oe<br>ede ed<br>|<br>=<br>S|<br>28)<br>_| |<br>Fie<br>—<br>'<br>pre<br>.<br>yy) £&<br>ee<br>ee|oe<br>=<br>=<br>&e)<br>. 45<br>21s<br>os}.<br>&<br>tm<br>Se<br>esl<br>ti<br>ns<br>g 5<br>"<br>W<br>“Bl<br>2 &<br>“a<br>7)<br>“a<br>wn<br>wn<br>28<br>sy<br>|<br>=<br>:<br>.<br>o<br>g<br>:<br>oe<br>N15|||||||||||||||.<br>o<br>:|.<br>o<br>:|.<br>o<br>:|
||||||=<br>ua|_||.<br>;||ue||.|||oo<br>:|.||i="<br>is|8a<br>=||||
|;|||||:<br>§<br>a|Ne}<br>tS<br>®<br>"||In<br>B&|A<br>;|Bs<br>ve<br>4|os<br>wn|||aN<br>oo|rn)<br>a<br>uo<br>N|||»<br>8|oO<br>%<br>N|||;|
||uo|,<br>||.|z2|<br> wf 2<br>22]<br>s =<br>BS]<br>Sl<br>peal<br>N<br>coPW] <br>~~ S<br>aS)||22]<br>3 2<br>2] <br>5,=<br>sf)<br>2Pl <br>So]<br>i<br> SS)<br>S<br>Ds)||32)<br>3g<br> 22] <br>a = <br>SF)<br> Zw]<br>eS<br>t<br>VRS!<br>S<br>SE]|$2}<br>32]<br>| 22] 22] <br>3<br>So<br>3 of<br>3&8<br>3g<br> 22]<br>22}<br>22]8) <br> 6 F<br>=,=<br>6 = ig<br>—<br>wF**l** oF | wR<br>gel <br>aw<br>aw<br>—bvl<br>Sel<br>DO<br>iy O<br>“Ho<br>ane)<br>X<br>i<br>4<br>io<br>Sse]<br>Set<br>o><br>el<br>Sw<br>&S<br>S<br>Sal<br>jag}<br>jae<br>ol<br>Se|||||=|<br>| ==]<br>22) <br>3g<br>3g<br>3g<br> €2)<br>| 22)<br>22/ <br>=,=<br>5 =<br>S.<br>/<br>ue<br>tuo<br> eB | asl<br>as<br>oF<br>—pl ww<br>oo<br>NS<br>NS<br>hy ><br>i<br>R<br>ed<br>Fl<br>be<br>Se<br>Sal<br>Sa<br>Se<br>&P<br>S 8||] <br> |<br>;||.JE<br>= <br>2|=<br>JE<br> 5/8<br> Se<br>;<br>=<br>Ble) <br>elm}<br>°<br>= |<br>=<br>ies]<br>sis|y<br>“><br>:<br> oy||—|

i<br>R<br>ed<br>Fl<br>be<br>Se<br>Sal<br>Sa<br>Se<br>&P<br>S 8||] <br> |<br>;||.JE<br>= <br>2|=<br>JE<br> 5/8<br> Se<br>;<br>=<br>Ble) <br>elm}<br>°<br>= |<br>=<br>ies]<br>sis|y<br>“><br>:<br> oy||—|
||;<br>:|.|.|a<br>)<br>oS<br>2 §<br>= 8<br>No<br>:<br>a||a<br>ee<br>=<br>°<br>a<br>.<br>Q<br>—_<br>NN||a<br>4<br>ES<br>x<br>)<br>So<br>gS|a<br>a<br>§<br>&<br>iS)<br>So<br>Ss|a<br>a<br>Fy<br>o<br>gs}<br>_&<br>_e<br>@<br>2<br>NR<br><2<br>><br>~N<br>S<br>Oo<br>4|-|a<br>©<br>S|<br>g.<br>o<br>ay<br>-N<br>2<br>a||A.<br>©<br>§<br>3<br>o<br>a<br>NY<br>a]<br>a|a<br>a<br>Bl<br>Og<br>WS}<br>ws<br>'<br>Oo 2<br>oe<br>SEI<br>Sé8<br>S<br>5<br>Re!<br>Re!|||acd<br>IR)<br>5/5<br>P/E)<br>a<br>Z\S<br>gO<br>oO ls||a,<br>|<br>|<br>Ke|||
|.|||||||||||||||||||||||
||;|||||||||||||||;|||fea]<br>ON]||||
||||||||||||||||||||5||||
|||||||||||||||,||||o8|||‘||
||||||||||||||||||||5||||
||||||||||||||||||||-<br>-|™|||
||||||||||||||||||||i]||||
||||||||||||||||||||ey||||
|||||||||||||||-||,|||>||||
||||||||||||||||||||Cc.||||
||||||||||||||||||||5||||

1oooON

: :

==> picture [576 x 663] intentionally omitted <==

|||||||i]|||| ||||||||||||||||||||ey|||| |||||||||||||||-||,|||>|||| ||||||||||||||||||||Cc.|||| ||||||||||||||||||||5||||




1oooON 

: : 

**==> picture [576 x 663] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
. : ‘ - yoy<br>. - 1oooON<br>roFSS? cs ecoleBs |S 5 S\f ny= £we :<br>oo S28 sis|.< BEI & 7<br>: BSA oa Se PI]: & Ble =<br>; . ; eeepcee y oaS) SsoeSle|4| 3_ oOv<br>Lo . fs & mils 32/8 =] g.<br>SO Ag gl . . |& 2 erl > 8.<br>.<br>. a By Of oir] O8 FI y<br>. #) 88 8 g § g z]<br>e| 33 B 34 el-=CtCS<br>. =] aif <2 a & a oO<br>: pa. st ‘ a=<br>a TOITx FsoO a)Foo g Sa Yes .<br>: ; & ¢ = 5 Se ao Lo} wn B=<br>ele o & os 8 8) is) Be<br>eA & E BBS ‘o] [Ae aca<br>S| 7 oo. ¢ mee)<br>| £0 eS S| le > B |<br>a a} Bgl Be B|<br>to, P Roo P led<br>. ana Yo Ss o<br>; CC} «& a 5 & z<br>: : . + a &, 2<br>; qo BY<br>. = as] og .<br>;<br>oO oe les _ fo ce<br>( pabasee 2 BSEe<br>: : | Bethe gss a SEes 4<br>- | oo . Saehesea sg oH 7 8 og ©<br>:<br>; | S8BEasz 2 5622<br>: RB & © B les °<br>. | -| ~s 3 = S S|<br>: . & Go oo oO<br>: . >a] om Box Smt oa ae<br>an - 3 8° 3 . 3 2 3 2 3 So 3 8<br>:<br>: ‘  . : 25S) 238]5 25Sal | “25S8l es}25 2825<br>‘ je“ FB a a7) |. 2<br>, ey 1S) to] = Ny] —<br>Ss) 3s 2] | 2); $ oy.<br>BRLas} op BY wy & gepro & SF<br>ms =e} Fs} | Hs) Fs) Sal<br>oOo, So > > i > o> > ><br>: . Sea Sa one Sa Sa oa ;<br>eR) eB ° 8 oe| [@s 3s<br>. o a @ o @ oO<br>a row a a a - ;<br>|<br>| sl sl S~| | 2 |<br>. 7 4 E Gi Noid &<br>; ; RS . v > oOo oo icy<br>; wo ND v = 8 Rel ’<br>. ° S NX Cs to<br>.

Sa one Sa Sa oa ;<br>eR) eB ° 8 oe| [@s 3s<br>. o a @ o @ oO<br>a row a a a - ;<br>|<br>| sl sl S~| | 2 |<br>. 7 4 E Gi Noid &<br>; ; RS . v > oOo oo icy<br>; wo ND v = 8 Rel ’<br>. ° S NX Cs to<br>. : ooS aS 2S ot& S2<br>‘ a : oO :<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. woe 

= ‘ 

: 7 : 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


**==> picture [1 x 1] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


’ . 

. ’ 

: 

} 

. 

- 

. 

. 

. 

4 

**==> picture [2 x 15] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


**==> picture [577 x 704] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
7 Zn<br>" DF<br>. . =cel =38 e| —BISbe oOq|4 :<br>\ aS ie) oF Sis: | ° ><br>. S| mot O| IF = |<br>. . Sion & 3 3 Blo<br>. o = o H . < ’<br>. . w gS 5 i oat<br>| ‘mao oy 2 |e|<br>, ada SS de] 2 =| & Els<br>@ 9! Fs | &. | Su<br>; . i aés]a es38 : oe<ale 15~~=<br>’ Sh Se]. a ; =<br>: | BF | | ata<br>! 3 . ‘ 4 os<br>a ) :<br>: : ole<br>. : e1S ;<br>: . S |. 9 a5<br>~ oo =|sREeSekEe s| | - Bis<br>: g we Re RS Ble n<br>: , 2,5 BY eee gesE — elNM]a<br>. ; a we |. ; = 1g<br>; . : - —: _ = = of=, ;<br>. :<br>. ; °° - Ss Bol<br>a . iy oe& ™. .<br>.<br>ve . . [38 ° oa Blobe 2 Nie .<br>: s&| 52 SEE | * “5<br>. - : . 2Q. . oOwe j. N oS en .<br>|<br>: - a el 9 & oy Bly & Fle<br>NB] BY © Plz & ele |<br>an oe ti we] 8S & S Ply mn | 5<br>ee: ; we on Sale & Bs<br>: . oS > oo opi? & o- (s<br>S a a |%. 2 ~1O<br>.

- : . 2Q. . oOwe j. N oS en .<br>|<br>: - a el 9 & oy Bly & Fle<br>NB] BY © Plz & ele |<br>an oe ti we] 8S & S Ply mn | 5<br>ee: ; we on Sale & Bs<br>: . oS > oo opi? & o- (s<br>S a a |%. 2 ~1O<br>. oS ay : a| & = | x<br>, ae | @ N<br>;<br>, ‘ 2 a -§ > | | ‘<br>< S5 a am<br>a . to= eel& , £10Ms<br>, . : oO .<br>. ; S a 2 - ar (><br>. fi<br>: a}<br>: . oOit<br>. =|<br>: -<br>:pe<br>:S<br>*<br>. oa<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


: 

oo 

. 

: 

' 

, 

. . 

**==> picture [435 x 706] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
es)<br>|<br>|<br>a] ES ae<br>,<br>; Z| & Ele @ Slr Z|4 |. :<br>; Q eran aol o SE | o|-]<br>. . : S. & |S o 218 eh |S<br>Lol. , ee 2. cack =<br>£ O oe ie<br>. ow] c=) Os <ip<br>g a= gp  Qbks<br>a S Be ae<br>S 3 ar<br>=e = = 1S<br>‘ 0 +sy i<br>. a a<br><. a BIS 2 a ¥ cis<br>a Ria ot a. & s<br>. eer ee t= $|5<br>, FREES) ES ae sla!<br>. a4 28 g 8 e & om<br>gS FF eo ¢ dx a 5<br>BUYERE Ss ae ss =<br>me mo, FBBESs|a, &. S| foa3 a ha=| ©2<br>fee= Rs 5 : _ |e<br>:7 , ” : ~ ale-<br>: | Zl. ¢ Oo.7| | ts.ale<br>, . ol 3«2 =z $|Eve ,<br>ry a 8 ao &|o<br>=o @ 5 = . = 1S<br>. , ® € os. g 2a ie :<br>: 38 & py | &<br>z = ; 3 N | & a<br>° of<br>: =><br>. &s eS r |R<br>, — a} 8 S] | Eg<br>. 3 2 3 a<br>F 7 62) 22]7 Fel] ele—<br>‘ ' 3s5 =6 8 Zad38 2kgf “IE .<br>ee = & BONS).<br>: , : = leet2 we i= .<br>; (BL go& oo = Sie] 35<br>, ~ 2) Sg co SIS} et .<br>| Sei 25 Se lol ef<br>RB] && KE} | Fl} Cc<br>5 S. a >IN<br>5<br>. 9 z I lol<br>w2S= 58§2 S)adwR i) moS|%ie) CD+<br>: .& &o gl<& :<br>a | ES<br>.<br>.

(BL go& oo = Sie] 35<br>, ~ 2) Sg co SIS} et .<br>| Sei 25 Se lol ef<br>RB] && KE} | Fl} Cc<br>5 S. a >IN<br>5<br>. 9 z I lol<br>w2S= 58§2 S)adwR i) moS|%ie) CD+<br>: .& &o gl<& :<br>a | ES<br>.<br>. se] Se Sas p<br>ia NL on” ZIN<br>. S'S. os, mh oS a<br>, nel ag Se yw 5<br>oe . g}el. g|«2 | Bape é2 2ne:<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. 

- - - . : 

a 

. 

**==> picture [23 x 7] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
a<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


; 

. 

, 

, : 

> ; ae\ : * . 

’ 

. 

. 

! 

_ | 

. 

oo 

. 

. 

: 

‘ 

.o6 ne 

. 

| 

> .“ ,oy . . . 

1’ 

. 

~ ‘ 

i) 

**==> picture [595 x 729] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
,<br>,<br>tS. Zn .<br>bN<br>|<br>N<br>| | _ ee ee "2° Fleho<br>=) 75 Om OD VIA). Z|wR<br>@ om<br>SSEYS|- E) FOS aa a5 Ss) 7g 8i\¢ Sls<br>a5 el 6 b& =8 <aS| =<8 2 <si|4 35 2 araa B/So<br>2 o = 2 o |p. a tz 3 Se Flt]<br>F<br>. ¢3| g¢ e) SEB) 2s] 28) Be) Fel | slay<br>. , - aSeAeee 6@|-o8 aa@3& pons 5gp, SB&<gEis)25Bley eB)z eB) 26]eSB5 ; s<)iS=| . ys.g.=o8se@]-).8 . a=2/2).3/5gc .|<br>} 8 eel z E 2] £8 Ar<br>, #| £2 5 8 5 E 7 |= ,<br>, g ee ee ees S =<br>oo 5 zB. ~ & 3<br>& |<br>7) — 3 -<br>. -ZBS Ye] USE 2B Ee¢ < <= ae 5 |a8<br>eSe| £3) $28) 38 Bg § E Bl && an ml<br>; BES) So] 288) f= QP Z 2 al as 5 |=<br>. Bs " Y a my a] IS g G 2 .<br>EoD hae ec ‘ <= » Wo 8 $ Ss .<br>| As| #8) S23) FS) Bex g |<br>: as| & S| z Pol sal E& Ss 3 ann .<br>. . Be)gfS43 a8BsBS) fy5Soe]8 &.— 85]a8 bes5 a& ; =y5 Sf.;<br>& ~ D = 8 a<br>. & § os¢ 2 f oo .

br>EoD hae ec ‘ <= » Wo 8 $ Ss .<br>| As| #8) S23) FS) Bex g |<br>: as| & S| z Pol sal E& Ss 3 ann .<br>. . Be)gfS43 a8BsBS) fy5Soe]8 &.— 85]a8 bes5 a& ; =y5 Sf.;<br>& ~ D = 8 a<br>. & § os¢ 2 f oo . a =a<br>A = |<br>* 2 Yr5 S ge; | ; BS =<br>, | :<br>, . : = = kK a a >a >a =|z |g 5. vo<br>\ | - = = aot a > > = |e.<br>v | E<br>: 7 |<br>. Ce — S2Ee|lez Lae3 —= ee ee weee=Oo SEL3{eo}<br>, Bee oS =} Og “| ge) £2) 5 = |5<br>ee “| Sa) 2) ]  gigp<br>, |<br>. | - g a| |& 36 mo S als<br>| ve > o s| . & 9° S| re . Bg inn<br>3TS ~Y. o on 5 yj<br>> >| >| > &<br>|<br>, 32| 32) 32 s2|| FF 22]= 22|is] 22)es] | efa .. . . ;<br>| Bg= Ba $3] 68 3 3 3 8 ¢g| £8 z NIE<br>. — = = a a.<br>| nN ; Y es w= Pie ,<br>, ze=.wl nwon inOSs EF ie an & a) Sele BIE 3<br>} Pl ss DP) us wn Z © 8 s |B re<br>, BS] SS] BSP Sel} BS} RS! BS Be Ae |<br>e|SF&a Se]2eta] Se]ae)i=a 22]esNn. o | Ss]Bysy 22Sela Se}Blo Sa]azq | 5.FiePs Va .<br>~“ ¢ OQ fq’) a \ 2 go go ¢<br>: |<br>. | g 5 5 2 5 3 B Sy ale’ |<br>. oo: | 88 ane) & 3g £ me * & a<br>a=} iS) ww) 28 S S S 4 Bla| (1<br>. nS8 3> aaS a> . S “O S o a hse<br>a a — =<br>|<br>,<br>aN<br>©Sj+<br>. eAEy<br>of= . -<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Py 

: ‘ . 

. ' 

‘ 

:

a<br>a=} iS) ww) 28 S S S 4 Bla| (1<br>. nS8 3> aaS a> . S “O S o a hse<br>a a — =<br>|<br>,<br>aN<br>©Sj+<br>. eAEy<br>of= . -<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


Py 

: ‘ . 

. ' 

‘ 

: 

```text
||.||||||,|||||.||||,<br>,<br>I.|"|‘|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|:||;||ue|bo|||.|mo||.|wy<br>aN|:<br>ies)||oN<br>$68||'<br>:||
|||||||||||||||||||.|
|a<br>,<br>‘<br>;|||é<br>B<br>B<br>5.<br>B.<br>5<br>3]<br>=<br>8<br>is<br>.<br>en.<br>no<br>i<br>5<br>E<br>8<br>a<br>a<br>.<br>a<br>cd<br>5<br>(2<br>Ey<br>=<br>=:<br>a<br>@<br>;<br>;<br>ARAB<br>ZS.<br>BERBERERs] <br>|<br>SSBPELS|BER<br>PEER PSE<br>See<br>mee eS<br>Be<br>S2aub 8<br>st<br>SPER<br>~>Sz<br>oREB es 5 <br>BES)<br>"Ss<br>we<br>°<br>v<br>-<br>a]<br>2<br>B<br>a||||=<br>2gle|<br>27B|<br>fo<br>a Fle<br>°<br>5<br>BS|><br>& g<br>a 2<br>> oF<br>3<br>5<br>5B<br>.<br>Be<br>a<br>GVZra<br> F335<br>BER=<br>SeEe||<br>Os<br>Sg es<br>BPS<br>e<br>.<br>nae<br> Bs<br>ga<br>i]<br>Fe<br>&<br>a.|..|7<br>a<br>2S]<br>£|<br>F8|<br>Fs)<br>2Sle|<br>2]<br>&e|<br>s8&]<br>5,<br>_e<br>wn<br>ta<br>Z Phe<br>oO]<br>-£&<br>re<br>iS<br>riok.<br>;<br>2A<br>e|<br>&<br>5<br>2s |F<br>3]<br>22<br>a4<br>ha =<br>ae<br>= 8.

r>2S]<br>£|<br>F8|<br>Fs)<br>2Sle|<br>2]<br>&e|<br>s8&]<br>5,<br>_e<br>wn<br>ta<br>Z Phe<br>oO]<br>-£&<br>re<br>iS<br>riok.<br>;<br>2A<br>e|<br>&<br>5<br>2s |F<br>3]<br>22<br>a4<br>ha =<br>ae<br>= 8. <br>g<br>Py<br>;<br>z<br>Q<br>bas<br>g<br>g<br>iy<br>vc)<br>de].<br>3S<br>©<br>oO}<br>Bi<br>|<br>ro<br>UO<br>=<br>o)<br>o<br>op<br>|<br>:<br>Zz<br>< 2/9 Z Ol<br>Qa<br>S|)<br>GESE ase S25] <br>B| PEZREEeR<br>2S) <br>=| | SEBse]<br>ze5|<br>S35<br>5<br>&<br>gVlaS5c<br>Qas_<br>SB sie s<br>5<br>s<br>i"<br>3/° 8<br>5 4<br>=<br>Fy<br>235<br>ea<br>BSBS<br>|<br>Fst<br>nA<br>—=T10<br>“||<br>gee<br>BE)<br>=<br>G |<br>ch<br>><br>§<br>5|||||<br>-<br> <br>|7<br>FSERD|<br>FE]<br>BE! Ele)<br>2/4<br>wms{-<br>ml BE<br>Ze<br>a<br>ey<br>mepre|.<br>5<br>e<br>BZ!<br>Sls<br>a<br> 8<br>Ble<br>e<br>& 1OQ<br>oO<br>FS)<br>a|S<br>a)<br>BI)<br>als<br>ga<br>ll<br>o |<br>©<br>x.<br>> |e<br>ZT]<br>é<br>565<br>ef<br>oS)<br>|<br>a<br>a<br>S|]<br>Ss<br>Qle<br>a<br>a<br> @E SES<br>gE)<br> SEEREe |<br>BIE<br>EES] |<br>"El<br>ou<br>2.<br>|<br>gs<br>=.<br>wm<br>o<br>ey<br>2<br>a<br>a Bly<br>.<br>>]<br>© BIRZ<br>~.<br>’<br>io<br>—<br>2<br>|Be<br>(ey<br>Qu<br>7g<br>=<br>@<br>|S<br>_*<br>_|£|||ae<br>:|
|;|i<br>A||<br>A|A|3<br>=)<br>A|~<br>os<br>A|A|4<br>=| <br>A||:<br>Qa<br> ET<br>A|||>.<br>><br>5<br>=<br>A|><br>5<br>A|A|‘<br>S|<br>=]<br>A|le<br>=<br>Bie<br>A5|A5|;<br>A5<br>||

>_*<br>_|£|||ae<br>:|
|;|i<br>A||<br>A|A|3<br>=)<br>A|~<br>os<br>A|A|4<br>=| <br>A||:<br>Qa<br> ET<br>A|||>.<br>><br>5<br>=<br>A|><br>5<br>A|A|‘<br>S|<br>=]<br>A|le<br>=<br>Bie<br>A5|A5|;<br>A5<br>||
|||||&<br>|<br>**5**]<br>&|&<br>a<br>**=**<br>|<br>to||&<br>aes<br>34<br>oF<br>Ee 6|&|&<br>s<br>=<br>5<br>el|&|&|&<br>3<br>7<br>=<br>4<br>5<br><<br>tm|&<br>o|<br>oe]<br>s|<br>**o**||&|&<br>@ wel]<br>FF<br>Fs<br>:<br>282| ><br>@ es]<br>¢s<br>280<br>5|&<br>3 hm.<br>6 (5<br>ofS|.<br>15<br>line|&<br>.<br>:|&|
|;|||||;||ae|||||||||a<br>|e|||
||.|||S<br>;<br>><br>Be|=<br>wo].<br>ae<br>Bos||=<br>Zo||S<br>x<br>><br>Zoo||.|OR<br>S<br>N],<br>;<br>i<br>><br>><br>Sol<br>Bs|Ss<br>86<br>:<br>><br>Zo||a)<br>S|<br>}<br>»<br>BP<br>_<br>><br>[><br>Solkcs|2 ele<br>. s/&<br>&<br>N<br>hal<br>=<br>z<br>£ Ie|7||
|.|||:<br>;|BE)<br>Ss)<br>:<br>~]<br>=<br>— =<br>oo W<br>Rg<br>_<br>Se<br>2<br>=<br>fe|BF<br>1)<br>foun]<br>aad<br>— B<br>i ©<br>So ><br>% &<br>B<br>a||BF)<br>=<br>Le)<br>pacts<br>wn &<br>AD<br>i 2<br>oP<br>Qe<br>“B)<br>a|} <br>||BFP)<br>—<br>ay<br>8 &<br>a 2<br>o 8<br>><br>Se<br> “Bp<br>a||:<br>||BF)<br>SF)<br>al<br>@<br>Le)<br>=<br>fey<br>ot<br>2&|<br>28<br>io RP]<br>uo 8<br>set<br>a®<br>Rel<br>oo<br>=e!<br>ES<br> FB)<br>SP)<br>al<br>oS|pF<br>ram<br>2<br>o<br>£8<br>— 2<br>a<br>ow<br>wel<br>sel<br>Se.||BeiEl | <br>on<br>@<br>pa<br>Go<br>is<br>\<br>& Sho **&**<br>— BIn<br>wD &lin ©<br>2 wlio ><br>weiss<br>Ske<br>S<br>Es|2<br>|<br>= <br>.<br>male<br>OIG<br>ela]<br>ole'|<br>21S<br>lS<br>F\5 |A<br>>|o|-<br>oS<br>3s<br>ee<br>A||

br>Go<br>is<br>\<br>& Sho **&**<br>— BIn<br>wD &lin ©<br>2 wlio ><br>weiss<br>Ske<br>S<br>Es|2<br>|<br>= <br>.<br>male<br>OIG<br>ela]<br>ole'|<br>21S<br>lS<br>F\5 |A<br>>|o|-<br>oS<br>3s<br>ee<br>A||
|||||o<br>Q<br>3<br>@ |.<br>_*<br>Ss<br>S|=<br>“<br>=<br>—||E<br>*<br>S<br>coe]||=<br>s<br>S<br>~~]||||<br>3 &<br>os<br>=<br>.<br>&<br>S<br>Read<br>to|z<br>ar<br>vd.<br>S<br>wD||©<br>S<br>g<br>SB}<br>S<br>>|<br>ow<br>;<br>iS)<br>EI<br>.<br>So<br>OD |<br>.<br>=&||||
|||||||||||||||||Se|||
||||||||||||||||,<br>.<br>ON||||
|||||||||||||||||5=|||
|||||||||||||||||A‘)|||
||:||||||||||||||i|3<br>ot|||
|||||||||||||||||wn|||
|||||||||||||||||*|||
|||||||||||||||||tv]|||
|||||||||||||||||am|||
|||||||||||||||||=|||

: +b

‘

;

. .

==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- OD ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [570 x 652] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- ° bar . el — o s . . . , ar.2 o7a T= ; mo . ; : . =o7 sSF)o | §sBEo © ; . ; 2> Cc.-fl waa= @ . a Be] 3 o a eB} oe . arans BBEAA]. o & : ag = af & . : . ‘ SEE) S28) 2s ; a -€ 31-8 : vis a8 Be my : 2e< 2 @ td P a eps) 825 Sl Sep See aa . Eee) ge. g , : iG g we J . B oe 56 = . oy FS) S| ®@ | - Ol oO a 1 - | . \ . , : : “J - Oo — . . = g = . = 7 5 ea , a) Ss] wl — us ~ ; ad oo | Fal Fa] Fa) .: :3g Oo]: 3 2 <a . ; (88Sl . fad3 3 =é 3 . . :. nH Ww ree) : r SF ofl2 & : OO NS mel Noe . . .

r>. . = g = . = 7 5 ea , a) Ss] wl — us ~ ; ad oo | Fal Fa] Fa) .: :3g Oo]: 3 2 <a . ; (88Sl . fad3 3 =é 3 . . :. nH Ww ree) : r SF ofl2 & : OO NS mel Noe . . . i > or) Qe oe sel Sa . vas S of , . aQ oa . @& ; a a. a | : S|. S| ge 5, FEFof Saow< , . iS . o] CS . = o| . ty ----- End of picture text -----

;

: |

rhe

‘

==> picture [3 x 3] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text ----- , ----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [2 x 1] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

||||||||||||||||||||fost of|fost of|fost of|sf<br>+]|sf<br>+]|sf<br>+]|Fel<br>||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||||||||||||||||||N<br>_||NS|||(288||
|||||||||-|||||||a||:||<br>.<br>.||Bl<br>BIB)<br>=|<br>2)<br>=<br>aya]<br>=<br>al|<br>Sls<br>=4<br>=<br>the<br>ay<br>5<br>& |=||SES]<br>SF]<br>.<br>228/<br>aes;<br>m6 2<br>oe &<br>BE & <br>=.

|(288||
|||||||||-|||||||a||:||<br>.<br>.||Bl<br>BIB)<br>=|<br>2)<br>=<br>aya]<br>=<br>al|<br>Sls<br>=4<br>=<br>the<br>ay<br>5<br>& |=||SES]<br>SF]<br>.<br>228/<br>aes;<br>m6 2<br>oe &<br>BE & <br>=. oO|PESEL<br>S328)<br>8 8 sie<br>soll<br>a6 8<br>o<br>a<br> See<br>~ao B||Airh<br>Ele|<br>a |<br>= slo<br>mh<br>| ty<br>|<br>ey<br>=<br>e1S|
|||||:|||.|||||||||||.<br>;||o<br>a<br>=|<br>i=<br>o<br>fy||Og ~} <br>Oa<br>“oO<br>3|ag<br>Oo<br>—<br>3||S18<br>,<br>S/e<br>= |<br>.<br>ia em|
||.|||||||||||||||||:|||al<br>ama||g<br>+|g<br>ob|:|5<br>f=]<br>:|
||||;|||||:||.|.|-|'|_<br>.||||;<br>LO<br>,|inal<br>e3ci280] |S29Rs|<br>ReEEBSE | <br>oP<br>&,'9<br>5S’<br>ils<br>ps<br>HO<br>EN ke<br>=<br>ele<br>FO<br>Ppeees<br>mY<br>los<br>@<br>1S<br>Seb<br>Ssa||<br>Rebs &<br>& Se 8<br>SBP|<br>2 &|||S29Rs|<br>—<br> BZR Ss] <br>as)<br>o|<br>One8 z<br>.<br>el<br>a<br>2 2<br>26788) <br>"BEA A =<br>—<br>BYes|<br>VUES<br>BES<br>a8 2|FOF<br> £8&<br>&<br>oOo<br>g<br>x<br>2<br> BES<br>KA<br>Rj<br>“3x<br>Bb<br>iv)<br>a||eS<br>ak<br>iTS<br>aie<br>e|S<br>Sila].<br>&<br>|<br>=F<br>:<br>=<br>eee<br>big<br>z<br>oo|
|||||||||||||oo||||||||:|||:||I|
|||.|||||\<br>VV<br>\|‘<br>,|||||re||||||.<br>|<br>,|.<br>**o**|=<br>=<br>wo<br>ive)<br>al<br>=<br>_<br>=<br>3<br>ns}<br>S|<br>es<br>(¥<br>”|°<br>~<br>te Z<br>b &2<br>5S<br>PS SR TS<br>Baeeee<br>Lea<br>G 6 E<br>BBE||o|<br>:<br>nw<br>_<br>3<br>=<br>tH<br>%|||<br>Is<br>she<br>S<br>= SIE<br>.<br>Ze<br>ay<br>2 |S<br>a\e<br>mel<br>iy|
|||||||||||||||||||||.||:<br>oe<br>oo<br>SS|:||x<br>A<br>m>|h<br>.|
|||||||||||||||||||;||:||;<br>Lo<br>.<br>ty<br>af|||2 ol<br>a IN<br>.|

<br>S<br>= SIE<br>.<br>Ze<br>ay<br>2 |S<br>a\e<br>mel<br>iy|
|||||||||||||||||||||.||:<br>oe<br>oo<br>SS|:||x<br>A<br>m>|h<br>.|
|||||||||||||||||||;||:||;<br>Lo<br>.<br>ty<br>af|||2 ol<br>a IN<br>.|
||||||||||,|||||||||;|}22)<br>23)<br>S 3<br>gs<br>gz]<br>¢<br>pF)<br>a|||]-<br>Fs]<br>|<br>ge|<br>Bo|Fal}<br>3<br>¢ 8] | <br>5 =||ealkl<br>Smile l<br> Sle<br>eS|
|||||||||||||||||||||Nn<br>.<br>=||.<br>:|||'°|
|||:|||||||4|||.||‘||||7<br>a|;|68)<br>£8<br>S|<br>se<br>IE]. 3 §<br>@<br>ia<br>Oo||ee}<br>a4<br>& &<br>2.|28<br>><br>a<br>& &<br>@<br>|<br>5||3/51<br>2,|S.<br>A)<br>SIS) a<br>“8 3<br>|<br>N|
||||||||||_<br>:||||:|||||||<br>:||z)<br>€<br>a<br>N<br>Y<br>=<br>&S<br>i=)||Bgl<br>Ss<br>rox<br>a<br>@|&<br>et<br>N<br>Ps||ainika<br>BIS<br>@<br>—<br>BIC<br>:<br>c|
|||||||||||||||||||||a<br>H<br>=||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||:||||||||||||;|;|;|;|;|;|;|;4|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||g|
||||||||‘|||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||EY|
|||||||||||||:||||'|||||||||*|
||||||.|||||||||||||,|||||||i]|

4 : ; :

|:||||||||||||;|;|;|;|;|;|;|;4| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||g| ||||||||‘||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||EY| |||||||||||||:||||'|||||||||*| ||||||.|||||||||||||,|||||||i]|




4 : ; : 

an ;- So tpaentintitewns cannes gees omnes oeES_— Hee lS ee Ee eeIE SAIS SAM RSs Ws NERO ENACTao ARE HE PsooeLSER RSOIROa/ea CNaSeNTC SRO ORE Se a , , ee a Annexure - J | | FORM=J . a levee vee we whens 2 oo fPule55) Se ct a . Fe, FORM FOR APPEAL . . 1. Name of the Appellant : Steria India Ltd. Unit ~ 1 , 2. Address : Ground, 1", 6" & 8" Floor | : a mo oe SeaviewSector 135,SEZ, Noida Building -:2013044, Plot(UP) No. 20 &; 21, . , . . wo, 8.~ Name and Address of the Authority, : - _ Development Commissioner * whose decision or order is brought up Noida Special Economie Zone inappeal ~~ co Noida Dadri Road, Phase — Il, - . ; ae Noida- 201305 (UP) . ” oe. 4: Brief of the decision against which . — oe : - . . a , , Appeal is‘ made:: . : : , . Approvallegallocatedentity.in forsameAsunificationSEZper andNSEZbelongingof threeUnit SEZApprovalto singleUnits, ; oo . te , =| Committeeno specific heldprovision on 08"in May’SEZ Act 2017,or “thereRules ofis |. . . LOA of same legal entity, hence-not allowed. oS 8, Reason as to why the decision me Se os Fs ce needs review - —_ / >... As per detailed reasoning attached: | . | an a _ For Steria (India) Limited - oo 6. Any other. remarks a, oo . \S\Coews fo Se , _. , Authorised Signatory . . ; Signature of the Appellant fo. oo . . Oe | : SO _ Name in Block Letters : VANDANA ARUN fe . - Designation . . ; : Legal Director & Company Secretary .

\S\Coews fo Se , _. , Authorised Signatory . . ; Signature of the Appellant fo. oo . . Oe | : SO _ Name in Block Letters : VANDANA ARUN fe . - Designation . . ; : Legal Director & Company Secretary . ; 7 -Tel.No. (Mobile). | ot 98100-86879 nos . E-Mail Address 3 vandana.arun @ soprasteria.com Oe Fax. . : _ , 

a SS 

1 

. 

. . 

. ye 

**==> picture [2 x 4] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
n<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. 

/ 

Minutes of of the5252 meeting of the BoA for of the BoA for the BoA for BoA for for SEZ held on 30 March 212 held on 30 March 212 on 30 March 212 30 March 212 March 212 212 0 - i “4 (i). Request of M/s. Ramdev Chemical M/s. Ramdev Chemical Ramdev Chemical Chemical Industries, a unit in M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, in M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, Dahej SEZ Limited, SEZ Limited, Limited, Gujarat for extension extension of LoP beyond 31" May, beyond 31" May, 31" May, May, 2012 (beyond 3m 3m year) - i _ The Board, Board, after deliberations, extended deliberations, extended extended the LoP of LoP of of the unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ up to 31 March, 2013. __ to 31 March, 2013. __ 31 March, 2013. __ March, 2013. __ 2013. __ __

extended extended the LoP of LoP of of the unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ up to 31 March, 2013. __ to 31 March, 2013. __ 31 March, 2013. __ March, 2013. __ 2013. __ __ 

/ Minutes of of the5252 meeting of the BoA for of the BoA for the BoA for BoA for for SEZ held on 30 March 212 held on 30 March 212 on 30 March 212 30 March 212 March 212 212 0 - i “4 . ~ a (i). Request of M/s. Ramdev Chemical M/s. Ramdev Chemical Ramdev Chemical Chemical Industries, a unit in M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, in M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, M/s. Dahej SEZ Limited, Dahej SEZ Limited, SEZ Limited, Limited, 9% Gujarat for extension extension of LoP beyond 31" May, beyond 31" May, 31" May, May, 2012 (beyond 3m 3m year) - i . _ The Board, Board, after deliberations, extended deliberations, extended extended the LoP of LoP of of the unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ unit up to 31 March, 2013. __ up to 31 March, 2013. __ to 31 March, 2013. __ 31 March, 2013. __ March, 2013. __ 2013. __ __ .% : 7 a . (ii) Requests of M/s. Hangers Plus (J). Private. Limited-a. unit:in Mis..Mahindra World . - noo . - City SEZ. Chennai for extension of LoP beyond 31% March 2012 (beyond 5" year) | _ _ d, after deliberations, extended the LoP of the unit for period of one year ~ ; 4 >xpiry of the validity, of the last extension i.e, up to 31 March, 2013. So , se co Request of Mis. Larsen & Toubro Limited for temporary 2" gate es7 Gujaratduring construction activitiesin the sectoraspecific SEZ, for IT/ITES: at Vadodara,re . i .

, up to 31 March, 2013. So , se co Request of Mis. Larsen & Toubro Limited for temporary 2" gate es7 Gujaratduring construction activitiesin the sectoraspecific SEZ, for IT/ITES: at Vadodara,re . i . The Board, after deliberations, granted approval for operation of the temporary gate Oe upto 31° December, 2012 or till the completion of the construction work, whichever is — , -earlier. The Board also directed that the temporary gate shall cease to be in operation as soon ; , asthe construction activity is finished: : a SeTai **T** emata = i[Ms] ORInfospace Limited, gag[ty] 7 i , - . Lor‘ The Board after. deliberations remanded the proposal back to. UAC for its : a consideration and decision. : a SO . Item No. 52.8: Request for transfer of unit from one SEZ to another oe - (id) Request of Mis. Taspop.com a ‘unit in the sector specific SEZ for IT/ITES at / . Gurgaon, Haryana, being developed by M/s. DLF Cyber City Developers Limited for 2 oO shifting itslocation to Gurgaon Infospace Limited SEZ at Gurgaon, Haryana. oo | oe 2 The Board after deliberations decided to defér the request of the unit. | ) oo Item No. 52.9: Request of Mis. Cosmo Films Ltd, a unit in the sector specific Special . Economic Zone for Engineering & Electronics Sectorat Shendre, District Aurangabad o , developed by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporationfor broad-banding of ° po LoP to include the item of manufacture viz.

or Engineering & Electronics Sectorat Shendre, District Aurangabad o , developed by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporationfor broad-banding of ° po LoP to include the item of manufacture viz. BOPP Films falling under CTH No..39 20 i | 20, a : : _ | : | , DoR stated that while the SEZ falls under Engineering & Electronics sector whereas, = the item proposed to be broadbanded fell under plastic sector. The Board, was informed by DC that this was a case of backward integration by the unit. The Board, after deliberations deferred the request of the unit directing the DC to furnish a detailed report on the nature and -type of product proposed to be broadbanded in the context of the existing manufacturing unit = - of the SEZ. ae . . Item No, 52.10: Request for: permission to shift M/s. Prayas Woolens Private’ - . . Limited from EOU scheme to SEZ scheme in KASEZ, Gandhidham Pe . 

. 

. 

. 

' : 

: 

. 

’ 

, 

. 

- 

. 

. 

A 

' 

(iv) Proposal of M/s, Unitech Developers & Projects Ltd,,co-devéloperfor duty free procuremen’ ofHSDto 2 : , carryon authorized operation in SEZ. : : 4 & After due'deliberations, developer. for duty free procurementUACofapproved“3900 KL.HSDthe proposal(BUROofM/s.II{) andUnitech9185 Developers’Lirs. Lube &0:Projectsfor a valueLid_co-of 9Bt Rs.1461.36 Lacs to carry on authorized operation namely ‘Power (including power backup facilities) for ae captive use only’ in the IT/ITES SEZ of M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Ltd. at Village-Dundahera, Gurgaon = (Haryana). - CS . a - ~ -. (y) Proposal of M/s.

y ‘Power (including power backup facilities) for ae captive use only’ in the IT/ITES SEZ of M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Ltd. at Village-Dundahera, Gurgaon = (Haryana). - CS . a - ~ -. (y) Proposal of M/s. Unitech Developers & Projects Ltd., co-developer for approvalof three tists of[goods.] : . es o The proposal of M/s. Unitech Developer BO goods to carry on following default authorized operations& Projectsin ITATESLid., co- SEZdeveloperof M/s.forGurgaonapprove!Infospacof thr **e** e Ltd.list ofat 2. 8d ». Village Oindahera Gurgaon was placed before the approval commitiee :- . ; . Name of Authorised Operation a OO isuimated value , an ARS.Hy aes) on ofall types ofbuilding in processing area’as approved by UAC | oe 3076.96 | ‘ Last-[ ] Construction ofall types of building : | (Mechanical)Sa namy in processingoSarea as approved by UACOGhe 216.45: | | [AirConditioning | of processing **a** reacc oo BOT SO |. _Alr Conditioning of processing rea 200 ‘List: |2 Electrical,Fire protectionGas systemand Petroleumwith sprinklers,Natural Gasfire Distribution & smoke detectors,Network includiag AOR893.89 Electrical, Gas and Petroleuin Natural Gas Distribution Network inchiding’ | 373.54 7 - | vij Proposal of M/s. RBS India Development Centre Pvt. Ltd. for merger of two SUZ units iocated_in) Do, | ITATES SEZ of M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Ltd: at Gtirgoan (Haryana). ; ef | Tt was broughtto the notice of UAC that in the absenceof specifie provision in SEZ Act/ Rules the ) oo 7>] proposal of M/s. RBS India Development Centre Pvt. Ltd, for merger of two SEZ unit having LOA No.

s broughtto the notice of UAC that in the absenceof specifie provision in SEZ Act/ Rules the ) oo 7>] proposal of M/s. RBS India Development Centre Pvt. Ltd, for merger of two SEZ unit having LOA No. or thfo referredSTPUSEZ/Unit/03/4to BoA, however, 5/61 | datedBoA in16.12.2009its meeting&held LOAorf 30.03.2012No. 10/350/2010-SEZ/8395.has remanded: backdatedthe propose![2.112010to UACwas” | for consideration& decision: 7 HO oT - The proposal was accordingly placed before UAC and after.due deliberations, 1/\C decided to approve the merger of LOA No. STPI/SEZ/Unit/03/45/611 dated 16.12.2009 granted to Unit-] with LOA No.. So 10/350/2010-SEZ/8395 dated 12.11.2010 granted to Unit-If subject to execution ofa revised Bond-Cum-LUT ot & further subject to condition that the unit.shail not be entitled for income “ax benefits ‘The existing projections of both LOPs be merged and.LOA granted to Unit-ll be stand cancelled for all intent and f | purposes. a - . 2 Ow. - ““(vil) Proposal of M/s. Huron India Pyt. Ltd. for approval of list of services, i os an -—-UAC deferred the proposal in view of the Notification No. 40/2012 dated 20:06.2012 issued by 7 — -CBEC effective from I“ day of July, 2012, 0° ae SO ; 3N§ ] Minutes of the meéeting-Haryand-26.06/20|2 . Se ; : ; i” wos oo : 

> . , . 

. 

. - ‘ . 

. Lf 

**==> picture [594 x 685] intentionally omitted <==**

e from I“ day of July, 2012, 0° ae SO ; 3N§ ] Minutes of the meéeting-Haryand-26.06/20|2 . Se ; : ; i” wos oo : 

> . , . 

. 

. - ‘ . 

. Lf 

**==> picture [594 x 685] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
yf | Minuuies of the 54 meeting of the , ; st . ,<br>yes BoA for SEZs held on 14* September 2012 9 oo<br>fi) In terms of Section 9 of the SEZ Act, 2005, BoA is the Licensing Authority for —<br>setting up of-defence units in SEZs. Once a proposal has been approved by the<br>ee ee BOA, the licence will be issued by DIPP on receipt ofthe minutesof BoA.<br>(ii) Exports of such items may be regulated as per the provisions of Foreign Trade )<br><n (iii) ThePolicylicensingand ITC.€HS)conditionsCode.will be finalizedSein consultationete See  withtek the DIPP,mo the de tee wo ee<br>a Department of Defence Production and the Ministry of Home Affairs. This is . ,<br>because the special conditions incorporated for industrial licenses for the defence<br>sector have been incorporated by DIPP on the recommendations of the —s—<br>Department of Defence Production, which in turn, consulted the Ministry of a<br>oo Home Affairs in the matter. 7 -<br>7 (iv) Each of the consignment ofsupply to DTA must be thoroughly examined by<br>, Development Commissioner. _.<br>,<br>| (v) While selling in the domestic area, only Government Agencies would be allowed ,<br>: - to procure the equipments. i a 7<br>(vi) All consignment will be accompanied by an authorized person of the Government<br>procuring agency.

ic area, only Government Agencies would be allowed ,<br>: - to procure the equipments. i a 7<br>(vi) All consignment will be accompanied by an authorized person of the Government<br>procuring agency. - a - oe oF<br>See ee racer rend aiel Senc mien aacaueee Gala mat a<br>| ELEN EETNS aminesaterRvARIITatormeentwey \<br>| BEZ<br>unite Tocnied ise: a deurnmocca reaom / _<br>og) ; The Board, after deliberations, remanded the request back to UAC with the directions<br>eb that proposals which are within the competence of UACs / DCs need not be brought before<br>var BoA. , _ . :<br>Item No. 54.15: Requests for Contiguity Relaxation _ _ oe .<br>, (i) Request of M/s. Kakinada SEZ Private Limited, for relaxation of the contiguity an :<br>| - of the multi product SEZ at Ponnada, Mulapeta, Ramanakkapeta villages in Kakinada, |<br>. Do East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh . ' we<br>oe - The Board, after deliberation, deferred the request. . , a oe<br>oO “(ii) Request of M/s. Reliance Haryana SEZ Limited (RHSL) for relaxing contiguity<br>of the multi services SEZ. — ,<br>an -. DC, NSEZ informed the Board that in this case the contiguity relaxation is being , .<br>sought at the instance of HUDA who has requested for Right of Way (RoW) for construction ss<br>of the Northern Peripheral Road from Dwarka to Kherki Daula. The DC also informed the<br>Board that the validity of the SEZ stands expired: w.e.f. 20" June, 2012 and no further oO<br>extension has been sought by the developer. DC further informed that the developer has not<br>: ‘taken steps towards operationalisation of the SEZ.

expired: w.e.f. 20" June, 2012 and no further oO<br>extension has been sought by the developer. DC further informed that the developer has not<br>: ‘taken steps towards operationalisation of the SEZ. The Board, therefore, after deliberations, , "<br>ue decided not to grant further extension to the project. Accordingly, HUDA may go ahead with .<br>oe construction of the portion of the Northern Peripheral Road passing through the SEZ. ,<br>Item No. 54.16: Request for transfer of unit from one SEZ to another oo . .<br>: (i) . Request of M/s. iSpace Global Solutions Private Limited a unit in the Navayuga OS<br>_ Legala Estates Private Limited, IT/ITES SEZ at Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District, - ;<br>Andhra Pradesh for shifting its location to another SEZ in Andhra Pradesh -<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


° 

+ a 

7 

**==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


° 

.: 

‘ 

. 

s. .

Z in Andhra Pradesh -<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


° 

+ a 

7 

**==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


° 

.: 

‘ 

. 

s. . 

_ (ii) Half-Yearly report in Erom-E for the period ending March, 2013 submitted by the co-developer, Mis. Unitech Developers & Projects Lid, : /. + UAC took note of the half yearly report for the period ending 31 March, 2013 submitted by the co-. : developer irrespectof IT/ITES SEZ of M/s. Gurgaon Infospace Ltd. at Dundahera, Gurgaon, | | (iii) Issue of Occupation Certificate for Block No.8 (part) of IT/ITES SEZ by M/s. Gurgaon Infospace to, It was brought to the notice that proposal for issuance of completion / occupation certificate for ” , Block No.8 (part) submitted by the developer was forwarded to M/s. Nexus Creations, Architect on panel ~~ of NSEZ, for examination. M/s. Nexus Creations has submitted their report as per check list provide by STP, Gurgaon and recommended that the proposal is technically correct ds per the prescribed norms. After oea _ dueSubject to deliberations,conditionUACthatdecidedthe developer to issueshall completion./deposit comipounding occupation certificatecharges ofin Rs.17,53,530/- respect of Block No.8 (part) Seoo Giiv) Proposal ofthe developer to allot builtup space to Mis. Sunshine Teahouse Pvt. Lid. to setup & operate ‘Chaayos Restaurant’ in the processing area of SEZ. - Lo a , Jos After due deliberations, UAC approved the propasal of M/s, Gurgaon Infospace Ltd., developer to allot built-up space of approx 873 sqfi. at Unit No.

urant’ in the processing area of SEZ. - Lo a , Jos After due deliberations, UAC approved the propasal of M/s, Gurgaon Infospace Ltd., developer to allot built-up space of approx 873 sqfi. at Unit No. 10, Aminity Block ontease basis to M/s. Sunshine mo : _ TeahouseVillage Dundahera,Pvt, Ltd. Gurgaon,to setup & operate ‘Chaayos Restaurant’. in the processing areaof IT/ITES-; SEZ at - , AE . twas. brought to the notice of UAC that in the absence of specific provision in SEZ Act / Rules fr the proposal of M/s. Sapient Consulting Pvt. Ltd. for merger of two SEZ units (Unit-Il & Unit-Ill) having oe ©. LOA No, 10/113/2011-SEZ/8785 dated 03.11.2011 & LOA No, [0/114/2011-SEZ/8786 dated 03.11.2011 os . a was referred to BoA, however; BoA.in its meeting held on 14.09.2012 has remanded back the proposal to | " . (UAC for consideration & decision. The proposal was discussed by UAC in the meeting held.on 25.10.2012 , - . . and decided to examine the proposal at legal angle. Accordingly, the matter was forwarded to M/s, Rajeey So Sharma & Associates, CA firm of NSEZA for legal opinion. M/s. Rajeey Sharma & Associates vide ‘its / . - detter dated 20.05.2013 has given its opinion that the Company. may be permitted for the merger of its two a a _ SEZ units subject to the fulfillment of the procedural compliances and the submission of documents that , ~ deductions under Section 10AA of the Income Tax:Act, 1961 may not be available to the unit. a 4 . .

s subject to the fulfillment of the procedural compliances and the submission of documents that , ~ deductions under Section 10AA of the Income Tax:Act, 1961 may not be available to the unit. a 4 . . The proposal was accordingly once again placed ‘before UAC and after due deliberations, UAC ; decided to approve the merger of LOA No, 10/113/2011-SEZ/8785 dated 03.1201] granted to Unit-ll _ >» with LOA No, 10/114/2011-SEZ/8786 ddted 03.11.2011 granted to Unit-lil subject to execution of a : revised Bond-Cum-LUT. & further subject to condition that the unit-shall not be entitled for income tax . benefits, The existing projections of both LOAs be merged and LOA granted to Unit-I] be stand cancelled — ce for all intent and purposes. So ’ (vi) Request of:-M/s, Sapient Consulting Pvt. Lid. (Unit-1) for movement of data backup tapes to its SEZ oO unit location at Noida. . . After due deliberations, UAC approved the proposal ofthe unit for movement of data backup tapes oo to its another SEZ unit location at ‘Ground to 3 floor, Tower-C, Aachvis Softech Pvt. Ltd. SEZ, Plot No. 7, Sector-144, Noida’ for the purpose of storage ofbackup data subject to compliance of guidelines issued. by MOC vide letter no. D,12/25/2012-SEZ dated 26.02.2013. ae Ss , HB Minutes of the mesting-Haryana SEZ8-30,07.20)3 _ . . ; . . ; . 

: 

4. 

' 

» 

, 

. 

7 

. 

. 

. 

1 

. 

; 

2: 

x. - . . 

. 

iG

letter no. D,12/25/2012-SEZ dated 26.02.2013. ae Ss , HB Minutes of the mesting-Haryana SEZ8-30,07.20)3 _ . . ; . . ; . 

: 

4. 

' 

» 

, 

. 

7 

. 

. 

. 

1 

. 

; 

2: 

x. - . . 

. 

iG 

- | | | ; 5 innextued - 3 . a oe os | Form-J : FORM FOR APPEAL (See tule 55) , | ot | | FOR OFFICIAL USE re a OC So - : . a Date: 08th Tune, 2017 7 ; L Name of the Appellant . oS Onnsynex Ventures Pvt. Ltd. z 7 a 2° Address: . _ 4A Ground Floor Vipul Agora, Mg Road, Gurgaon, 122002 : 3.” . ; a Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, a[Office] OainNuns ane address order i broadheete DepartmentNoida Special[of][Commerce,] Economic Zone, NoidaoftheDabri Development Road, Commissioner, appea! _ Phasell, Noida-201305, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar(UP) / , 4. Brief of the decision against which Rejection of Application Dated:24,04.2017 for Warehousing & Trading Unit in , °- Appeal is made ___. Multi Product SEZ(NSEZ) ,vide letter no:09/01/2017-PROJ/Dated: 23.05.2011 ; : , > The application was madé for Warehousing and Trading unit under-Rule76 of oo 5: Reason- as to whywy the4 decisionSedov needs1.1, 7SEZof unitRules,2006ies,inFTWZ 2006in and and hencea multi-product was considered was rejectedSEZ;underHowever vide theletter termsIt was no.ofmisinterpreted O9101/2017-ProfRule 18(5).& asRulean5(2)(c)applicationof et a 2 OO ; 2 [Details attached as ANNEXURE I] co oo 6, Any other remarks | co Directors relevant profile/expsgence) LOl's/Service orders and space availabilityatNSEZ [Attaceh as ANNEXURE Il] \\ ByY. a : ee . co, Signature of the Appellant 5.

I] co oo 6, Any other remarks | co Directors relevant profile/expsgence) LOl's/Service orders and space availabilityatNSEZ [Attaceh as ANNEXURE Il] \\ ByY. a : ee . co, Signature of the Appellant 5. ences | Se, Co , - ce ~ Name in- BlockDesignation Letters. :°.: DIRECTORHARSH PAUL oeSINGH TAKKAR a recr - Place: GURGAON.*. ~ Tel. No. : #849999069685 oo OB Date: 08th JUNE, 2017 a! E-mail Address : .ONNSYNEX@GMAIL.COM. mS , Be sax: seassstnageseatonmgunegineseienennts 7 . Documents to be enclosed with the appeal: . " . - 1. Copy of the decision/rejection letter , Ce oo , Demand Draft of Rs. 2,500/- in favour of Pay and Accounts Officer, Department of Commerce, New Delhi. . a a 

**==> picture [114 x 5] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
. . .<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


+ . 

: 

\ 

. 

. 

\ 

. . ~ 

. 

t 

. 

**==> picture [589 x 713] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
Poe - BG Annexuxe —Yy<br>re f FORM-J | -<br>,<br>| . FORM FOR APPEAL | Re iy ro :<br>oS [Refer rule 55]: . : x LY ¢2(W me : ; .<br>= Fi . FOR OFFICIAL USE . . ‘ 4 ; /<br>~~ 1. Name ofthe Appellant ‘1 M/s. sujan oil<br>Ns [8] 2. Address : ; & gas infra logistics: 7 me:<br>ca - : : Zone,Plot No. 39/50, Sector Gandhidham— 370 -01, 230, Kandla Special Economic oe a :<br>. \9 ™ 3, Name’ and . address of the : Joint Development Commissioner, Office of the aa<br>elNe__ co: authority,broughtup whosein appeal decision ora order is EconomicGandhidhamDevelopment Zone,— Kutch- Commissioner,Ministry - 370of 230.

Joint Development Commissioner, Office of the aa<br>elNe__ co: authority,broughtup whosein appeal decision ora order is EconomicGandhidhamDevelopment Zone,— Kutch- Commissioner,Ministry - 370of 230. Commerce° Kandla& Industry,aSpecial - ob|Po.<br>oo 4, Brief of the decision against which : A proposal’ fer Broad Banding to include ‘ ; ; Oe<br>Appeal is made warehousing of fertilizer in -Existing LOA No. - 4<br>; sO KASEZ/1A/23/2009-10/0374 dated 22.10.2009, It : 4 ‘ a<br>ao. . . ~ was informed to Committee that on.behalf of our a oo<br>. ' client, we intend to warehouse the imported<br>. ; -’ fertilizersexported toincluding.Gulf countriesurea which.as perwillinstructionsbe: further:of | . a fo,| . ;<br>; clients. It was further stated that import of urea. ed<br>: ‘ attracts State Trading Enterprises condition. :<br>,<br>oe, . Therefore, the Committee after due deliberations’ _ ~~ -<br>‘ oo ; : decided to reject our proposal as fertilizers are very - . . i : co<br>: . ‘sensitive: items and also its import is possible. only :<br>;<br>through State Trading Enterprise.' i a<br>5. “Reason.as to why the decision needs —: - Statement of facts attached as annexure<br>“review | if<br>7 — . , . f Ce<br>6. Any other remarks ot We have received the order dated 11.04.2017 on a i ,<br>mp mc © 16.04.2017 at our unit, - E ,<br>ot J Signature of appellant edd cesses - | i :<br>°<br>, Namein Block Letters: GopalT. Sujan ; i 0<br>oo Place: Gandhidham; é. . Tel.Designation’?No. :02836 Partner220407 .

2017 at our unit, - E ,<br>ot J Signature of appellant edd cesses - | i :<br>°<br>, Namein Block Letters: GopalT. Sujan ; i 0<br>oo Place: Gandhidham; é. . Tel.Designation’?No. :02836 Partner220407 . SO | oo<br>.<br>7 ; i , oo<br>Date: 12.05.2017 ‘ E-mail Address :gopal@actship.com;info@actship.com | ; :<br>" Fax:.02836 238864, — Po ERR Te. Pe an a ce,<br>ih Documents to be enclosed with the appeal: SEREE Ro 3 a ite dee dal be i .<br>o _ 1. Copy of the decision/rejection letter, OO es OE OS F .<br>ae 2, Demand Draft No. 707730 dated 12.05.2017 for Rs: 2,500/ - in favour of Pay and Accounts. i ;<br>So . Officer, Department ofCommerce,<br>New Délhie i Shs | ede louRES ne 7 E<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


oo 

« 

**==> picture [2 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
;<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


. 

. . 

. 

; 

' 

1 

. i 

. 

. 

7 

5 

x 

. 

‘ 

. 

« 

. 

1 

. 

. 

. 

’ 

: 

5 

. 

t 

. 

‘ 

. . 

« 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


; 

. 

**==> picture [596 x 765] intentionally omitted <==**

. 

’ 

: 

5 

. 

t 

. 

‘ 

. . 

« 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


; 

. 

**==> picture [596 x 765] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
4 . .<br>p . . STATEMENT OF FACTS<br>——ove— . 7<br>,<br>aa . ce _ANNEXURE1 . :<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>LoO . a 1. exApThe p lorov Appellant,r a tional No, KASEZ/14/023/2009-10M/s, sujan oll & &as infradatedlogistics,22.10.2009KASEZ an approvedfor- warehousingunit vide Letteractivity of  ofOil - Se : ee,<br>E‘ 2. TheBroad Appellant requested Bandingact  vide an application dated 04"- March, 2017 indicating.  proposalSeen for , ; ;<br>bo. t9.lnclude imported| fertilizers in tbulk.and to repack the same into Small bags<br>of S kgs, 10 kgs, 15 kes, 20kgs and 25 kgs and even £0 kgs bagsfor export to gulf countries™ ,<br>:; fertilizerserties in smallne Bu= quantityOanries-and-ever-in-develaped team there isrequirement of. , —<br>oo . gulfcountries, for gardening /Does kitchen gardening which is not available:  in many . ; .<br>nO, 3. chapterFertilisersis f ailreelyunder chapter 31 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. All items falling. under this ~<br>v.iMportable exceptUREA fallingunder chapter heading 3102 10 00, import<br>;<br>, , OfPotash UREALimited subjectis canalised and to allowedpara 2.11 through “State Trading Enterprise, Le. MMTC and Indian. Se<br>of Foreign Trade Policy”.<br>.<br>oO<br>; However, for export, all the items are restricted and/or require license. In this connection, ; :<br>’ instruction no.

Enterprise, Le. MMTC and Indian. Se<br>of Foreign Trade Policy”.<br>.<br>oO<br>; However, for export, all the items are restricted and/or require license. In this connection, ; :<br>’ instruction no. 47 dated 04.03.2010 issued from file no. C-4/1/2010-SEZ, issued by Ministry , SO<br>: of Commerce and Industry, which specifies that permission / approval can be accorded by. © os<br>a ~ the BOA and accordingly, appellant requested.to grant permission / approval through BOA,<br>(4)bulk Appellant including UREA requested for export, ‘for the permission after repacking for in smaller broad banding packets. for import of fertilizers jn : ‘ SN _<br>- 5. Approval committeehas erred in considering that fertilizers can be imported only through - a a : Z<br>‘State Trading Enterprises. However, the fact-is that all the fertilizers are Importable freely i .<br>except UREA, which can be imported only through STATE TRADING ENTERPRISE, As per the<br>instruction - | .<br>| ; no. 47 dated 04.03.2010 issued from file ro. C-4/1/2010-SEz, issued by Ministry i<br>; of Commerce and Industry, clarifies. that any SEZ unit can import prohibited items for i e:<br>exports. However, only condition is that each such case shall be placed before BOA, so that<br>;<br>— -  . « Views of DGFT and DOR can be taken before taking the decision. , I:<br>ce a 6. The approval committee erred in terming the item as sensitive, as fertilizer is no where iz<br>termed as a sensitive item.

ews of DGFT and DOR can be taken before taking the decision. , I:<br>ce a 6. The approval committee erred in terming the item as sensitive, as fertilizer is no where iz<br>termed as a sensitive item. Even if it is Considered as a sensitive item for the sake of ; a “<br>argument, not being admitted, the: intelligence wing of the customs such as Special<br>: Intelligence and Investigation Bureau (SIIB) and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence ‘can . poe| ;<br>detect if any nefarious activities are carried out by the unit. The goods/fertilizers will be vO po .<br>arriving at the Port of importation and from there-it will ‘be transported. to the appellants<br>.<br>‘unit at KASEZ and once the cargo is completely arrived at the appellants unit at KASEZ, the oS oe La .<br>same can be tallied with the bill of entry quantity, so. that the import accounting will be iH Be<br>._ done. ‘As“regards to Exports, since small quantities are going same will be exported in ee<br>~ wholecontainers trans a ction,nd tha t her th e iscontainers no scope forwill diver be s ealedicn of goods,by the SEZ.

ds to Exports, since small quantities are going same will be exported in ee<br>~ wholecontainers trans a ction,nd tha t her th e iscontainers no scope forwill diver be s ealedicn of goods,by the SEZ. authorities and as such the - ra ne<br>| oo ;<br>; andThe if Goverhment’s this approachpolicyIs missing of “Ease then of doingthe whole business”the conceptis basically “TRUST BASED” approach is .<br>defeated, of “Ease of doing Business” is U<br>sensitive Therefore, terming the import and export of fertilizers from the KASEZ as ; a<br> item is absolutely bad in the eyes of law especially when there is'no evidence to : : i? ,<br>/<br>importshow that and anyexport SEZ of units fertilizers, in any of the SEZ in India committed any offence in dealing with , i 0<br>re ; 7<br>_ .» &xports<br>/ 7 7. ‘Ifthe pérmission is granted, Government of India will earn valuable foreign exchange due to i<br>of fertilizer to various Gulf countries with value addition, : Be De<br>:<br>--. cucu ae . :<br>te<br>so ces ea Tata ey gen watt neswae<br>:<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


x 

: 

“0 

) 

. 

;

er to various Gulf countries with value addition, : Be De<br>:<br>--. cucu ae . :<br>te<br>so ces ea Tata ey gen watt neswae<br>:<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


x 

: 

“0 

) 

. 

; 

. | ffo : PRAYER EE | . : : f £ In the above facts and circumstances, the Appellant prays that: . : ce . : | f f (i) + The impugned letter/order dated 11.04.2027, issued by Joint Development Commissioner, j / Kandla Special Economic Zone, be set aside; and : ;. Ii .: ; i (ii) Appeal be allowed with consequential reliefs'tothe appellant. _ Lo. a | é f The Appellant craves leave to add, alter and or amend the grounds of the appeal at or before the time of . if , Oe hearing, . - : -” if fsPo The Appellant prays that a Personal Hearing be granted in order to explain their case in detgil—, if |a ' | SIGNATUREOFTHE APPELLANT =| 

**==> picture [529 x 24] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>
ae oO oe CD a RE wo, : a<br>**----- End of picture text -----**<br>


}. 

**==> picture [1 x 2] intentionally omitted <==**

**----- Start of picture text -----**<br>


.

Verbatim extracted text (OCR/PDF). Older scans and tables may show extraction artifacts — verify against the original for anything you act on.

Analysis

No analysis generated for this document yet (analysis runs over brief docs + on-demand). Run build_analysis.py --ids 100 --apply.